[Bug 241453] Re: Bump to SVN 1.5
Wolfgang, I suspect you have built this package against libneon-gnutls, which has an issue with Subversion 1.5. I tried the packages you provided, and using a client ssl certificate setup, I get the "Could not read status line: SSL error:" problem (noted in Debian Bug #480041). I built the Subversion 1.5 package against libneon (not gnutls, the openssl version) and do not encounter this problem. If you would like to gert around this, you need to recompile the package, and edit your control file to use libneon instead of libneon- gnutls. (I have done this, and get a package that works with ssl client certs). Hope this helps, Seamus -- Bump to SVN 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241453] Re: Bump to SVN 1.5
Not as yet. I have been running the Open SSL (libneon) build on my PC for a while and it seems to be OK? I can chuck this up somewhere if you want to have a look? Cheers Seamus -- Bump to SVN 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241453] Re: Bump to SVN 1.5
The source package also builds libapache2-svn. I have compiled all of the packages and the svn command works now, but these have been built against libneon27 (which uses openssl) instead of libneon27-gnutls (which uses gnutls). The decision has been made (by the Debian maintainer) to only build against the gnutls library, however this causes SSL client certificate negotiation to break. (c.f. Debian bug # 480041). I am waiting to hear back to see what the outcome of that bug will be to see whether I just stick with the openssl libneon, or a fix is found for the gnutls version. Cheers -- Bump to SVN 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 241453] Re: Bump to SVN 1.5
We too really want this in production. I see Matthias has uploaded a source package for Intrepid (based on the Debian/Experimental one). I am working on Backporting this to Hardy. Once I have a working package (currently experiencing an SSL problem, possibly due to libneon27-gnutls) I'll pop it up somewhere, probably PPA, and it can get tested. We'll see how we go. -- Bump to SVN 1.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65218] Re: doesn't include atomic operations
Yes we have linux-headers-* installed, and the asm/bitops.h isn't there (the asm directory isn't even). For this particular problem I have found a workaround using C's builtin atomic memory functions, but I suspect that the bitops method is a little cleaner/lighter. Incidentally, we are not using this to create a kernel module, just some software that needs to do low level (& atomic) memory operations for lightweight locking of variables in shared memory. But if the original post on this thread is correct, isn't linux-headers- a virutal package for linux-libc-dev? Cheers Seamus -- doesn't include atomic operations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65218] Re: doesn't include atomic operations
Hi, this is still a problem. We have a software product that uses test_and_set_bit (used to be included from asm/bitops.h) which we cannot build under Ubuntu. Currently we build under a cross compiling environment (i.e. Scratchbox) but this is less than ideal. Any ideas/plans to bring these back? Cheers Seamus -- doesn't include atomic operations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
