[Bug 1682732] Re: package python3-xapian (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/xapian/__init__.py', which is also in package python3-xapian1.3

[Raoul Bhatia]

Below, I am providing my fix using dpkg.
(Please disregard any additional output that you will see from etckeeper, 
needrestart, etc.; 
also, I have APT::Install-Recommends "0" and APT::Install-Suggests "0")


Maybe the solution is as easy as adding a "Replaces: python3-xapian1.3" or 
"Breaks: python3-xapian1.3" to the python3-xapian package?



# dpkg --purge --force-all python3-xapian1.3
> dpkg: python3-xapian1.3: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you 
> requested:
>  apt-xapian-index depends on python3-xapian (>= 1.4.3-1); however:
>   Package python3-xapian is not installed.
>   Package python3-xapian1.3 which provides python3-xapian is to be removed.
> 
> (Reading database ... 70556 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing python3-xapian1.3 (1.3.4-0ubuntu1) ...
> Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-9ubuntu2) ...


# apt --fix-broken install
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree   
> Reading state information... Done
> Correcting dependencies... Done
> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer 
> required:
>   libboost-filesystem1.61.0 libboost-iostreams1.61.0 libboost-system1.61.0 
> libcgmanager0 libperl5.22 libxapian-1.3-5 libxapian22v5 perl-modules-5.22 
> upstart
> Use 'apt autoremove' to remove them.
> The following additional packages will be installed:
>   python3-xapian
> Suggested packages:
>   xapian-doc
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   python3-xapian
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> 431 not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0 B/463 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 3,647 kB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
> [master b85798d] saving uncommitted changes in /etc prior to apt run
>  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  rewrite ld.so.cache (99%)
> (Reading database ... 70510 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../python3-xapian_1.4.3-1_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking python3-xapian (1.4.3-1) ...
> Setting up python-apt-common (1.4.0~beta2) ...
[...]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1682732

Title:
  package python3-xapian (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-
  packages/xapian/__init__.py', which is also in package
  python3-xapian1.3 1.3.4-0ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xapian-bindings/+bug/1682732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1665453] [NEW] Upgrade to 4.8.0-37.39 from Yakkety

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

When will this package be upgraded to the most recent stable kernel from
Yakkety?

http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux/linux_4.8.0-37.39/changelog

I think I am hitting the following bug every other day on my hypervisor.

- mm, oom: stop pre-mature high-order OOM killer invocations

Thanks,
Raoul

** Affects: linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665453

Title:
  Upgrade to 4.8.0-37.39 from Yakkety

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-edge/+bug/1665453/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1546641] Re: unity-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in up_exported_daemon_get_lid_is_closed()

[Raoul Bhatia]

I am seeing the same issue with Linux Mint 18.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546641

Title:
  unity-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in
  up_exported_daemon_get_lid_is_closed()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/upower/+bug/1546641/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1510970] Re: Intel driver crashes on Ubuntu 15.10

[Raoul Bhatia]

I have had no crashes since a couple of days (however, of little usage).

SNA is still active:
$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep SNA --color
[11.933] (II) intel(0): SNA compiled: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20150808-0ubuntu4 (Robert Ancell )
[11.933] (II) intel(0): SNA compiled for use with valgrind
[11.973] (II) intel(0): SNA initialized with Ivybridge (gen7, gt2) backend

Kernel:
$ uname -a
Linux raobhati.cisco.com 4.2.0-19-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 11 11:39:30 
UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510970

Title:
  Intel driver crashes on Ubuntu 15.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1510970/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1466889] Re: [Lenovo ThinkPad X250] SD card is not recognized.

[Raoul Bhatia]

Kernel 3.19.0-27-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 14 21:43:37 UTC 2015
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[ 1262.959100] mmc0: new high speed SDHC card at address b368
[ 1262.960257] mmcblk0: mmc0:b368 SMI   30.0 GiB 
[ 1262.961323]  mmcblk0: p1 p2
[ 1263.068815] mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 63075616, nr 8, 
cmd response 0x900, card status 0xb00
[ 1263.068821] mmcblk0: retrying using single block read
[ 1263.153118] mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 63075616, nr 8, 
cmd response 0x900, card status 0x0
[ 1263.153125] blk_update_request: 29 callbacks suppressed
[ 1263.153128] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 63075616
[ 1263.237436] mmcblk0: error -110 transferring data, sector 63075617, nr 7, 
cmd response 0x900, card status 0x0
[ 1263.237445] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk0, sector 63075617


Was working a couple of weeks ago with some other 3.19.0-xxx kernel

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466889

Title:
  [Lenovo ThinkPad X250] SD card is not recognized.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1466889/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1442884] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-3.19.0/fs/btrfs/inode.c:3142!

[Raoul Bhatia]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413008 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413008

This bug has effected me with linux-image-extra-3.19.0-26-generic 
linux-image-3.19.0-26-generic.

I was doing an rsync job when it completely blocked.

Unable to kill rsync, not even with kill -9.
Unable to reboot -fn.
Only hard resetting the server worked.

(However, I was able to operate on ext4 partitions as I used to).


[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [ cut here ]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] kernel BUG at 
/build/linux-UKwbSJ/linux-3.19.0/fs/btrfs/inode.c:3142!
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP 
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Modules linked in: cpuid nf_log_ipv4 xt_nat 
vhost_net vhost macvtap macvlan xts gf128mul xt_CHECKSUM ipt_MASQUERADE 
nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 ebtable_fil
ter ebtables iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 iptable_mangle 
iptable_raw nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_tftp nf_nat_snmp_basic 
nf_nat_sip nf_nat_pptp n
f_nat_proto_gre nf_nat_irc nf_nat_h323 nf_nat_ftp nf_nat_amanda ipmi_devintf 
iptable_filter ip_tables ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler nf_log_ipv6 nf_log_common 
xt_recent ip6table_nat nf
_nat_ipv6 nf_nat xt_comment ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 xt_addrtype xt_physdev 
br_netfilter xt_mark ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_snmp xt_tcpudp xt_CT 
ip6table_raw xt_multiport nf
_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_conntrack xt_NFLOG nfnetlink_log xt_LOG 
nf_conntrack_tftp nf_conntrack_sip nf_conntrack_sane
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  nf_conntrack_proto_udplite nf_conntrack_proto_sctp 
nf_conntrack_pptp nf_conntrack_proto_gre nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink 
nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf
_conntrack_broadcast nf_conntrack_irc nf_conntrack_h323 nf_conntrack_ftp ts_kmp 
nf_conntrack_amanda nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables bridge stp 
llc gpio_ich ppde
v kvm_intel kvm parport_pc i3200_edac serio_raw shpchp edac_core parport 
lpc_ich mac_hid xgifb(C) 8250_fintek dm_crypt coretemp autofs4 btrfs raid10 
raid0 multipath linear raid1
 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor 
raid6_pq hid_generic usbhid e1000e ahci psmouse libahci ptp hid pps_core
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] CPU: 3 PID: 27450 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Tainted: G 
C 3.19.0-26-generic #27-Ubuntu
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Hardware name: empty empty/TYAN Toledo i3210W/i3200R 
S5211, BIOS V1.06  09/30/2008
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] task: 8800eb8475c0 ti: 880101df4000 task.ti: 
880101df4000
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RIP: 0010:[c0553980]  [c0553980] 
btrfs_orphan_add+0x1c0/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RSP: 0018:880101df7c38  EFLAGS: 00010286
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RAX: ffe4 RBX: 8800e968e000 RCX: 
8801a9595000
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RDX: ea9a RSI: 0004 RDI: 
8801a9595138
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RBP: 880101df7c78 R08: 0001cef0 R09: 
8800105f0120
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] R10: 88020fd9cf30 R11: ea0004019340 R12: 
880002e141a0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] R13: 88010072f9a0 R14: 8800e968e458 R15: 
0001
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] FS:  () 
GS:88020fd8() knlGS:
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] CR2: 032b3218 CR3: eacea000 CR4: 
000427e0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Stack:
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  880101df7c78 c0591bb5 8801a9595000 
880202a53000
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  8800105f0120 880002e141a0 880102206800 
880014f46900
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  880101df7d08 c053d2da 8800105f0120 
8800105f01a0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Call Trace:
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [c0591bb5] ? 
lookup_free_space_inode+0x45/0xf0 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [c053d2da] 
btrfs_remove_block_group+0x13a/0x760 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [c0576e6a] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x63a/0x760 
[btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [c053db49] 
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x249/0x270 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [c05460e4] cleaner_kthread+0x144/0x1a0 
[btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [c0545fa0] ? check_leaf+0x360/0x360 
[btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [81095939] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [81095870] ? 
kthread_create_on_node+0x1c0/0x1c0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [817cb658] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  [81095870] ? 
kthread_create_on_node+0x1c0/0x1c0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Code: 60 04 00 00 e9 b0 fe ff ff 66 90 89 45 c8 f0 
41 80 64 24 80 fd 4c 89 e7 e8 9e 21 fe ff 8b 45 c8 e9 1b ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 
00 00 0f 0b b8 f4 ff ff ff e9 10 ff ff ff 4c 89 f7 45 31 f6 e8 29 78 
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RIP  [c0553980] 
btrfs_orphan_add+0x1c0/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015]  RSP 

[Bug 1413008] Re: Kernel BUG shortly after mounting btrfs filesystem

[Raoul Bhatia]

This bug has effected me with linux-image-extra-3.19.0-26-generic 
linux-image-3.19.0-26-generic.

I was doing an rsync job when it completely blocked.

Unable to kill rsync, not even with kill -9.
Unable to reboot -fn.
Only hard resetting the server worked.

(However, I was able to operate on ext4 partitions as I used to).

[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [ cut here ]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] kernel BUG at 
/build/linux-UKwbSJ/linux-3.19.0/fs/btrfs/inode.c:3142!
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Modules linked in: cpuid nf_log_ipv4 xt_nat 
vhost_net vhost macvtap macvlan xts gf128mul xt_CHECKSUM ipt_MASQUERADE 
nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 ebtable_fil
ter ebtables iptable_nat nf_nat_ipv4 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 iptable_mangle 
iptable_raw nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_tftp nf_nat_snmp_basic 
nf_nat_sip nf_nat_pptp n
f_nat_proto_gre nf_nat_irc nf_nat_h323 nf_nat_ftp nf_nat_amanda ipmi_devintf 
iptable_filter ip_tables ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler nf_log_ipv6 nf_log_common 
xt_recent ip6table_nat nf
_nat_ipv6 nf_nat xt_comment ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 xt_addrtype xt_physdev 
br_netfilter xt_mark ip6table_mangle nf_conntrack_snmp xt_tcpudp xt_CT 
ip6table_raw xt_multiport nf
_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_conntrack xt_NFLOG nfnetlink_log xt_LOG 
nf_conntrack_tftp nf_conntrack_sip nf_conntrack_sane
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] nf_conntrack_proto_udplite nf_conntrack_proto_sctp 
nf_conntrack_pptp nf_conntrack_proto_gre nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink 
nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf
_conntrack_broadcast nf_conntrack_irc nf_conntrack_h323 nf_conntrack_ftp ts_kmp 
nf_conntrack_amanda nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables bridge stp 
llc gpio_ich ppde
v kvm_intel kvm parport_pc i3200_edac serio_raw shpchp edac_core parport 
lpc_ich mac_hid xgifb(C) 8250_fintek dm_crypt coretemp autofs4 btrfs raid10 
raid0 multipath linear raid1
 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor 
raid6_pq hid_generic usbhid e1000e ahci psmouse libahci ptp hid pps_core
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] CPU: 3 PID: 27450 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Tainted: G C 
3.19.0-26-generic #27-Ubuntu
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Hardware name: empty empty/TYAN Toledo i3210W/i3200R 
S5211, BIOS V1.06 09/30/2008
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] task: 8800eb8475c0 ti: 880101df4000 task.ti: 
880101df4000
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RIP: 0010:[c0553980] [c0553980] 
btrfs_orphan_add+0x1c0/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RSP: 0018:880101df7c38 EFLAGS: 00010286
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RAX: ffe4 RBX: 8800e968e000 RCX: 
8801a9595000
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RDX: ea9a RSI: 0004 RDI: 
8801a9595138
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RBP: 880101df7c78 R08: 0001cef0 R09: 
8800105f0120
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] R10: 88020fd9cf30 R11: ea0004019340 R12: 
880002e141a0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] R13: 88010072f9a0 R14: 8800e968e458 R15: 
0001
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] FS: () GS:88020fd8() 
knlGS:
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] CS: 0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] CR2: 032b3218 CR3: eacea000 CR4: 
000427e0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Stack:
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] 880101df7c78 c0591bb5 8801a9595000 
880202a53000
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] 8800105f0120 880002e141a0 880102206800 
880014f46900
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] 880101df7d08 c053d2da 8800105f0120 
8800105f01a0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Call Trace:
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [c0591bb5] ? 
lookup_free_space_inode+0x45/0xf0 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [c053d2da] 
btrfs_remove_block_group+0x13a/0x760 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [c0576e6a] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x63a/0x760 
[btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [c053db49] 
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x249/0x270 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [c05460e4] cleaner_kthread+0x144/0x1a0 
[btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [c0545fa0] ? check_leaf+0x360/0x360 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [81095939] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [81095870] ? 
kthread_create_on_node+0x1c0/0x1c0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [817cb658] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] [81095870] ? 
kthread_create_on_node+0x1c0/0x1c0
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] Code: 60 04 00 00 e9 b0 fe ff ff 66 90 89 45 c8 f0 
41 80 64 24 80 fd 4c 89 e7 e8 9e 21 fe ff 8b 45 c8 e9 1b ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 
00 00 0f 0b b8 f4 ff ff ff e9 10 ff ff ff 4c 89 f7 45 31 f6 e8 29 78
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RIP [c0553980] 
btrfs_orphan_add+0x1c0/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] RSP 880101df7c38
[Wed Aug 19 23:24:01 2015] ---[ end trace 659ce2722e7eecfe ]---

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a 

[Bug 752583] Re: Name resolution does not work with IPv6 only name servers

[Raoul Bhatia]

On Ubuntu Vivid,
mtr-tiny 0.85-3 crashes without any proper output when having IPv6 only 
nameservers.

It crashes in such way,
that i need to issue a reset to get the terminal back into a sane state.

Kindly see my attachment.

** Attachment added: mtr-tiny_ipv6_nameservers.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mtr/+bug/752583/+attachment/4429266/+files/mtr-tiny_ipv6_nameservers.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752583

Title:
  Name resolution does not work with IPv6 only name servers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mtr/+bug/752583/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1291277] Re: bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

[Raoul Bhatia]

I had the same issue on Debian Jessie until I upgraded from version
4.3-11 to 4.3-11+b1 on amd64.

This solved the issue! Changelog:

bash (4.3-11+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes

  * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes.
  * Rebuild against glibc 2.19-13

 -- amd64 Build Daemon (binet) buildd-bi...@buildd.debian.org  Tue, 07
Oct 2014 16:20:35 +0200

Please consider this for this bug report.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291277

Title:
  bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt:
  'user@server'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

This also effects trusty LTS.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

AFAIRC

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

just tested that on Ubuntu 14.04:

Package: bacula-common
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9.1ubuntu3
Severity: important

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

just tested that on Ubuntu 14.04:

Package: bacula-common
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9.1ubuntu3
Severity: important

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

This also effects trusty LTS.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

AFAIRC

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1351353] Re: Kernel oops

[Raoul Bhatia]

I am also seeing errors like intel_display.c:3313
intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips ... over various kernel releases from
Ubuntu 14.04 and now Ubuntu 14.10.

My hardware is a Lenovo X1 Carbon with an external display connected to
the display port.

lspci -nn:
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor DRAM 
Controller [8086:0154] (rev 09)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core 
processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] (rev 09)
00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset 
Family USB xHCI Host Controller [8086:1e31] (rev 04)
00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series 
Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 [8086:1e3a] (rev 04)
00:16.3 Serial controller [0700]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series 
Chipset Family KT Controller [8086:1e3d] (rev 04)
00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset 
Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 [8086:1e2d] (rev 04)
00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset 
Family High Definition Audio Controller [8086:1e20] (rev 04)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset 
Family PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:1e10] (rev c4)
00:1c.1 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset 
Family PCI Express Root Port 2 [8086:1e12] (rev c4)
00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset 
Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 [8086:1e26] (rev 04)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation QS77 Express Chipset LPC 
Controller [8086:1e56] (rev 04)
00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 7 Series Chipset Family 
6-port SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [8086:1e03] (rev 04)
00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family 
SMBus Controller [8086:1e22] (rev 04)
02:00.0 System peripheral [0880]: Ricoh Co Ltd MMC/SD Host Controller 
[1180:e822] (rev 07)
03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6205 
[Taylor Peak] [8086:0085] (rev 96)

After the freeze i can restart my display manager (lightdm) and resume my work 
for some time.
Quite often, this happens when I wake up my screen after a lock or after 
un-/re-plugging my external display.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1351353

Title:
  Kernel oops

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1351353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1273201] Re: bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at boot

[Raoul Bhatia]

I'm looking forward to that :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273201

Title:
  bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at
  boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1273201/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1261873] Re: [trusty] usershare access denied error (leads to non working nautilus samba sharing)

[Raoul Bhatia]

As mentioned in comment 12, there are some configuration options
regarding [homes] commented out.

If you put these back in, (i.e. comment [home], ... back in), it will work with 
the Ubuntu provided packages.
At least, I can confirm this to be working with samba 
2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.3.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261873

Title:
  [trusty] usershare access denied error (leads to non working
  nautilus samba sharing)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1261873/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1261873] Re: [trusty] usershare access denied error (leads to non working nautilus samba sharing)

[Raoul Bhatia]

As mentioned in comment 12, there are some configuration options
regarding [homes] commented out.

If you put these back in, (i.e. comment [home], ... back in), it will work with 
the Ubuntu provided packages.
At least, I can confirm this to be working with samba 
2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.14.04.3.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261873

Title:
  [trusty] usershare access denied error (leads to non working
  nautilus samba sharing)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1261873/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1273201] Re: bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at boot

[Raoul Bhatia]

I can confirm this for

DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS

and network-manager 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7.

Reverting bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch (and recompiling)
seems to solve this issue.

Kindly re-evaluate bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch and exclude
or adapt it for Ubuntu trusty and upcoming releases.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273201

Title:
  bridge_ignore_without_connections.patch breaks NM created bridge at
  boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1273201/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

any news on this bug report?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

any news on this bug report?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1183804] Re: [Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U772] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1028 intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0xe2/0x1a0 [i915]()

[Raoul Bhatia]

seeing this issue on Ubuntu 14.04 amd64,
currently running linux-image-3.15.0-2-generic from May 26th.

I've also seen this running stock 3.13.x from trusty.

Will try linux-image-3.15.0-5-generic_3.15.0-5.10_amd64.deb (current
utopic kernel) next.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1183804

Title:
  [Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U772] WARNING: at
  /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1028
  intel_wait_for_pipe_off+0xe2/0x1a0 [i915]()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1183804/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1310279] [NEW] Enabling mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

 # a2enmod mpm_prefork
 Considering conflict mpm_event for mpm_prefork:
 Considering conflict mpm_worker for mpm_prefork:
 Considering conflict mpm_itk for mpm_prefork:
 ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs 
 to be disabled first!

/usr/share/doc/libapache2-mpm-itk/README.Debian states, that mpm_itk is
an addon to prefork, however, if mpm_itk is enabled, I failed to
a2enmod mpm_prefork.

System: Ubuntu 14.04
 # cat /etc/lsb-release
 DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
 DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04
 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty
 DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

Apache2 Version 
 #  dpkg -l | grep apache2
 ii  apache2  2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64Apache HTTP Server
 ii  apache2-bin  2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64Apache HTTP Server (binary files and modules)
 ii  apache2-data 2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 all  Apache HTTP Server (common files)
 ii  apache2-mpm-prefork  2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64transitional prefork MPM package for apache2
 ii  apache2-utils2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64Apache HTTP Server (utility programs for web servers)
 ii  libapache2-mod-php5  5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4 
 amd64server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (Apache 2 module)
 ii  libapache2-mod-xsendfile 0.12-2  
 amd64Serve large static files efficiently from web applications
 ii  libapache2-mpm-itk   2.4.6-01-1  
 amd64multiuser module for Apache

Cheers,
Raoul

PS: libapache2-mpm-itk is out of sync with apache2 (2.4.6 vs 2.4.7). A
more recent release can be found at http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/ - maybe it
is worth having a look.

** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310279

Title:
  Enabling mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot
  proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1310279/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1310279] [NEW] Enabling mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

 # a2enmod mpm_prefork
 Considering conflict mpm_event for mpm_prefork:
 Considering conflict mpm_worker for mpm_prefork:
 Considering conflict mpm_itk for mpm_prefork:
 ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot proceed due to conflicts. It needs 
 to be disabled first!

/usr/share/doc/libapache2-mpm-itk/README.Debian states, that mpm_itk is
an addon to prefork, however, if mpm_itk is enabled, I failed to
a2enmod mpm_prefork.

System: Ubuntu 14.04
 # cat /etc/lsb-release
 DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
 DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04
 DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty
 DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

Apache2 Version 
 #  dpkg -l | grep apache2
 ii  apache2  2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64Apache HTTP Server
 ii  apache2-bin  2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64Apache HTTP Server (binary files and modules)
 ii  apache2-data 2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 all  Apache HTTP Server (common files)
 ii  apache2-mpm-prefork  2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64transitional prefork MPM package for apache2
 ii  apache2-utils2.4.7-1ubuntu4  
 amd64Apache HTTP Server (utility programs for web servers)
 ii  libapache2-mod-php5  5.5.9+dfsg-1ubuntu4 
 amd64server-side, HTML-embedded scripting language (Apache 2 module)
 ii  libapache2-mod-xsendfile 0.12-2  
 amd64Serve large static files efficiently from web applications
 ii  libapache2-mpm-itk   2.4.6-01-1  
 amd64multiuser module for Apache

Cheers,
Raoul

PS: libapache2-mpm-itk is out of sync with apache2 (2.4.6 vs 2.4.7). A
more recent release can be found at http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/ - maybe it
is worth having a look.

** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310279

Title:
  Enabling mpm_prefork: ERROR: Module mpm_itk is enabled - cannot
  proceed due to conflicts. It needs to be disabled first!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1310279/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1095534] Re: Remmina remote desktop client goes fullscreen on the wrong display

[Raoul Bhatia]

Duplicate of bug 85?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095534

Title:
  Remmina remote desktop client goes fullscreen on the wrong display

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/1095534/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 999985] Re: remmina goes full-screen on the wrong monitor

[Raoul Bhatia]

still present in trusty with the most recent updates installed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85

Title:
  remmina goes full-screen on the wrong monitor

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/85/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

[Raoul Bhatia]

2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1 works in my home environment.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

[Raoul Bhatia]

2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1 works in my home environment.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

[Raoul Bhatia]

Hi Robie,

samba 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu5 seems to fix the issue - at least in my test
environment using smbclient -L

I will also try to test this in the environment I use at home and report
back if this issue is also fixed there.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

[Raoul Bhatia]

Hi Robie,

samba 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu5 seems to fix the issue - at least in my test
environment using smbclient -L

I will also try to test this in the environment I use at home and report
back if this issue is also fixed there.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Hi Robie,

Yes, there is a valid users = %S line present in the smb.conf file.
When I comment it out, smbclient -L works as expected.

What i did:
1) Comment out valid users = %S, see the diff:
 root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# diff -u ~/smb.conf.old smb.conf
 --- /root/smb.conf.old  2014-04-01 18:19:16.880909594 +0200
 +++ smb.conf2014-04-01 18:19:40.065312095 +0200
 @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
  # The following parameter makes sure that only username can connect
  # to \\server\username
  # This might need tweaking when using external authentication schemes
 -   valid users = %S
 +;   valid users = %S
 
  # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain 
 Logons
  # (you need to configure Samba to act as a domain controller too.)

2) Restart samba:
 root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# service samba restart

3) Test the connectivity:
 root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# smbclient -L \\localhost -U ubuntu
 Enter ubuntu's password:
 Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.3-Ubuntu]
 
 Sharename   Type  Comment
 -     ---
 IPC$IPC   IPC Service (ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu))
 print$  Disk  Printer Drivers
 Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.3-Ubuntu]
 
 Server   Comment
 ----
 UBUNTU   ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu)
 
 WorkgroupMaster
 ----
 WORKGROUPUBUNTU

There are a number of other options which IMHO are placed under [homes]
but are commented in:

Here the full, unchanged default smb.conf file (read only, create mask, 
directory mask, valid users):
c u t   
#=== Share Definitions ===

# Un-comment the following (and tweak the other settings below to suit)
# to enable the default home directory shares. This will share each
# user's home directory as \\server\username
;[homes]
;   comment = Home Directories
;   browseable = no

# By default, the home directories are exported read-only. Change the
# next parameter to 'no' if you want to be able to write to them.
   read only = yes

# File creation mask is set to 0700 for security reasons. If you want to
# create files with group=rw permissions, set next parameter to 0775.
   create mask = 0700

# Directory creation mask is set to 0700 for security reasons. If you want to
# create dirs. with group=rw permissions, set next parameter to 0775.
   directory mask = 0700

# By default, \\server\username shares can be connected to by anyone
# with access to the samba server.
# The following parameter makes sure that only username can connect
# to \\server\username
# This might need tweaking when using external authentication schemes
   valid users = %S

# Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons
# (you need to configure Samba to act as a domain controller too.)
;[netlogon]
;   comment = Network Logon Service
;   path = /home/samba/netlogon
;   guest ok = yes
;   read only = yes

# Un-comment the following and create the profiles directory to store
# users profiles (see the logon path option above)
# (you need to configure Samba to act as a domain controller too.)
# The path below should be writable by all users so that their
# profile directory may be created the first time they log on
;[profiles]
;   comment = Users profiles
;   path = /home/samba/profiles
;   guest ok = no
;   browseable = no
;   create mask = 0600
;   directory mask = 0700

[printers]
   comment = All Printers
c u t   

Also, i compared this with to the smb.conf from samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1
which i took from Debian Jessie and applied on my Ubuntu 14.04 Ubuntu
Trusty Tahr (development branch). In this configuration, everything
below [homes] is commented out.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Hi Robie,

Yes, there is a valid users = %S line present in the smb.conf file.
When I comment it out, smbclient -L works as expected.

What i did:
1) Comment out valid users = %S, see the diff:
 root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# diff -u ~/smb.conf.old smb.conf
 --- /root/smb.conf.old  2014-04-01 18:19:16.880909594 +0200
 +++ smb.conf2014-04-01 18:19:40.065312095 +0200
 @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
  # The following parameter makes sure that only username can connect
  # to \\server\username
  # This might need tweaking when using external authentication schemes
 -   valid users = %S
 +;   valid users = %S
 
  # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain 
 Logons
  # (you need to configure Samba to act as a domain controller too.)

2) Restart samba:
 root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# service samba restart

3) Test the connectivity:
 root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# smbclient -L \\localhost -U ubuntu
 Enter ubuntu's password:
 Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.3-Ubuntu]
 
 Sharename   Type  Comment
 -     ---
 IPC$IPC   IPC Service (ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu))
 print$  Disk  Printer Drivers
 Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.3-Ubuntu]
 
 Server   Comment
 ----
 UBUNTU   ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu)
 
 WorkgroupMaster
 ----
 WORKGROUPUBUNTU

There are a number of other options which IMHO are placed under [homes]
but are commented in:

Here the full, unchanged default smb.conf file (read only, create mask, 
directory mask, valid users):
c u t   
#=== Share Definitions ===

# Un-comment the following (and tweak the other settings below to suit)
# to enable the default home directory shares. This will share each
# user's home directory as \\server\username
;[homes]
;   comment = Home Directories
;   browseable = no

# By default, the home directories are exported read-only. Change the
# next parameter to 'no' if you want to be able to write to them.
   read only = yes

# File creation mask is set to 0700 for security reasons. If you want to
# create files with group=rw permissions, set next parameter to 0775.
   create mask = 0700

# Directory creation mask is set to 0700 for security reasons. If you want to
# create dirs. with group=rw permissions, set next parameter to 0775.
   directory mask = 0700

# By default, \\server\username shares can be connected to by anyone
# with access to the samba server.
# The following parameter makes sure that only username can connect
# to \\server\username
# This might need tweaking when using external authentication schemes
   valid users = %S

# Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons
# (you need to configure Samba to act as a domain controller too.)
;[netlogon]
;   comment = Network Logon Service
;   path = /home/samba/netlogon
;   guest ok = yes
;   read only = yes

# Un-comment the following and create the profiles directory to store
# users profiles (see the logon path option above)
# (you need to configure Samba to act as a domain controller too.)
# The path below should be writable by all users so that their
# profile directory may be created the first time they log on
;[profiles]
;   comment = Users profiles
;   path = /home/samba/profiles
;   guest ok = no
;   browseable = no
;   create mask = 0600
;   directory mask = 0700

[printers]
   comment = All Printers
c u t   

Also, i compared this with to the smb.conf from samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1
which i took from Debian Jessie and applied on my Ubuntu 14.04 Ubuntu
Trusty Tahr (development branch). In this configuration, everything
below [homes] is commented out.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

If anyone wants to quickly update to the packages from Debian until this
issue is fixed, here some wget lines for retrieving them:

wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_4.1.5+dfsg-1_all.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common-bin_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-dsdb-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-vfs-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-libs_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/libwbclient0_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/python-samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/smbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/libsmbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

 #!/bin/sh
 
 VER=4.1.6+dfsg-1
 ARCH=amd64
 
 for p in samba samba-common-bin samba-dsdb-modules samba-vfs-modules 
 samba-libs libwbclient0 python-samba smbclient libsmbclient; do 
   wget 
 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/${p}_${VER}_${ARCH}.deb;
 done
 
 wget 
 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_${VER}_all.deb;

should fetch the packages in a more generic way.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

If anyone wants to quickly update to the packages from Debian until this
issue is fixed, here some wget lines for retrieving them:

wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_4.1.5+dfsg-1_all.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common-bin_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-dsdb-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-vfs-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-libs_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/libwbclient0_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/python-samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/smbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;
wget 
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/libsmbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb;

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

 #!/bin/sh
 
 VER=4.1.6+dfsg-1
 ARCH=amd64
 
 for p in samba samba-common-bin samba-dsdb-modules samba-vfs-modules 
 samba-libs libwbclient0 python-samba smbclient libsmbclient; do 
   wget 
 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/${p}_${VER}_${ARCH}.deb;
 done
 
 wget 
 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_${VER}_all.deb;

should fetch the packages in a more generic way.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

Debian Bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914

** Also affects: bacula (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1299249] [NEW] bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

Package: bacula-common
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9ubuntu1
Severity: important

 # /usr/sbin/bsmtp -h backup -f (Bacula) root -s Bacula: Backup OK of 
 backup-fd Full root
 bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: 
 ERR=Success

This happens on an IPv6 only host running Ubuntu saucy.

The current workaround is to add backup.DOMAIN.TLD to /etc/hosts, e.g.
+ 127.0.1.1   backup.DOMAIN.TLD

I think this problem might be solved with a more recent Bacula version.

Cheers,
Raoul
PS: I will also file this bug directly with Debian.

** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: bacula (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #742914
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1299249] Re: bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

Debian Bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914

** Also affects: bacula (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1299249] [NEW] bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

Package: bacula-common
Version: 5.2.6+dfsg-9ubuntu1
Severity: important

 # /usr/sbin/bsmtp -h backup -f (Bacula) root -s Bacula: Backup OK of 
 backup-fd Full root
 bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: 
 ERR=Success

This happens on an IPv6 only host running Ubuntu saucy.

The current workaround is to add backup.DOMAIN.TLD to /etc/hosts, e.g.
+ 127.0.1.1   backup.DOMAIN.TLD

I think this problem might be solved with a more recent Bacula version.

Cheers,
Raoul
PS: I will also file this bug directly with Debian.

** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: bacula (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #742914
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742914

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299249

Title:
  bacula-common: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:377 Fatal gethostbyname for myself
  failed backup.DOMAIN.TLD: ERR=Success

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1299249/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Dear Robie,

actually, it is quite easy to reproduce during an update from saucy to
trusty and i suspect that this bug will even strike when you do a clean
trusty install.

Nevertheless, i reproduced this issue with a fresh saucy install:

1. install saucy using 
http://at.mirror.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/saucy/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
2. install openssh-server and samba-server during installation (via tasksel?)
3. reboot and verify samba status:
# root@ubuntu:~# smbstatus

Samba version 3.6.18
PID Username  Group Machine
---

Service  pid machine   Connected at
---

No locked files

4. add a user and view list the available shares
# root@ubuntu:~# smbpasswd -a ubuntu
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:


# root@ubuntu:~# smbclient -L \\localhost -U ubuntu
Enter ubuntu's password:
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.18]

Sharename   Type  Comment
-     ---
IPC$IPC   IPC Service (ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu))
print$  Disk  Printer Drivers
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.18]

Server   Comment
----
UBUNTU   ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu)

WorkgroupMaster
----
WORKGROUPUBUNTU


5. do-release-upgrade -d (remove obsolete packages; reboot)

6. verify samba access (FAILS!)
--ubuntu@192.168.122.233's password:
Welcome to Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) (GNU/Linux 3.13.0-18-generic 
x86_64)

 * Documentation:  https://help.ubuntu.com/

  System information as of Sat Mar 22 08:50:31 CET 2014


Last login: Sat Mar 22 08:41:59 2014 from rbi
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ smbstatus

Samba version 4.1.3-Ubuntu
PID Username  Group Machine
---
Failed to initialize session_global: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

Service  pid machine   Connected at
---
Failed to initialize session_global: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Failed to traverse sessions: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

No locked files

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ smbclient -L \\localhost -U ubuntu
Enter ubuntu's password:
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.3-Ubuntu]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED



Please let me know in case you require this system as a KVM/QEMU disk image.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Dear Robie,

actually, it is quite easy to reproduce during an update from saucy to
trusty and i suspect that this bug will even strike when you do a clean
trusty install.

Nevertheless, i reproduced this issue with a fresh saucy install:

1. install saucy using 
http://at.mirror.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/saucy/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
2. install openssh-server and samba-server during installation (via tasksel?)
3. reboot and verify samba status:
# root@ubuntu:~# smbstatus

Samba version 3.6.18
PID Username  Group Machine
---

Service  pid machine   Connected at
---

No locked files

4. add a user and view list the available shares
# root@ubuntu:~# smbpasswd -a ubuntu
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:


# root@ubuntu:~# smbclient -L \\localhost -U ubuntu
Enter ubuntu's password:
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.18]

Sharename   Type  Comment
-     ---
IPC$IPC   IPC Service (ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu))
print$  Disk  Printer Drivers
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.18]

Server   Comment
----
UBUNTU   ubuntu server (Samba, Ubuntu)

WorkgroupMaster
----
WORKGROUPUBUNTU


5. do-release-upgrade -d (remove obsolete packages; reboot)

6. verify samba access (FAILS!)
--ubuntu@192.168.122.233's password:
Welcome to Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) (GNU/Linux 3.13.0-18-generic 
x86_64)

 * Documentation:  https://help.ubuntu.com/

  System information as of Sat Mar 22 08:50:31 CET 2014


Last login: Sat Mar 22 08:41:59 2014 from rbi
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ smbstatus

Samba version 4.1.3-Ubuntu
PID Username  Group Machine
---
Failed to initialize session_global: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

Service  pid machine   Connected at
---
Failed to initialize session_global: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Failed to traverse sessions: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

No locked files

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ smbclient -L \\localhost -U ubuntu
Enter ubuntu's password:
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 4.1.3-Ubuntu]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED



Please let me know in case you require this system as a KVM/QEMU disk image.

Cheers,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Thank you for your fast reply.

Updating Samba 3 to Samba 4 *is* possible, please see
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba .

There might be some configuration changes but all in all it is no big
deal to manually merge them - at least not for a basic setup without any
active directory (AD) integration.

As stated, when using Samba 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 from Ubuntu trusty,
things do not work even with the most basic/default config file.

Replacing the packages with a more recent Version 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 from
Debian Jessie helps to resolve this issue. No further configuration
changes compared to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 from trusty are required.

I simply downloaded all packages and issued
# dpkg -i libsmbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
libwbclient0_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb python-samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb samba-common_4.1.5+dfsg-1_all.deb 
samba-common-bin_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
samba-dsdb-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb samba-libs_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
samba-vfs-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb smbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Please let me know what else you require to address this bug report.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1292548] Re: Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Thank you for your fast reply.

Updating Samba 3 to Samba 4 *is* possible, please see
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba .

There might be some configuration changes but all in all it is no big
deal to manually merge them - at least not for a basic setup without any
active directory (AD) integration.

As stated, when using Samba 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 from Ubuntu trusty,
things do not work even with the most basic/default config file.

Replacing the packages with a more recent Version 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 from
Debian Jessie helps to resolve this issue. No further configuration
changes compared to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 from trusty are required.

I simply downloaded all packages and issued
# dpkg -i libsmbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
libwbclient0_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb python-samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb samba-common_4.1.5+dfsg-1_all.deb 
samba-common-bin_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
samba-dsdb-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb samba-libs_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb 
samba-vfs-modules_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb smbclient_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Please let me know what else you require to address this bug report.

Thanks,
Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] [NEW] Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

I have been using Samba as a standalone server since many years and have
successfully gone through multiple Samba upgrades.

This week, I upgraded from Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) to Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty).
This came with an upgrade from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 
2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty).
(NOTE: I did not use the samba4 package but was still sticking to Samba 3 in 
Ubuntu saucy)


After the update, I wasn't able to access the shares any more.

smbclient -L localhost -U% / smbclient -L localhost -U user resulted in 
various errors, including
* tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
* (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (IPC$)
* NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
* string_to_sid: SID IPC_ is not in a valid format


I was neither able to properly browse the server/shares via smbclient nor via 
Windows 7 Ultimate nor Windows 8.1.

However, I was able to directly access a share from a Linux shell using
smbclient -U user //server/share-c ls.

Not even purging samba, all related configuration, all folders,
including /etc/samba, /var/cache/samba, /var/spool/samba,
/var/lib/samba, and re-installing samba (Version  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3
from trusty) did the trick.


Only after installing all related packages from Debian jessie (Version 
2:4.1.5+dfsg-1), everything worked out of the box again.

Thus, I think that something in the most recent Ubuntu Samba package
might be broken and kindly ask you to investigate, as there will be
several users who will upgrade and stick to this LTS release.

Thanks,
Raoul

PS. I did not try Samba 4.0 (Package samba4*) on Ubuntu saucy and
therefore cannot tell if these are working as expected.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1277432] Re: Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

[Raoul Bhatia]

Debian now ships 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 which works for me - the version
currently shipped with Ubuntu does not, see bug 1292548

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277432

Title:
  Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1277432/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1277432] Re: Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

[Raoul Bhatia]

Debian now ships 2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 which works for me - the version
currently shipped with Ubuntu does not, see bug 1292548

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277432

Title:
  Please update to samba 4.1.x from Debian/sid for trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1277432/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292548] [NEW] Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

I have been using Samba as a standalone server since many years and have
successfully gone through multiple Samba upgrades.

This week, I upgraded from Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy) to Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty).
This came with an upgrade from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to 
2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty).
(NOTE: I did not use the samba4 package but was still sticking to Samba 3 in 
Ubuntu saucy)


After the update, I wasn't able to access the shares any more.

smbclient -L localhost -U% / smbclient -L localhost -U user resulted in 
various errors, including
* tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
* (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (IPC$)
* NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
* string_to_sid: SID IPC_ is not in a valid format


I was neither able to properly browse the server/shares via smbclient nor via 
Windows 7 Ultimate nor Windows 8.1.

However, I was able to directly access a share from a Linux shell using
smbclient -U user //server/share-c ls.

Not even purging samba, all related configuration, all folders,
including /etc/samba, /var/cache/samba, /var/spool/samba,
/var/lib/samba, and re-installing samba (Version  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3
from trusty) did the trick.


Only after installing all related packages from Debian jessie (Version 
2:4.1.5+dfsg-1), everything worked out of the box again.

Thus, I think that something in the most recent Ubuntu Samba package
might be broken and kindly ask you to investigate, as there will be
several users who will upgrade and stick to this LTS release.

Thanks,
Raoul

PS. I did not try Samba 4.0 (Package samba4*) on Ubuntu saucy and
therefore cannot tell if these are working as expected.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548

Title:
  Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
  2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks access to the server

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1292548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1291277] [NEW] bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
bash-static's prompt incorrectly reads 'I have no name!@server',
whereas bash's (and also zsh's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'.

Packages:
 $ dpkg -l|grep bash
 ii  bash 4.3-2ubuntu1 
 amd64GNU Bourne Again SHell
 ii  bash-completion  1:2.1-2ubuntu3   
 all  programmable completion for the bash shell
 ii  bash-static  4.3-2ubuntu1 
 amd64GNU Bourne Again SHell (static version)

This did not happen with bash-static 4.2-5ubuntu3 on saucy.

Possibly related to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsh/+bug/1291281

Thanks,
Raoul

** Affects: bash (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291277

Title:
  bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt:
  'user@server'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1291281] [NEW] compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh prompt: 'user@server'

[Raoul Bhatia]

Public bug reported:

After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
zsh-static's prompt incorrectly reads '@server',
whereas zsh's (and also bash's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'.

Also, when launching zsh-static from another shell, e.g. zsh, i see:
 user@server~ $ zsh-static
 compaudit:112: unknown group
 compaudit:112: unknown group
 @srever ~ $

Packages:
 $ dpkg -l|grep zsh
 ii  zsh  5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
 amd64shell with lots of features
 ii  zsh-common   5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
 all  architecture independent files for Zsh
 ii  zsh-static   5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
 amd64shell with lots of features (static link)

To my knowledge, this did not happen with zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6 on
saucy.

Possibly related to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277

Thanks,
Raoul

** Affects: zsh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
- zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6's prompt shows '@server',
+ zsh-static's prompt incorrectly shows '@server',
  whereas zsh's (and also bash's) prompt correctly shows 'user@server'.
  
- To my knowledge, this did not happen with zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6 on
- saucy.
+ $ dpkg -l|grep zsh
+ ii  zsh  5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
amd64shell with lots of features
+ ii  zsh-common   5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
all  architecture independent files for Zsh
+ ii  zsh-static   5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
amd64shell with lots of features (static link)
+ 
+ 
+ To my knowledge, this did not happen with zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6 on saucy.
  
  Possibly related to
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277
  
  Thanks,
  Raoul

** Summary changed:

- zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh prompt: 'user@server'
+ compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh prompt: 
'user@server'

** Description changed:

  After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
  zsh-static's prompt incorrectly shows '@server',
  whereas zsh's (and also bash's) prompt correctly shows 'user@server'.
  
- $ dpkg -l|grep zsh
- ii  zsh  5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
amd64shell with lots of features
- ii  zsh-common   5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
all  architecture independent files for Zsh
- ii  zsh-static   5.0.2-3ubuntu6   
amd64shell with lots of features (static link)
+ Also, when launching zsh-static from another shell, e.g. zsh, i see:
+  user@server~ $ zsh-static
+  compaudit:112: unknown group
+  compaudit:112: unknown group
+  @srever ~ $
  
+ Packages:
+  $ dpkg -l|grep zsh
+  ii  zsh  5.0.2-3ubuntu6 
  amd64shell with lots of features
+  ii  zsh-common   5.0.2-3ubuntu6 
  all  architecture independent files for Zsh
+  ii  zsh-static   5.0.2-3ubuntu6 
  amd64shell with lots of features (static link)
  
- To my knowledge, this did not happen with zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6 on saucy.
+ To my knowledge, this did not happen with zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6 on
+ saucy.
  
  Possibly related to
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277
  
  Thanks,
  Raoul

** Description changed:

  After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
- zsh-static's prompt incorrectly shows '@server',
- whereas zsh's (and also bash's) prompt correctly shows 'user@server'.
+ zsh-static's prompt incorrectly reads '@server',
+ whereas zsh's (and also bash's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'.
  
  Also, when launching zsh-static from another shell, e.g. zsh, i see:
   user@server~ $ zsh-static
   compaudit:112: unknown group
   compaudit:112: unknown group
   @srever ~ $
  
  Packages:
   $ dpkg -l|grep zsh
   ii  zsh  5.0.2-3ubuntu6 
  amd64shell with lots of features
   ii  zsh-common   5.0.2-3ubuntu6 
  all  architecture independent files for Zsh
   ii  zsh-static   5.0.2-3ubuntu6 
  amd64shell with lots of features (static link)
  
  To my knowledge, this did not happen with zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6 on
  saucy.
  
  Possibly related to
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277
  
  Thanks,
  Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291281

Title:
  compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh
  prompt: 

[Bug 1291277] Re: bash-static: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash: 'user@server'

[Raoul Bhatia]

** Description changed:

  After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
- bash-static 4.3-2ubuntu1 shows 'I have no name!@server',
- whereas bash (and also zsh) correctly shows 'user@server'.
+ bash-static's prompt incorrectly reads 'I have no name!@server',
+ whereas bash's (and also zsh's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'.
+ 
+  $ dpkg -l|grep bash
+  ii  bash 4.3-2ubuntu1   
  amd64GNU Bourne Again SHell
+  ii  bash-completion  1:2.1-2ubuntu3 
  all  programmable completion for the bash shell
+  ii  bash-static  4.3-2ubuntu1   
  amd64GNU Bourne Again SHell (static version)
  
  This did not happen with bash-static 4.2-5ubuntu3 on saucy.
  
+ Possibly related to
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsh/+bug/1291281
+ 
  Thanks,
  Raoul

** Summary changed:

- bash-static: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash: 'user@server'
+ bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

** Description changed:

  After a dist-upgrade from saucy to trusty,
  bash-static's prompt incorrectly reads 'I have no name!@server',
  whereas bash's (and also zsh's) prompt correctly reads 'user@server'.
  
+ Packages:
   $ dpkg -l|grep bash
   ii  bash 4.3-2ubuntu1   
  amd64GNU Bourne Again SHell
   ii  bash-completion  1:2.1-2ubuntu3 
  all  programmable completion for the bash shell
   ii  bash-static  4.3-2ubuntu1   
  amd64GNU Bourne Again SHell (static version)
  
  This did not happen with bash-static 4.2-5ubuntu3 on saucy.
  
  Possibly related to
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsh/+bug/1291281
  
  Thanks,
  Raoul

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291277

Title:
  bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt:
  'user@server'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1291277] Re: bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt: 'user@server'

[Raoul Bhatia]

== ApportVersion =
2.13.3-0ubuntu1

== Architecture =
amd64

== Date =
Wed Mar 12 11:36:21 2014

== Dependencies =
apt-utils 0.9.15.4ubuntu2
debconf 1.5.51ubuntu2
debconf-i18n 1.5.51ubuntu2
debianutils 4.4
dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5
gcc-4.8-base 4.8.2-16ubuntu6
gcc-4.9-base 4.9-20140303-0ubuntu3
libacl1 2.2.52-1
libapt-inst1.5 0.9.15.4ubuntu2
libapt-pkg4.12 0.9.15.4ubuntu2
libattr1 1:2.4.47-1
libaudit-common 1:2.3.2-2ubuntu1
libaudit1 1:2.3.2-2ubuntu1
libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-5
libc6 2.19-0ubuntu2
libdb5.3 5.3.28-3ubuntu1
libgcc1 1:4.9-20140303-0ubuntu3
liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-7build3
liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2ubuntu2
libpam-modules 1.1.8-1ubuntu2
libpam-modules-bin 1.1.8-1ubuntu2
libpam0g 1.1.8-1ubuntu2
libpcre3 1:8.31-2ubuntu2
libselinux1 2.2.2-1
libsemanage-common 2.2-1
libsemanage1 2.2-1
libsepol1 2.2-1
libstdc++6 4.8.2-16ubuntu6
libtext-charwidth-perl 0.04-7build3
libtext-iconv-perl 1.7-5build2
libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-7
libustr-1.0-1 1.0.4-3ubuntu2
multiarch-support 2.19-0ubuntu2
passwd 1:4.1.5.1-1ubuntu9
perl-base 5.18.2-2
sensible-utils 0.0.9
tar 1.27.1-1
zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1ubuntu1

== DistroRelease =
Ubuntu 14.04

== Package =
bash-static 4.3-2ubuntu1

== PackageArchitecture =
amd64

== ProblemType =
Bug

== ProcEnviron =
TERM=screen
PATH=(custom, no user)
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash-static

== ProcVersionSignature =
Ubuntu 3.13.0-17.37-generic 3.13.6

== SourcePackage =
bash

== Tags =
 trusty

== Uname =
Linux 3.13.0-17-generic x86_64

== UpgradeStatus =
Upgraded to trusty on 2014-03-12 (0 days ago)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291277

Title:
  bash-static prompt: 'I have no name!@server' vs. bash prompt:
  'user@server'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1291277/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1291281] Re: compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh prompt: 'user@server'

[Raoul Bhatia]

== ApportVersion =
2.13.3-0ubuntu1

== Architecture =
amd64

== Date =
Wed Mar 12 11:47:08 2014

== Dependencies =
dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5
gcc-4.9-base 4.9-20140303-0ubuntu3
libacl1 2.2.52-1
libattr1 1:2.4.47-1
libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-5
libc6 2.19-0ubuntu2
libcap2 1:2.24-0ubuntu2
libgcc1 1:4.9-20140303-0ubuntu3
libgpm2 1.20.4-6.1
liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2ubuntu2
libncursesw5 5.9+20131221-1ubuntu1
libpcre3 1:8.31-2ubuntu2
libselinux1 2.2.2-1
libtinfo5 5.9+20131221-1ubuntu1
multiarch-support 2.19-0ubuntu2
tar 1.27.1-1
zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1ubuntu1
zsh 5.0.2-3ubuntu6
zsh-common 5.0.2-3ubuntu6

== DistroRelease =
Ubuntu 14.04

== Package =
zsh-static 5.0.2-3ubuntu6

== PackageArchitecture =
amd64

== ProblemType =
Bug

== ProcEnviron =
TERM=screen
PATH=(custom, no user)
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash-static

== ProcVersionSignature =
Ubuntu 3.13.0-17.37-generic 3.13.6

== SourcePackage =
zsh

== Tags =
 trusty

== Uname =
Linux 3.13.0-17-generic x86_64

== UpgradeStatus =
Upgraded to trusty on 2014-03-12 (0 days ago)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1291281

Title:
  compaudit:112: unknown group / zsh-static prompt: '@server' vs. zsh
  prompt: 'user@server'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsh/+bug/1291281/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1264674] Re: nginx segfault when adding add_header in configuration

[Raoul Bhatia]

ack for nginx-extra

gdb backtrace:

root@www /etc/nginx # gdb nginx
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.1-ubuntu
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
and show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/...
Reading symbols from /usr/sbin/nginx...Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/nginx...done.
done.
(gdb) run -t
Starting program: /usr/sbin/nginx -t
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__strcmp_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S:213
213 ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  __strcmp_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/../strcmp.S:213
#1  0x00428be1 in ngx_conf_handler (last=0, cf=0x7fffe1e0) at 
src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:305
#2  ngx_conf_parse (cf=cf@entry=0x7fffe1e0, filename=filename@entry=0x0) at 
src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:243
#3  0x00445d8b in ngx_http_core_server (cf=0x7fffe1e0, 
cmd=optimized out, dummy=optimized out) at 
src/http/ngx_http_core_module.c:3009
#4  0x00428d1a in ngx_conf_handler (last=1, cf=0x7fffe1e0) at 
src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:387
#5  ngx_conf_parse (cf=cf@entry=0x7fffe1e0, 
filename=filename@entry=0x7fffdb70) at src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:243
#6  0x00429115 in ngx_conf_include (cf=0x7fffe1e0, cmd=optimized 
out, conf=optimized out) at src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:783
#7  0x00428d1a in ngx_conf_handler (last=0, cf=0x7fffe1e0) at 
src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:387
#8  ngx_conf_parse (cf=cf@entry=0x7fffe1e0, filename=filename@entry=0x0) at 
src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:243
#9  0x00440e92 in ngx_http_block (cf=0x7fffe1e0, cmd=optimized 
out, conf=optimized out) at src/http/ngx_http.c:239
#10 0x00428d1a in ngx_conf_handler (last=1, cf=0x7fffe1e0) at 
src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:387
#11 ngx_conf_parse (cf=cf@entry=0x7fffe1e0, 
filename=filename@entry=0x7767c0) at src/core/ngx_conf_file.c:243
#12 0x004265d9 in ngx_init_cycle 
(old_cycle=old_cycle@entry=0x7fffe390) at src/core/ngx_cycle.c:268
#13 0x0041841a in main (argc=optimized out, argv=optimized out) at 
src/core/nginx.c:333
(gdb)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1264674

Title:
  nginx segfault when adding add_header in configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1264674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1230917] Re: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

[Raoul Bhatia]

Is there any way to quickly address this problem by myself?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230917

Title:
  php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1230917/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1230917] Re: php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

[Raoul Bhatia]

Is there any way to quickly address this problem by myself?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1230917

Title:
  php5-fpm logrotate errors after package switched to upstart

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1230917/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs