Re: [Bug 58374] Re: Authentication impossible (improbable?)
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:35 PM, JJMerelo 58...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ¡Found the solution! it's a problem with the file associations in Konqueror. Fire up konqueror, go to Settings - configure Konqueror - File management - File associations and move down gedit so that Konqueror or Firefox web browser (or any other) is above it. Hope it helps Nice. I will add this info to the wiki shortly. Good sleuthing, it is appreciated. Mark JJ -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to kflickr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58374 Title: Authentication impossible (improbable?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/58374 Title: Authentication impossible (improbable?) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 739693] Re: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
On Mar 30, 2011 3:51pm, Andy Dougherty 739...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: This issue is being tracked upstream as http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=86854 I'd like to fix this upstream, but need some basic information first. Assuming this is a deliberate change in Ubuntu, the fix for perl-5.14 will be to detect this situation in the hints/linux.sh hint file and add the appropriate plibpth values automatically. In order to do that, I could use some help: First: How does one reliably detect this version of Ubuntu? (Assume I look in '/etc/issue' should be good. have never used Ubuntu, and don't have access to it for testing.) I often install OSs in VMs now to get over this, if you care to see things first hand. Mark Second: Does anyone understand this new organization enough to suggest how to coax the necessary directory name (eg /lib/i386-linux-gnu) out of the build tools? (For example, what should it be on an amd64 system? How about PPC? SPARC? Are there trailing 32s or 64s on any of those names? etc.) Thank you. Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu ** Bug watch added: rt.perl.org/rt3/ #86854 http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=86854 -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/739693/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739693] Re: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
I am sure there are other suitable fixes and possible debate if this should be made a 'default' search path but here is a potential fix none the less. ** Patch added: Add the new lib paths to default search paths used by Configure https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/739693/+attachment/1930371/+files/configure-adjust-for-moving-libs.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: Re: [Bug 739693] Re: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
On Mar 22, 2011 12:53pm, Steve Peters st...@fisharerojo.org wrote: I can look into this, unfortunately not today. There was a lot of work done to get the correct 64-bit libs found on Linux since there didn't seem to be a standard location for them across distributions. My guess is that Ubuntu currently has found another way to make this happen or there is some other configuration that has been done on the build machine that isn't on your machine. Steve Thanks Steve. I am in no rush, I just noticed this issue when building perl on its own. I decided to see if Ubu had a fix for the package, figuring it would have been hit already by someone, I didn't see anything, so raised the defect. I thought it might just be my system but using pbuilder should have created a fresh chroot env. ensuring no pollution from my system. Mark On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:56 AM, TundraMan 739...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: I am sure there are other suitable fixes and possible debate if this should be made a 'default' search path but here is a potential fix none the less. ** Patch added: Add the new lib paths to default search paths used by Configure https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/739693/+attachment/1930371/+files/configure-adjust-for-moving-libs.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to perl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/739693/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739693] [NEW] Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: perl Attempting to build the 'perl' package fails on natty. libc6 in natty has moved the core system libs (such as libm) that used to be in /lib into /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu. Perl's Configure script does not include this path in libspath/libpth/loclibpth so it fails to find the libraries. Subsequently the libs are dropped from the build line for gcc and the build falls over during linking. I have reproduced this on my system by grabbing the src-deb via 'apt-get source perl' both on the base system and in a pbuilder env.. The end result is a build failure cc -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib -o miniperl \ gv.o toke.o perly.o pad.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o reentr.o mro.o hv.o av.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys.o doop.o doio.o regexec.o utf8.o taint. o deb.o universal.o xsutils.o globals.o perlio.o perlapi.o numeric.o mathoms.o locale.o pp_pack.o pp_sort.o \ miniperlmain.o opmini.o perlmini.o util.o: In function `Perl_safesysmalloc': /tmp/buildd/perl-5.10.1/util.c:78: undefined reference to `pthread_getspecific' util.o: In function `Perl_safesysrealloc': /tmp/buildd/perl-5.10.1/util.c:134: undefined reference to `pthread_getspecific' util.o: In function `Perl_croak_nocontext': /tmp/buildd/perl-5.10.1/util.c:1444: undefined reference to `pthread_getspecific' util.o: In function `Perl_safesyscalloc': /tmp/buildd/perl-5.10.1/util.c:271: undefined reference to `pthread_getspecific' util.o: In function `Perl_die_nocontext': ... - Under a normal build several libs should follow at the end of the build line, like '-lm' ** Affects: perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 739693] Re: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
** Attachment added: pbuilder screen log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693/+attachment/1927920/+files/screenlog.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739693 Title: Configure does not find libs in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 508484] Re: kflickr strips exif tags on upload
Don't get all snarky with comments like which for some unknown reason, I decided to upload using kflickr, this is not appreciated. The thumbnail problem along with the EXIF problem are due to the version of KFlickr shipped with Ubuntu, it is extremely old (something be addressed via bug 383499 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kflickr/+bug/383499). I am in the process of making the latest version available for Karmin in my PPA, please try it and if the bug continues leave this bug open, otherwise this should be a dupe of 383499. The PPA can be found at https://launchpad.net/~asselsm/+archive/ppa. -- kflickr strips exif tags on upload https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 508484] Re: kflickr strips exif tags on upload
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya sand...@foss-community.com wrote: Hey Tundraman, now that I have had a decent night's sleep after posting that bug report, I realize that I needn't have vented my frustrations in the bug. Really sorry for that. After uploading 200+ photos using my slow connection till late in the night, putting titles and descriptions in Flickr (because I cannot see the thumbnails in kflickr) and *then* realizing that exif tags are missing really set me off. I had to re-upload all the photos using postr for the time being. No problem. I realize when hard work and more importantly - time - seems to be wasted by misbehaving software that this can be frustrating. So no worries. I appreciate your hard work on this. I want kflickr to do well. Else I wouldn't have bothered to file this bug report. If this and other bug you mentioned are both fixed, this would be the best flickr uploader in the Linux world. And that is the reason I still try to use it. True, submitting a bug is far more valuable then just writing it off and doing nothing. Thanks for keeping at it. Let's hope Ubuntu can get this officially uprev.ed to my latest code base and others won't similarly waste their time. Mark Thanks again. -- kflickr strips exif tags on upload https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508484 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to kflickr in ubuntu. -- kflickr strips exif tags on upload https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141445] Re: Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...)
@shadowfoxx - here is where I found things vendor_id = cat /sys/class/sound/hwC0D0/vendor_id subsystem_id = cat /sys/class/sound/hwC0D0/subsystem_id codec address = /proc/asound/card0/codec#0 the zero at the end node = 0x19 verb = 0x707 (this comes from observing the output of hda-verb when passing in SET_PIN_WIDGET_CONTROL) arg = 0x21 (this comes from observing the value of node 0x19 when using hda_analyzer.py) -- Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141445] Re: Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...)
shadowfoxx and Vijay, more playing around and I agree the VREF of 50 is the way to go. More good news, I have a way to make this persistent even with a reboot :). Obviously the end solution is to submit a patch to ALSA, which I will do eventually but thankfully there is an early patching system available which we can take advantage of, you can read about it at http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tiwai/docs/HD-Audio.html#_early_patching But here is the goods as you have to use hda-verb and sysfs to poke around to get the necessary values. Cut and paste the following into a new file '/lib/firmware/hda-init.fw'. snip [codec] 0x10ec0262 0x17aa3837 0 [verb] 0x19 0x707 0x21 snip then modify your /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf file to add the following to the 'options snd-hda-intel' line 'patch=hda-init.fw'. So you should now have something like: options snd-hda-intel power_save=10 power_save_controller=N model=lenovo-3000 patch=hda-init.fw This will allow the VREF_50 to survive the reboot, works for me :). For some reason the input source keeps switching back to Mic and I have to change it to Int Mic using alsamixer each boot but I suspect this is fixable. -- Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141445] Re: Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...)
After much messing around I have a working internal MIC on my brother's Lenovo 3000 Y410. I had to use the Alsa HDA Analyzer found at http://www .alsa-project.org/main/index.php/HDA_Analyzer along with the patch by Sananth found at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1039685highlight=hp+dv6000page=4 to change Node [0x18] Pin VREF to GRD. This was the key to getting things working, there may be a way to do this directly with ALSA utils but this HDA Analyzer works well for this. For optimal MIC settings I also changed Node 0x18 Val[0] and Val[1] to '3', using 'alsamixer' I set the Int Mic to 100% and Int Mic Boost to 33%, Capture [0] to 100%, and Input Source [0] to 'Int Mic'. I also used the information found at http://ohioloco.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1310074 to set Audio Default Output and Default Input to PulseAudio Sound Server. In /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf I added model=lenovo-3000 to the snd-hda- intel options line. Installing Skype Beta which uses PulseAudio I am now able to make calls! This has been a persistent issue with my brother's laptop and I see others here are using the Y410 so I hope this information helps others out and if not I feel your pain. -- Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141445] Re: Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...)
Ooops. Sorry that should have been Node 0x19 Int Mic for the above. Also setting the Mic to 100% is not needed this is for playback and you actually want to mute this or you will get terrible feedback, don't worry muting mic playback will not prevent you from recording. -- Internal microphone not working on intel-hda (Realtek ALC262) in gutsy (and intrepid and ...) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383499] Re: Upgrade kflickr-kde4
The version number of the package or of the application? I would prefer not to have the application version number change since the SourceForge and other sites would not have this so folks reporting bugs could possibly get confused as to what version to report the bug against, I prefer to only have one version number in the wild, per release, to be honest. Yes I have moved to a date based versioning when I ported the app to KDE4 but since I nor the app is part of KDE, I figure this is my prerogative and much prefer date based versions over the old major.minor versioning. So if we are simply talking about the package version I guess it is entirely up to you although I would say there are no gains to be made by not matching the application version. If you are modifying the app version I would disagree with this since as I point out this will just lead to confusion when mapping to my upstream releases. Mark -- Upgrade kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 383499] Re: Upgrade kflickr-kde4
My PPA has fresh snapshots of the development version and can be found here: https://launchpad.net/~asselsm/+archive/ppa I would very much like to see this better track the latest release, better then it has been. I am able to help out where needed and have also poked the Debian maintainer as they have also fallen behind and getting them to stay more current should make the job in Ubuntu easier. Thanks for your work Peter, this will help kflickr show its best face to the Ubuntu community. -- Upgrade kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234942] Re: kflickr doesn't show thumbnails on hardy gnome
A new upsteam release is now available for use with KDE4. Debs are currently available for Ubuntu Intrepid i386 and amd64. Development is ongoing with full functionality expected around the new year. -- kflickr doesn't show thumbnails on hardy gnome https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299904] Re: Thumbnails won't load
This is due to the fact that Intrepid ships with KDE4 and the 0.9.1 release of kFlickr was prepared for KDE3. I suspect with some effort you could use 0.9.1 with KDE4 but why spend the time. A new release of kFlickr is now ready which is a port to KDE4. You can grab the debs from sourceforge and hopefully official packages for Intrepid will be ready soon. -- Thumbnails won't load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220135] Re: Hard lock booting/logging out/restarting [Q965]
Wooohooo. The latest .24-19 kernel along with whatever xorg-intel updates that have gone out lately have solved this problem for me on my Dell Optiplex 745. I no longer have troubles with hard lockup just as kdm starts and also the suspend/resume is working like a champ. On my home computer which had problems on return from suspend with the -18 kernel the -19 now fixes this. I am now much happier. -- Hard lock booting/logging out/restarting [Q965] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209368] Re: [hardy] OSD doesn't work in Konversation anymore
There is a kubuntu specific patch applied to the package kubuntu_03_osd_kde4.diff which changes the checks done to ensure the OSD does not display if the screen is locked or the screensaver running. Anyways removal of this patch fixes the issue. Now I just have to update the patch to be a bit smarter and try to get it accepted :). -- [hardy] OSD doesn't work in Konversation anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209368 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is subscribed to konversation in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194624] Re: checkbox and radiobox rendering issue
This problem does not exist in Ubuntu. It is definitely a Kubuntu issue. -- checkbox and radiobox rendering issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194624] [NEW] checkbox and radiobox rendering issue
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 When selecting a radiobox or checkbox on a webpage it becomes rendered as a larger empty square and doesn't get rendered correctly until focus is moved away. This makes it difficult to determine the state of the widget. Ubuntu Hardy updated Feb. 22 DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu hardy (development branch) firefox-3.03.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 22 22:56:46 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 Package: firefox 3.0~b3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux yow-loaner 2.6.24-8-generic #1 SMP Thu Feb 14 20:40:45 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: apport-bug -- checkbox and radiobox rendering issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194624] Re: checkbox and radiobox rendering issue
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12160403/Dependencies.txt -- checkbox and radiobox rendering issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194624] Re: checkbox and radiobox rendering issue
The theme is Firefox (default) 2.0. I am also running KDE (kubuntu), sorry I may not of been clear about this in my original post. I have 3 systems running Kubuntu Hardy and all exhibit this behavior. All have the ubufox packaged installed as well. I will try to do some diagnostics and play with some other themes if I find some time. I lost a whole bunch of time on a new install the other day due to a language-pack issue causing KDE not to start :(. On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Tero Ratilainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It happens with domino style here as well on KDE (kde-style-domino). Works well with Konqueror, so the bug is probably GTK/Firefox dependant. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- checkbox and radiobox rendering issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194624 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- checkbox and radiobox rendering issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors
Seems to be fixed in the latest firefox update. -- web page background render errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors
Similar issue can be seen on iGoogle. I have the planet theme for iGoogle and the top banner image shows part of the firefox window, make sure your browser window is wide enough as it happens on the right. Youtube is another place, the search and upload buttons have the window frame titlebar as the background. -- web page background render errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195293] [NEW] battery status always shows 99%
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kde-guidance kde-guidance-powermanger is always showing 99% even though it definitely is not 99%. The battery icon in the system tray is full green and the tooltip shows 99%. The built in battery indicator LEDs show 40-60%. ** Affects: kde-guidance (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- battery status always shows 99% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 195293] Re: battery status always shows 99%
Ah. Just notice an additional behavior to this bug. When I plug in the AC the battery charge % displays correctly. -- battery status always shows 99% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195293 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145448] Please sync kflickr (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kflickr Severity: wishlist please sync klickr 0.9-1 from debian unstable. The release fixes a major bug in batch editing mode. kflickr (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #434426) * Bump debian/compat to 5. * Add XS-VCS-Bzr header in debian/control. * Change debian/watch to search for .tar.gz instead of .tar.bz2. -- Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:59:36 +0200 ** Affects: kflickr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync kflickr (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145448 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
