[Bug 1973403] Re: gnome-shell is using over 13GB of ram after 5 days
You can close this bug now. After 11 days gnome-shell memory usage has been stable. I must have had an application causing the issue. As I leave my PC on for a long time, never shutdown, I do not know what it would have been that caused this. But I am sure it is not gnome-shell. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973403 Title: gnome-shell is using over 13GB of ram after 5 days To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1973403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1973403] Re: gnome-shell is using over 13GB of ram after 5 days
I have looked in ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/ There is no extensions folder. This is a new install of Ubuntu 22.04 with no modifications yet. Here is the ls output of the folder ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/ drwx-- 2 richard richard 4.0K May 16 07:24 . drwx-- 23 richard richard 4.0K May 15 16:21 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 richard richard 2.0K May 16 07:24 application_state -rw-rw-r-- 1 richard richard0 May 7 15:13 gnome-overrides-migrated -rw-rw-r-- 1 richard richard 592 May 14 23:56 notifications I will apply a updates again, if there are any, reboot and create the file you need. It'll take a day or so. Many thanks for your feedback. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973403 Title: gnome-shell is using over 13GB of ram after 5 days To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1973403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1973403] [NEW] gnome-shell is using over 13GB of ram after 5 days
Public bug reported: This is on Ubuntu 22.04 All updates After 5 days gnome-shell is using 13GB or ram. System is a Asus PN50 512 GB m.2 drive 64 GIG Ram. AMD 4800U ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: gnome-shell 42.0-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat May 14 11:27:20 2022 DisplayManager: gdm3 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-07 (6 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419) RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. RelatedPackageVersions: mutter-common 42.0-3ubuntu2 SourcePackage: gnome-shell UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session ** Attachment added: "Screen shot of resource viewer" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973403/+attachment/5589711/+files/Screenshot%20from%202022-05-14%2011-34-11.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973403 Title: gnome-shell is using over 13GB of ram after 5 days To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1973403/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528398] Re: Partner search engine not as user friendly as the 7digital one
Well - more than a year has gone by, and no action. Let me rephrase not as user friendly. No - HOPELESS. Particularly for a classical music lover such as myself. Until now I have been reduced to searching on the 7digital.com site, taking a unique string from the album that I wished to purchase and then searching in Ubuntu One Music Store (UOMS) for that. Until this morning, that is. Found this on 7digital.com: http://www.7digital.com/artists/various-artists/pomp-and-circumstance-1/ I defy anyone to find that in UOMS using Rhythmbox or Banshee (Maverick and Natty respectively). Eventually, using Banshee in Natty, I went to Amazon MP3 Store, found the album within one minute, logged into my Amazon account and paid for it within another minute and downloaded within 5 minutes. And I saved 50p into the bargain! I don't mind that UOMS is generally 50p an album more expensive than Amazon. I'm happy to pay that in order to support Canonical and however much goes upstream to gnome, but I can't do that if I can't find what I want to purchase. Sorry - you are in danger of losing customers to Amazon. This really needs to be addressed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528398 Title: Partner search engine not as user friendly as the 7digital one -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528398] Re: Partner search engine not as user friendly as the 7digital one
Oops - this particular album was the same price in 7digital.com and Amazon, but the principle still applies. Many 7digital albums are more expensive than in Amazon but I'm happy to pay if I can actually find the album. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528398 Title: Partner search engine not as user friendly as the 7digital one -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734325] Re: Natty: Users should be able to easily turn off (disable) global menu
I believe this bug is indeed invalid because you can already disable the global menu in the classic desktop very easily. I'm surprised no one's mentioned this yet. The global menu is simply a panel applet in classic gnome. If you want to disable it, right-click on it and Remove from Panel. If you want to re-enable it, right-click on the panel Add to panel Indicator Applet Appmenu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734325 Title: Natty: Users should be able to easily turn off (disable) global menu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734325] Re: Natty: Users should be able to easily turn off (disable) global menu
Since I can't edit a comment, just to clarify. I meant invalid only for classic desktop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734325 Title: Natty: Users should be able to easily turn off (disable) global menu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646293] Re: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646293 Title: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646293] Re: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg
It's not clear whether some of the last few posters have the enclosure that gives you 'ID 05e3:0701' from lsusb - which is what the bug nominator has - but this problem is not going to go away by itself. I'm disappointed (a diplomatic understatement) that this bug remains undecided and unassigned. There are plenty of people out there with the ID 05e3:0701 device who are affected by this bug and the thread I linked in #2 continues to grow. This one: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1618085 I have also responded in other threads on Ubuntuforums about the same ID 05e3:0701 issue where the OP has not contributed to the linked thread. This ghastly device seems to be an insidiously common one. The fact that it works in Natty (so far!) is not a reason to neglect it in Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646293 Title: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646293] Re: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg
Sorry - I meant linked in #3. Can't see how to edit typos here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646293 Title: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711401] Re: update to glew 1.5.7 broke unity
This also affects ATI graphics using the open source driver. ATI Radeon HD4350 here and unable to log into Natty Unity desktop or run compiz in classic desktop with 1.5.7 version libglew and libglewmx. Downgrading these two to 1.5.2 restores ability to run Unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711401 Title: update to glew 1.5.7 broke unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624755] Re: to remove a pen drive have to use safely remove drive twice
I also get this in Maverick on a machine with a nvidia chipset, but not on two others with an Intel and an AMD/ATI chipset. The affected machine's lspci includes: 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP78S [GeForce 8200] OHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev a1) 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP78S [GeForce 8200] EHCI USB 2.0 Controller (rev a1) The unaffected machines have Intel 82801I (ICH9 Family) and ATI SB700/SB800 respectively. On the affected nvidia-chipset machine I also see this behaviour with external hard drives, not just flash drives. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624755 Title: to remove a pen drive have to use safely remove drive twice -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646293] Re: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg
There is a thread started recently on Ubuntuforums with three people so far affected by this issue with this device (same as bug reporter): Bus 001 Device 003: ID 05e3:0701 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB 2.0 IDE Adapter From my dmesg: [ 2785.490024] usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3 [ 2785.643953] usb-storage 1-4:1.0: Quirks match for vid 05e3 pid 0701: 520 [ 2785.644021] scsi9 : usb-storage 1-4:1.0 [ 2786.643567] scsi 9:0:0:0: CD-ROMHL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4167B DL12 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0 [ 2787.199190] sr1: scsi3-mmc drive: 48x/48x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray [ 2787.199417] sr 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr1 [ 2787.199584] sr 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 5 Ubuntu forums thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1618085 -- usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 646293] Re: usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg
Oops, sorry, forgot to add to above. This is in Maverick. -- usb connected cd/dvd drive not showing up in Nautilus despite being in dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314860] Re: New timestamp when copying to NTFS partition
I can add something to this. This is happening in Jaunty as of today. If you rely on the fstab entry as set up by the Jaunty installer for an internal partition (device mountpoint ntfsdefaults,nls=utf8,umask=007,gid=460 1), you get: Nautilus file copy ext3 partition - NTFS partition - date/time changed to current. Nautilus file copy NTFS partition - ext3 partition - date/time preserved. But if you change the fstab entry to a simple: devicemountpointntfsdefaults0 0 ...date and time stamps are preserved both ways. In fact that's what I've been using (or with filesystem field = ntfs-3g) for quite some and I have yet to have a problem with it. Also to add: date/time is preserved copying both ways with an automounted external NTFS drive. No problem there. -- New timestamp when copying to NTFS partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314860 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349774] Re: cannot change background color on parts of panel
I'm getting this as well - since this morning's updates. Ugly opaque white bits on the panels if I choose Solid-Colour/Semi transparent, or Background Image. Yes, the problem goes away with Human-Clearlooks and Clearlooks Themes. Thanks. -- cannot change background color on parts of panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149013] Problem with gnome-panel startup if solid colour
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel Gutsy-Beta. Same issue found on two different machines. On start-up, immediately after logging in, with default desktop setup, both the upper and lower gnome panels work fine. But if I change them to Properties Background Solid colour (and with the slider bar about one-third the way along, that is nearer the transparent end), both panels appear briefly, but as the desktop loads up only the upper one appears properly. If I wait until the desktop has completely loaded, and then click anywhere on the desktop, the lower panel immediately appears and works as it should. If I set the panels back to Properties Background None, the lower one starts up properly and works OK. Only a minor bug, but slightly worrying. I've not seen this in Gnome before, but until I installed Gutsy Beta I had not used the 2.20 version. Could this be an upstream bug? ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Problem with gnome-panel startup if solid colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149013] Re: Problem with gnome-panel startup if solid colour
Thanks for your response. My apologies - I didn't think of compiz and you are quite right. On both the desktop (Nvidia GeForce 6200) and the laptop (Intel 915G) I had Visual Effects set to 'Normal' - the default, which is why I forgot about it. Setting them to 'None' on both machines causes the problem to go away. One curiosity - with compiz enabled, now I get the problem whether the panel is set to 'Solid Colour' or 'None'. I don't know why it behaved differently before I posted the bug. Anyway, if this is a duplicate you might as well close this one. And apologies once again for making an unnecessary report. By the way, Gutsy is looking good. Congratulations to all the devs. -- Problem with gnome-panel startup if solid colour https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86114] Re: e2label appears to be broken in Feisty Herd 4
I'm afraid that Herd 4 has long since departed my machine to join that cloud of unwanted electrons in the sky. It would have been interesting to have looked at the two outputs you suggest. I'm sorry I didn't think of that then because I can see that the problem probably didn't lie with e2label itself. Anyway, e2label works fine in the final release of Feisty so whatever the problem was has obviously been fixed. Thanks for your response, Theodore. :) I was beginning to get lonely. ;) -- e2label appears to be broken in Feisty Herd 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86114 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86114] e2label appears to be broken in Feisty Herd 4
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Feisty Fawn - Herd 4 - fully updated earlier today (18th February 2007). Self-explanatory terminal input and output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo e2label /dev/hda11 Password: e2label: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hda11 Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. The ext3 partition label for /dev/hda11 is 'Gentoo'. I have about a half-dozen distros on different partitions on this laptop and the others report (or change) the partition labels without difficulty. This error message is wrong, and Gentoo boots up and works fine. ;) I don't know whether this is related, but when I do 'sudo /etc/init.d/dbus restart' to deal with the issue of mounted volumes that won't appear on my desktop* the volumes appear but labelled hda1, hda2, etc rather than with my partition labels. Again the other distros are behaving properly. * This seems to be a bug that, unlike the e2label one, has been aired on UbuntuForums. I don't know whether it has been reported or not. I'll search for it and if not put in a report myself. ProblemType: Bug Date: Sun Feb 18 20:09:32 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux sony-feisty 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: - Ubuntu Feisty Fawn - Herd 4 - fully updated earlier today (16th February + Ubuntu Feisty Fawn - Herd 4 - fully updated earlier today (18th February 2007). Self-explanatory terminal input and output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo e2label /dev/hda11 Password: e2label: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hda11 Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. The ext3 partition label for /dev/hda11 is 'Gentoo'. I have about a half-dozen distros on different partitions on this laptop and the others report (or change) the partition labels without difficulty. This error message is wrong, and Gentoo boots up and works fine. ;) I don't know whether this is related, but when I do 'sudo /etc/init.d/dbus restart' to deal with the issue of mounted volumes that won't appear on my desktop* the volumes appear but labelled hda1, hda2, etc rather than with my partition labels. Again the other distros are behaving properly. * This seems to be a bug that, unlike the e2label one, has been aired on UbuntuForums. I don't know whether it has been reported or not. I'll search for it and if not put in a report myself. ProblemType: Bug Date: Sun Feb 18 20:09:32 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux sony-feisty 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux -- e2label appears to be broken in Feisty Herd 4 https://launchpad.net/bugs/86114 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 86114] Re: e2label appears to be broken in Feisty Herd 4
** Description changed: Ubuntu Feisty Fawn - Herd 4 - fully updated earlier today (18th February 2007). Self-explanatory terminal input and output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo e2label /dev/hda11 Password: e2label: No such file or directory while trying to open /dev/hda11 Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock. The ext3 partition label for /dev/hda11 is 'Gentoo'. I have about a half-dozen distros on different partitions on this laptop and the others report (or change) the partition labels without difficulty. This error message is wrong, and Gentoo boots up and works fine. ;) I don't know whether this is related, but when I do 'sudo /etc/init.d/dbus restart' to deal with the issue of mounted volumes that - won't appear on my desktop* the volumes appear but labelled hda1, hda2, - etc rather than with my partition labels. Again the other distros are - behaving properly. + won't appear on my desktop or in the Places menu (bug #73227) the + volumes appear but labelled hda1, hda2, etc rather than with my + partition labels. Someone mentioned this in bug #73227. The other gnome + distros on this machine do show the partition labels correctly. - * This seems to be a bug that, unlike the e2label one, has been aired on - UbuntuForums. I don't know whether it has been reported or not. I'll - search for it and if not put in a report myself. ProblemType: Bug Date: Sun Feb 18 20:09:32 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux sony-feisty 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux -- e2label appears to be broken in Feisty Herd 4 https://launchpad.net/bugs/86114 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
