[Bug 1739477] Re: Scilab 6.0 shows warnings about files from package liblucene4.10-java, but does not depend on it
I pushed a commit to the salsa.debian.org repo of scilab : next upload will fix that. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739477 Title: Scilab 6.0 shows warnings about files from package liblucene4.10-java, but does not depend on it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/1739477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166628] Re: New compile error on ARM
Is it fixed upstream too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166628 Title: New compile error on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1166628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166628] Re: New compile error on ARM
(the question is so I know if it's useful to push changes around the ARM asm issues upstream or not) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166628 Title: New compile error on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/binutils/+bug/1166628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1166628] [NEW] New compile error on ARM
Public bug reported: I have the following compile error with gcc-4.7 version 4.7.2-23ubuntu2: /bin/bash ../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CC ../mpn/m4-ccas --m4=m4 gcc -std=gnu99 -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_`echo udiv | sed 's/_$//'` -I. -I.. `test -f 'udiv.asm' || echo './'`udiv.asm libtool: compile: ../mpn/m4-ccas --m4=m4 gcc -std=gnu99 -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_udiv -I. -I.. udiv.asm -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/udiv.o m4 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -DOPERATION_udiv -DPIC udiv.asm tmp-udiv.s gcc -std=gnu99 -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I.. -DOPERATION_udiv -I. -I.. tmp-udiv.s -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/udiv.o tmp-udiv.s: Assembler messages: tmp-udiv.s:83: Error: ARM register expected -- `str r1,[ r0 ]' tmp-udiv.s:134: Error: ARM register expected -- `str r1,[ r0 ]' make[2]: *** [udiv.lo] Error 1 The problem occurs trying to compile either mpir (upstream 2.6.0 or upstream trunk), or the ubuntu source package for libgmp10. The source file triggering the problem is in fact mostly the same. I think I can blame gcc rather than that source file because it used to compile when my toshiba ac100 was still running precise, then quantal. ** Affects: gcc-4.7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166628 Title: New compile error on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.7/+bug/1166628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926855] Re: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile
I can confirm 4.6.2-16ubuntu1, uploaded Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:39:11 +0100 fixes the problem : I can compile sage without compiler problems! Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855 Title: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/926855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713985] Re: [armel] Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM
This is still a problem with 2.13-24ubuntu4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713985 Title: [armel] Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-misc/+bug/713985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926855] [NEW] [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile
Public bug reported: I'm porting the sagemath software to ARM. I completed the port with ubuntu oneiric. I upgraded to (a snapshot of) precise, and now a single file in the whole project doesn't build anymore. Hence something has been broken from oneiric/armel to precise/armhf. The attached mp.c is a gcc -E version of the problematic file, so it allows to easily reproduce the issue without fuss : if you compile it with gcc -c -o mp.o mp.c -O3 -funroll-loops, then the assembler will find two cases of branch out of range. Other switch combinations don't give problems, and the same combination is ok on x86_64 for example. Ah, on precise the gcc version is the one of Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:10:59 +100 uploaded by doko, and changelog Merge with debian. There's no problem giving more details or doing tests if you want. ** Affects: gcc-4.6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855 Title: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/926855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926855] Re: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile
** Attachment added: Example problematic file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855/+attachment/2714685/+files/mp.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855 Title: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/926855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926855] Re: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile
The file compiles with -O3 -funroll-loops -marm (someone suggested I try) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855 Title: [ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/926855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713985] [NEW] Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM
Public bug reported:
Consider the following test program :
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
int
main (int argc,
char* argv[])
{
long double x = 6.0;
printf(tgammal (%.20Lf)=%.20Lfn, x, tgammal(x));
return 0;
}
When run on 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2, the result is :
tgammal (6.)=119.97157829
while when run on 2.11.2-11 (glibc's unstable), the result is :
tgammal (6.)=119.8612
The second result is acceptable, while the second isn't. This makes sage
(http://www.sagemath.org) unhappy...
** Affects: eglibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- Function tgammal has precision issues in this version
+ Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713985
Title:
Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on
ARM
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713985] Re: Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM
I forgot to say that it was on an ARM (little-endian) box! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713985 Title: Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677360] [NEW] Generated assembly doesn't correspond to the ARM processor
Public bug reported: While investigating why I couldn't compile sage on the toshiba AC100 (an ARM-based netbook) -- this is report http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10285 , it appeared that some of the problems are due to the compiler, which from a C file goes to an assembly file... and then fails to build it! Here is an example -- taken from Boehm's garbage collector's failed compilation (the full build log is attached to the sage report): gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\gc\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\gc\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\7.1\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=\gc 7.1\ -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\snipped\ -DGC_VERSI ON_MAJOR=7 -DGC_VERSION_MINOR=1 -DPACKAGE=\gc\ -DVERSION=\7.1\ -DGC_LINUX_TH READS=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE _INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DNO_EXECUTE_ PERMISSION=1 -DALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS=1 -DGC_GCJ_SUPPORT=1 -DJAVA_FINALIZATION=1 -DATOMIC_UNCOLLECTABLE=1 -DLARGE_CONFIG=1 -I./include -fexceptions -I libatomic_ ops/src -g -O2 -MT alloc.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/alloc.Tpo -c alloc.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/alloc.o /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s:1314: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode `swp ip,r2,[r3]' /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s:1371: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode `swp ip,r0,[r2]' /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s:2783: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode `swp lr,r2,[r6]' /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s:2851: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode `swp r1,r0,[r3]' /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s:3613: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode `swp ip,r2,[r3]' /tmp/cckXY2Jn.s:3652: Error: selected processor does not support Thumb mode `swp ip,r1,[r3]' make[3]: *** [alloc.lo] Error 1 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Generated assembly doesn't correspond to the ARM processor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677360] Re: Generated assembly doesn't correspond to the ARM processor
Notice that launchpad insisted that my package number doesn't exist -- but I know it does, since the head of /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/changelog.Debian.gz is : gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14ubuntu5) maverick; urgency=low * Avoid include paths starting with a double slash. LP: #635840. -- Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:00:29 +0200 and : $ ls /var/cache/apt/archives/ | grep gcc-4.4 gcc-4.4_4.4.4-14ubuntu5_armel.deb I say it is 4.4.4-14ubuntu5, and I have good reasons to think so! -- Generated assembly doesn't correspond to the ARM processor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 23545] Re: No more X on resume after hibernate
I reported it upstream as : http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10975 The more we will be interested and ready to give information about the matter, the faster it will get fixed. The ideal situation is if one of us had a clue about the code itself. -- No more X on resume after hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/23545 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63348] Re: ekiga segfaults on start up
The fact is that we ekiga developpers develop ekiga. And ubuntu packages ekiga. If packages don't follow the bugfixes releases, then there's nothing we can do except pester that the bug reports come directly to us, giving us undue work. -- ekiga segfaults on start up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63348] Re: ekiga segfaults on start up
No, that mean edgy itself hasn't been kept up to date, and we ekiga developers suffer duplicate reports on duplicate reports although we try to be as reactive as possible for volunteers. Pun intended. -- ekiga segfaults on start up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63348] Re: ekiga segfaults on start up
2.0.x releases are bugfix-only releases : cherry-picking makes no sense. -- ekiga segfaults on start up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63348] Re: ekiga segfaults on start up
2.0.3 is very old : we're releasing 2.0.9 in a few days! -- ekiga segfaults on start up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63348] Re: ekiga segfaults on start up
Mark as rejected as you wish, but notice that 2.0.3 is old news already : we're up to 2.0.5! -- ekiga segfaults on start up https://launchpad.net/bugs/63348 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78756] Re: gnome-volume-manager-gthumb stopped working in Feisty
Same here ; notice the camera is obviously detected by gnome-volume- manager (I killed it and ran it with -n in console to check). -- gnome-volume-manager-gthumb stopped working in Feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/78756 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 23545] Re: No more X on resume after hibernate
@Greg Michalec: did you try to disable DRI? That's what makes it mostly work for me. -- No more X on resume after hibernate https://launchpad.net/bugs/23545 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15179] Re: Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files
Moving files behind the user's back is a very bad practice. Doing so looking at their permissions is fragile. My two eurocents. -- Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files https://launchpad.net/bugs/15179 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15179] Re: Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files
Removing files in the _temporary_ directory isn't behind users' back, so it's better : you claim something, you stick to it. Why not make applications save those files readonly? That way the user will not write to them. -- Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files https://launchpad.net/bugs/15179 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62106] Re: Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card
Eh, I have wonderful news : I got a wifi router, which meant I could use 'managed'. And with managed, I get Rx invalid nwid by the hundred of thousands! With 2.6.15-27-k7 in mode managed, I have only one such at the end of the day! -- Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card https://launchpad.net/bugs/62106 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 15179] Re: Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files
I commented the following to the blog post : I save temporary files in /tmp, so you know at least one person which would be very annoyed if you disallow /tmp. A solution would be to make a special “Temporary” location, which would really be /tmp, but would at least make things clear for a newcomer. -- Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files https://launchpad.net/bugs/15179 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
It wasn't really rejected : it was marked as duplicate. Probably this bug should track the other bug upstream. -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63348] Re: ekiga segfaults on start up
The druid may crash because accessibility is on... It's a bug in atk, where multithreading isn't supported. -- ekiga segfaults on start up https://launchpad.net/bugs/63348 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
Hmmm... if it's handling a condition which wasn't handled, then it's a real fix :-) If it's handling a condition which shouldn't have arisen in the first place, then it's a workaround and it's bad :-) -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63969] Re: grub does not respond to ESC
Eh, I removed this line and grub is able to show the menu again normally. -- grub does not respond to ESC https://launchpad.net/bugs/63969 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 23545] Re: No more X on resume after hibernate
Uh... I had forgotten I had reported the problem here... just discovered it again. I have both suspendhibernate working with 2.6.15-27-k7 (not perfectly for hibernate : I have to switch backforth from console before getting my screen back -- and it's not locked). Disabling DRI made it work. More recent kernels just don't work. -- No more X on resume after hibernate https://launchpad.net/bugs/23545 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63969] Re: grub does not respond to ESC
If it does like here, the menu isn't displayed, but is still there and you can select the right line blindly. -- grub does not respond to ESC https://launchpad.net/bugs/63969 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
As I said, the fact that booting a different kernel makes the difference between works and fails is certainly indicative of a bug between acpid and kernel. Could others test if using an older kernel helps ? -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
(1) enough reports ; (2) enough information to solve it. -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
Notice my comment about successfully using an older kernel with the rest being the same. I'm not sure playing with the xserver will really help :-/ -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62106] Re: Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card
The upgrade to 2.6.17-10.29 didn't solve that : only managed is available. -- Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card https://launchpad.net/bugs/62106 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
I have some new things to say about the problem : (1) I'm using the radeon driver, not fglrx ; (2) the problem occurs with 2.6.17-10.28 and 2.6.17-10.29 (3) but not with my trusty 2.6.15-27.48 (I upgraded from dapper recently) What information could I provide to help with finding a solution? -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57803] Re: fonts do not diplay when run in X
After today's update, emacs in X works again! Thanks! -- fonts do not diplay when run in X https://launchpad.net/bugs/57803 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58498] Re: Can't init Maxima session within TeXmacs
What I find strange is that the last entry in changelog.Debian.gz is to say that the support for maxima had been re-enabled! -- Can't init Maxima session within TeXmacs https://launchpad.net/bugs/58498 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61746] Re: Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
I have seen the same issue today on an ASUS A2D with a Radeon Mobility 9200. Notice that removing the battery had the same effect (power cable was plugged, of course...) : kill X. Isn't the X server a little touchy about acpid events ? -- Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63800] Re: closing lid restarts gdm
are you sure it's gdm restarting and not the same as bug #61746, where X dies ? -- closing lid restarts gdm https://launchpad.net/bugs/63800 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62106] Re: Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card
(1) is perhaps related to bug #60938 ; I ran depmod -a and it fixed the issue. Now both linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic and linux- restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 have the only-managed problem. -- Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card https://launchpad.net/bugs/62106 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57803] Re: fonts do not diplay when run in X
Same problem here. I came here to report, and I'm pretty happy to see it is already there :-) I'm quite surprised the bug is still marked unconfirmed, though. -- fonts do not diplay when run in X https://launchpad.net/bugs/57803 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62106] Re: Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card
I can confirm this with a netgear card. I did have some problems when upgrading : (1) linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic couldn't load the module because of unresolved symbol issues ; (2) linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 can load the module but cannot set mode to non-managed. So I'm still using 2.6.15(-27). Hope those informations help. -- Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card https://launchpad.net/bugs/62106 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63777] Re: Lock Version not working
Eh, today I fought quite a long time with synaptic to get it to unlock some packages : no way. Synaptic did as it does when it does something, but when I got hand again, nothing had changed. I finally unlocked them by removing the /var/lib/synaptic/preferences file (which had been created when the box was still dapper). I then changed my mind and decided to re-lock one of them. Same problem. I would say the menu is connected to make the user wait while we rebuild the package categories which we didn't change. Hope it helps -- Lock Version not working https://launchpad.net/bugs/63777 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63777] Re: Lock Version not working
To be precise, I have 0.57.11ubuntu10 here and now. -- Lock Version not working https://launchpad.net/bugs/63777 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2784] Re: Can't link a C++ lib to a program
Pfff... I don't have the developpment environment ready to retest anymore and lack the time to reinstall it properly. I propose to close the bug. PS: Isn't the reporter supposed to be able to close a report? -- Can't link a C++ lib to a program https://launchpad.net/bugs/2784 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
