[Bug 1873614] Re: Definition of add_mountroot_fail_hook doesnt match lvm2's usage
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1871154 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871154 As a workaround in the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions replace the line ln -s "$0" /tmp/mountroot-fail-hooks.d/"$0" with n -s "$0" /tmp/mountroot-fail-hooks.d/"$1" in add_mountroot_fail_hook() dunction as suggested above, then run # update-initramfs -uk all as root. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873614 Title: Definition of add_mountroot_fail_hook doesnt match lvm2's usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/initramfs-tools/+bug/1873614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580045] [NEW] in smbfs package the smbmount binary removed but libpam-mount with smbfs would use it
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Hello, I update my 8.10 LTS today and in the new smbfs package the smbmount/mount.smbfs has been removed and mount.cifs is presented. Unfortunately the libpam-mount would use it (debug mode, auth.log): May 13 17:37:34 xxxhost login[11005]: pam_mount(misc.c:285) command: smbmount [//blah/share] [/home/bela/[..]/share] [-o] [username=bela,uid=324,gid=234] So at least symlink would be needed not to break the upgrade. That's why I filed this bug here not to the libpam-mount maintainer. Cheers, toma ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- in smbfs package the smbmount binary removed but libpam-mount with smbfs would use it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 580045] [NEW] in smbfs package the smbmount binary removed but libpam-mount with smbfs would use it
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Hello, I update my 8.10 LTS today and in the new smbfs package the smbmount/mount.smbfs has been removed and mount.cifs is presented. Unfortunately the libpam-mount would use it (debug mode, auth.log): May 13 17:37:34 xxxhost login[11005]: pam_mount(misc.c:285) command: smbmount [//blah/share] [/home/bela/[..]/share] [-o] [username=bela,uid=324,gid=234] So at least symlink would be needed not to break the upgrade. That's why I filed this bug here not to the libpam-mount maintainer. Cheers, toma ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- in smbfs package the smbmount binary removed but libpam-mount with smbfs would use it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383849] [NEW] gsasl build depends on virtual package of libgcrypt-dev which is uninstallable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gsasl gsasl build depends on virtual package of libgcrypt-dev which is uninstallable since the libgcrypt11-dev 1.2.4-2ubuntu7 provides it, so the gsasl should contain libgcrypt11-dev 1.2.4-2ubuntu7 | libgcrypt-dev at least. E: Package libgcrypt-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for gsasl: libgcrypt-dev dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libgcrypt-dev libkrb5-dev help2man libidn11-dev libgnutls-dev libntlm0-dev Thanks, toma ** Affects: gsasl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: gsasl package virtual -- gsasl build depends on virtual package of libgcrypt-dev which is uninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 378680] [NEW] apt-get build-dep doesn't install all the necessary packages
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apt
Hello,
I tried on hardy:
#sudo apt-get build-dep -o Debug::BuildDeps=1 python2.5=2.5.2-2ubuntu4.1
where python has in control file and cache:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autoconf, automake1.9, libreadline5-dev,
libncursesw5-dev (= 5.3), tk8.4-dev, libdb4.6-dev [amd64 i386 lpia],
libdb4.2-dev [!amd64 !i386 !lpia], zlib1g-dev, libgdbm-dev, blt-dev (= 2.4z),
libssl-dev, sharutils, libbz2-dev, libbluetooth-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386
!kfreebsd-amd64], locales, libsqlite3-dev, libffi4-dev (= 4.1.2),
mime-support, libgpmg1 [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], netbase,
lsb-release, bzip2, netbase, gcc (= 4:4.2) | gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.2-4) [alpha
powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc]
Build-Depends-Indep: libhtml-tree-perl, texlive-latex-recommended, texinfo,
emacs22, debiandoc-sgml, sharutils
and it silently discards the libbluetooth-dev package on amd64 and i386
(linux) arch.
Poking around, I found that apt parses correctly
[debSrcRecordParser::BuildDepends(vectorpkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildDepRec
BuildDeps, bool ArchOnly) ],
but fails in cmdline/apt-get.cc at
code
bool hasAlternatives = (((*D).Op pkgCache::Dep::Or) ==
pkgCache::Dep::Or);
if (skipAlternatives == true)
{
if (!hasAlternatives)
skipAlternatives = false; { // end of or group
std::cout MOO7: skipping: (*D).Package
(*D).Version std::endl;
std::cout MOO7: skipping: info: (*D).Op std::endl;
continue;
}
}
/code
when it iterates over the all Build-Depends and Build-Indep-Depends
packages.
The output of this modified C++ code for better understanding:
[..]
MOO4 Install: libbluetooth-dev
MOO7: skipping: libbluetooth-dev
MOO7: skipping: info: 0
[..]
, later the dpkg-checkbuilddeps will fail when I try to build this
python. In this case, by using apt-get build-dep the python's build
dependency cannot be satisfied nor built.
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apt build-dep build-depends
--
apt-get build-dep doesn't install all the necessary packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378680
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 365475] [NEW] python2.5=2.5.2-2ubuntu4.1 package's build-dep cannot be satisfied
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python2.5 # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04.2 Release:8.04 Hello, the python2.5 version 2.5.2-2ubuntu4.1 package cannot be built on amd64 however: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autoconf, automake1.9, libreadline5-dev, libncursesw5-dev (= 5.3), tk8.4-dev, libdb4.6-dev [amd64 i386 lpia], libdb4.2-dev [!amd64 !i386 !lpia], zlib1g-dev, libgdbm-dev, blt-dev (= 2.4z), libssl-dev, sharutils, libbz2-dev, libbluetooth-dev [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], locales, libsqlite3-dev, libffi4-dev (= 4.1.2), mime-support, libgpmg1 [!hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64], netbase, lsb-release, bzip2, netbase, gcc (= 4:4.2) | gcc-4.1 (= 4.1.2-4) [alpha powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc] Build-Depends-Indep: libhtml-tree-perl, texlive-latex-recommended, texinfo, emacs22, debiandoc-sgml, sharutils Build-Conflicts: tcl8.3-dev, tk8.3-dev, python2.5-xml, python-xml can be found in the control file: depends on the libbluetooth-dev. #dpkg -l libbluetooth-dev pn libbluetooth-dev none(no description available) apt-get --simulate build-dep python2.5=2.5.2-2ubuntu4.1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. I checked, and I suspect that the libbluetooth-dev is the real problem, but unsure: Package: libbluetooth-dev Version: 3.29-0ubuntu1 Depends: libbluetooth2 (= 3.29-0ubuntu1), libc6-dev | libc-dev Conflicts: bluez-pan, libbluetooth-dev, libsdp2-dev (= 1.5.2) Provides: libbluetooth2-dev so it's weird to me that it depends on libbluetooth2 same version, provides it, but also conflicts it. Please advise. Best regards, Tamas SZERB ** Affects: python2.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- python2.5=2.5.2-2ubuntu4.1 package's build-dep cannot be satisfied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365475 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 362494] [NEW] time build depends on virtual automaken which is ninstallable
Public bug reported: The time package Build-Depends on automaken which is a virtual package (provided by automake, automake1.7.. etc), and the apt cannot resolve therefore the dependency to build up the building environment. According the ubuntu proposal for this, you should use Build-Depends: .. automake1.7 | automaken or anything ensuring that the first package is really installable (and the time package buildable with it: 1.7 fulfills this) then listing the virtuals. Cheers, toma ** Affects: time (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- time build depends on virtual automaken which is ninstallable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
