Re: [Bug 882954] Re: gcc fails to compile legal code
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Dave Gilbert
wrote:
> One difference from 10.04 is that the linker is more touchy about the
> order of link options, so make sure the -lrt is after the .o which
> requires it.
Interesting, and it solves the problem.
I have this code in a file named bug.c:
> I am baffled. Here is a tiny program that also fails to compile, and
> gives the sane error:
>
> #include
>
> unsigned timetest()
> {
> struct timespec t ;
> return( clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME,&t)) ;
> }
cc -lrt bug.c
gives two errors, not finding clock_gettime() or main()
cc bug.c -lrt
gives only one, not finding main()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882954
Title:
gcc fails to compile legal code
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/882954/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882954] Re: gcc fails to compile legal code
I am using -lrt. However, that does not seem to be the issue since it affects linking. My compiles are failing before the linking step is reached. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882954 Title: gcc fails to compile legal code To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/882954/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882954] [NEW] gcc fails to compile legal code
Public bug reported:
I am working on a program (ftp://ftp.cs.sjtu.edu.cn:990/sandy/maxwell/).
It compiled fine until I upgraded to Xubuntu 11.10, but now it fails
with " undefined reference to `clock_gettime'".
I am including time.h as man clock-gettime says I should.
Compiling on a different Ubuntu system (11.04) works fine.
cpp timermod.c | grep clock_gettime seems to show it is being defined.
I am baffled. Here is a tiny program that also fails to compile, and
gives the sane error:
#include
unsigned timetest()
{
struct timespec t ;
return( clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME,&t)) ;
}
** Affects: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882954
Title:
gcc fails to compile legal code
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/882954/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568546] Re: package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
After getting the failure message, I did some checking. Update manager says my system is up to date, even after reloading. The ubuntu software center shows "Sun Java 6 Runtime" as installed, does not offer to let me upgrade it. I'm confused. Is the upgrade software confused too? -- package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568546] Re: package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45031504/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45031505/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45031506/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45031507/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 568546] [NEW] package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: New install of Karmic on solid state disk, Intel core two, plenty of RAM. No swap; I'll add that later on rotating disk. After install, it said 150-odd upgrades were needed. Java was the only one that failed. I did accept the license. ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 23 00:19:16 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) Package: sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic SourcePackage: sun-java6 Title: package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic x86_64 ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- package sun-java6-jre 6-15-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568546 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
Just updated Xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 beta. Only things running are a few terminals, Pidgin & Firefox with many tabs. Plenty of RAM, 4 gigs. No flash on page I was browsing. This did not take Firefox down. -- npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476193] [NEW] xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xfstt Happens often, has been ever since I upgraded to Karmic. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 AssertionMessage: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated CrashCounter: 1 Date: Fri Nov 6 14:50:12 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/xfstt Package: xfstt 1.7-5 ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/xfstt --daemon --notcp ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic Signal: 6 SourcePackage: xfstt StacktraceTop: __kernel_vsyscall () raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 ?? () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 __fortify_fail () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 Title: xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 UserGroups: ** Affects: xfstt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash i386 -- xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476193] Re: xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219913/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219915/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219916/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219917/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219918/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219919/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35219920/ThreadStacktrace.txt -- xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 471126] Re: xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960805/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960807/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960808/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960809/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960810/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960811/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960812/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34960813/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- xfstt assert failure: *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/bin/xfstt terminated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85738] Re: [Edgy] kernel panic with Realtek RTL 8168/8111
righ at the start this says: > I've got a P5B motherboard with a Core 2 Duo E6600 processor running Edgy Eft AMD64 (with all updates done). Why an AMD kernel on an Intel CPU? -- [Edgy] kernel panic with Realtek RTL 8168/8111 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
