[Bug 986841] Re: Debug log created by Adobe Reader browser plugin (nppdf.so)
Thanks Jeffery, The edit in post #3 is working here. I used chmod to the .so file then let my user ID edit the file and chmod back to 644. For some reason Okteta as root was slow slow slow. As a test I booted to an older partition with Ubuntu 12.04. Started Firefox - no bug file on desktop. Ran update-manager. Started Firefox - with just home page, no pdfs loading and the bug file appeared on the desktop. Bug also present on my spouse's laptop. Fix worked there too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986841 Title: Debug log created by Adobe Reader browser plugin (nppdf.so) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/adobe-isv/+bug/986841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969359] Re: [keyboard]: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu (and blinking numlock)
Follow up observations patch applied on 11-30 (post #140) This is for a remote PC I connect to via VNC over SSH. tightvnc. I don't see it often. Today was first time in 3 weeks. User has trouble getting photos from camera. Initial cpu load around 30% - things look good. PC uptime is 2 hours - from TOP number 3 in TIME is gnome-settings-. Why so high? Caps lock came on once while I was connected. We share a gedit screen for text back and forth. Strange bug still though. When connecting an SD card reader or pen-drive it takes 5 minutes for nautilus to see it. From the CLI # ls /media shows if very fast, but as empty. While waiting out the card reader the cpu load zooms up to 250% and stays there. May not be related but I should mention it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969359 Title: [keyboard]: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu (and blinking numlock) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/969359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969359] Re: [keyboard]: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu (and blinking numlock)
I just installed the i386 ...06 deb on a friend's PC with the problem. Before the install cpu load was like 6.x or 7.x now it's like 0.3 Hope the bug stays dead. Thanks for the package. Will post back only if the bug returns. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969359 Title: [keyboard]: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu (and blinking numlock) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/969359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969359] Re: [keyboard]: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu (and blinking numlock)
I'm fighting this bug too. Tried the fix in #85 but bug came back again. So I'm back here again. Tried the fix of uncheck remember-numlock-state cpu load dropped from 5.0 to under 1.0 and system seems fine now. Could be a hardware issue. The user has a replacement keyboard. Don't know what she did with her original Dell keyboard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969359 Title: [keyboard]: gnome-settings-daemon consumes 100% cpu (and blinking numlock) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/969359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032456] Re: Canon inkjets (and some other printers) print only half of the last page after 20120801 upgrade to v1.5.3-0ubuntu2
Another test: Canon i560 still working for me with ...4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032456 Title: Canon inkjets (and some other printers) print only half of the last page after 20120801 upgrade to v1.5.3-0ubuntu2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1032456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032456] Re: Canon inkjets (and some other printers) print only half of the last page after 20120801 upgrade to v1.5.3-0ubuntu2
Just used synaptic package manager to download and install cups (1.5.3-0ubuntu3) in Ubuntu 12.04 Now my Canon i560 prints full page again. Thank You! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032456 Title: Canon inkjets (and some other printers) print only half of the last page after 20120801 upgrade to v1.5.3-0ubuntu2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1032456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781931] Re: New windows are moved to front but don't take focus
Bug affects me in Gnome Classic (No Effects) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781931 Title: New windows are moved to front but don't take focus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/781931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781931] Re: New windows are moved to front but don't take focus
Should mention Ubuntu 12.04 - 64 bit - all updates I've seen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781931 Title: New windows are moved to front but don't take focus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/781931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 489830] Re: Settings of gpointing-device-settings are non-persistent
Thank you Alex Burfee (joop-wow) I've had this bug since gnome3/unity 11.04. In 12.04 beta 1 there is a new version of gpointing-device-settings 1.5.1-6 and the bug is still there. Thanks to Alex I have a fix - I posted it in ubuntuforums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1941067 basically just xinput edits in a script with a little more how to automate it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489830 Title: Settings of gpointing-device-settings are non-persistent To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpointing-device-settings/+bug/489830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771252] Re: settings are lost after reboot
Affects me too on Ubuntu 11.10 and on Fedora 16 After reboot settings are ignored Hack: Open settings - turn off wheel emulation close settings Open settings - turn on wheel emulation Then it's working again --- until the next reboot. :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771252 Title: settings are lost after reboot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpointing-device-settings/+bug/771252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
OK - more tests I downloaded 11.04 alpha 1 from http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/natty/alpha1 Date stamp is Dec 3. Kernel is 2.6.37-7-generic Bug persists - random assignment of drives as sda or sdb (unity will be interesting - gets to desktop fast) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 Title: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Ubuntu 10.04 RC System has two hard drives. 15 partitions on SATA 1TB drive. 12 partitions on ATA/IDE 120GB drive. Each boot U1004RC assigns random drive letters. 1TB to sda or maybe 1TB to sdb. My large Data partition on sda5 shows as sdb5 often, about 30% of the time on boot. So I changed /etc/fstab to use UUID for all partitions. Still this happens. I play with lots of Linux OS (27 partitions, 3 for Data). I have not seen this anywhere but 10.04. The truly maddening part is root always shows as /dev/sda11, but if Data shows as sdb5 then changes made to root are stored in /dev/sdb11 not /dev/sda11 ! The first step each boot is a terminal window and 'df' to see if the drives are backwards again. And I changed the desktop background as an obvious error flag. Expected: each boot the drives always have the same device ID Seen: random assignment of sda, sdb + --- + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) + Package: linux (not installed) + ProcEnviron: + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_US.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + Tags: maverick + Uname: Linux 2.6.37-020637rc2-generic x86_64 + UnreportableReason: The running kernel is not an Ubuntu kernel + UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom david david4schwab dialout dip fax floppy fuse joyce lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare tape video -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 Title: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
Hi Jeremy, I don't mind helping, but I'm at the level I need much more detailed instructions. I didn't see how to use your links. I have 10.10 and installed and booted kernel 2.6.37-rc2. The problem still exists. I did not see where to download a 11.04 alpha version. If you want me to test that please give me a link to download the iso. Thanks, David -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 Title: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
Hi Fabio, I'm using Ubuntu 10.10 now. I still use UUID like I explained before like #5 above. For a test in Ubuntu 10.10 I rebooted the PC 10 times and checked $ df /dev/sda - 4 times /dev/sdb - 6 times On my PC /dev/sda is more likely after a cold boot after the hard drives have stopped spinning. On a personal note this is not a problem for me. I just learned a different way. -- 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
My explanation looks fuzzy. I was checking in df to see which drive / root was on. -- 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573354] Re: qcad-data required for working font for dimensions
me too! I vote for having Synaptics automatically install qcad-data with qcad so dimension lines can be displayed. I installed qcad in April so maybe this is already fixed. I just used qcad on Ubuntu 10.04 for the first time and the problem showed up. I downloaded qcad-data and the dimensions in a saved file suddenly appear. -- qcad-data required for working font for dimensions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
I'm using totally UUID for fstab etc. No issues there for me. I learned how to use script commands like: tune2fs -c -1 -i 3m -L 1TB_09 /dev/disk/by-uuid/dd6032a7-02ec-4b78-afff-8c5795345667 where before I used: tune2fs -c -1 -i 3m -L 1TB_09 /dev/sda9 To spin down the second drive for energy and noise: hdparm -y /dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD1200BB-53CAA0_WD-WMA8C1772952 where before I used: hdparm -y /dev/sdb The panel's sensors applet to measure HDD temps remains broken. I don't see the fix for that yet. Mathieu31, since the issues are after GRUB maybe this link can help you troubleshoot. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GRUB2#Combining_the_use_of_UUID.27s_and_basic_scripting Since hitting GRUB2 I just chmod /boot/grub/grub.cfg and manually edit it, careful to keep a backup of my revised /boot/grub/grub.cfg because it can and does get overwritten without permission on new kernels. -- 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
** Attachment added: fstab http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45329046/fstab -- 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] Re: 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
Thanks Dave. I'm attaching fstab. I am using only UUID since seeing this issue. 10 boots found my /Data on sda 6 times sdb 4 times. In rc.local I have: # Spins down the sdb drive - to be quieter and save energy hdparm -y /dev/sdb That is now broken. I will write a script that finds /Data then spins down the other drive. Can I use udev rules to always have sda assigned to my 1TB drive? I'll explore it. Sidebar: fstab said Use 'blkid -o value -s UUID' - that gives a list of 25 UUIDs with no partition locations. I prefer 'ls -l /dev/disk/by- uuid/' to see which UUID with which partition. David -- 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569645] [NEW] 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 10.04 RC System has two hard drives. 15 partitions on SATA 1TB drive. 12 partitions on ATA/IDE 120GB drive. Each boot U1004RC assigns random drive letters. 1TB to sda or maybe 1TB to sdb. My large Data partition on sda5 shows as sdb5 often, about 30% of the time on boot. So I changed /etc/fstab to use UUID for all partitions. Still this happens. I play with lots of Linux OS (27 partitions, 3 for Data). I have not seen this anywhere but 10.04. The truly maddening part is root always shows as /dev/sda11, but if Data shows as sdb5 then changes made to root are stored in /dev/sdb11 not /dev/sda11 ! The first step each boot is a terminal window and 'df' to see if the drives are backwards again. And I changed the desktop background as an obvious error flag. Expected: each boot the drives always have the same device ID Seen: random assignment of sda, sdb ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 543131] [NEW] 10.04 install - grub to partition - drill down not selecting
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity When installing Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 1 to /dev/sda11 using [Advanced] to select the location for GRUB the drill down shows/offers all the partitions, but when clicking on the drill down list for /dev/sda11 the text box remains /dev/sda it does not show /dev/sda11 which is what I expect. I can type /dev/sda11 and install GRUB to /dev/sda11. The bug is that in the past the drill down let me select the location for GRUB now it only lists the partitions and ignores my choice. I can only attach one log file not the two that are requested. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 10.04 install - grub to partition - drill down not selecting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441907] Re: grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1)
My observation: When I install Ubuntu 9.10 (Grub2) to hdb the PC cannot boot. The bios goes to the first grub line, maybe it's Grub Loading and dies. The bios lets me choose which hard drive I boot from. If I tell the bios to boot from hdb then I get an old grub legacy menu. My conclusion is that Ubuntu has split Grub2 between hda and hdb and Grub2 cannot deal with that. I look forward to trying Fedora. -- grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441907] Re: grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1)
Same problem with 9.10 RC. Installed to sdb6 --- cannot boot PC. Fix was to install again the second time to sda7 and now it can boot -- grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435027] Re: mountall does not mount all swap partitions
Installed 9.10 RC Both swap partitions are used (sda2 and sdb2 each 2GB) :) -- mountall does not mount all swap partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441907] Re: grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1)
grub2 CAN boot when installed on other than first partition. I'm doing exactly that. It works fine installed to my sda7. This bug is about not being able to install and boot on sdb7. ** Summary changed: - grub2 not properly installed when using other-than-first partition on a drive + grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1) -- grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435027] Re: mountall does not mount all swap partitions
OUCH! Now that partition will no longer boot. I used Synaptic to add the ppa, saw the new version for mountall and installed it. Before reboot I ran the mountall --debug command. Do you want all 288 lines? the last line was mountpoint_ready: / Want a grep filter of it? I edited out all but / in /etc/fstab but it still will not boot. In an hour I take off for a two week vacation. Sorry about the timing. I cannot test until I get back but I can post the mountall.log if you want it. -- mountall does not mount all swap partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435027] Re: mountall does not mount all swap partitions
OK Scott It's on the attachment I hope. Reviewing /etc/fstab to try to get it to boot again I saw I had swap sdb2 commented out at the time. ** Attachment added: mountall.log before new mountall http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5757/mountall.log -- mountall does not mount all swap partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435027 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441907] [NEW] grub2 cannot boot partition on sdb (hd1)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 Ubuntu 9.10 Beta on a Dell E520N desktop grub2 installs to hd0 grub2 can boot partitions on hd0 when installed to hd0 (i.e. sda5 works fine) grub2 dies like a brick when Ubuntu 9.10 is installed to a partition on hd1 Super Grub Disk cannot recover it. To get back I install again this time to hd0. I can clone the partition (cp -a) from hd0 to hd1 then edit /boot/grub/grub.cfg to list the right UUID and hd1 partition and it boots to hd1. (I also edit /etc/fstab of the clone.) It's just the install that kills the PC. I see grub-install (hd0) displayed during installation. Expected results: install Ubuntu 9.10 to sdb6 and boot with Grub2 Results seen (and repeated): install to sdb6 then on reboot Grub2 dies, never even a menu, no grub prompt, nothing. I use two hard drives with Linux OS partitions on both. My work-around is to keep an empty partition on hd0 install to it then cp -a to move it over to hd1. Creates new problem of /boot/grub/grub.cfg is stuck on hd0. ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- grub2 cannot boot partition on sdb (hd1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441907 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441931] [NEW] fstab only mounts one swap partition - 9.10 Beta
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 9.10 Beta Two swap partitions sda2 and sdb2 Only one gets mounted at boot, sdb2 swapon /dev/sdb2 --- shows mounted swapon /dev/sda2 --- mounts second swap Ubuntu 9.04 always mounted both no problem If I comment out sdb2 in /etc/fstab then sda2 gets mounted OK. So it seems only the last swap listed in /etc/fstab is acknowledged Tested with UUID and /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2 in /etc/fstab --- still only one gets used Similar to bug 435027 ? - maybe but doesn't look like it to me. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fstab only mounts one swap partition - 9.10 Beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305664] Re: gnome-terminal keyboard shortcuts don't allow change
My bad. In Ubuntu 7.04 to change the keyboard shortcut for Action Copy you can click on the word Copy and it asks for the new shortcut. In Ubuntu 8.10 if you click on Copy nothing. I finally discovered that now the user cannot click on Copy but must click on the shortcut key field. The bug is just that changing the user interface created confusion. I did test with two new users. Both work now that I know the new method. Thanks Pedro. -- gnome-terminal keyboard shortcuts don't allow change https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305664] [NEW] gnome-terminal keyboard shortcuts don't allow change
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal In gnome-terminal could not get keyboard shortcuts to accept changes. Changes are ignored. My fix was to edit using gconf-editor. Change /apps/gnome-terminal/keybindings and change the fields there (copy, paste was all I wanted to change, but was not allowed to from just gnome-terminal) Default installation does not have directory ~/.gconf/apps/gnome-terminal/keybindings needs also it's one file %gconf.xml. Without that cannot edit keyboard shortcuts. After gconf-editor the directory and file exists. Request: in creating the user account also create the missing keybindings file so edits are possible. Ubuntu 8.10 (I think I also saw this problem in 8.04) ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-terminal keyboard shortcuts don't allow change https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
OK I've learned it's not a bug but a feature! You cannot add a menu so you can turn on the items under the menu without first turning on at least one of the items under the menu. Or in my specific case to turn on the System Tools menu I must first turn on an item in that menu (i.e. Root Terminal). Then System Tools menu turns itself on. I expected to add the menu then turn on items in the menu. This fails big time. I don't like this feature but now I understand it. -- menu editor won't accept changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
This error is in 7.10 final as well. See this forum post http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=604877 My work-around was editing out a NOT line in /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu This a bug in the logic of nesting files for local and global controls. Alacarte is Broken as it currently is released. Upgrades may not see this error, New installs will. -- menu editor won't accept changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
Confirming the error is still there in 7.10 final release The error also occurs for users that ARE in the admin group. -- menu editor won't accept changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96706] Re: menu editor won't accept changes
I'm getting this error in 7.10 Beta It is not consistent. I can add items like Applications - Accessories - File Browser and it works. The menu shows it. But I cannot add Applications - System Tools. Not as root, as system admin, as terminal running sudo alacarte. It seems to allow executable items to be added but not submenus. I tried to create a new submenu and it refuses that to. -- menu editor won't accept changes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 146369] USB keyboard not available at 7.10 Beta LiveCD boot menu
Public bug reported: Just downloaded and tried the 7.10 Beta Live CD desktop i386 My Dell-Ubuntu E520n has only a USB keyboard. The boot menu ignores the keyboard until X loads. SuSE 10.2 and Mandravia 2007 have this problem. For some good clues see Mandriva threads: http://mandrivausers.org/index.php?showtopic=42341 http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=31630 SuSE forums also discuss this problem. Ubuntu 7.04 does not have this problem, new to 7.10 Beta. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- USB keyboard not available at 7.10 Beta LiveCD boot menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
