[Bug 1830986] [NEW] nodejs-dev and php7.2-dev have conflicting requirements in Bionic

2019-05-29 Thread Robin Munn
Public bug reported:

Because of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/nodejs/+bug/1779863, the
nodejs-dev package now depends on libssl1.0-dev. The php7.2-dev package
depends on libssl-dev, but libssl1.0-dev conflicts with libssl-dev. This
makes it impossible to have nodejs-dev (or anything that depends on it,
such as npm) and php7.2-dev installed at the same time, which is
something that web developers might want to do pretty often (for
example, I just ran into this issue while trying to set up a new laptop,
running Bionic, for web development).

To reproduce: `sudo apt install npm php7.2-dev`

Package versions I observed this in:

npm 3.5.2-0ubuntu4, which depends on
node-gyp 3.6.2-1ubuntu1, which depends on
nodejs-dev 8.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4, whose LibSSL dependency conflicts with
php7.2-dev 7.2.17-0ubuntu0.18.04.1

** Affects: nodejs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830986

Title:
  nodejs-dev and php7.2-dev have conflicting requirements in Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1830986/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1084238] Re: Remmina freezes when disconnecting vnc session with ssh tunnel

2015-09-22 Thread Robin Munn
I can confirm both the bug and the proposed patch: on Trusty (remmina
version 1.0.0-4ubuntu3), remmina hangs when I disconnect from a VNC
session tunneled through SSH. But if I apply the close_tunnel_last
patch, rebuild the .deb package and install the patched .deb, the hang
goes away.

The patch attached by jcollins to comment #2 has a whitespace
inconsistency in it (most lines use tab characters, but one uses space
characters for indentation) so I've attached a new version of the patch
that stays consistent with the original file's indentation.

Please include this patch in the Ubuntu package of remmina, so that this
bugfix (written over two *years* ago!) can finally get into Ubuntu.

** Patch added: "close_tunnel_last.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/1084238/+attachment/4471856/+files/close_tunnel_last.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084238

Title:
  Remmina freezes when disconnecting vnc session with ssh tunnel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/1084238/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1041790] Re: [snb] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0b160001 IPEHR: 0x0b140001, workaround i915.semaphores=0

2013-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
I've been experiencing a recurring lockup that may or may not be this
bug; what I can add to the discussion is that if it is this bug, it
appears to be Linux-only. My company bought several of its developers
identical laptops (Dell Latitude E6520 models). The other developers who
are using these laptops are using Windows, and I'm the only one using
Linux. I've been experiencing these hangups 3-4 times per week, on
average, over the past year. But when I asked the other developers in my
company with Latitude E6520s if they'd experienced random-seeming
hangups, they all said no. Which means that either I got the only laptop
with a defective chip, or else the Windows driver doesn't experience
this problem.

I hope this helps in some way; sorry I can't be of more technical help,
but GPUs are outside my area of expertise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041790

Title:
  [snb] GPU lockup  IPEHR: 0x0b160001 IPEHR: 0x0b140001, workaround
  i915.semaphores=0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1041790/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681423] Re: [MIR] libssh2

2013-01-22 Thread Robin Munn
It's been a month since I reopened this MIR, and no apparent activity.

@adconrad - Have you noticed anything else besides the possible problems
Kees Cook identified and I've submitted patches for? Are there any other
reasons why this package could not go into main? LP #311029 depends on
this getting resolved, and I'd like to see that one fixed in time for
Raring. Which means this one also needs action soon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681423

Title:
  [MIR] libssh2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/681423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681423] Re: [MIR] libssh2

2012-12-18 Thread Robin Munn
This MIR expired without a decision being made. But since a project I'm
working on needs bug #311029 to be fixed, and #311029 is in turned
blocked by this MIR, I'm reopening the MIR to hopefully make some
progress on it.

** Changed in: libssh2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681423

Title:
  [MIR] libssh2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/681423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681423] Re: [MIR] libssh2

2012-12-18 Thread Robin Munn
One of the concernes that Kees Cook raised over this MIR was the
compile-time warnings about ignored return values. While those only
appear in example code and not in actual library code, it's always best
to heed the warnings the compiler gives. I've written a patch to fix the
compile-time warnings in the example code by actually checking the
return values and doing something about them.

** Patch added: no-more-unused-results-in-example-code.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/681423/+attachment/3463521/+files/no-more-unused-results-in-example-code.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681423

Title:
  [MIR] libssh2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/681423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681423] Re: [MIR] libssh2

2012-12-18 Thread Robin Munn
The other concern was that the upstream tests should actually run at
build time. This patch addresses that concern.

** Patch added: run-tests-during-build.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/681423/+attachment/3463522/+files/run-tests-during-build.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681423

Title:
  [MIR] libssh2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/681423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 807347] Re: package fglrx 2:8.861-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: update-alternatives: error: unable to make /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so.dpkg-tmp a symlink to /etc/alternatives/x86_64-linux-gnu

2011-07-13 Thread Robin Munn
I got the same bug on my system that I upgraded from Natty to Oneiric.
The cause turned out to be simple: the /usr/lib/dri directory did not
exist, and so update-alternatives could not create the
/usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so.dpkg-tmp symlink.

Simply running sudo mkdir /usr/lib/dri fixed this problem for me.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807347

Title:
  package fglrx 2:8.861-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: update-
  alternatives: error: unable to make /usr/lib/dri/fglrx_dri.so.dpkg-tmp
  a symlink to /etc/alternatives/x86_64-linux-gnu_fglrx_dri: No such
  file or directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/807347/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 308780] Re: pacpl is generating incorrect MIME type when converting from FLAC to M4A

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
This may not actually be a bug; or if it is, it isn't a bug in pacpl.

What pacpl does when encoding to the M4A format is call faac to do the
actual encoding work. In the faac man page, the -w option can be given
to Wrap AAC data in an MP4 container.  This is enabled by default for
output files with the extensions .mp4 and .m4a.

Since pacpl is calling faac with an output extension of .m4a, faac is
properly wrapping the audio in an MP4 container, and file is properly
detecting the MP4 container. Whether file should do any further
detection of the MP4 container, to determine whether it contains a video
stream or only an audio stream, is another question. Perhaps a bug
should be filed against the file package to enhance its detection
smarts regarding .m4a files, but I'm not convinced that that's needed.

At any rate, since this is not actually a bug in pacpl, I'm going to
close this bug report as Invalid.

** Changed in: pacpl (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
pacpl is generating incorrect MIME type when converting from FLAC to M4A
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533111] [NEW] pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: pacpl

While using pacpl to convert a batch of .flac files to .m4a, I noticed
it failing on a randomly-selected set of music files. Closer examination
revealed that they were all classical music pieces whose tags I had
gotten from MusicBrainz, and that the files that were failing were the
pieces whose title contained double-quotes with a space character inside
them. For example, the Mozart album at http://musicbrainz.org/release
/45179fbc-62c0-4992-9511-c61310dc0f9f.html (title too long to copy here)
has the following track titles:

...
Track 7: Mass No. 15 for Soloists, Chorus  Orchestra in C major, K. 317 
Coronation Mass: VI. Agnus Dei
Track 8: Missa solemnis No. 16 for Soloists, Chorus  Orchestra in C major, K. 
337: I. Kyrie
...

After much poking at the problem, I have figured out what is happening.
After decompressing the .flac files to .wav, pacpl is calling the
following commands to encode the M4A files:

For track 7:

faac --title Mass No. 15 for Soloists, Chorus  Orchestra in C major,
K. 317 Coronation Mass: VI. Agnus Dei --track 7 --artist
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart --album Masses: Mass in C minor K. 427,
Coronation Mass in C major K. 317, Missa Solemnis in C major K. 337,
Kyrie in D minor K. 341 (Kölner Kammerchor  Collegium Cartusianum feat.
conductor: Peter Neumann) --comment  --year 1990-01-01 --genre
Classical  -w -q 100
/home/rmunn/tmp/music/classical/Masses/02.07.19776.wav -o
/home/rmunn/tmp/music/classical/Masses/02.07.m4a

For track 8:

faac --title Missa solemnis No. 16 for Soloists, Chorus  Orchestra in
C major, K. 337: I. Kyrie --track 8 --artist Wolfgang Amadeus
Mozart --album Masses: Mass in C minor K. 427, Coronation Mass in C
major K. 317, Missa Solemnis in C major K. 337, Kyrie in D minor K. 341
(Kölner Kammerchor  Collegium Cartusianum feat. conductor: Peter
Neumann) --comment  --year 1990-01-01 --genre Classical  -w -q
100 /home/rmunn/tmp/music/classical/Masses/02.08.19813.wav -o
/home/rmunn/tmp/music/classical/Masses/02.08.m4a

Track 8 works, but track 7 fails with the error message Cannot encode
several input files to one output file.

Because the double-quotes in the title string aren't quoted or
backslash-escaped, the shell sees them as the end of the title string.
If the double-quote characters contain just a single word (as in track
8, where it's the word Kyrie) then this doesn't matter, as the shell
still sees that whole title (from Missa solemnis to the word Kyrie)
as a single string. But in track 7, the parameter Mass No. 15 for
Soloists, Chorus  Orchestra in C major, K. 317 Coronation Mass: VI.
Agnus Dei gets interpreted by the string as:

First parameter: Mass No. 15 for Soloists, Chorus  Orchestra in C major, K. 
317 Coronation
Second parameter: Mass: VI. Agnus
Third parameter: Dei

And thus, faac thinks it's being asked to encode several input files
(one file called Mass: VI. Agnus and another file called Dei) with
just a single output file, and so it gives up.

Since the original files that triggered this bug for me are copyrighted,
I can't upload them here. I have, however, managed to reproduce this bug
using a .flac file I created myself (from a Creative-Commons licensed
file downloaded from www.freesound.org), so I'll upload that file to
this bug report so that the bug can be reproduced.

** Affects: pacpl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 533111] Re: pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn

** Attachment added: nightengale.flac - converts to .m4a without any problems
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40312142/nightengale.flac

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533111] Re: pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn

** Attachment added: nightengale_with_quotes.flac - Title contains 
double-quotes with a space in them, which triggers the bug
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40312150/nightengale_with_quotes.flac

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533111] Re: pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
Audio source for those two .flac files is the sound sample from
http://www.freesound.org/samplesViewSingle.php?id=983. The only
difference between the two files is the title tag; everything else
should be identical.

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533111] Re: pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
To reproduce the bug:

1) Download both nightengale*.flac files into the same directory.
2) Run pacpl -v -t m4a nightengale*.flac

For extra debugging output:

sudo $EDITOR /usr/bin/pacpl
Search for the regex pnotice.*encode_string
Delete the words if $dryrun from the end of the line, so that the debug 
message will print even in non-dryrun mode. (In dryrun mode, the title tag 
isn't actually extracted, so the debug information printed in dryrun mode is 
not the actual command that gets edited in non-dryrun mode).
Run the pacpl command above, and note the combination of spaces and quotes in 
the call to the faac encoder.

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533111] Re: pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
I believe the solution to this bug would be to check the title tag for
double-quote characters (and possibly other special shell characters
like dollar signs, etc.) and backslash-escape them before passing them
to the encoder.

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 533111] Re: pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags

2010-03-05 Thread Robin Munn
Upstream doesn't have a bug tracker, but
http://pacpl.sourceforge.net/faq.html lists an email address to contact
to report bugs. I've reported this bug upstream by emailing them the URL
of this Launchpad report.

-- 
pacpl can't handle double-quote characters in title tags
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533111
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522693] Re: support for MAC .dmg files

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
** Tags added: wishlist

-- 
support for MAC .dmg files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522693] Re: support for MAC .dmg files

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
Thank you for your bug report. This bug has been reported to the
developers of the software. You can track it and make comments at:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610562

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #610562
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610562

** Also affects: brasero via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610562
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
support for MAC .dmg files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522693
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 523893] Re: writer incorrect translation to spanish

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
Thank you for your bug report. This bug has been reported to the developers of 
the software. You can track it and make comments at:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109471

** Bug watch added: OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker #109471
   http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109471

** Also affects: openoffice via
   http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109471
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
writer incorrect translation to spanish 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 523893] Re: writer incorrect translation to spanish

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
writer incorrect translation to spanish 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 525118] Re: When I type 1, application disappears

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This bug appears to be a bug in testdrive, not in gnome-
terminal, so I have reassigned the bug to the testdrive package.

** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) = testdrive (Ubuntu)

-- 
When I type 1, application disappears
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525118
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 525144] Re: gnome-about-me

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This bug appears to be a bug in gnome-control-center (the
package that contains the gnome-about-me application), not a bug in gdm,
so I have reassigned the bug to the correct package.

** Package changed: gdm (Ubuntu) = gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)

-- 
gnome-about-me
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525144
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 525144] Re: gnome-about-me

2010-02-20 Thread Robin Munn
Confirmed on Lucid with:

gdm 2.29.6-0ubuntu3
gnome-control-center 1:2.29.90-0ubuntu3


** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
gnome-about-me
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525144
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 523264] Re: [lucid] dos2unix is not in tofrodos

2010-02-18 Thread Robin Munn
The dos2unix and unix2dos commands were dropped from the most recent
tofrodos package to make room for a new dos2unix package (see
/usr/share/doc/tofrodos/NEWS.Debian.gz for the reason why). However, the
command-not-found package, which is what gives those suggestions, has
not been updated with this information.

This is actually a bug in command-not-found, not a bug in tofrodos:
switching bug to that package. Also marking as confirmed since I can
reproduce on my own Lucid system.

** Package changed: tofrodos (Ubuntu) = command-not-found (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
[lucid] dos2unix is not in tofrodos
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523264
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 523081] Re: ext4 of SCS13(0,0,0,)

2010-02-17 Thread Robin Munn
English translation of original report:

Still more problems with my PC: after problems caused by upgrading
Ubuntu 8.10 to 9.10 (Brasero crashed/froze and the hibernate feature
would also freeze on restart), and since I suspected bugs caused by an
update over my crappy ADSL line, I wanted to reinstall Ubuntu 8.10 from
the original CD from Canonical, since it had worked perfectly.

But I could no longer install from the partition: every time I would
receive the message the attempt to mount an ext4 file [translator's
note: did he mean filesystem?] from SCSI 3 (0,0,0) partition number 1
(sda on [something missing here]) has failed. You can try partitioning
again from the menu.

Same message with the new original Ubuntu 9.10 CD from Canonical that I
got in the mail yesterday.

Now I'm suspecting that my hard disk has died suddenly, what do you
think? Thanks in advance for your help, Sincerely, Jicé@

-- 
ext4 of SCS13(0,0,0,)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-15 Thread Robin Munn
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #279422
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=279422

** Also affects: debian via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=279422
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 520898] Re: Truncated text in the keyboard selection step

2010-02-12 Thread Robin Munn
** Summary changed:

- Scripture truncate in the keyboard selection
+ Truncated text in the keyboard selection step

-- 
Truncated text in the keyboard selection step
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520898
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 518230] [NEW] Some PDF forms don't save entered information

2010-02-06 Thread Robin Munn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evince

When trying to fill out certain PDF forms, such as the PDF tax forms
available form irs.gov, with evince, I noticed a problem. Some forms
could be filled out and saved just fine, and when those forms were
reloaded the entered form data was still there. But other forms didn't
work properly: filling in the form and saving it appeared to work, but
when I loaded the form again the entered data was blank.

One form that worked properly was the 1040 form, 
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040.pdf
One form that failed to work was the 1040 Schedule SE form, 
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sse.pdf

Also, when clicking on the rows of the SE that I had previously entered
data into (and that now appeared blank), I noticed that evince no longer
gave me an editing cursor for those rows. It was as if the form's text-
entry box for those rows (and ONLY those rows) had been replaced by a
blank, white, non-interactive rectangle. All other rows on the form
(that I had not previously entered data into) were still interactive,
but the rows that *should* have contained data were blank and
unresponsive.

To reproduce the problem:

1) Download the 1040 and 1040 SE forms from the above links.
2) Open the 1040 in evince. Enter some data. Save the form. Close evince.
3) Re-open the 1040. Verify that the data entered previously is still there, 
and can be edited.
4) Open the 1040 SE in evince. Enter some data on rows 1a and 2 of the form, 
leaving row 1b blank. Save the form. Close evince.
5) Re-open the 1040 SE. Notice that rows 1a and 2 are blank and no longer 
respond to mouse clicks or keypresses, but row 1b (and other rows) can still be 
used.

This happens on Ubuntu Karmic (9.10), using version 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 of
the evince package (from karmic-updates).

** Affects: evince (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Some PDF forms don't save entered information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 518230] Re: Some PDF forms don't save entered information

2010-02-06 Thread Robin Munn
Note that this does not appear to be the same bug as #492959 or #477644:
the saved forms are not 0-byte files as in bug #492959, and the PDFs are
not encrypted as in bug #477644.

-- 
Some PDF forms don't save entered information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 518230] Re: Some PDF forms don't save entered information

2010-02-06 Thread Robin Munn
The URLs in the bug description link to the 2009 U.S. tax forms. In case
the bug is dependent on a particular quirk of the forms that will go
away in 2010 (when those URLs no longer point to the 2009 forms), I've
attached year-2009 copies of these two forms to this bug report.

** Attachment added: Form 1040 - works properly
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38843862/f1040.pdf

-- 
Some PDF forms don't save entered information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 518230] Re: Some PDF forms don't save entered information

2010-02-06 Thread Robin Munn

** Attachment added: Form 1040 Schedule SE - does not save form data
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38843871/f1040sse.pdf

-- 
Some PDF forms don't save entered information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518230
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-05 Thread Robin Munn
New upstream version 2.0b8 has been released; I've uploaded
2.0b8-0ubuntu1 source package to http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/python-
nltk

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-05 Thread Robin Munn
Uploaded new source package with version number 2.0~b8 to avoid needing
an epoch once NLTK 2.0 (final) is released.

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-04 Thread Robin Munn
Reuploaded since I just realized my previous upload had omitted a vital
dependency.

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-02 Thread Robin Munn
I've been independently working on packaging NLTK, and was just about to
create a needs-packaging bug when I found this one.

It looks like my package has a bit more work done on it than the one
that odd-rationale has uploaded (e.g., I went through and identified
several potential legal problems in the debian/copyright file) -- should
I upload my version to REVU as well? With what version?

By the way, I've contacted upstream regarding the possible legal
problems, and they've fixed the problems in SVN, with a 2.0b8 release
expected sometime this week. So 2.0b7 should probably not be accepted
yet.

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-02 Thread Robin Munn
All right, I'm assigning this bug to myself. I'll upload my version of
the package to REVU with a 2.0b7-0ubuntu2 version number, and will
upload a 2.0b8 package once upstream makes a release.

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: Odd-rationale (odd-rationale) = Robin Munn (rmunn)

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514936] Re: [needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)

2010-02-02 Thread Robin Munn
New 2.0b7-ubuntu2 source package is now up at REVU:
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/python-nltk

-- 
[needs-packaging] nltk (Natural Language Toolkit)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 64323] Re: No conversion bad error message with SQLite 2.x database

2007-05-11 Thread Robin Munn
One upstream developer has said,this is a packaging issue. If gentoo or
ubuntu bundled f-spot with sqlite2 in the past, they shouldn't had
removed that dependency without providing an upgrade script or
mechanism.

Another person followed up on upstream Bugzilla with the opinion that
upstream should handle this scenario.

So upstream may or may not fix this, but my guess is that they'll stick
with the distros should handle this opinion. Therefore, a conversion
script should be included in the Ubuntu package, for the benefit of
those who did an upgrade from an older version of f-spot (say, one that
came with Breezy, or even Hoary) to a recent version.

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #418818
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418818

** Also affects: f-spot (upstream) via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418818
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
No conversion  bad error message with SQLite 2.x database
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 73718] Re: Update notifier's pop-up interrupts you while watching Totem in full-screen view

2006-11-29 Thread Robin Munn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63552 ***

This is essentially the same bug as #63552.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 63552
   Update-manager is very invasive

-- 
Update notifier's pop-up interrupts you while watching Totem in full-screen view
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73718

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 73718] Re: Update notifier's pop-up interrupts you while watching Totem in full-screen view

2006-11-29 Thread Robin Munn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63552 ***

I mean bug #63552. (Including the word bug means Launchpad
automatically turns it into a link. Nice, huh?)

-- 
Update notifier's pop-up interrupts you while watching Totem in full-screen view
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73718

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 73721] Download speed looks odd when it's slow (bytes/sec)

2006-11-29 Thread Robin Munn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

The update-manager download speed reports its speed as 17.2k/s when
it's fast. But when it's slow, that becomes 3047/s -- no b
indicating bytes. This looks odd.

The display should be changed to either kb/s, Mb/s, and so on
(always using the b suffix), or else the bytes/sec case should be
special-cased to display b if there's no prefix.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Download speed looks odd when it's slow (bytes/sec)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73721

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 36461] Re: XOrg dualhead regression

2006-08-22 Thread Robin Munn
This appears to be breaking a *LOT* of people's systems - see
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=241286 for details.

-- 
XOrg  dualhead regression
https://launchpad.net/bugs/36461

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs