[Bug 887331] Re: file-roller cannot open filetypes with derived mimetypes (e.g. epub and ods files)
Old bug, just tripped me up after upgrading to Ubuntu 17.10, now can't open a .epub file but I can open it via a link (ln -s xyz.epub xyz.tgz). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887331 Title: file-roller cannot open filetypes with derived mimetypes (e.g. epub and ods files) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/887331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437862] Re: pg_upgradecluster fails: "could not get cluster locales"
This bug prevents me upgrading from 9.5 -> 9.6.
I tried both workarounds suggested above:
Edited /usr/bin/pg_upgradecluster changing lines 333 and 354 of that script
from:
push @argv, ('-t', '5') if $version >= '8.4';
to
push @argv, ('-t', '30') if $version >= '8.4';
which was my guessed change based on comment #4 above: the posted link is
broken.
I re-ran pg_upgradecluster but it crashed with the same error, and within less
than a second of starting which suggests to me this isn't a timeout issue in my
case.
Also checked my postgresql.conf file IAW comment #5 above, my port line
was already uncommented.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437862
Title:
pg_upgradecluster fails: "could not get cluster locales"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-common/+bug/1437862/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1183692] Re: Not enough disk space for kernel security update on /boot
Agree with the above. There should be a simple, foolproof-as-possible way to manage boot device free space. I am currently trying to rescue my wife's computer from an incomplete 14.04LTS -> 16.04LTS upgrade that has failed near the end because it ran out of space on /boot. THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN! Maybe I should have known to check for adequate free space on /boot before doing an upgrade, but if I should have known that, so should the upgrader and it should have checked and warned me BEFORE STARTING the upgrade! Ideally the upgrade process should offer the option of clearing out old kernels (there were only 2 there apart from the one in use) before proceeding. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1183692 Title: Not enough disk space for kernel security update on /boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1183692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169054] Re: Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does not remove user from nopasswdlogin group
Problem still present in 14.04 LTS A family member inadvertently changed their User Account to Login without password and subsequently I was unable to revert this change until I discovered the nopasswdlogin group and manually removed them from that group. ** Summary changed: - Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does remove user from nopasswdlogin group + Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does not remove user from nopasswdlogin group -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169054 Title: Disabling then Re-Enabling login without password does not remove user from nopasswdlogin group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/1169054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1380084] Re: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
I forgot to mention: uname -a Linux robs-tosh-L50-a 3.13.0-40-generic #69-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 13 17:53:56 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ssh -V OpenSSH_6.6.1p1 Ubuntu-2ubuntu2, OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380084 Title: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1380084/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1380084] Re: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
This bug has hit me quite hard in the last week, breaking a number of automated ssh processes that have been working without a hitch prior to sometime after Monday evening (8 December, UTC+8) this week. I can pin it down to that because each Monday and Friday evening I use a scripted ssh tunnel to connect a pgAdmin III client to a remote Postgres database. It worked last Monday, it didn't in between. Sometime after Monday this week, other ssh processes also broke. I'm providing this info in case it helps someone pin down what changed to cause this problem. I'm surprised it's only flagged as affecting 4 people! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380084 Title: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1380084/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1380084] Re: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
Also (because it is a different result from one posted earlier):
echo ${SSH_AUTH_SOCK}
/run/user/1000/keyring-X8I7Ly/ssh
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380084
Title:
SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't
use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1380084/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1380084] Re: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
Also (because it is a different result from one posted earlier):
echo ${SSH_AUTH_SOCK}
/run/user/1000/keyring-X8I7Ly/ssh
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380084
Title:
SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't
use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1380084/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1380084] Re: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
This bug has hit me quite hard in the last week, breaking a number of automated ssh processes that have been working without a hitch prior to sometime after Monday evening (8 December, UTC+8) this week. I can pin it down to that because each Monday and Friday evening I use a scripted ssh tunnel to connect a pgAdmin III client to a remote Postgres database. It worked last Monday, it didn't in between. Sometime after Monday this week, other ssh processes also broke. I'm providing this info in case it helps someone pin down what changed to cause this problem. I'm surprised it's only flagged as affecting 4 people! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380084 Title: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1380084/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1380084] Re: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0
I forgot to mention: uname -a Linux robs-tosh-L50-a 3.13.0-40-generic #69-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 13 17:53:56 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ssh -V OpenSSH_6.6.1p1 Ubuntu-2ubuntu2, OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380084 Title: SSH client requires SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 will not work without it, can't use key auth without SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1380084/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314739] Re: Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04
Many thanks Brian for pointing this out. For anyone else who finds this via a search engine, I fixed my problem with the help of some information from http://askubuntu.com/questions/202730/how-to-fix-the- unable-to-calculate-upgrade-issue-when-upgrading-from-12-04-to. Specifically I executed: sudo apt-get remove xserver-xorg-video-* to remove an XVideo driver that was blocking my upgrade. After this I was able to complete a successful upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314739 Title: Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1314739/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314739] [NEW] Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04
Public bug reported: When I execute: sudo do-release-upgrade in the terminal, it gets to the point where it says: Calculating the changes Calculating the changes and then says: An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. As none of the above applies, I'm mystified as to why this is happening. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.205.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-19.33-generic 3.11.10.5 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu Date: Thu May 1 01:34:17 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-08-29 (609 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120823.1) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2014-04-30 (0 days ago) ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade saucy third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314739 Title: Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1314739/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314739] Re: Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04
I just noticed that the debugging info above suggests I updated to Saucy yesterday. This is incorrect. Looking at my apt logs, I have installed Saucy back in October 2013. In case it is relevant, I have changed computers since. My current spindle (an SSD) was in my old notebook computer which developed intermittent hardware faults so I purchased a new notebook in March this year and simply moved the SSD into the new notebook. Perhaps this (or the intermittent hardware faults) have contributed to/caused my current upgrade problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314739 Title: Unable to upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1314739/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1225281] Re: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set in the environment.
Subtle variation, but also occurs when you sudo su and then try and run gedit. ** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1225281 Title: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set in the environment. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1225281/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248684] Re: gnome-system-log crashed during start
I created a filter using a Regex expression. Following this, gnome- system-log crashes each time I try to start it, with the following error message: (gnome-system-log:6811): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: g_menu_item_set_detailed_action: Detailed action name 'win.filter_Vesper Marine' has invalid format My filter was simply this: (?i)vesper I don't do much Regex and I was trying to do a case-insensitive search. Anyway, hopefully this will help developers to reproduce the but. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248684 Title: gnome-system-log crashed during start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-log/+bug/1248684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1157318] Re: Login error in CUPS when adding a printer (or other admin procedure)
I believe I have the same issue, I have package cups 1.6.2-1ubuntu5. When I try and do any admin task via the web interface, I get: E [15/Sep/2013:18:51:03 +0800] [Client 11] Unknown MD5 username rob In my cupsd.conf file, I have the following (relevant bits only): DefaultAuthType BasicDigest (this machine is visible on a domestic LAN only) Require user @lpadmin (in various locations that previously had require user @SYSTEM) I've tried the workarounds mentioned above, but these have not fixed the problem for me. In /var/log/kern.log, I'm seeing lots of the following: Sep 15 18:50:25 robs-computer kernel: [ 3865.265435] type=1400 audit(1379242225.411:40): apparmor=STATUS operation=profile_replace name=/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf pid=18814 comm=apparmor_parser Sep 15 18:50:25 robs-computer kernel: [ 3865.265732] type=1400 audit(1379242225.411:41): apparmor=STATUS operation=profile_replace name=/usr/sbin/cupsd pid=18814 comm=apparmor_parser -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1157318 Title: Login error in CUPS when adding a printer (or other admin procedure) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1157318/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165104] Re: oneconf is only showing the pc you are on in raring and isn't sharing to other machines
I too have this problem. I am very new to oneconf and thought I'd use it to migrate installed apps from my wife's old computer to her new one. After finding the problem described by this bug in the GUI, I thought I'd try the command line to link the two computers. Firstly, each computer seems to have its own oneconf inventory (using the same Ubuntu One login). If I execute: oneconf-query --list --hosts on each computer, it returns a single unique ID and the correct host name for that computer - I believe it should return both?? If I look at the One Google Account Apps information (https://login.ubuntu.com/+applications), I see both computers listed. However, I tried to execute the following on the old computer: kaye@kayes-old-computer:~$ oneconf-query --share-inventory --hostid=ID- of-new-computer and it threw an exception - see attached traceback. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165104 Title: oneconf is only showing the pc you are on in raring and isn't sharing to other machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oneconf/+bug/1165104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165104] Re: oneconf is only showing the pc you are on in raring and isn't sharing to other machines
Sorry, should have attached this to the previous comment. ** Attachment added: Oneconf exception traceback https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oneconf/+bug/1165104/+attachment/3759813/+files/oneconf-exception-traceback.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165104 Title: oneconf is only showing the pc you are on in raring and isn't sharing to other machines To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oneconf/+bug/1165104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1206952] Re: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD)
This was posted automatically when the install process crashed. It asked me for the log but said it would include the user password, so I declined. Where do I find the install log? I could edit it to obfuscate the password. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206952 Title: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1206952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1206952] [NEW] Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD)
Public bug reported: Trying to install fresh 13.04 onto a machine with a 128G SSD and 2 x 1TB HDD in hardware RAID0. I'm trying to get the OS onto LVM partitions on the SSD (just using the generic LVM install from the checkbox on the relevant dialog in the Install Wizard) and plan to use the HDDs for data etc, but I keep getting this Grub error. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: ubiquity 2.14.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.331 Date: Wed Jul 31 22:59:17 2013 InstallCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring ubiquity-2.14.6 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206952 Title: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1206952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1206952] Re: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD)
As I noted in my comments, I did NOT wish to install to the RAID HDDs, the Ubuntu Installer did that. I specifically selected /dev/sdc (an SSD) as my installation target during setup. I think there is a valid bug here as the Installer tried to put Grub on a different drive from the one that I'd targeted for the OS to be installed on. I note this was a straight, vanilla (apart from the LVM option) install of Ubuntu 13.04 onto a single SSD. Specifically, this was NOT dual boot. Also, not sure what you mean by fakeraid. This is a Hardware RAID set up using the motherboard hdd controller. Are you saying it's not a real RAID controller and that I should use the Linux SW RAID instead? ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206952 Title: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1206952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1206952] Re: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD)
Hi Phillip, Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I didn't choose to have grub installed anywhere. Unless I missed something, that's not an option you're given in the basic install process. Neither should it be, asking the average punter where they'd like grub installed would confuse them mightily! Phillip Susi ps...@ubuntu.com wrote: According to the logs you selected /dev/sda, which is the default. Do not confuse the selection of where to install the system to with the selection for where to install grub to. The two can be different. If your bios is set to boot from the ssd ( /dev/sdc ) then you need to make sure to select that drive from the drop down list for where to install grub, not just assign the root filesystem to a partition on that disk. Yes, I am saying it is not a real raid controller and you are better off using Linux SW raid instead, unless you must dual boot with Windows, which does not understand Linux SW raid, but does understand the fake raid. See http://wiki.ubuntu.com/FakeRaidHowto for more information. ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206952 Title: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD) Status in “grub-installer” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Trying to install fresh 13.04 onto a machine with a 128G SSD and 2 x 1TB HDD in hardware RAID0. I'm trying to get the OS onto LVM partitions on the SSD (just using the generic LVM install from the checkbox on the relevant dialog in the Install Wizard) and plan to use the HDDs for data etc, but I keep getting this Grub error. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: ubiquity 2.14.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.331 Date: Wed Jul 31 22:59:17 2013 InstallCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true persistent file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1206952/+subscriptions Cheers, Rob Hills -- Sent from my Android phone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206952 Title: Fresh install 13.04 from Live usb stick to SSD (with 2 x RAID0 HDD) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1206952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 857824] Re: Wishlist: Update to Unison 2.40.63
I don't believe this is a duplicate as this bug report refers specifically to Oneiric. Bug #769479 has resulted in the latest stable version of Unison (2.40.63) being made available in Precise, but it remains unavailable in Oneiric. This creates a problem for people like me who need to sync between one machine running Precise and another running Oneiric. I suggest fixing this problem by keeping the existing default Unison package in Oneiric at 2.32.52, and adding an extra package unison-2.40. This will allow people to update their unison if they want to without adversely affecting people who are happy with version 2.32.52. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 769479 Unison version not up-to-date -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857824 Title: Wishlist: Update to Unison 2.40.63 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unison/+bug/857824/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 857824] Re: Wishlist: Update to Unison 2.40.63
While people wouldn't often need 2.32 AND 2.40 together, they may well require one of the two because unison will only work if it is the same version on both computers that are being synchronised. Hence, at present, if one of those computers is running Oneiric and the other is running Precise, you can't use Unison to sync between them unless you install Unison version 2.32 on the machine running Precise, hence missing out on the significant improvements with version 2.40, AND not being able to sync with other machines running Precise unless they also downgrade Unison. I'll look at the Backports stuff and see what I can do. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857824 Title: Wishlist: Update to Unison 2.40.63 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unison/+bug/857824/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044795] [NEW] requestbackport tool missing from ubuntu-dev-tools package for Oneiric
Public bug reported: The Ubuntu Backports Wiki (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports) says: The Ubuntu Backporters team recommends using the requestbackport tool in the ubuntu-dev-tools package to file backport requests I have installed ubuntu-dev-tools package (on an Oneiric system via sudo apt-get install ubuntu-dev-tools). However, I can't find the requestbackport tool, and it's not mentioned in the package info in the Ubuntu Software Centre. Is the Wiki out of sync with the package, or am I missing something really obvious here? I have of course tried entering the command requestbackport in a terminal and also man requestbackport returns no manual entry for requestbackport whereas man backportpackage pulls up that package's man page. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044795 Title: requestbackport tool missing from ubuntu-dev-tools package for Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1044795/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533276] Re: Fails to enable Make Startup Disk button
Not sure why this bug seems to have languished. It's biting me today, as it seems to do episodically for no obvious reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533276 Title: Fails to enable Make Startup Disk button To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/533276/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945285] Re: Installation failed creating USB Boot of Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 1
I have been getting a similar problem: Could not move syslinux files in /media/0434-37D2: [Errno 39] Directory not empty. Maybe /tmp/tmphQWJSw is not an Ubuntu image? I've been trying to create a Clonezilla Live USB stick via a Ubuntu 11.10 Live boot USB. uname -a : Linux ubuntu 3.0.0-12-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 7 14:56:25 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I've attached my ~/.cache/usb-creator.log ** Attachment added: Error Log file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/945285/+attachment/3280683/+files/usb-creator.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945285 Title: Installation failed creating USB Boot of Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/945285/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884159] Re: cddb not working
I've experienced this problem with 2 CDs today. Both are present in the MusicBrainz database. I suspect the problem is that both CDs have unusual file/partition layouts. One is this one (MusicBrainz link) http://musicbrainz.org/release- group/ca08ae46-d5ce-4587-b3f4-45a532f767b8 . When I insert it into the CD on Ubuntu 11.10, automount pops up 2 mount points, one the usual music CD and the other is named David Hobson (the artist's name) and contains a Windoze executable. From instructions on the CD jacket, one can download an extra song using this. The other CD is Human Nature Counting Down (http://musicbrainz.org/release/0ea44d06-51cb-4f5c-8a4f-87256956b5fe). This CD includes some image files and also causes Ubuntu to create two different Automounts, one for the music and one for the images. Could these atypical CD layouts be tripping up banshee? If a developer needs an .iso of one of these CDs to test with, I can supply. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884159 Title: cddb not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/884159/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884159] Re: cddb not working
Googling this issue shows it's long been a problem for Banshee that seems to reappear intermittently. It would be nice if a permanent workaround could be built in, enabling a user to specify a MusicBrainz URL or an album Catalog number that Banshee could then use to retrieve metadata. Then when Banshee can't retrieve this automatically, at least the user can do something to help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884159 Title: cddb not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/884159/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212681] Re: Add Telstra Bigpond Australian repo
If you try to access http://files.bogpond.com/ in your browser, you are redirected to: http://go.bigpond.com/help/file_library/index.jsp According to that page, Telstra is now providing unmetered access to AARnet mirrors. From my brief exploration, these seem to include Ubuntu mirrors up to the current released version (11.10). So, the information on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/mirror.files.bigpond.com-archive is no longer correct and should probably be deleted or at least updated with a link to the above (bigpond) URL as well as the launchpad page for AARNet: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/mirror.aarnet.edu.au- archive HTH, Rob Hills -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212681 Title: Add Telstra Bigpond Australian repo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/212681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 865470] Re: Oneiric Gnucash crashes on startup: undefined gnc-path-get-bindir
I had the same problem and while the solution posted by mgm eventually helped me to find and fix my problem, it may be a bit terse for some. To spell out what I did to fix this problem in more detail: I looked in /usr/local/lib and found some old Gnucash libraries: ls -al /usr/local/lib/libgnc-* (AFAICT, the gnucash libs seem to start with libgnc-) To prove they're old, I used locate: sudo updatedb locate libgnc- This showed some duplicated libgnc files in /usr/lib/gnucash and /usr/local/lib. Checking the date/time stamps in both places showed the files in /usr/local/lib were older. I then moved the offending files from /usr/local/lib out of the way: sudo mv /usr/local/lib/libgnc-* /tmp After doing this, my Gnucash started working again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865470 Title: Oneiric Gnucash crashes on startup: undefined gnc-path-get-bindir To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/865470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 865470] Re: Oneiric Gnucash crashes on startup: undefined gnc-path-get-bindir
This problem started for me immediately after an update from 11.04 to 11.10. After the OS Upgrade, Gnucash simply stopped working. No error messages or anything, it just wouldn't work. Fortunately, I had the skills to try starting it in a terminal console, see the error message there, google it and find this bug report, interpret mgm's description of the problem and use that to fix my program. I am not sure why this is not considered a bug in the upgrade process. Should it not locate and fix such problems? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865470 Title: Oneiric Gnucash crashes on startup: undefined gnc-path-get-bindir To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/+bug/865470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 758019] Re: wicd doesn't show in the tray
I disagree, I think this *is* a wicd issue. Shouldn't the install process put wicd in the unity systray panel whitelist by default? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758019 Title: wicd doesn't show in the tray -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212681] Re: Add Telstra Bigpond Australian repo
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Add Telstra Bigpond Australian repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 212681] Re: Add Telstra Bigpond Australian repo
Today I tried to add this repository to the URL mentioned in #1 (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors) but it's already there with a status of under review. It would be _extremely_ helpful to a large number of Australian users if this repository could be added, even if it still doesn't contain the multiverse repository. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- Add Telstra Bigpond Australian repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
