[Bug 1226100] Re: Fix FTBFS of aptdaemon 1.1.1 for Saucy
Sorry. I only tested against pep8 (1.4.5). The latest version is more strict. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226100 Title: Fix FTBFS of aptdaemon 1.1.1 for Saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1226100/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1022407] Re: Update to 0.8.x
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1207169 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169 Servus Matthias, PackageKit und Freunde sind nun mit aktuellen Versionen in Ubuntu Saucy gelandet. Wie auch Listaller in der Version 0.5.8-1. Danke für die Unterstützung und entschuldige, dass es so lange gedauert hat. Grüße, Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022407 Title: Update to 0.8.x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1022407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1200303] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.8.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
I uploaded PackageKit 0.8.10 and aptdaemon 1.1.1. It would be nice if you could upload the corresponding gnome-packagekit. ** Patch added: gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1200303/+attachment/3791209/+files/gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200303 Title: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.8.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1200303/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1200303] Re: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.8.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Patch removed: gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1200303/+attachment/3791209/+files/gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1200303/+attachment/3791229/+files/gnome-packagekit_3.8.4-ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200303 Title: Sync gnome-packagekit 3.8.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1200303/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1217699] [NEW] PLease merge packagekit-qt 0.8.8-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: The packagekit transistion has been started. ** Affects: packagekit-qt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217699 Title: PLease merge packagekit-qt 0.8.8-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-qt/+bug/1217699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1217699] Re: PLease merge packagekit-qt 0.8.8-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Patch added: packagekit-qt_0.8.8-2ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-qt/+bug/1217699/+attachment/3791210/+files/packagekit-qt_0.8.8-2ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217699 Title: PLease merge packagekit-qt 0.8.8-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-qt/+bug/1217699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1090656] Re: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
Hello Brian, Actually this bug is very mysterious to me. There are constantly popping up questions in the Launchpad answers of aptdaemon. Since it is quite a hurdle for new users to get from a detail in the policykit dialog that mentions the name aptdaemon to the Launchpad answer site of the project, I think that it could be a quite common error. I have got no clue about the reason for this issue. I was hopping that other projects would also get this error so that I could say that it isn't an aptdaemon related problem :) Cheers, Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090656] Re: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Triaged ** Changed in: policykit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1213920] [NEW] Downgrade Lintian to a Suggest
Litian is used to make assumptions about the quality of third party packages that e.g. have been downloaded from the Internet by the user. So it is not used as a developer tool in this context. We could argue if ubuntu-desktop should depend on lintian instead of aptdaemon itself. But which flavour would like to skip this feature? There is optionally the posibillity to disable the installation of recommends if you want to have a low system size. Cheers, Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213920 Title: Downgrade Lintian to a Suggest To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1213920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1207169] Re: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Hello Jeremy, I am still waiting for a reply from Colin. Because the transition will break the click plugin for packagekit. I can upload packages for both aptdaemon and packagekit, see ppa:packagekit/0.8 Cheers, Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169 Title: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1207169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1207169] Re: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
@Matthias: A sync of apper and listaller would be sufficient? I don't see any Ubuntu specific changes. What kind of internal API do you mean? I use the GPK tools daily on my Debian box with aptdaemon. I uploaded an updated packagekit and aptdaemon package to ppa:packagekit/0.8 @Colin: I will wait until you have updated your click package plugin before uploading to Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169 Title: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1207169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1207169] Re: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Am 2013-08-12 08:54, schrieb Matthias Klumpp: GPK, Apper and Listaller can all be synced, I think (if there are no Ubuntu-specific changes - for GPK, the Ubuntu packages were a sync from Debian experimental, so merging the new packages from unstable will work (transition is included)). Listaller uses PackageKit's internal interfaces through a plugin, which only works with PK (it basically installs a thin layer in front of the native backend to catch Listaller packages). Aptd would need a rewritten Listaller plugin, which does not exist. GPK and Apper should work with aptd (if the system DBus API is complete). Thanks for the merge-work! Cheers, Matthias I prepared a merge for GPK, too. Unfortunately my upload to the ppa contains a typo (yelp-utils instead yelp-tools). gnome-packagekit (3.8.2-4ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low * Merge from Debian Unstable. Remaining changes: + Drop obsolete python-packagekit-gtk package + Drop build dependency on obsoleted gtk-doc-utils and libapt-pkg-dev + Replace build dependecy on gnome-doc-utils by yelp-tools + Raise version of the libglib2.0-dev build dependency + Alternatively depend on aptdaemon's PackageKit compatibility layer So we would just sync Listaller from Debian. It is ok if it depends on packagekit. It is not the purpose of aptdaemon to provide a complete replacement for PackageKit. We just want to use the normal client libraries. Cheers! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169 Title: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1207169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022407] Re: Update to 0.8.x
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1207169 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1207169 Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022407 Title: Update to 0.8.x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1022407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1207169] [NEW] Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Thanks ** Affects: packagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Sebastian Heinlein (glatzor) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Sebastian Heinlein (glatzor) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207169 Title: Please merge packagekit 0.8.10-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1207169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1197727] Re: Replace your changes in ... configuration file prompt is unattractive
Am Freitag, den 19.07.2013, 15:32 + schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas: b. What do you mean by the header from the message? Do you mean the Replace your changes in... string? Or is there a separate header that currently isn't being shown? c. A question mark icon is the least specific icon that an alert could use. Can we be more specific by using the icon of the app that requested the task, in this case Software Updater? The question mark informs the user that the dialog doesn't represent a warning or even an error. That is a valuable information. Why should we show the icon of the application? Since e.g. update-manager is the parent window the user should be aware that this is an update-manager related dialog. d. I think it's safer just to pull the filename out and put it on its own line, rather than including it in a sentence. e. We could show the diff using labelled colors, without using - or + characters. This sketch combines these suggestions (except that it's missing the resizability). What do you think? ** Attachment added: draft design for the alert https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1197727/+attachment/3742770/+files/config-change.png I don't understand how it works exactly. Do you want to have a toggle button between keep and replace? What is the purpose of the continue button? There isn't an ignore option at that point for the user. The suggested diff viewer isn't very easy to implement. I will make a small research if there is code that we could reuse. In the end it would be nice to have a kind of editor which would allow a more detailed merge of the configuration files instead of the all or nothing approach which is currently taken. Cheers, Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197727 Title: Replace your changes in ... configuration file prompt is unattractive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1197727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094616] Re: Update PackageKit interface to 0.8
I will upload the release in the next days. ** Branch linked: lp:aptdaemon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094616 Title: Update PackageKit interface to 0.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/1094616/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1197727] [NEW] Replace your changes in ... configuration file prompt is unattractive
Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2013, 09:47 + schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas: a. it's closable and maximizable and should be neither It is maximazable if the changes are expanded. This allows you to see more changes. If the dialog is resizable it should also support maximize. b. the title is update-manager Should we use the header from the message? It seems that compiz wants to have a title. c. the question-mark icon is uninformative It seems to be common for GTK apps to have a question icon on dialogs that ask a question. Why should it behave differently? d. the filename is in the primary text, with Ascii quotes, though it may be very long What about the following text: Replace your configuration changes by a later version of the default configuration? The default configuration in /etc/your/config has been changed either by yourself or by a program. A later version of the configuration file that would replace your changes is available. If you don't know why the file is there already, it is usually safe to replace it. A copy of the old configuration will be stored at /etc/your/config.dpkg-old The last paragraph is too technical? e. a programmer-style diff is likely incomprehensible to non- programmers Alternatives? Should we add some information that the user should not be scared by the diff? This is a so called two-way-diff view of the old and new configuration that is often used by programmers. Red lines have been removed and green lines have been added. as a tooltip? f. the recommendation is to replace the file, but the default is Keep. Done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197727 Title: Replace your changes in ... configuration file prompt is unattractive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1197727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1190097] Re: Nautilus tries but fails to auto-install applications needed to open files of a given type
Thomas, the bug did re-occur? Or do you refer to the not fixed version of session-installer? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190097 Title: Nautilus tries but fails to auto-install applications needed to open files of a given type To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/app-install-data-ubuntu/+bug/1190097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022407] Re: Update to 0.8.x
Hello Matthias and Jeremy, I ported aptdaemon to the 0.8 interface at the weekend. All of the PK tests in aptdaemon pass and I can use pkcon without any problems. My plan is to extend the test suite and release by the end of the week. Cheers, Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022407 Title: Update to 0.8.x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1022407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046513] Re: Software Update tries to install unnecessary alternate dependency
Unfortunately PackgeKit 0.8.x is blocked because of the missing updated compat code in aptdaemon. So Fix committed seems to be a better state. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Triaged ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046513 Title: Software Update tries to install unnecessary alternate dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1046513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1158117] Re: Control centre fails to start because of an obsolete import of a deprecated and removed widget
Oh, the patch did not find its way into the raring release? That is a pitty. You don't need to compile anything. Just open /usr/bin/mythbuntu- control-center in a text editor as root and remove the AptMessageDialog from the imports. You have to leave the closing bracket. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158117 Title: Control centre fails to start because of an obsolete import of a deprecated and removed widget To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mythbuntu-control-centre/+bug/1158117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1175025] Re: conflict with python3-aptdaemon.pkcompat
Am 2013-05-02 08:26, schrieb dino99: @Sebastian here with Saucy ( Raring too) both policykit aptdaemon are used. And the policykit dependants list is much longer then the aptdaemon one. So maybe you said that we are on the transition way (post #2) for a possible future design, but right now you seems missing something. Sorry, but I don't understand your intention. What is the problem? What problem do you want to solve? What are the effects/symptome of the problem? Because I don't see any. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175025 Title: conflict with python3-aptdaemon.pkcompat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1175025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1175025] Re: conflict with python3-aptdaemon.pkcompat
We are using aptdaemon as the default package manager service and not packagekitd as Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175025 Title: conflict with python3-aptdaemon.pkcompat To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1175025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 528584] [NEW] show notification when software is installed if software center is closed before installation finishes
wer should have a session with the unity developers at the next uds. imho a lot of stuff should be handled at that level. we could even consider upstart events for the communication. Launchpad Bug Tracker 528...@bugs.launchpad.net schrieb: You have been subscribed to a public bug: If a user closes the software-center interface while operations are still in progress, a notification should be shown when all operations are completed. However, if the window has not been closed, a notification is not needed and should not be shown. Installing: * single package: Show [Title]Package name has finished installing[body]Launch it from the Application Category menu with the software-center icon, or possibly the application's icon. I think that the software-center icon would be useful in helping the user understand where the notification is coming from, but the application icon may also be useful. This should be discussed before implementation * multiple packages: Show [Title]Your software has finished installing notification with software-center-icon. Removal doesn't really need notifications because once software is removed, you don't need to interact with it so you won't be waiting for any process to complete. See also bug 613996, about notification for tasks completed when the window is in the background. ** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Triaged ** Tags: db -- show notification when software is installed if software center is closed before installation finishes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528584 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to aptdaemon in Ubuntu. -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528584 Title: show notification when software is installed if software center is closed before installation finishes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/528584/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1156401] Re: 'codec' not supported Gsteamer doesn't play any files such as videos or even sound
Which file do you want to open? Can you provide more information about it? ** Also affects: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156401 Title: 'codec' not supported Gsteamer doesn't play any files such as videos or even sound To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-good0.10/+bug/1156401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1049467] Re: Multimedia plugins installer says Python, rather than the Videos application, needs me to install plugins
Fix the detection of the client application in sessioninstaller ** Changed in: sessioninstaller Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Patch added: fix-lp1049467.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1049467/+attachment/3625504/+files/fix-lp1049467.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049467 Title: Multimedia plugins installer says Python, rather than the Videos application, needs me to install plugins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/1049467/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1070152] Re: Local sync (CalDav/CardDav) broken because of missing helper binary
https://launchpad.net/~glatzor/+archive/syncevolution You can use my packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070152 Title: Local sync (CalDav/CardDav) broken because of missing helper binary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syncevolution/+bug/1070152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 898851] Re: update-manager crashed with TypeError in function(): Must be number, not tuple
Indeed. I just forgot this patch :) Should make sense. The error reports of the users seem to indicate that there is really something more worse broken on their system and we only see a side effect here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898851 Title: update-manager crashed with TypeError in function(): Must be number, not tuple To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/898851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1158117] [NEW] Control centre fails to start because of an obsolete import of a deprecated and removed widget
Public bug reported: Rob Fargher (fargher-gmail) wrote 1 hour ago: #8 Bug is not fixed in Raring. Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/mythbuntu-control-centre, line 40, in module from aptdaemon.gtkwidgets import (AptErrorDialog, ImportError: cannot import name AptMessageDialog ** Affects: mythbuntu-control-centre (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Status: Triaged ** Changed in: mythbuntu-control-centre (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: mythbuntu-control-centre (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158117 Title: Control centre fails to start because of an obsolete import of a deprecated and removed widget To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mythbuntu-control-centre/+bug/1158117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1158117] Re: Control centre fails to start because of an obsolete import of a deprecated and removed widget
The AptMessageDialog was deprecated some time ago, since the concept of messages was removed from aptdaemon. The widgets gets imported but is never used. See the attached patch for a fix. ** Patch added: fix-obsolete-import-of-deprecated-widgets.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mythbuntu-control-centre/+bug/1158117/+attachment/3587250/+files/fix-obsolete-import-of-deprecated-widgets.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158117 Title: Control centre fails to start because of an obsolete import of a deprecated and removed widget To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mythbuntu-control-centre/+bug/1158117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1108552] Re: mythbuntu-control-centre failed to start
Sorry, for the noise on this bug. Perhaps it is too early in the morning here :) The new issue that you see Rob is the fault of control center. It imports (but never uses) a deprecated widget from aptdaemon that was removed in the 1.0 release. See LP #1158117 for details and a fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108552 Title: mythbuntu-control-centre failed to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1108552/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1125514] Re: Wording fix for Install software to openfiles? window
Am 2013-03-19 09:37, schrieb Matthew Paul Thomas: Sebastian, sorry, I don't understand the question. Are you saying the API lets you search for an application that can open multiple Mime types? E.g. Find an application that handles both audio/mpeg3 and application/ogg? If so, what is the use case for that? Thanks. Indeed. You can request a handler or several handlers for multiple mime types at once. I also cannot imagine a good use case for requesting several mime type handlers at the same time. But that is the given design of the PackageKit API that we need to implement here. The same is true for multimedia codecs - and more obvious: You e.g. need a handler for the audio stream, the video stream and the container format. In a cornor case all three handlers are located in separate packages. There is a small logic in session-installer that pre-selects the package or the best packages that provide all handlers by default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514 Title: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1125514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1125514] Re: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window
hello mpt, but how to handle the case of multiple mime types or gstreamer codecs? generally not all applications can support all mime types or codecs. so in this particular case you need to show in the dialog which application supports which mime type. and perhaps which mime type is not supported add all. the test script has an option to search for multiple codecs. if you uninstall the gstreamer bad and ugly plugins you should get an idea and how this is handled currently. Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com schrieb: Thanks Sebastian! Currently my sketches in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations#searching show only Mime types only, not human-readable names for types. I thought that if the OS doesn't have any software installed for a type, probably it doesn't know a human-readable name for the type either. After all, /etc/mime.types includes only Mime types and their corresponding filename suffixes, not human-readable names. (Maybe there is a list with human-readable names somewhere else?) It would be nice to show the human-readable name as well, if we know it. So, I've defined a file type string for use in the UI, being the Mime type, plus the human-readable name in brackets if known. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations?action=diffrev2=27rev1=25 Does that look good to you? Apart from that string, though, whether we know a human-readable name for the Mime type shouldn't make any difference to whether -- or how -- we offer to install an application for that Mime type. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to sessioninstaller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514 Title: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1125514/+subscriptions -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514 Title: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1125514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1129673] Re: 12.04 crash's on older HP laptop
Sorry, but this is just not enough information to identify or resolve your issue. Please say what you did, what errors you get and what you expected. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129673 Title: 12.04 crash's on older HP laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1129673/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048802] Re: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1050799 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050799 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1050799 PackageKit compatibility layer tests (tests/test_pk.py) fail if http_proxy is set ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048802 Title: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1048802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1036799] Re: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1054984 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054984 ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1054984 aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036799 Title: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1036799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1079895] Re: Read-only filesystem causes unhandlable error
How should the error look like, Matthew? This is really a very technical issue. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079895 Title: Read-only filesystem causes unhandlable error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1079895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022993] Re: aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _emit_acquire_item(): 'utf-8' codec can't decode bytes in position 0-1: invalid continuation byte
** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022993 Title: aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _emit_acquire_item(): 'utf-8' codec can't decode bytes in position 0-1: invalid continuation byte To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1022993/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1011785] Re: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode : file stream must be in binary mode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1054984 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054984 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1054984 aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011785 Title: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode : file stream must be in binary mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1011785/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 746019] Re: Got The package system is broken message after installing Volley Brawl
We now handle a broken depenency system by having introduced the FixDepends() method. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/746019 Title: Got The package system is broken message after installing Volley Brawl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/746019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1060081] Re: aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _emit_acquire_item(): 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x93 in position 1: invalid start byte
What language do you use? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060081 Title: aptd crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in _emit_acquire_item(): 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x93 in position 1: invalid start byte To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1060081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125514] Re: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window
I am currently working on a 1.0 release of aptdaemon. Afterwards I will have a look at sessioninstaller. There is a very akward cornor case: We could find an application that handles the file type but we don't know the file type :) Because knowning the type means to have a human name for the file/mime type only. Should we show the technical definition of the type, e.g. audio/x-mp3 instead? The PackageKit API allows to specify more than one mime type. So we could end up with the situation in which we don't know only one of the types. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514 Title: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1125514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1120322] Re: update-manager crashed with UnboundLocalError in show_diff(): local variable 'line_number' referenced before assignment
** Changed in: aptdaemon Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1120322 Title: update-manager crashed with UnboundLocalError in show_diff(): local variable 'line_number' referenced before assignment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/1120322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116503] Re: Problems installing package signature from Python script
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116503 Title: Problems installing package signature from Python script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1116503/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101815] Re: You don't have got the required privileges to perform this action.
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the bug by cancelling a transaction, e.g. a package installation tiggered by the language selector. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101815 Title: You don't have got the required privileges to perform this action. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1101815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101815] Re: You don't have got the required privileges to perform this action.
The grammar was fixed in latest raring. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101815 Title: You don't have got the required privileges to perform this action. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1101815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032104] Re: The package is of bad quality error message is bad
a.) S-C should perform a simulate() before showing the default local .deb file installation warning b.) e.) makes it a little bit more compliacted. only the details in the error dialog contain translation specific information. Both the title and the message are only error specific - so they are always the same for every package that creates the same error. It would require a re- design of the API to change this. Matthew, could you provide a better wording so far? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032104 Title: The package is of bad quality error message is bad To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1032104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 430197] Re: Disable partial upgrades during a development release
The partial upgrade is required if you run the development version. the
pure dependency definitions of the packages are not enough.
we could argue if not every upgrade should be a partial upgrade.
Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com schrieb:
So we need a confirmation alert listing the removals, then? Okay,
specification updated.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations?action=diffrev2=22rev1=21
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) = (unassigned)
** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
More and more people test devel release of Ubuntu. While we give
adequate warnings on the risks of running ubuntu+1 releases sometimes
it's not enough.
update-manager has a concept of a partial upgrade which seems to be
more trouble than it's worth. Perhaps give the user a more descriptive
set of options, something like:
a) Wait until later until the archive works itself out.
b) Install stuff, but don't remove anything
c) Do a partial upgrade (and perhaps a scary warning like apt does when
you try to remove glibc. Yes, I recognize that I could explode my
machine, do it.
Or perhaps something like Something bad has happened, go use apt-get
or something that makes it clear that update-manager is confused.
+
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareUpdates#Installing: The selected
+ updates should then install with the standard interface.
+
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations#updating: If the
+ new package conflicts with installed packages, a confirmation alert
+ should appear: ‘“{title}” can’t be updated unless these items are
+ removed:’, with “Cancel” and “Update Install” buttons, but
otherwise
+ identical to the equivalent alert when installing a new package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Aptdaemon
Developers, which is subscribed to aptdaemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430197
Title:
Disable partial upgrades during a development release
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/430197/+subscriptions
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430197
Title:
Disable partial upgrades during a development release
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/430197/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 430197] Re: Disable partial upgrades during a development release
oh i missed the previous discussion.
Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com schrieb:
So we need a confirmation alert listing the removals, then? Okay,
specification updated.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations?action=diffrev2=22rev1=21
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) = (unassigned)
** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
More and more people test devel release of Ubuntu. While we give
adequate warnings on the risks of running ubuntu+1 releases sometimes
it's not enough.
update-manager has a concept of a partial upgrade which seems to be
more trouble than it's worth. Perhaps give the user a more descriptive
set of options, something like:
a) Wait until later until the archive works itself out.
b) Install stuff, but don't remove anything
c) Do a partial upgrade (and perhaps a scary warning like apt does when
you try to remove glibc. Yes, I recognize that I could explode my
machine, do it.
Or perhaps something like Something bad has happened, go use apt-get
or something that makes it clear that update-manager is confused.
+
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareUpdates#Installing: The selected
+ updates should then install with the standard interface.
+
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwarePackageOperations#updating: If the
+ new package conflicts with installed packages, a confirmation alert
+ should appear: ‘“{title}” can’t be updated unless these items are
+ removed:’, with “Cancel” and “Update Install” buttons, but
otherwise
+ identical to the equivalent alert when installing a new package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Aptdaemon
Developers, which is subscribed to aptdaemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430197
Title:
Disable partial upgrades during a development release
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/430197/+subscriptions
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430197
Title:
Disable partial upgrades during a development release
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/430197/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1108552] Re: mythbuntu-control-centre failed to start
mythubuntu control center uses the ancient python gtk2 bindings. Are there any plans to go for python3, gtk3 and gobject introspection? We broke backwards compatibility in aptdaemon. I will try to restore it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1108552 Title: mythbuntu-control-centre failed to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1108552/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125514] Re: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window
I was hoping that this was a kind of test setup and not a real life screenshot :/ Having a short look at the code I have to admit that the logic of the dialog isn't very good. The case in which a file cannot be opened at all isn't handled. That is why you get this strange dialog. Unfortunately we don't know the path of the file. Only the human undfriendly mime type, e.g audio/x-mp3. I already implemented some tricks to get a nice name of the requesting application. I could add a test if we cannot get a real world name for mime type, but what to do in this case? Should we point to an Internet site or support platform? Getting the name of the distro is easy. I could add this to your code changes afterwards: platform.dist()[0] You can use the test command in the sessioninstaller source code to trigger the dialog yourself: In a terminal session run: ./session-installer And in a second one: ./test --install-mime-types audio/x-mp3 audio/x-ogg ** Description changed: + Logic of the mime type handler dialog isn't very good: + + * Doesn't handle the case in which we could not find a mime type handler at all + * Doesn't handle unknown mime types + + -- + I am using 12.04. When opening an unknown file type, Nautilus will attempt to find and install the needed software. Currently, the window text is, nautilus requires to install software to open files of the following file type: I propose that we change the wording to (1) Nautilus needs to install additional software to open this type of file: - (2) Nautilus requires installing additional software to open these files: - (3) Nautilus requires installing additional software to open files of the following type: + (2) Nautilus requires installing additional software to open these files: + (3) Nautilus requires installing additional software to open files of the following type: or something similar. I have attached a screenshot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514 Title: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1125514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134320] Re: Need to install unsigned packages with aptdamon's PackageKit emulation
Please have a look at the PackageKit API documentation: The first argument of the PackageKitGlib.Client.install_packages() method is only_trusted. Just set to false to allow installing unauthenticated packages. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134320 Title: Need to install unsigned packages with aptdamon's PackageKit emulation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1134320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1114870] Re: package libkfile4 4:4.9.4-0ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 842799 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842799 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 842799 Software installation or update doesn't block session exit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114870 Title: package libkfile4 4:4.9.4-0ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1114870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1125514] Re: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window
Oh, there are perhaps even more pieces of bad grammar :) Would you mind to have a look at sessioninstaller/core.py ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125514 Title: Wording fix for Install software to open files? window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1125514/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 842799] Re: Software installation or update doesn't block session exit
Systemd's logind introduced a new DBus interface to inhibit shutdown or suspend. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/inhibit We would need support in unity. ** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842799 Title: Software installation or update doesn't block session exit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/842799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441686] Re: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary
We could add this functionality to either gtk3widgets or all the clients. Depends a little on the direction we want to take with software-center/unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441686 Title: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/441686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668846] Re: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open
Good idea to use a timeout. Could be implemented on the aptdaemon/gtk3widgets level. Sometimes a background task could block your transaction (e.g. fetching the latest updates) - those background tasks use an apt-get based cron job. We could detect if it is part of the cron job or if the apt-get command runs in a terminal. Furthermore we could hardcode nice names for apt-get, aptitude and dpkg. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668846 Title: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/668846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090656] Re: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
** Also affects: aptdaemon Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = policykit (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/2clickupdate/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 936122] Re: Possible race in the transaction limbo (perhaps of run with remove_from_connection_without_exception)
Am Freitag, den 01.02.2013, 22:42 + schrieb Brian Murray: This is occurring fairly regularly for users of 12.04 as seen on errors.ubuntu.com: https://errors.ubuntu.com/bucket/?id=/usr/sbin/aptd:KeyError:_inline_callbacks:put Sorry, but I cannot login to erros.ubuntu.com. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936122 Title: Possible race in the transaction limbo (perhaps of run with remove_from_connection_without_exception) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/936122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053155] Re: Too many windows: 4 windows only for the installation of codecs in Totem
** Changed in: sessioninstaller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053155 Title: Too many windows: 4 windows only for the installation of codecs in Totem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sessioninstaller/+bug/1053155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1116503] Re: Problems installing package signature from Python script
For security reasons the short key ID isn't enough. Could you please try E5E86C008AA65D56 instead. I will check why we don't get a better error message here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116503 Title: Problems installing package signature from Python script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1116503/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 898851] Re: update-manager crashed with TypeError in function(): Must be number, not tuple
Since we cannot get to the root of the problem - which seems to be located in GTK+ or Python GI - I would vote to just work arround the crash. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = precise-updates ** Patch added: fix-lp898851.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/898851/+attachment/3470694/+files/fix-lp898851.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898851 Title: update-manager crashed with TypeError in function(): Must be number, not tuple To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/898851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1019757] Re: aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in pkgCacheGenerator::ListParser::NewProvides()
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu) ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019757 Title: aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in pkgCacheGenerator::ListParser::NewProvides() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1019757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 891255] Re: A failed Run() call doesn't let the transaction fail (e.g. authorization errors)
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891255 Title: A failed Run() call doesn't let the transaction fail (e.g. authorization errors) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/891255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1064102] Re: aptd crashed with OSError in _execute_child(): [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory
It seems that your system requires more system memory (RAM) or a larger swap. Have you seen this error again? ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064102 Title: aptd crashed with OSError in _execute_child(): [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1064102/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668846] Re: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open
I close bug for aptdaemon since I don't see how we could improve the situation from the daemon side. The transaction is in the STATUS_WAITING_LOCK state. INMHO software- center should raise the visibility of this state e.g. by showing a persistent in-window notification if the transaction is in this state for a longer time. If you need any code from the aptdaemon side please feel free to reopen it again. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668846 Title: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/668846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1050799] Re: PackageKit compatibility layer tests (tests/test_pk.py) fail if http_proxy is set
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050799 Title: PackageKit compatibility layer tests (tests/test_pk.py) fail if http_proxy is set To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1050799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619363] Re: aptdaemon dbus backend crash in self._transaction.run(defer=True)
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed ** Changed in: software-center-aptdaemon-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619363 Title: aptdaemon dbus backend crash in self._transaction.run(defer=True) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/619363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090656] Re: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1017540] Re: aptd crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Disconnected: Connection was disconnected before a reply was received
It seems that your D-Bus daemon crashed. This isn't related to aptdaemon. If you get the problem again, we should fill a bug against dbus. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017540 Title: aptd crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Disconnected: Connection was disconnected before a reply was received To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1017540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806945] Re: Похоже в коде приложения aptdaemon есть ошибка, программы, которая позволяет устанавливать/удалять приложения и выполнять прочие задачи, связанные с управлением пакетами. Сообщите об
I don't expect that we get the required information ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: aptdaemon Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806945 Title: Похоже в коде приложения aptdaemon есть ошибка, программы, которая позволяет устанавливать/удалять приложения и выполнять прочие задачи, связанные с управлением пакетами. Сообщите об этой ошибке на http://launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+filebug и повторите снова. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/806945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1063764] Re: aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in File()
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu) ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063764 Title: aptd crashed with SIGSEGV in File() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1063764/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094616] [NEW] Update PackageKit interface to 0.8
Public bug reported: The PackageKit 0.8 introduced a lot of API changes. We want to support the new interface. ** Affects: aptdaemon Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Changed in: aptdaemon Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: aptdaemon Importance: Undecided = High ** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094616 Title: Update PackageKit interface to 0.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/1094616/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094614] [NEW] Add a GLib based client library
Public bug reported: It would be nice to have a tiny GLib based C library available which also makes use of introspection to provide client libraries to other progamming languages. ** Affects: aptdaemon Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Also affects: aptdaemon Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: aptdaemon Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: aptdaemon Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Branch linked: lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/glib -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094614 Title: Add a GLib based client library To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/1094614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078544] Re: python-aptdaemon: upgrading marks auto-installed packages as manual
Thanks a lot for spotting this error. There seem to be another issue with downgrades. If the package is marked as auto installed it cannot be downgraded. You can reproduce this by appliying the extended states setup in the test_upgrade to test_downgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078544 Title: python-aptdaemon: upgrading marks auto-installed packages as manual To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/1078544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078544] Re: python-aptdaemon: upgrading marks auto-installed packages as manual
The user should be allowed to override any holds, so I have chosen your second patch. ** Changed in: aptdaemon Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078544 Title: python-aptdaemon: upgrading marks auto-installed packages as manual To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptdaemon/+bug/1078544/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090153] Re: cannot install or uninstall executables
What do you maean by executables? Do you get any details in the error dialog? ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090153 Title: cannot install or uninstall executables To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090153/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1078412] Re: package libkdewebkit5 4:4.9.2-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package libkdewebkit5 is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
The libkdewebkit package failed to install at this session: 2012-11-13 15:47:15 And it just stayed in the half-configured state. This is not related to aptdaemon. ** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = kde4libs (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde4libs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078412 Title: package libkdewebkit5 4:4.9.2-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: package libkdewebkit5 is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half-installed') To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde4libs/+bug/1078412/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1042368] Re: aptd crashed with KeyError in put(): '/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d'
** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042368 Title: aptd crashed with KeyError in put(): '/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1042368/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1055190] Re: Software-properties-gtk does not start
It seems that you have got some file system issues on your system. Please try to re-install the python3-gi package ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055190 Title: Software-properties-gtk does not start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1055190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015718] Re: package python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets 0.43+bzr805-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
You are using zRam? Could be related to this. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015718 Title: package python-aptdaemon.gtk3widgets 0.43+bzr805-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1015718/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1042368] Re: aptd crashed with KeyError in put(): '/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d'
Pplease ignore the last comment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042368 Title: aptd crashed with KeyError in put(): '/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1042368/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1042368] Re: aptd crashed with KeyError in put(): '/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d'
http://www.usr-local-share.com/?p=594 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042368 Title: aptd crashed with KeyError in put(): '/org/debian/apt/transaction/2c08d272196f4bcaa1629a98b5d6856d' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1042368/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1050055] Re: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode
This should be fixed in Quantal and Raring. ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050055 Title: aptd crashed with AssertionError in _assert_bin_mode(): file stream must be in binary mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1050055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 725387] Re: type 'exceptions.TypeError': add_repository() got multiple values for keyword argument 'src_type'
Sorry, but I cannot analyze the bug with the given information. Actually all seems to be fine! Since the error did not occur anymore on a recent Ubuntu version I will close it. ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725387 Title: type 'exceptions.TypeError': add_repository() got multiple values for keyword argument 'src_type' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/725387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986729] Re: Erro ao Instalar Drivers FGLRX
** Package changed: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) = jockey (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986729 Title: Erro ao Instalar Drivers FGLRX To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/986729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441686] Re: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary
I tried to reproduce it. And all works fine: Software-center ignores the error (ERROR_DAEMON_DIED) silently and a crash report is created. The only problem is that the user doesn't get a notification about the failed transaction. The progress bar just vanishes and the install button re-appears. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441686 Title: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/441686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 712377] Re: Opening a known good *.deb with software centre, fails to install as lintian errors cannot be overidden
Am Samstag, den 15.12.2012, 18:02 + schrieb Kevin Leeds: What would be a good place to look to find definitive information on file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile? (In case I am paranoid and don't trust Google packages much or forum contributions from people not very well known to me, or interested to know where definitive documentation can be found in general for Ubuntu issues?) Take a look at *.desc in /usr/share/lintian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712377 Title: Opening a known good *.deb with software centre, fails to install as lintian errors cannot be overidden To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/712377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1079895] Re: Read-only filesystem causes unhandlable error
** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** No longer affects: aptdaemon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079895 Title: Read-only filesystem causes unhandlable error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1079895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090656] [NEW] Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
Public bug reported: Myself and plenty of others are posting pretty much the same question and no one is getting a reply. All you're saying is it must be us typing our passwords wrong but its NOT. Don't try putting the blame off because you don't know you're software or something. So, how about helping somebody out before people start removing your crap. ** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: policykit (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Project changed: aptdaemon = policykit (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: policykit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: policykit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090656] Re: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
Can you specify what you have done before? Did you perform an upgrade? Install a new Ubuntu version? Gets your password accepted when doing other administration tasks (e.g. adding a new user in the system preferences)? Do you use automatic login or do you login with in our password? ** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090656] Re: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit
I changed the bug status to confirmed since there have been several questions about this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090656 Title: Passwords aren't accepted anymore by PolicyKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1090656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619363] Re: aptdaemon dbus backend crash in self._transaction.run(defer=True)
** Changed in: software-center-aptdaemon-plugins (Ubuntu) Assignee: Huynh Trung Tin (tinvuong51003405) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619363 Title: aptdaemon dbus backend crash in self._transaction.run(defer=True) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/619363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085673] Re: Update manager shows incorrect download size
Do you see this miscalculations often? Can you reproduce them? ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085673 Title: Update manager shows incorrect download size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1085673/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668846] Re: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open
Aptdaemon already shows the name of the binary/application which holds the lock in the status message: Waiting for XXX to exit Possible values in real life are aptitude, apt-get, dpkg and synaptic. The status of the transaction is set to PK_STATUS_ENUM_WAITING_FOR_LOCK on the PackageKit interface and to aptdaemon.enums.STATUS_WATING_FOR_LOCK on the aptdaemon interface which is used by s-c. So basically all technical requirements are there. An important use case is the daily update of the cache to check for upgrades. It currently doesn't use aptdaemon but calls apt-get update. So you can get random cache locks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668846 Title: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/668846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 983776] Re: tooltip of downloads is too wide (gtk3widgets)
** Summary changed: - Update manager cosmetic flaw + tooltip of downloads is too wide (gtk3widgets) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983776 Title: tooltip of downloads is too wide (gtk3widgets) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/983776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668846] Re: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open
The cleanest solution would be to use aptdaemon for the daily updates and in synaptic. But especially the later one would require a little bit of work. Since synaptic runs in the user session and aptdaemon doesn't it isn't the job of aptdameon to notify the user. Sending Synaptic to the front doesn't give the user any clue that he has to close it. Furthermore it is a bad idea to close an application without the confirmation of the user. You never know what kind of unapplied changes there are. ** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668846 Title: No obvious error when Software Centre can't install due to Synaptic being open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/668846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032104] Re: The package is of bad quality error message is bad
Hopefully some first answers: (a) If you click on a package s-c is opened to install it. the second dialog is just an error message that the installation tiggered. The error only appears if you install a package file - it will never appear if installing from a repository. (d) The worst kind of problems: unpredictable problems :) And very technical ones. The quality problems are violations of the Ubuntu/Debian packaging policy. The user could see failures to install or update software or strange behavior of applications and crashes. (g) Isn't allowed isn't true anymore. That is correct. Thanks for your input! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032104 Title: The package is of bad quality error message is bad To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/1032104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441686] Re: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary
1. If aptdaemon dies because of SEGV we want to know it. So it is ok to get the apport report for aptdaemon. 2. It is not ok that s-c crashses too. It should show the task cannot be monitoried ... error dialog. I will have a look at it. SIGKILL could also do the job to kill aptdaemon. 3. You only get the task cannot be monitoried ... message if we don't have a clue: Aptdaemon just vanished (on the Dbus). Normally you should get the aptdaemon apport report. But the apport dialog only talks about a system service and not about e.g. a failed application installation. AFAIK it is possible to modify the apport message: e.g. Update installtion failed. But you cannot rely only on the apport notification to notify the user that he or her action failed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441686 Title: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/441686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441686] Re: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary
If a patient has too many fatal diagnosis to remember, we just say he is seriously ill. Perhaps we should say to the user: something strange happened on your computer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441686 Title: Task cannot be monitored or controlled alert is unhelpful and scary To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptdaemon/+bug/441686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
