[Bug 756317] Re: Captive portals may corrupt apt package lists

2014-03-20 Thread Roberto D'Auria
As I said in a duplicate bug, I think this is a serious issue both from
a user viewpoint (i've seen people switching back to Windows due to this
bug, since a "normal" user doesn't know how to fix this) and a security
viewpoint. The captive portal owner could easily insert a malicious
repository into the APT configuration.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756317

Title:
  Captive portals may corrupt apt package lists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/756317/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 299361] Re: Preload doesn't start because state file has wrong entry.

2012-07-16 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I have the same problem here, on the LTS release (12.04 64bit).
After some time, preload.state gets corrupted, with comments like "line 2693: 
invalid tag". 
Removing the line does not solve the problem, since it leads to other errors. 
The only way to get preload working again
is to remove preload.state.

I think this is a severe bug, for a package shipped with a LTS release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299361

Title:
  Preload doesn't start because state file has wrong entry.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/preload/+bug/299361/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 464157] Re: New upstream version: 0.7.2

2010-01-11 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I contacted the debian maintainer, when it will answer I'll update here.

-- 
New upstream version: 0.7.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 464157] Re: New upstream version: 0.7.2

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Fixed a warning.

** Attachment added: "pykaraoke_0.7.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37680497/pykaraoke_0.7.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
New upstream version: 0.7.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 464157] Re: New upstream version: 0.7.2

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Upgraded it to 7.0.2 for lucid, this is the new diff.gz.

** Attachment added: "pykaraoke_0.7.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37680451/pykaraoke_0.7.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
New upstream version: 0.7.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 350278] Re: kopete-cryptography has broken dependency on libkleo4

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Fixed it rebuilding. Here's the debdiff.

** Attachment added: "debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37680142/debdiff

-- 
kopete-cryptography has broken dependency on libkleo4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350278
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492865] Re: python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Here's the debdiff for Karmic

** Attachment added: "karmic_debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37679164/karmic_debdiff

-- 
python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492865] Re: python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Fixed. :D

** Attachment added: "debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37678598/debdiff

-- 
python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492865] Re: python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Here's the debdiff.

** Attachment added: "debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37678557/debdiff

-- 
python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 492865] Re: python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist

2010-01-10 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Fixed with a rebuild, now it should be OK.

** Attachment added: "soya_0.14-4build1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37678396/soya_0.14-4build1.diff.gz

-- 
python-soya has unmetdeps; libode0debian1 doesn't exist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-09 Thread Roberto D'Auria

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37653391/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-09 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I fixed many lintian info and warnings, too.

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-09 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I fixed it adding a script for converting .py files to UNIX mode in rules. 
All the patches are fixed, too.

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37649799/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-08 Thread Roberto D'Auria
It isn't the patch. Download the upstream source code and open a file (I
just tried "start.py") with an editor like "vi" or "geany", with end-
lines visualization active. You'll see it shows a ^M after every line,
and is this causing bash to fail on "#!/usr/bin/python^M". It's an
uptream issue, they're using MS-DOS mode and it can't work on Ubuntu
without a fix.

Please, let me know how to proceed. For the other issue ('fake'
patches), I already resolved.

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-08 Thread Roberto D'Auria
There's a problem: the source code is all encoded in MS-DOS mode (CR LF
instead of LF), and without switching to UNIX mode exec or the bash
itself don't recognize the interpreter. The old (1.6.3) source code was
encoded in UNIX mode.

bash: ./start.py: /usr/bin/python^M: bad interpreter: No such file or
directory

How should I act on this? re-encode the original source code file-by-
file?

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-08 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Sorry, it's my first package update. I did it another time, following your 
hints. These are the steps I've done:
- download the new source, extracted and renamed the archive to 
openrpg_1.7.1.orig.tar.gz
- apt-get source openrpg, for the old source + diff.gz
- copied the old debian/ dir
- dch -i and edited the changelog
So, I removed old patches and re-created them with quilt inserting only 
required changes.
Then, `quilt pop -a` and `debuild -S -sa`. The generated diff.gz is attached to 
this comment.

Am I doing something wrong? What the 'non-sense' lines are?

I hope this is right.

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37619842/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504786] Re: DRI not working on ATI 3D Rage Pro 215GP

2010-01-08 Thread Roberto D'Auria

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37617221/Xorg.0.log

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37617222/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37617223/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
DRI not working on ATI 3D Rage Pro 215GP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504786
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504786] [NEW] DRI not working on ATI 3D Rage Pro 215GP

2010-01-08 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-mach64

$ lspci | grep Rage
02:0c.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro 215GP (rev 
5c)

The first problem i noticed is (from Xorg.0.log)
(II) MACH64(0): Using Mach64 accelerator CRTC.
(II) MACH64(0): Storing hardware cursor image at 0xFD3FFC00.
(II) MACH64(0): Using 8 MB linear aperture at 0xFD00.
(!!) MACH64(0): Virtual resolutions will be limited to 4095 kB
 due to linear aperture size and/or placement of hardware cursor image area.
(WW) MACH64(0): Cannot shadow an accelerated frame buffer.


I don't know why aperture size is limited. Any idea?

Anyway, 4095 kB should be enough for 800x600 at 16bit of depth, so I
write this resolution on xorg.conf and it goes on, but...

drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
[drm] failed to load kernel module "mach64"
(EE) [drm] drmOpen failed.
(EE) MACH64(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit Failed

So:
(II) MACH64(0): Direct rendering disabled

I don't have any "mach64.ko" or similar on my system, but xserver-xorg-
video-mach64 is obviously installed.

$ locate mach64
/usr/lib/directfb-1.2-0/gfxdrivers/libdirectfb_mach64.so
/usr/lib/dri/mach64_dri.so
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/mach64_drv.so
[...] (nothing useful, only doc and a mach64.h in kernel source package)

The video card works well, but there's no way to enable DRI.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Jan  8 15:36:46 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 6.8.2-1
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-17.54-generic-pae
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-mach64
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-17-generic-pae i686

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
DRI not working on ATI 3D Rage Pro 215GP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504786
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-06 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Fixed python_intepreter_path.

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37517545/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2010-01-06 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I removed the patches already applied upstream. This is the new diff.

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37514725/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2009-12-31 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I can't work on this for a little cause I'm on holidays, next week I'll
test it more carefully.

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2009-12-31 Thread Roberto D'Auria
fixed diff.gz

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37322749/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2009-12-30 Thread Roberto D'Auria
debdiff between openrpg_1.6.3-1.1ubuntu1.dsc and
openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.dsc

** Attachment added: "debdiff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37299104/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 177560] Re: OpenRPG current version is out of date.

2009-12-30 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I've updated this from upstream
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/openrpg/files/), please review.

** Attachment added: "openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37298738/openrpg_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz

-- 
OpenRPG current version is out of date.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501672] Re: [needs-packaging] gparted 0.5.0

2009-12-30 Thread Roberto D'Auria
gparted 0.5.0 is already on Debian archive, so a sync is needed for upgrading 
it. There's already a sync request open at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/500956

Maybe we should mark this as duplicate?

-- 
[needs-packaging] gparted 0.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501672
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501116] Re: chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)

2009-12-30 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I updated lucid package too, by adding the old patches (already in
karmic) and the new one that fixes this bug.

** Attachment added: "debdiff for lucid"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37288897/asterisk_1.6.2.0%7Erc2-0ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501116
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501116] Re: chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)

2009-12-30 Thread Roberto D'Auria
** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => New

-- 
chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501116
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501116] Re: chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)

2009-12-30 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Changed karmic to karmic-proposed and added a '#' before LP number.

** Attachment added: "new debdiff"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37288255/asterisk_1.6.2.0%7Erc2-0ubuntu1.2.debdiff

-- 
chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501116
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501116] Re: chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)

2009-12-29 Thread Roberto D'Auria
I patched the source, here's the debdiff. 
This is my first patch, so I hope I've done it well. Any comment/suggestion 
will be very useful.

** Attachment added: "debdiff of patched source"
   
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37277921/asterisk_1.6.2.0%7Erc2-0ubuntu1.2.debdiff

** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
chan_iax2 crashes on nonexistent fr->callno (patch available)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501116
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 501379] Re: not installable

2009-12-29 Thread Roberto D'Auria
Package: mozilla-dom-inspector
[...]
Source: seamonkey
Version: 1.1.17+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
Depends: seamonkey-dom-inspector

It needs seamonkey-dom-inspector (which depends on seamonkey-browser),
not Firefox/Iceweasel... or did you mean something else?

Anyway, mozilla-dom-inspector package seems broken:

$ sudo apt-get install mozilla-dom-inspector
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  mozilla-dom-inspector: Depends: seamonkey-dom-inspector but it is not going 
to be installed
E: Broken packages

mozilla-dom-inspector and seamonkey-dom-inspector cannot be installed
together:

$ sudo apt-get install mozilla-dom-inspector seamonkey-dom-inspector
[...]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  seamonkey-dom-inspector: Conflicts: mozilla-dom-inspector (< 2:1.8) but 
1.1.17+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
E: Broken packages

I hope this can be useful.

-- 
not installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501379
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs