[Bug 1655108] [NEW] Please update, important security fixes!
Public bug reported: Dear maintainer, please update this package, upstream has important security fixes! Thanks! ** Affects: firejail (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655108 Title: Please update, important security fixes! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firejail/+bug/1655108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620980] [NEW] After updating Chromium its GUI is absurdly large (DPI settings ignored?)
Public bug reported: Today I updated Chromium. After that update the browser gui is absurdly large, like on a 800x600 screen - it seems like it ignores DPI settings now. I have DPI set to 144 in my xfce desktop. How to change that behavior? ** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620980 Title: After updating Chromium its GUI is absurdly large (DPI settings ignored?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1620980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620980] Re: After updating Chromium its GUI is absurdly large (DPI settings ignored?)
For a quick fix: add --force-device-scale-factor=1 to your chromium starter script. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620980 Title: After updating Chromium its GUI is absurdly large (DPI settings ignored?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1620980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484429] Re: Plugging in a LUKS device causes the following error: Error unlocking device: cryptsetup exited with exit code 239: Command failed: Device already exists
This problem still exists in trusty. after suspend / resume an external excrypted harddrive automaint fails with this error. How to solve this totally annoying behaviour? Also I would like to know: how can I make the automount mechanism forget the password? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484429 Title: Plugging in a LUKS device causes the following error: Error unlocking device: cryptsetup exited with exit code 239: Command failed: Device already exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/udisks/+bug/484429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484429] Re: Plugging in a LUKS device causes the following error: Error unlocking device: cryptsetup exited with exit code 239: Command failed: Device already exists
BTW this error seems to be triggered by the password input mechanism -
when I save the luks password "forever", volume management will always
remount that enrypted device without trouble after resume.
The two other options ("forget immediately" and "forget when log out")
lead to the described problem with cryptsetup failing with a "device
already exists".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484429
Title:
Plugging in a LUKS device causes the following error: Error unlocking
device: cryptsetup exited with exit code 239: Command failed: Device
already exists
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/udisks/+bug/484429/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91389] Re: Please add support for more than one VPN simultaneously
Premier Ubuntu Annoyances Bug, selected for Global Linux Annoyances Report 2016. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91389 Title: Please add support for more than one VPN simultaneously To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/91389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1286882] Re: libapache2-mpm-itk postinst failed
HEY, UBUNTU MAINTAINER, ARE YOU SLEEPING??? SO F* ANNOYING!!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286882 Title: libapache2-mpm-itk postinst failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpm-itk/+bug/1286882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 889073] Re: pcretest missing from libpcre
Unbelievable. This is why people hate Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889073 Title: pcretest missing from libpcre To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre3/+bug/889073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1286882] Re: libapache2-mpm-itk postinst failed
apache-mpm-itk is NOT dead, this is destructive disinfo. It is very alive and used in big environments every day. It was last updated on 2014-03-01as you can see here http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/ The mailing list is also active. The bug described here seems to be related to https://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734865 This is jsut some packaging error and should be fixed by the ubuntu maintainer. AGAIN: apache-mpm-itk IS NOT DEAD. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #734865 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734865 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286882 Title: libapache2-mpm-itk postinst failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpm-itk/+bug/1286882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1269491] Re: [new-upstream]LiVES 2.2.2
The author states on the website: Versions 2.2.0 and 2.2.1 both contained serious bugs. Please update to 2.2.2. So, yes, please update. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269491 Title: [new-upstream]LiVES 2.2.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lives/+bug/1269491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1284558] [NEW] SEGFAULT at start: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed
Public bug reported: This is for 14.04. Since the last glibc update a few days ago I can not start firefox anymore. I get this error: (process:3489): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::sm-connect after class was initialised (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::show-crash-dialog after class was initialised (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::display after class was initialised (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::default-icon after class was initialised Segmentation fault (core dumped) The same goes for thunderbird, but i will post a new bugreport for that. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 14.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284558 Title: SEGFAULT at start: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1284558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1160569] Re: [regression] GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed
This problem still exists on Ubuntu 14.04 alpha since the glibc update a few days ago (somewhere mid february 2014). (process:3503): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::sm-connect after class was initialised (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::show-crash-dialog after class was initialised (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::display after class was initialised (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::default-icon after class was initialised Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160569 Title: [regression] GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1160569/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1160569]
This problem still exists on the upcoming Ubuntu 14.04 ubucatz@ubuntu:~$ firefox (process:3489): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::sm-connect after class was initialised (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::show-crash-dialog after class was initialised (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::display after class was initialised (firefox:3489): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::default-icon after class was initialised Segmentation fault (core dumped) ubucatz@ubuntu:~$ thunderbird (process:3503): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::sm-connect after class was initialised (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::show-crash-dialog after class was initialised (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::display after class was initialised (thunderbird:3503): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Attempt to add property GnomeProgram::default-icon after class was initialised Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160569 Title: [regression] GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion `sys_page_size == 0' failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1160569/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit
PROBLEM STILL EXISTS ON 14.04 LTS!!! please either fix chkrootkit or change /sbin/init - I hope in a more security aware post snowden era this will now trigger some more action - certainly many users will be very irritated about this. This does not happen on other distros. Must be fixed before release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+bug/454566/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 454566] Re: False positive for SucKit
PROBLEM STILL EXISTS ON 14.04 LTS!!! please either fix chkrootkit or change /sbin/init - I hope in a more security aware post snowden era this will now trigger some more action - certainly many users will be very irritated about this. This does not happen on other distros. Must be fixed before release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454566 Title: False positive for SucKit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/server-papercuts/+bug/454566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 556372] Re: Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / cryptsetup
We are doing some research on how PARTICIPATION actually works in the Ubuntu ecosystem and we would like to know if there is any community process that would allow voting on this issue? This is an especially interesting issue because from a technical view it is very clear - of course it is total nonsense to have such basic things like cryptsetup depend on a graphical boot animation gimmick. But this makes the question even more interesting how such unreflected decisions creep into the community. Is this an attempt to make Ubuntu a bad name? Is there some planning for future plymouth features that make this dependency needed today? Or is this just kind of a strange joke? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556372 Title: Please remove the plymouth dependency from mountall / cryptsetup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptsetup/+bug/556372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
