[Bug 1964697] [NEW] speedtest-cli crash
Public bug reported: When called from crontab, speedtest-cli sometimes crashes. Crashes tend to occur more frequently shortly after a reboot. cat /etc/cron.d/speedtest # UncleT scripts to monitor upstream network SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin */15 * * * *root/usr/bin/speedtest-cli 2>&1 See crash dump for details ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: speedtest-cli 2.1.2-2ubuntu0.20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.14.0-1027.30-oem 5.14.21 Uname: Linux 5.14.0-1027-oem x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./pool/main/l/linux-hwe-5.11/linux-modules-extra-5.11.0-34-generic_5.11.0-34.36~20.04.1_amd64.deb CasperMD5CheckResult: fail Date: Sun Mar 13 01:13:40 2022 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-29 (73 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210914) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) SourcePackage: speedtest-cli UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) mtime.conffile..etc.logrotate.d.apport: 2021-12-18T21:15:17 ** Affects: speedtest-cli (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal uec-images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964697 Title: speedtest-cli crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speedtest-cli/+bug/1964697/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877658] Re: very buggy on download exe with sourceforge
Errors like this are still common during install: Get:1 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/andale32.exe [198 kB] Fetched 198 kB in 1s (213 kB/s) Err:1 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/corefonts/arial32.exe Could not resolve 'iweb.dl.sourceforge.net' E: Failed to fetch http://iweb.dl.sourceforge.net/project/corefonts/the fonts/final/arial32.exe Could not resolve 'iweb.dl.sourceforge.net' E: Download Failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877658 Title: very buggy on download exe with sourceforge To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1877658/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954635] Re: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration
The major number would suggest that it's a logical volume, but it doesn't seem to correspond to a logical volume, so I'm not sure what it is: # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT loop0 7:00 377.4M 1 loop /media/filesystem loop1 7:10 221.8M 1 loop loop2 7:20 82.1M 1 loop /usr/lib/modules loop3 7:30 61.9M 1 loop /snap/core20/1270 loop4 7:40 42.2M 1 loop /snap/snapd/14066 loop5 7:50 67.2M 1 loop /snap/lxd/21835 loop6 7:60 24.3M 1 loop /snap/subiquity/2974 sda 8:01 119.5G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:11 119.5G 0 part │ └─ventoy253:80 1.2G 1 dm /cdrom └─sda2 8:2132M 0 part sr011:01 1024M 0 rom nvme0n1 259:00 953.9G 0 disk ├─nvme0n1p1 259:40 260M 0 part ├─nvme0n1p2 259:6016M 0 part ├─nvme0n1p3 259:70 952.6G 0 part └─nvme0n1p4 259:80 995M 0 part nvme1n1 259:10 953.9G 0 disk ├─nvme1n1p1 259:20 512M 0 part ├─nvme1n1p2 259:30 1G 0 part └─nvme1n1p3 259:50 952.4G 0 part ├─kangaroovg-rootlv 253:00 5G 0 lvm ├─kangaroovg-usrlv 253:1020G 0 lvm ├─kangaroovg-varlv 253:20 5G 0 lvm ├─kangaroovg-varliblv 253:30 7G 0 lvm ├─kangaroovg-homelv 253:40 100G 0 lvm ├─kangaroovg-srvlv 253:50 5G 0 lvm ├─kangaroovg-usrlocallv 253:60 5G 0 lvm └─kangaroovg-swaplv 253:70 8G 0 lvm # ls -l /dev/dm* brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 0 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-0 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 1 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-1 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 2 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-2 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 3 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-3 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 4 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-4 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 5 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-5 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 6 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-6 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 7 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-7 brw-rw 1 root disk 253, 8 Dec 16 03:20 /dev/dm-8 /dev/dma_heap: total 0 crw--- 1 root root 249, 0 Dec 16 03:20 system # lvscan ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/rootlv' [5.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/usrlv' [20.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/varlv' [5.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/varliblv' [7.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/homelv' [100.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/srvlv' [5.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/usrlocallv' [5.00 GiB] inherit ACTIVE'/dev/kangaroovg/swaplv' [8.00 GiB] inherit # vgscan Found volume group "kangaroovg" using metadata type lvm2 # ls -l /dev/kangaroovg total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 homelv -> ../dm-4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 rootlv -> ../dm-0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 srvlv -> ../dm-5 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 swaplv -> ../dm-7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 usrlocallv -> ../dm-6 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 usrlv -> ../dm-1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 varliblv -> ../dm-3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 16 08:58 varlv -> ../dm-2 # -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954635 Title: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954635] Re: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration
** Attachment added: "Contents of /var/crash in crashed install" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+attachment/5547285/+files/var.crash.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954635 Title: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954635] Re: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration
** Attachment added: "Contents of /var/log in crashed install" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+attachment/5547284/+files/var.log.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954635 Title: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954635] [NEW] subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration
Public bug reported: Subiquity for 20.04 crashes and a system install attempt fails when attempting to do an install with a complex network or disk configuration. When attempting an install with a semi-complex configuration (e.g. multiple network interfaces bonded together using LACP or multiple partitions with LVM, tmpfs, and swap), the installer will crash and fail. I am attempting an automated install using ISOs generated by the scripts at https://github.com/covertsh/ubuntu-autoinstall-generator and I am attempting to use the daily Ubuntu ISOs downloaded by that script. The user-data file that is attached fails with the current Ubuntu ISO download; however, it works with a daily ISO download that I made on 2021-12-03, so it appears that something broke on or after that date. ** Affects: subiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Full user-data file" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954635/+attachment/5547283/+files/generic-focal-p340-share.cfg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954635 Title: subiquity crashes when attempting advanced network/disk configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954635/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1954582] [NEW] activation-mode directive not recognized in user-data file
Public bug reported: Using daily update image for 20.04 Placing activation-mode in the netplan section of the user-data file results in an error about an unknown token. After the automated install fails and you get dumped to a shell, no changes to files in /etc/netplan are needed to make the netplan try or netplan apply commands work without error. Documentation on this token are at https://netplan.io/reference/ (and elsewhere). ** Affects: subiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954582 Title: activation-mode directive not recognized in user-data file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1954582/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934735] Re: package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
It looks like the root cause of this issue is that the post-install script uses the mktemp command when the current user is root and the default Ubuntu configuration sets $TMPDIR to /tmp/user/uid# so the temporary file that gets created is in /tmp/user/0. Later, the script switches to the gitolite3 user and tries to read the file that was created with mktemp (as the gitolite3 user, but that read fails because the gitolite3 user doesn't have permission to navigate the parent directories of the file. Changing permissions on the parent directories is a security problem, so the best solution is probably to set the $TMPDIR environment variable to some world-readable directory, such as /tmp, at the start of the post-install script. So, a one-line addition to the debian/postinst script probably fixes the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934735 Title: package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitolite3/+bug/1934735/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1932525] Re: This bug is back on my pc - bug #1722481 Systemd Sync twice at shutdown
I am seeing something similar on 20.04. If my network fails and I have any network filesystems mounted (including nfs3 or nfs4 via autofs or iSCSI via fstab) when I issue a shutdown or reboot command, then I am likely to have a 10+ minute delay after the console displays that it has reached target shutdown. The console will then cycle through displaying information about each filesystem, such as the fact that the system is trying to unmount it, the unmount failed, and it is now forcibly killing processes. While I have not looked at the source, the timing of the console messages would imply that the process to unmount filesystems and kill processes is single-threaded, as there is a significant delay as it goes through this process with each filesystem. After it has cycled through all filesystems, it then slowly cycles through each filesystem again. Unfortunately, the logging system has already shut down by the time any of this happens, so I have no logs in journald or syslog to submit in relationship to this issue. Can the process be fixed to only cycle through each filesystem once, and also to attempt to do multiple filesystems simultaneously so that, at worst, I only have to wait through one timeout cycle? I could possibly see a reason that you might need to wait the timeout multiple times in the event of nested remote filesystems (e.g. if every level of /dont/try/this/at/home was a different filesystem on non-local disk), but that is not the configuration that I have. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932525 Title: This bug is back on my pc - bug #1722481 Systemd Sync twice at shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1932525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95925] Re: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed
The unofficial database proposed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debsecan/+bug/95925/comments/12 appears to work. It's at least a major improvement on the current situation. I'd suggest that Ubuntu officially adopt the server-side tool and that appropriate updates are made to the defaults distributed with the package so that writing manual overrides to SUITE and SOURCE are not needed in /etc/default/debsecan to get usable results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95925 Title: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debsecan/+bug/95925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 95925] Re: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed
** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95925 Title: debsecan should be either adjusted (for ubuntu) or removed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debsecan/+bug/95925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1953212] [NEW] easygit homepage returns 404 error
Public bug reported: The project homepage listed in easygit packaging returns a 404 error. The package info as shown by apt, aptitude, etc. lists a URL that returns a 404, and the upstream-source listed in /usr/share/doc/easygit/copyright also has this problem. It appears that https://people.gnome.org/~newren/eg/ may be the correct URL. $ apt show easygit Package: easygit Version: 0.99-2 Priority: optional Section: universe/vcs Origin: Ubuntu Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers Original-Maintainer: Debian QA Group Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug Installed-Size: 291 kB Depends: perl:any, git-core, less, perl Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~newren/eg/ Download-Size: 66.9 kB APT-Manual-Installed: yes APT-Sources: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages Description: git for mere mortals In short, Easy GIT is a single-file wrapper script for git, designed to make git easy to learn and use. . Features: * eg focuses on documentation and examples * eg removes many principle-of-least-surprise violations that catch git newbies unaware * eg provides subcommands that are a natural extension of capabilities users know from cvs/svn (eg also takes care to make sure the modifications to its subcommands are easily discoverable and error-avoiding for existing git users as well!) ** Affects: easygit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953212 Title: easygit homepage returns 404 error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/easygit/+bug/1953212/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1952901] [NEW] default ciderwebmail-uwsgi.conf breaks Apache
Public bug reported: Package: ciderwebmail Version: 1.05+20191006-1 OS: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS The /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/ciderwebmail-uwsgi.conf file that is shipped with ciderwebmail breaks Apache when it is enabled. Apache fails with: apachectl[69192]: AH00526: Syntax error on line 42 of /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/ciderwebmail-uwsgi.conf: apachectl[69192]: Invalid command 'ProxyPass', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration This happens after running "a2enconf ciderwebmail-uwsgi" Related upstream bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963880 ** Affects: ciderwebmail (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952901 Title: default ciderwebmail-uwsgi.conf breaks Apache To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ciderwebmail/+bug/1952901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1952164] Re: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state
Discovered this was a system-wide problem, not specifically related to cups. Backup program was holding open a very high number if inotify watches and this was causing issues for other programs (including cups). Solution was to add a conf file in /etc/sysctl.d that set a higher value for fs.inotify.max_user_watches than the default (and then force a reload). In my case, this seems to work: echo "fs.inotify.max_user_watches=131072" >> /etc/sysctl.d/999-local.conf sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.d/999-local.conf Note that this solution may cause other issues on systems with low memory. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952164 Title: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1952164/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1952164] Re: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952164 Title: cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1952164/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1952164] [NEW] cups.path repeatedly goes into systemd failed state
Public bug reported: cups.path is repeatedly entering a failed state in systemd. Attempts to restart the unit or even reboot the machine are, at best, temporary solutions. # systemctl status cups.path ● cups.path - CUPS Scheduler Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cups.path; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: resources) Triggers: ● cups.service Nov 24 04:33:31 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler. Nov 24 10:48:43 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: cups.path: Failed to enter waiting state: No space left on device Nov 24 10:48:43 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: cups.path: Failed with result 'resources'. # journalctl -u cups.path -- Logs begin at Tue 2021-11-23 22:54:38 EST, end at Wed 2021-11-24 21:42:42 EST. -- Nov 23 22:54:51 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler. Nov 23 23:19:17 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: cups.path: Failed to enter waiting state: No space left on device Nov 23 23:19:17 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: cups.path: Failed with result 'resources'. -- Reboot -- Nov 24 04:33:31 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler. Nov 24 10:48:43 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: cups.path: Failed to enter waiting state: No space left on device Nov 24 10:48:43 kangaroo.unclet.net systemd[1]: cups.path: Failed with result 'resources'. Despite what the log messages suggest, none of my (non-snap) filesystems are full (or even close to full): # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on udev 32731616 032731616 0% /dev tmpfs 6556256 2536 6553720 1% /run /dev/mapper/kangaroovg-rootlv 5095040553996 4262516 12% / /dev/disk/by-id/dm-uuid-LVM-kxWkbFRXPo6GoeQURytO8JUpXOtGnGzNRQG28DNWnEi0JYl1Vkx1r7uvSiDwfZDb 20511312 724339212202960 38% /usr tmpfs 32781264 102432780240 1% /dev/shm tmpfs 5120 45116 1% /run/lock tmpfs 32781264 032781264 0% /sys/fs/cgroup none 4194304 3504 4190800 1% /tmp /dev/mapper/kangaroovg-varlv 5095040 1743876 3072636 37% /var /dev/nvme1n1p2 999320246420 684088 27% /boot /dev/mapper/kangaroovg-srvlv 5095040 20520 4795992 1% /srv /dev/mapper/kangaroovg-usrlocallv 5095040 31820 4784692 1% /usr/local /dev/mapper/kangaroovg-homelv 51343840 1300229235703724 27% /home /dev/mapper/kangaroovg-varliblv 5095040 1306604 3509908 28% /var/lib /dev/nvme1n1p1 523248 5360 517888 2% /boot/efi /dev/loop0 56832 56832 0 100% /snap/core18/2128 /dev/loop2 33152 33152 0 100% /snap/snapd/12883 /dev/loop1 72064 72064 0 100% /snap/lxd/21029 /dev/mapper/disharmony--kangaroo--qsan--vg-disharmony--kangaroo--qsan--lv 5325329320 198368460 4858509228 4% /srv/disharmony /dev/mapper/git--kangaroo--qsan--vg-git--kangaroo--qsan--lv 1055836596 77852 1002055476 1% /srv/git /dev/mapper/qsaniscsiunisonvg-unisonlv 5366618112 385871460 4980746652 8% /srv/unison /dev/mapper/qsaniscsilinuxbackupvg-linuxbackuplv 5366618112 96643028 5269975084 2% /srv/linux-backup /dev/mapper/qsaniscsisystemarchivevg-systemarchivelv 5366618112 745069628 4621548484 14% /srv/system-archive tmpfs
[Bug 1951920] [NEW] revise dependencies of munin to accept either munin-node or munin-node-c
Public bug reported: On a 20.04 system, attempting to install the packages munin and munin- node-c with aptitude fails, as munin recommends munin-node, but munin- node and munin-node-c conflict. Since both munin-node and munin-node-c provide the same function, the recommendation of the munin package should be adjusted to recommend either munin-node or munin-node-c. Expected result: aptitude install munin munin-node-c does show any conflicting dependencies. Acutal result: # aptitude install munin munin-node-c ... The following packages have unmet dependencies: munin-node-c : Conflicts: munin-node but 2.0.56-1ubuntu1 is to be installed The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Keep the following packages at their current version: 1) munin-node [Not Installed] Leave the following dependencies unresolved: 2) munin recommends munin-node Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q ** Affects: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951920 Title: revise dependencies of munin to accept either munin-node or munin- node-c To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/1951920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946312] [NEW] nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-uvm' failed with exit code 1.
Public bug reported: On 20.04, I'm getting repeated errors on my system when the nvdidia drivers are installed. This sequence of errors is logged multiple times per second: Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo systemd-udevd[499101]: nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-drm' failed with exit code 1. Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518031] nvidia-nvlink: Nvlink Core is being initialized, major device number 510 Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518035] NVRM: The NVIDIA probe routine was not called for 1 device(s). Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: This can occur when a driver such as: Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: nouveau, rivafb, nvidiafb or rivatv Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: was loaded and obtained ownership of the NVIDIA device(s). Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: Try unloading the conflicting kernel module (and/or Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: reconfigure your kernel without the conflicting Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: driver(s)), then try loading the NVIDIA kernel module Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518590] NVRM: again. Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518591] NVRM: No NVIDIA devices probed. Oct 7 01:45:29 kangaroo kernel: [26851.518746] nvidia-nvlink: Unregistered the Nvlink Core, major device number 510 Multiple systemd services report failures: root@kangaroo:~# systemctl list-units --state=failed UNITLOAD ACTIVE SUBDESCRIPTION ● nvidia-persistenced.service loaded failed failed NVIDIA Persistence Daemon ● plymouth-read-write.service loaded failed failed Tell Plymouth To Write Out Runtime Data ● systemd-udev-settle.service loaded failed failed udev Wait for Complete Device Initialization ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-465 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1049.51-oem 5.10.52 Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1049-oem x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./pool/main/l/linux-hwe-5.11/linux-modules-extra-5.11.0-34-generic_5.11.0-34.36~20.04.1_amd64.deb CasperMD5CheckResult: fail Date: Thu Oct 7 01:43:15 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-06 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210914) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal uec-images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946312 Title: nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-uvm' failed with exit code 1. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1946312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946312] Re: nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-uvm' failed with exit code 1.
** Attachment added: "Output of lshw" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1946312/+attachment/5531190/+files/lshw -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946312 Title: nvidia: Process '/sbin/modprobe nvidia-uvm' failed with exit code 1. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1946312/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
That change to the file does seem to prevent the error, and I appreciate the help with my immediate problem. I'm still wondering if having the program crash as it did without generating a very useful error message is desirable behavior. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
Any more info you need? I was trying to follow the official Ubuntu server guide ( https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/mail-postfix ) with only a few deviations for things like a different location for SSL files. Are there more problems with that guide? Earlier in this item, you suggested moving authenticated connects off of port 25l but that doesn't happen in thus guide. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
** Attachment added: "main.cf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+attachment/5520588/+files/main.cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
** Attachment added: "master.cf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+attachment/5520589/+files/master.cf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
I don't see a 220 message with the nc command either.
State Recv-QSend-Q Local Address:PortPeer Address:Port
Process
LISTEN0 1127.0.0.1:246970.0.0.0:*
users:(("IDrive:CDP-serv",pid=15790,fd=4))
LISTEN0 1000.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("master",pid=2515,fd=13))
LISTEN0 4096 0.0.0.0:4000 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("rpc.statd",pid=3079,fd=9))
LISTEN0 1000.0.0.0:993 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("dovecot",pid=1471,fd=35))
LISTEN0 1000.0.0.0:143 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("dovecot",pid=1471,fd=33))
LISTEN0 4096 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("rpcbind",pid=1103,fd=4),("systemd",pid=1,fd=237))
LISTEN0 4096 127.0.0.53%lo:53 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("systemd-resolve",pid=1137,fd=13))
LISTEN0 1280.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("sshd",pid=1490,fd=3))
LISTEN0 5127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:*
users:(("cupsd",pid=8958,fd=7))
LISTEN0 100 [::]:25 [::]:*
users:(("master",pid=2515,fd=14))
LISTEN0 4096 [::]:4000[::]:*
users:(("rpc.statd",pid=3079,fd=11))
LISTEN0 100 [::]:993 [::]:*
users:(("dovecot",pid=1471,fd=36))
LISTEN0 100 [::]:143 [::]:*
users:(("dovecot",pid=1471,fd=34))
LISTEN0 4096 [::]:111 [::]:*
users:(("rpcbind",pid=1103,fd=6),("systemd",pid=1,fd=239))
LISTEN0 128 [::]:22 [::]:*
users:(("sshd",pid=1490,fd=4))
LISTEN0 5[::1]:631 [::]:*
users:(("cupsd",pid=8958,fd=6))
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603
Title:
postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] Re: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
I didn't think the sasl2-bin package was needed, but someone else suggested I try adding it. Even with the settings that I had, shouldn't I have seen some messages from the server on the telnet connection? (e.g. remote mail server connecting to send mail to an address where this system is the final destination, so no authentication is attempted) If I telnet to port 25 on other servers, I get a 220 message, and then it waits for some command. On this system, I get no message from the server, and the connection is closed within about a second. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940603 Title: postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1940603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940603] [NEW] postfix/smtpd: fatal: no SASL authentication
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to setup a combination IMAP/SMTP server using Dovecot and
Postfix on a 20.04 system. After attempting to setup SASL
authentication for postfix, the system fails with a postfix/smtpd:
fatal: no SASL authentication mechanisms whenever any SMTP connection is
attempted (either via a program like Thunderbird or telnet localhost
25). I'm trying to use the guide at
https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/mail-postfix, but even with some of the
debug settings enabled, I'm still not seeing a more useful log message.
What's wrong?
My configuration:
root@kangaroo:~# apt list --installed | egrep 'postfix|dovecot|sasl'
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in
scripts.
dovecot-core/focal-updates,focal-security,now 1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.4 amd64
[installed]
dovecot-imapd/focal-updates,focal-security,now 1:2.3.7.2-1ubuntu3.4 amd64
[installed]
libauthen-sasl-perl/focal,now 2.1600-1 all [installed,automatic]
libsasl2-2/focal,now 2.1.27+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libsasl2-dev/focal,now 2.1.27+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed]
libsasl2-modules-db/focal,now 2.1.27+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
libsasl2-modules/focal,now 2.1.27+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic]
postfix/focal-updates,now 3.4.13-0ubuntu1 amd64 [installed]
sasl2-bin/focal,now 2.1.27+dfsg-2 amd64 [installed]
root@kangaroo:~# dovecot -n
# 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.7.2 ()
# OS: Linux 5.10.0-1038-oem x86_64 Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS
# Hostname: kangaroo.unclet.net
auth_debug = yes
auth_debug_passwords = yes
auth_mechanisms = plain login
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
mail_privileged_group = mail
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
special_use = \Junk
}
mailbox Sent {
special_use = \Sent
}
mailbox "Sent Messages" {
special_use = \Sent
}
mailbox Trash {
special_use = \Trash
}
prefix =
}
passdb {
driver = pam
}
protocols = " imap"
service auth {
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/auth {
group = postfix
mode = 0660
user = postfix
}
}
ssl_cert =
kangaroo.unclet.net[127.0.0.1]: 220 kangaroo.unclet.net ESMTP Postfix (Ubuntu)
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_create:
SASL service=smtp, realm=(null)
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: name_mask: noanonymous
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: name_mask: noplaintext
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
Connecting
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo dovecot: auth: Debug: Loading modules from directory:
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/auth
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo dovecot: auth: Debug: Module loaded:
/usr/lib/dovecot/modules/auth/lib20_auth_var_expand_crypt.so
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo dovecot: auth: Debug: Read auth token secret from
/var/run/dovecot/auth-token-secret.dat
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: VERSION?1?2
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: MECH?PLAIN?plaintext
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: name_mask: plaintext
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: MECH?LOGIN?plaintext
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo dovecot: auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=0)
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: name_mask: plaintext
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: SPID?46497
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: CUID?1
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: COOKIE?f1df4b151ab753934e42c4baaa1d2620
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: xsasl_dovecot_server_connect:
auth reply: DONE
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]:
xsasl_dovecot_server_mech_filter: skip mechanism: PLAIN
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]:
xsasl_dovecot_server_mech_filter: skip mechanism: LOGIN
Aug 17 04:07:21 kangaroo postfix/smtpd[46495]: fatal: no SASL authentication
mechanisms
Aug 17 04:07:22 kangaroo postfix/master[26205]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/sbin/smtpd pid 46495 exit status 1
Aug 17 04:07:22 kangaroo postfix/master[26205]: warning:
/usr/lib/postfix/sbin/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
Although this step was not in the install guide I've referenced, I've
tried adding sasl2-bin and editing /etc/default/saslauthd:
root@kangaroo:~# grep -v ^\# /etc/default/saslauthd |grep -v ^\$
START=yes
DESC="SASL Authentication Daemon"
NAME="saslauthd"
MECHANISMS="pam"
MECH_OPTIONS=""
THREADS=5
OPTIONS="-c -m /var/run/saslauthd"
root@kangaroo:~# systemctl is-active saslauthd
active
** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
[Bug 1823521] Re: on_ac_power returns 1 if battery is not present
I'm having a similar issue on Ubuntu 20.04 on a Lenovo P340, which is a desktop workstation system and thus doesn't even have any capability for battery operation without an external UPS. I'm attaching a copy of selected directories in /sys and /proc that the script inspects. ** Attachment added: "Tar of selected directories in /sys and /proc" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powermgmt-base/+bug/1823521/+attachment/5515514/+files/on_ac_power_bug.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823521 Title: on_ac_power returns 1 if battery is not present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1823521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938672] [NEW] Incomplete information in AppArmorProfiles web documentation
Public bug reported: The table of profiles on the page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/KnowledgeBase/AppArmorProfiles does not have any of the footnote entries for 20.04 or 20.10. Since these footnotes are present in the table for earlier versions of Ubuntu, it implies that there have been multiple changes to AppArmor profiles in 20.04. Example: The table shows that an AppArmor rule set exists for Apache2. For 18.04 (and earlier) releases, the table footnotes indicates that these rules are not enabled by default. The lack of footnote entries in the 20.04 (and later) release columns suggest that the AppArmor rules are enabled by default. However, even after installing the apache2 and libapache2-mod-apparmor packages, aa-status indicates that no AppArmor rules are enforced for Apache. Lengthy comments at the beginning of the /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.apache2 file indicate that this is the intended behavior, and thus the table on the page mentioned in the first paragraph is incomplete. Similar issues exist for multiple other table entries (Firefox, rsyslogd, etc.). This is being reported as a bug because the wiki page is marked as immutable. ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938672 Title: Incomplete information in AppArmorProfiles web documentation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1938672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937889] [NEW] weather not working with airport codes
Public bug reported: An example given in the man page for weather: weather rdu fails. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather rdu Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "rdu" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. I have tried multiple other airport codes, and none of them seem to work: taft@kangaroo:~$ weather dfw Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "dfw" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather nyc Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "nyc" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather lax Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "lax" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather lhr Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "lhr" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather hel Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "hel" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. taft@kangaroo:~$ weather syd Searching via airport... No IATA/FAA airport code "syd" in the /usr/share/weather-util/airports.gz file. ** Affects: weather-util (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937889 Title: weather not working with airport codes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/weather-util/+bug/1937889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1936273] [NEW] apt not respecting Ignore-Files-Silently directive
Public bug reported: I have a configuration management system that stores a backup copy of files that it updates with a suffix based upon the date that the file is updated (.-MM-DD) In Ubuntu 20.04, I have added a file 00ignore to the /etc/apt/apt.conf directory. The contents of the file are one line: Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.[12][0-9][0-9][0-9]-[01][0-9]-[0-3][0-9]$"; The system appears to read the file, but doesn't seem to process it, as apt and related programs still spit out warnings. # apt-config dump |grep Ignore Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently ""; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "~$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.disabled$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.bak$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.dpkg-[a-z]+$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.ucf-[a-z]+$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.save$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.orig$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.distUpgrade$"; Dir::Ignore-Files-Silently:: "\.[12][0-9][0-9][0-9]-[01][0-9]-[0-3][0-9]$"; N: Ignoring file '99unclet-override.2021-06-15' in directory '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension N: Ignoring file '00unclet.2021-06-18' in directory '/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension Note: aptitude does not display this warning, although many other apt- related programs do (e.g. apt, apt-get, apt-config). ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936273 Title: apt not respecting Ignore-Files-Silently directive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1936273/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934735] [NEW] package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Attempt to install gitolite3 fails. Directory path set in debconf for gitolite3/adminkey prior to install attempt. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: gitolite3 3.6.11-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1034.35-oem 5.10.41 Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1034-oem x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckMismatches: ./pool/main/l/linux-hwe-5.8/linux-modules-extra-5.8.0-59-generic_5.8.0-59.66~20.04.1_amd64.deb CasperMD5CheckResult: fail Date: Mon Jul 5 07:05:53 2021 ErrorMessage: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-05 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.2 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210627) PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.6 SourcePackage: gitolite3 Title: package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gitolite3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal uec-images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934735 Title: package gitolite3 3.6.11-2 failed to install/upgrade: installed gitolite3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitolite3/+bug/1934735/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1908090] Re: ubuntu 20.04 kdump fails
Are you sure you have this bug filed against the correct package? At a glance, it looks like you should file it against linux-meta (see https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/linux-crashdump ) kexec-tools "provides tools to load a kernel into memory and then "reboot" directly into that kernel using the kexec system call, bypassing the normal boot process." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908090 Title: ubuntu 20.04 kdump fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kexec-tools/+bug/1908090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1933711] Re: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails
The proposed fix works for me, both in the both in the simple example I posted, as well as a more complex configuration that I didn't post. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933711 Title: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1933711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1933711] [NEW] defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails
Public bug reported: Attempting to creat a tmpfs /tmp partition with the Ubuntu 20.04 autoinstaller fails with the error: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'device' The relevant section of the user-data file I'm attempting is: - id: tmpfs1 type: mount spec: "none" path: "/tmp" options: size=4194304 fstype: "tmpfs" This section is copied directly from https://curtin.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/storage.html (changing the path). The full file is attached. Autoinstall succeeds if all of the lines listed above are deleted. I'm using the daily ISO autoinstall image downloaded using the script at https://github.com/covertsh/ubuntu-autoinstall-generator . ** Affects: subiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Full user-data file" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933711/+attachment/5507186/+files/user-data -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933711 Title: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1933711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1933711] Re: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails
** Attachment added: "Log files from failed install" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1933711/+attachment/5507187/+files/crash-logs.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933711 Title: defining tmpfs /tmp in autoinstall config fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/1933711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie
Issue still exists after going to Budgie Welcome -> Themes -> Pocillo -> Apply Makeover but not Budgie Welcome -> Themes -> QogirBudgie -> Apply Makeover (i.e. QogirBudgie renders separators.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917304 Title: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1917304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie
expected-menu.png Shows bookmarks menu as rendered by "standard" Ubuntu (GNOME) - an appearance similar to this is what I expected. ** Attachment added: "expected-menu.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1917304/+attachment/5471479/+files/expected-menu.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917304 Title: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1917304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie
menu-editor.png Shows separators exist in Firefox config (from Budgie system) ** Attachment added: "menu-editor.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1917304/+attachment/5471478/+files/menu-editor.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917304 Title: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1917304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917304] Re: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie
budgie-menu.png: Bookmarks menu as rendered in Budgie ** Attachment added: "budgie-menu.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1917304/+attachment/5471477/+files/budgie-menu.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917304 Title: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1917304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917304] [NEW] Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu Budgie 20.04.2, bookmarks separators do not appear within Firefox bookmarks menu. This issue is being logged against Budgie, rather than Firefox because it does not appear in other variants of Ubuntu 20.04.2 (e.g. "standard"/GNOME, Ubuntu-Mate, Lubuntu) How to reproduce: Launch Firefox Go to Customize Make sure Menu bar is enabled Save settings Go to Bookmarks - Show All Bookmarks Verify that the bookmarks menu area shows several bookmarks/folders and separators (create them if they don't exist.) Open the Bookmarks menu and see that no separators appear Versions installed: budgie-desktop-environment 0.13.7 ubuntu-budgie-desktop 0.65 firefox 86.0+build3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 ** Affects: acroread (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: budgie-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Also affects: budgie-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917304 Title: Firefox bookmark separators not showing in budgie To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1917304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778082] Re: Language Support Is Incomplete dialog must show package list to install
I've also observed this behavior on Kubuntu 20.04. This command appears to fix the issue: sudo apt install $(check- language-support) Reference: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/421066/popup- language-support-is-incomplete-what-packages-does-it-want-to-install -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778082 Title: Language Support Is Incomplete dialog must show package list to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-runtime/+bug/1778082/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1568459] Re: unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions
Problem is still present in 18.04 The unison-all and unison-all-gtk have no real content. The only thing in them is the copyright file and a changelog file that indicates that old versions were removed. This contradicts the package description which says that it install multiple supported versions in order to sync with older systems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568459 Title: unison incompatible with older ubuntu/debian versions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unison/+bug/1568459/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1224723] Re: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless
CVE-2013-2465 is a CVE against Java, although it is against Oracle Java. It's not immediately clear to me whether or not this vulnerability is also applicable to openJDK. Can you confirm that this vulnerability does not apply to openJDK (or that it is already patched in this version)? Labeling the file as a virus is probably incorrect, but my concern was that it represented an unpatched security vulnerability. Most of the other files in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security /ubuntu-cve-tracker/master/view/head:/README.virus have obvious reasons that they would constitute false positives (e.g. they are samples of exploits/viruses), but I don't see an obvious reason why this particular file would be a false positive. If this really is a false positive, then I would suggest that it's a bug in the clam database, since that means that it is detecting a Java security problem where none exists. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New ** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224723 Title: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1224723/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1224723] Re: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224723 Title: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1224723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1224723] Re: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless
CVE-2013-2465 is a CVE against Java, although it is against Oracle Java. It's not immediately clear to me whether or not this vulnerability is also applicable to openJDK. Can you confirm that this vulnerability does not apply to openJDK (or that it is already patched in this version)? Labeling the file as a virus is probably incorrect, but my concern was that it represented an unpatched security vulnerability. Most of the other files in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security /ubuntu-cve-tracker/master/view/head:/README.virus have obvious reasons that they would constitute false positives (e.g. they are samples of exploits/viruses), but I don't see an obvious reason why this particular file would be a false positive. If this really is a false positive, then I would suggest that it's a bug in the clam database, since that means that it is detecting a Java security problem where none exists. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New ** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224723 Title: Clamscan finds CVE-2013-2465 in openjdk-6-jre-headless To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1224723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162119] [NEW] nagios not expanding wildcards correctly
Public bug reported:
I'm running nagios 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 on 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04.
I've turned on regular expression matching in /etc/nagios3/nagios.cfg with the
line:
use_regexp_matching=1
If I have some hosts defined like this in a file in /etc/nagios3/conf.d:
define host{
use generic-host; Name of host template
to use
host_name array001
address 10.1.1.1
}
define host{
use generic-host; Name of host template
to use
host_name array002a
address 10.1.2.1
}
define host{
use generic-host; Name of host template
to use
host_name array002b
address 10.1.2.2
}
and a hostgroup defined like this in a file in /etc/nagios3/conf.d:
define hostgroup {
hostgroup_name array2w
alias Array 2 Wildcard
members array002*
}
then, nagios will include host array001 in the hostgroup array2w even
though it shouldn't match.
** Affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162119
Title:
nagios not expanding wildcards correctly
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1162119/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1162119] [NEW] nagios not expanding wildcards correctly
Public bug reported:
I'm running nagios 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 on 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04.
I've turned on regular expression matching in /etc/nagios3/nagios.cfg with the
line:
use_regexp_matching=1
If I have some hosts defined like this in a file in /etc/nagios3/conf.d:
define host{
use generic-host; Name of host template
to use
host_name array001
address 10.1.1.1
}
define host{
use generic-host; Name of host template
to use
host_name array002a
address 10.1.2.1
}
define host{
use generic-host; Name of host template
to use
host_name array002b
address 10.1.2.2
}
and a hostgroup defined like this in a file in /etc/nagios3/conf.d:
define hostgroup {
hostgroup_name array2w
alias Array 2 Wildcard
members array002*
}
then, nagios will include host array001 in the hostgroup array2w even
though it shouldn't match.
** Affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162119
Title:
nagios not expanding wildcards correctly
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1162119/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1156678] [NEW] acroread not updating mozilla plugin version number correctly
Public bug reported: Version updates to Adobe Acrobat reader are not being reported correctly to Firefox. Although aptitude shows that I have version 9.5.4-1precise1 installed (as does Help-About Adobe Reader within Adobe Reader), when I go to tools-AddOns-Plugins in Firefox, the system reports that I have Adobe Reader 9.4 installed. Additionally, external browser plugin checkers (e.g. https://browsercheck.qualys.com/ ) report that I have version 9.4.0 installed. To reproduce this, it seems to be necessary to have installed an older version originally, and then upgraded using aptitude (or equivalent). Even if I remove the acroread package and then re-install it, Firefox and the external browser plugin checkers only report that I'm running version 9.5.0 and not 9.5.4. ** Affects: acroread (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1156678 Title: acroread not updating mozilla plugin version number correctly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/1156678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1026139] Re: NFS client readdir loop
I'm still seeing this bug in Ubuntu 12.04 (using static (i.e. non- automounter) mounts). Redhat claims to have fixed this bug with kernel release 2.6.32-279.el6 (for RHEL 6) and 2.6.18-348.el5 (for RHEL 5). Can their fixes be ported to the Ubuntu kernel tree? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026139 Title: NFS client readdir loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1026139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086151] [NEW] Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo
Public bug reported: In the file /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm , the default path to the rpcinfo command is specified as /usr/bin/rpcinfo . In more recent versions of Ubuntu (e.g. 12.04), the rpcinfo command has moved from /usr/bin/rpcinfo to /usr/sbin/rpcinfo . The default path in /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm should be updated to reflect this change. Some commands, such as /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_rpc won't work unless this value is changed. In /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm Replace this line: $PATH_TO_RPCINFO = /usr/bin/rpcinfo ; with $PATH_TO_RPCINFO = /usr/sbin/rpcinfo ; ** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios-plugins in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086151 Title: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1086151] [NEW] Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo
Public bug reported: In the file /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm , the default path to the rpcinfo command is specified as /usr/bin/rpcinfo . In more recent versions of Ubuntu (e.g. 12.04), the rpcinfo command has moved from /usr/bin/rpcinfo to /usr/sbin/rpcinfo . The default path in /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm should be updated to reflect this change. Some commands, such as /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_rpc won't work unless this value is changed. In /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/utils.pm Replace this line: $PATH_TO_RPCINFO = /usr/bin/rpcinfo ; with $PATH_TO_RPCINFO = /usr/sbin/rpcinfo ; ** Affects: nagios-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086151 Title: Nagios utils.pm has wrong default path to rpcinfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios-plugins/+bug/1086151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1076656] Re: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work
This bug is also present in mysql-client-core-5.1 on Ubuntu 10.04. It appears to have been introduced with release 5.1.66-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 in Ubuntu 10.04. ** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076656 Title: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/1076656/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1076656] [NEW] mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work
Public bug reported: The --ssl-capath option to mysql no longer works. The problem seems to exist whether the option is passed as a command line flag or the equivalent option is set in a file (e.g. .my.cnf). If I use the --ssl- ca option to explicitly set a CA file, I don't have any problems. $ mysql -h localhost --ssl-capath=/etc/ssl/certs/ ERROR 2026 (HY000): SSL connection error: Failed to set ciphers to use $ mysql -h localhost --ssl-capath=/etc/ssl/certs ERROR 2026 (HY000): SSL connection error: Failed to set ciphers to use $ mysql -h localhost --ssl-ca=/etc/ssl/certs/Equifax_Secure_CA.pem Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 44 Server version: 5.5.28-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 (Ubuntu) Copyright (c) 2000, 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle is a registered trademark of Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input statement. mysql \s -- mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.5.28, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 6.2 Connection id: 44 Current database: Current user: taft@localhost SSL:Cipher in use is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Current pager: less Using outfile: '' Using delimiter:; Server version: 5.5.28-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 (Ubuntu) Protocol version: 10 Connection: Localhost via UNIX socket Server characterset:latin1 Db characterset:latin1 Client characterset:latin1 Conn. characterset:latin1 UNIX socket:/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock Uptime: 37 min 5 sec Threads: 1 Questions: 119 Slow queries: 0 Opens: 171 Flush tables: 1 Open tables: 41 Queries per second avg: 0.053 -- mysql show variables like %ssl%; +---+--+ | Variable_name | Value| +---+--+ | have_openssl | YES | | have_ssl | YES | | ssl_ca| /etc/ssl/certs/Equifax_Secure_CA.pem | | ssl_capath| | | ssl_cert | /etc/ssl/certs/csbio.unc.edu.crt | | ssl_cipher| | | ssl_key | /etc/ssl/private/csbio.unc.edu.key | +---+--+ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: mysql-client-core-5.5 5.5.28-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-32.51-generic 3.2.30 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs fglrx ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Nov 8 15:25:43 2012 Logs.var.log.daemon.log: Logs.var.log.kern.log: MySQLConf.etc.mysql.conf.d.mysqld.safe.syslog.cnf: [mysqld_safe] syslog MySQLVarLibDirListing: False ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: mysql-5.5 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) modified.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.usr.sbin.mysqld: [modified] modified.conffile..etc.logrotate.d.mysql.server: [modified] mtime.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.usr.sbin.mysqld: 2012-11-08T11:15:12.470326 mtime.conffile..etc.logrotate.d.mysql.server: 2012-07-30T18:26:03 ** Affects: mysql-5.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076656 Title: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.5/+bug/1076656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1076656] Re: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work
This bug is also present in mysql-client-core-5.1 on Ubuntu 10.04. It appears to have been introduced with release 5.1.66-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 in Ubuntu 10.04. ** Also affects: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076656 Title: mysql --ssl-capath option doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/1076656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799
Shouldn't the update come from the socat package maintainer (Chris Taylor)? ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to socat in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166 Title: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/socat/+bug/1020166/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1020166] Re: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799
Shouldn't the update come from the socat package maintainer (Chris Taylor)? ** Changed in: socat (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166 Title: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/socat/+bug/1020166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020770] [NEW] gdm install prompts about dm when debconf value set
Public bug reported: When installing gdm 3.0.4-0ubuntu15 on a 12.04 system via aptitude, I get prompted as to which dm I want to use, even if I have already set the appropriate debconf values before attempting the install. Steps to reproduce: echo gdm shared/default-x-display-manager select lightdm |debconf-set-selections aptitude -y install gdm ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020770 Title: gdm install prompts about dm when debconf value set To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1020770/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020166] [NEW] Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799
Public bug reported: CVE-2010-2799 for socat has not been fixed on Ubuntu 10.04. The fix has been released upstream (1.7.1.3-1) and is already in Ubuntu 11.04 and later, so the fix may be as simple as adding this to the 10.04 updates. ** Affects: socat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: security ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-2799 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to socat in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166 Title: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/socat/+bug/1020166/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1020166] [NEW] Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799
Public bug reported: CVE-2010-2799 for socat has not been fixed on Ubuntu 10.04. The fix has been released upstream (1.7.1.3-1) and is already in Ubuntu 11.04 and later, so the fix may be as simple as adding this to the 10.04 updates. ** Affects: socat (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: security ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2010-2799 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020166 Title: Patch socat on lucid to address CVE-2010-2799 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/socat/+bug/1020166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails
problem was triggered by setgid bit on directory. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails
problem was triggered by setgid bit on directory. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772158] [NEW] samba force group option fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Running x86_64 version of Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS samba version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 The force group option is not working. If I specify a group to be forced on a share, new files/directories created by users connecting to this share do not get this group set. smb.conf section: [example] path = /srv/example read only = no guest ok = no valid users = +group1 force group = +group1 If a user creates a new file/directory in this share, the UNIX group for the new entry is the user's default UNIX group, not group1. I see this error in the client log on the samba server: [2011/04/28 01:02:45, 0] smbd/uid.c:309(change_to_user) PANIC: assert failed at smbd/uid.c(309): conn-force_group_gid != (gid_t)-1 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic 2.6.32.32+drm33.14 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Apr 28 01:15:43 2011 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: No SourcePackage: samba ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 772158] [NEW] samba force group option fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Running x86_64 version of Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS samba version: 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 The force group option is not working. If I specify a group to be forced on a share, new files/directories created by users connecting to this share do not get this group set. smb.conf section: [example] path = /srv/example read only = no guest ok = no valid users = +group1 force group = +group1 If a user creates a new file/directory in this share, the UNIX group for the new entry is the user's default UNIX group, not group1. I see this error in the client log on the samba server: [2011/04/28 01:02:45, 0] smbd/uid.c:309(change_to_user) PANIC: assert failed at smbd/uid.c(309): conn-force_group_gid != (gid_t)-1 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: samba 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-31.61-generic 2.6.32.32+drm33.14 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-31-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Apr 28 01:15:43 2011 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US SHELL=/bin/bash SambaServerRegression: No SourcePackage: samba ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 772158] Re: samba force group option fails
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772158 Title: samba force group option fails -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 670789] [NEW] libpam-afs-session gives user membership in nonexistant group
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-afs-session Using libpam-afs-session 1.7-2 on x86_64 version of Ubuntu 10.04.1 When I have this module in my PAM stack and I authenticate as a user with an AFS identity (and get a token), I get added to a group that doesn't exist, as reported by the id and groups commands: $ id uid=648(taft) gid=200(bioinf) groups=200(bioinf),2693(csbio),2694(csbioadm),1103439836 $ groups bioinf csbio csbioadm groups: cannot find name for group ID 1103439836 1103439836 1103439836 is not a group (or gid number of a group) that is defined anywhere on my system. If I comment out pam_afs_session.so from the common pam stack files, I don't see this behavior. Since the default Ubuntu /etc/bash.bashrc file runs the groups command, every time that I login as a user with an AFS identity, I get the above error message (groups: cannot find name for group ID 1103439836) before my first shell prompt. Note that the number of the non-existent group is not always the same. The files in /etc/pam.d on this system are: common-account account [success=2 new_authtok_reqd=done default=ignore]pam_unix.so account [success=1 default=ignore] pam_ldap.so account requisite pam_deny.so account requiredpam_permit.so account requiredpam_krb5.so minimum_uid=200 common-auth auth[success=3 default=ignore] pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=200 auth[success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok_secure try_first_pass auth[success=1 default=ignore] pam_ldap.so use_first_pass authrequisite pam_deny.so authrequiredpam_permit.so authoptionalpam_afs_session.so authoptionalpam_cap.so common-password passwordrequisite pam_cracklib.so retry=3 minlen=8 difok=3 passwordrequisite pam_krb5.so minimum_uid=200 try_first_pass use_authtok password[success=2 default=ignore] pam_unix.so obscure use_authtok try_first_pass sha512 password[success=1 user_unknown=ignore default=die] pam_ldap.so use_authtok try_first_pass passwordrequisite pam_deny.so passwordrequiredpam_permit.so passwordoptionalpam_gnome_keyring.so common-session session [default=1] pam_permit.so session requisite pam_deny.so session requiredpam_permit.so session optionalpam_krb5.so minimum_uid=200 session requiredpam_unix.so session optionalpam_ldap.so session optionalpam_afs_session.so session optionalpam_ck_connector.so nox11 common-session-noninteractive session [default=1] pam_permit.so session requisite pam_deny.so session requiredpam_permit.so session optionalpam_krb5.so minimum_uid=200 session requiredpam_unix.so session optionalpam_ldap.so session optionalpam_afs_session.so ** Affects: libpam-afs-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libpam-afs-session gives user membership in nonexistant group https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668436] [NEW] apparmor missing entry for some ssl ca cert files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apparmor The default apparmor profile in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs is missing entries for the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. Many of the files in the /etc/ssl/certs directory (which apparmor allows access to) are actually links to files in the /usr/share/ca- certificates/mozilla directory. Apparmor currently denies access to the files that are in the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. This access would be needed if you wanted to run a SSL service (e.g. ldaps) and your SSL certificate were signed by a public CA and the public CA's certificate were in the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. A default Ubuntu install puts most public CAs in the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory, and just has soft links to the files from the /etc/ssl/certs directory. Proposed addition to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs file: /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla r, /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/* r, ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: apparmor 2.5-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 29 13:04:51 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100816.1) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: apparmor ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- apparmor missing entry for some ssl ca cert files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668436] Re: apparmor missing entry for some ssl ca cert files
** Description changed: Binary package hint: apparmor The default apparmor profile in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs is missing entries for the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. Many of the files in the /etc/ssl/certs directory (which apparmor allows access to) are actually links to files in the /usr/share/ca- certificates/mozilla directory. Apparmor currently denies access to the files that are in the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. This access would be needed if you wanted to run a SSL service (e.g. ldaps) and your SSL certificate were signed by a public CA and the public CA's certificate were in the /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory. A default Ubuntu install puts most public CAs in the - /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory, and just have soft links - to the files from the /etc/ssl/certs directory. + /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla directory, and just has soft links to + the files from the /etc/ssl/certs directory. Proposed addition to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ssl_certs file: /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla r, /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/* r, ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: apparmor 2.5-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: openafs fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 29 13:04:51 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100816.1) ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: apparmor -- apparmor missing entry for some ssl ca cert files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250909] Re: Apt-get does not support packages of 2.5 gig...
This fix also needs to be released for other supported versions of Ubuntu (lucid, karmic, etc.) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Apt-get does not support packages of 2.5 gig... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250909 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652479] Re: pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update
Installing the 1.7-2 version from Debian testing fixed the problem for me. I second the proposal to resync with Debian. -- pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652479] [NEW] pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-afs-session OS: Running 10.04.1 on amd64 platform. Software versions: libpam-runtime: 1.1.1-2ubuntu5 libpam-afs-session: 1.7-1build1 The pam-afs-session module cannot be managed by pam-auth-update. When I have libpam-afs-session installed, and I run pam-auth-update, I don't see any options to configure AFS PAM support. I suspect that this is because this package does not place an entry in /usr/share/pam-configs. One effect of this problem is that, even after installing this package, an AFS ticket is not obtained at login unless the system administrator manually edits the files in /etc/pam.d. ** Affects: libpam-afs-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pam-afs-session cannot be managed by pam-auth-update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605149] [NEW] Upgrade to cups-bsd_1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2 hangs during preseeded install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups When my system runs aptitude -y full-upgrade during an preseeded (automated) install, the upgrade to the cups-bsd package hangs the upgrade. The system is installing the 64-bit version of 10.04. The aptitude upgrade is run from a script called by the late_command string in the preseed file (d-i preseed/late_command) The last message in the install log before the hang is: Preparing to replace cups-bsd 1.4.3-1 (using .../cups-bsd_1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2_amd64.deb) If I do a ps, I get the following processes (not counting the aptitude/dpkg commands) related to the cups upgrade: /bin/sh /var/lib/dpkg/info/cups-bsd.prerm upgrade 1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/share/debconf/frontentd /usr/sbin/update-inetd --pattern cups-lpd --disable printer If I kill the second process (it's a child of the first), then things continue on. Running this command on a live (normal booted) system works, as does running this upgrade from a live system. ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Upgrade to cups-bsd_1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2 hangs during preseeded install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
