[Bug 1015223] Re: cloud-init-nonet main process killed by TERM signal

2013-03-03 Thread Sean Channel
ading  normal exit SIGTERM to /etc/init/cloud-init.conf will probably
suppress the appearance of normal termination messages in dmesg.  What
would be slightly better, though probably overkill in this case, would
be a signal handler that somehow pacifies upstart by catching SIGTERM
and exiting more gracfully with 0 status.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015223

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet main process killed by TERM signal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1015223/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1015223] Re: cloud-init-nonet main process killed by TERM signal

2013-03-03 Thread Sean Channel
ading  normal exit SIGTERM to /etc/init/cloud-init.conf will probably
suppress the appearance of normal termination messages in dmesg.  What
would be slightly better, though probably overkill in this case, would
be a signal handler that somehow pacifies upstart by catching SIGTERM
and exiting more gracfully with 0 status.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015223

Title:
  cloud-init-nonet main process killed by TERM signal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1015223/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1075792] Re: Slow Unity performance in 12.10 Quantal Quetzal

2012-11-27 Thread Sean Channel
+1 exact same symtoms, different hardware (intel celeron based PC 
laptop)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075792

Title:
  Slow Unity performance in 12.10 Quantal Quetzal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1075792/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 745608] Re: [915GM] font corruption on Intel GMA900

2012-10-27 Thread Sean Channel
Ferry,

Could you please post some more detail? What is sna? What libs  drivers
are you using? E.g. mesa / opengl, intel video, vaapi..

I'm just trying to shine up my own quantal desktop here.  Thanks much!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745608

Title:
  [915GM] font corruption on Intel GMA900

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/745608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-11 Thread Sean Channel
Sage, thank you much for your comment (#4).  Tv, thanks for guidance and
letting me play along.

The ceph build already separates the main build from docs, and the
requirements for building are already quite substantial, so if someone
is up to the task of building deb packages on their own then they're up
to dealing with the docs. I speculate it may be worth investigating if
there are more current alternatives to the custom mods required for
sphinx if that is the only roadblock.

Far be it for me to say that you must ship docs, however, it may be
preferable to drive that traffic through the web site, which has the
advantage of incorporating community updates more frequently, and I
totally support that idea.

Since you don't really want another makefile and don't need another
script to build docs, I suggest adding it to the main package build if
they're going to ship at all, or let's close this issue and stick with
the web site.

I count only two truly great solutions in any category that exist right
now, and one is ceph. You have my allegiance.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-11 Thread Sean Channel
Sage, thank you much for your comment (#4).  Tv, thanks for guidance and
letting me play along.

The ceph build already separates the main build from docs, and the
requirements for building are already quite substantial, so if someone
is up to the task of building deb packages on their own then they're up
to dealing with the docs. I speculate it may be worth investigating if
there are more current alternatives to the custom mods required for
sphinx if that is the only roadblock.

Far be it for me to say that you must ship docs, however, it may be
preferable to drive that traffic through the web site, which has the
advantage of incorporating community updates more frequently, and I
totally support that idea.

Since you don't really want another makefile and don't need another
script to build docs, I suggest adding it to the main package build if
they're going to ship at all, or let's close this issue and stick with
the web site.

I count only two truly great solutions in any category that exist right
now, and one is ceph. You have my allegiance.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
just an update: Tv was right about the use of virtualenv: sphinx has to
be *built* in the presence of sphinx-ditaa and asphyxiate, not taken
from an installed system package. The burden on virtualenv can still be
minimised if all other deps are installed [from platform repos
(ubuntu)], but not python-sphinx.  It still makes for a noticeably
leaner and faster docs build.

I shall revisit how/where to shoehorn that in without disrupting things.

Subsequently, getting a docs package to build will be detached from the
main build/packages while making use of the same debian resources as
much as possible (likely with symlinks), so I'm still _not_ going to
force docs to be built and/or packaged along with the main build.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
if it's a question of weather to install sphinx or kludge the use of it
from system packages, I'd say whichever is less likely to break at some
point later.

Otherwise; number one goal is Make Tv Happy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
This might be more to the specs Tv offered:

https://github.com/seanchannel/ceph/commit/08f13c95bf210f433636d00d76b725feee6d3a37

. took out --quiet so you can see what is going into venv,
. check for path to sphinx-build
. added explicit call to venv python

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
just an update: Tv was right about the use of virtualenv: sphinx has to
be *built* in the presence of sphinx-ditaa and asphyxiate, not taken
from an installed system package. The burden on virtualenv can still be
minimised if all other deps are installed [from platform repos
(ubuntu)], but not python-sphinx.  It still makes for a noticeably
leaner and faster docs build.

I shall revisit how/where to shoehorn that in without disrupting things.

Subsequently, getting a docs package to build will be detached from the
main build/packages while making use of the same debian resources as
much as possible (likely with symlinks), so I'm still _not_ going to
force docs to be built and/or packaged along with the main build.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
if it's a question of weather to install sphinx or kludge the use of it
from system packages, I'd say whichever is less likely to break at some
point later.

Otherwise; number one goal is Make Tv Happy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-03 Thread Sean Channel
This might be more to the specs Tv offered:

https://github.com/seanchannel/ceph/commit/08f13c95bf210f433636d00d76b725feee6d3a37

. took out --quiet so you can see what is going into venv,
. check for path to sphinx-build
. added explicit call to venv python

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-01 Thread Sean Channel
I must agree w/ Tv that keeping the docs build separate helps source
users who don't need to deal with all that. Many other projects actually
do that ('cd doc; make html') due to substantial additional build deps.,
and I think I can take some cues from that.

The top Makefile could just include an optional target to descend into
doc and build that package, and the separate 'debian' there can be
largely or entirely generated from the top level (e.g. symlinked as much
as possible).

I'll put something together in a github clone you can look at (later
this week).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-10-01 Thread Sean Channel
I must agree w/ Tv that keeping the docs build separate helps source
users who don't need to deal with all that. Many other projects actually
do that ('cd doc; make html') due to substantial additional build deps.,
and I think I can take some cues from that.

The top Makefile could just include an optional target to descend into
doc and build that package, and the separate 'debian' there can be
largely or entirely generated from the top level (e.g. symlinked as much
as possible).

I'll put something together in a github clone you can look at (later
this week).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-09-28 Thread Sean Channel
I can perhaps add a separate Makefile  debian under doc to build a
package for this if you are interested (via github  cephs contrib
guildlines).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-09-28 Thread Sean Channel
I can perhaps add a separate Makefile  debian under doc to build a
package for this if you are interested (via github  cephs contrib
guildlines).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] [NEW] no docs package / html docs

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Channel
Public bug reported:

Please add a package for the very nice Sphinx based html docs

** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Channel
Got it, but the build prereqs for docs are not needed after they've been
generated. I transfered them to a system with none of that stuff and
they can be read in a browser or via local server just fine.

Once generated, the html docs can go into /usr/share/doc/ceph-doc from a
similarly named package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1056103] [NEW] no docs package / html docs

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Channel
Public bug reported:

Please add a package for the very nice Sphinx based html docs

** Affects: ceph (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1056103] Re: no docs package / html docs

2012-09-25 Thread Sean Channel
Got it, but the build prereqs for docs are not needed after they've been
generated. I transfered them to a system with none of that stuff and
they can be read in a browser or via local server just fine.

Once generated, the html docs can go into /usr/share/doc/ceph-doc from a
similarly named package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1056103

Title:
  no docs package / html docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1056103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 966744] Re: [i965] Resume from suspend leaves me with black screen or a screen of the desktop before it suspended. Compiz hung in intel_update_renderbuffers() from intel_prepare_render() from brw

2012-09-20 Thread Sean Channel
I got no problems. Try this: add i915.semaphores=1 to your kernel
options in /etc/default/grub (AND run update-grub AND reboot).  E.g:

  GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash elevator=noop
i915.semaphores=1


I also do created /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf with this in it:

  Section Device
  Identifier Intel
  Driver intel
  Option AccelMethod exa
  Option MigrationHeuristic greedy
  Option DebugWait true
  Option SwapbuffersWait false
  EndSection

^ ^ again, reboot if you do that and/or play with those options.

YMMV.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966744

Title:
  [i965] Resume from suspend leaves me with black screen or a screen of
  the desktop before it suspended. Compiz hung in
  intel_update_renderbuffers() from intel_prepare_render() from
  brw_draw_prims()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/966744/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 966744] Re: [i965] Resume from suspend leaves me with black screen or a screen of the desktop before it suspended. Compiz hung in intel_update_renderbuffers() from intel_prepare_render() from brw

2012-09-20 Thread Sean Channel
almost forgot: I also use the xserver-xorg-video-intel package from
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966744

Title:
  [i965] Resume from suspend leaves me with black screen or a screen of
  the desktop before it suspended. Compiz hung in
  intel_update_renderbuffers() from intel_prepare_render() from
  brw_draw_prims()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/966744/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 820881] Re: [i945] Heavy screen and font corruption when free memory is low on GMA950

2012-05-19 Thread Sean Channel
My suggestions:

1. DebugWait / SwapbuffersWait: create the file
/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf with the following:

Section Device
Identifier Intel
Driver intel
Option DebugWait true
Option SwapbuffersWait false
EndSection

2. Add i915.semaphores=1 to the kernel boot command line in 
/etc/default/grub/ E.g.:
 GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash i915.semaphores=1 (then run 
update-grub and reboot).

3. turn off font anti-aliasing,
4. set the DPI for your screen correctly,
^^Unfortunately multiple sub-systems manageo both of those. Suggestions welcome.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820881

Title:
  [i945] Heavy screen and font corruption when free memory is low on
  GMA950

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/820881/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 745608] Re: [915GM] font corruption on Intel GMA900

2012-04-27 Thread Sean Channel
It's like my computer is running out of toner. I get this font corruption 
everywhere unless I use this workaround: add debug options for intel driver by 
creating the file /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf with the following 
contents:
 
Section Device
Identifier Intel
Driver intel
Option DebugWait true
Option SwapbuffersWait false
EndSection

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745608

Title:
  [915GM] font corruption on Intel GMA900

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/745608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 475327] Re: qemu -net nic -net tap does not start due to qemu-ifXXX scripts

2012-02-13 Thread Sean Channel
I agree with the fix proposed in comment #6, though I question the
dependency on the ip utility (from package iproute) and using bash-
specific syntax, vs. the more standard route command (from net-
tools) e.g.:

switch=`route | awk '/^default / { print $8 }'`

Also I would caution against assuming which front-end GUI is being used,
if any (I use none).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475327

Title:
  qemu -net nic -net tap does not start due to qemu-ifXXX scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/475327/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 475327] Re: qemu -net nic -net tap does not start due to qemu-ifXXX scripts

2012-02-13 Thread Sean Channel
I really don't know who they are, but chances are good that you know
something I do not,  Serge, e.g.: plans, specs, requirements, etc..

Just my $.02 that iproute seems very useful for digging deeper, but
looks more like an optional package than anything standard. It is
however a dep. of other pkgs as well. Perhaps I should be using BSD. :)
Perhaps they want to get away from net-tools, for some reason. I
wouldn't throw myself on the tracks over it.

Re: bash syntax: the script header begins with #!/bin/sh, so I would
expect it to either have bourne shell / posix compatible syntax, or
start with #!/bin/bash instead. Not that it would likely ever be a
problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475327

Title:
  qemu -net nic -net tap does not start due to qemu-ifXXX scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/475327/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 820881] Re: [i945] Heavy screen and font corruption when free memory is low on GMA950

2012-02-10 Thread Sean Channel
I get font corruption in an i915 both with 512M and after upgrade to 2G
memory and no swap in either case.

Only adding the 'debugwait' fix makes the font corruption go away for me
in either Unity or Cinnamon desktop.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820881

Title:
  [i945] Heavy screen and font corruption when free memory is low on
  GMA950

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/820881/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 745608] Re: [915GM] font corruption on Intel GMA900

2012-02-10 Thread Sean Channel
'debugwait' fixed the problem for me on eeepc900 both w/ 512M  upgraded
2G ram, no swap in any case.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745608

Title:
  [915GM] font corruption on Intel GMA900

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/745608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 475327] Re: qemu -net nic -net tap does not start due to qemu-ifXXX scripts

2012-02-10 Thread Sean Channel
the script is needed to bring up a tap interface. the user would have to
write their own if it does not exist already. perhaps in the interest of
a more user-friendly experience the default script should first start a
bridge if one does not exist.

Requiring a permanant bridge already setup can conflict with
NetworkManager and seems too complex for the occasional desktop user.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475327

Title:
  qemu -net nic -net tap does not start due to qemu-ifXXX scripts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/475327/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs