[Bug 1798818] [NEW] DNS server is not updated after VPN is established

2018-10-19 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

The exact same VPN configuration (both server-client) was working perfectly 
with Ubuntu 18.04. After upgrading, the DNS server is not updated with the one 
pushed by the VPN server. It's not updated even if I set it to MANUAL and 
specify the IP address in the VPN configuration dialog.
This can be checked with `systemd-resolve --status` which returns the original 
LAN provided DNS server.

This breaks completely an OpenVPN connection under Ubuntu 18.10.

The workaround I did was to manually add a script in
`/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d` which forces systemd-resolve to use a
specific IP address as the main DNS server. But it's an ugly hack.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
Package: network-manager-openvpn 1.8.6-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-10.11-generic 4.18.12
Uname: Linux 4.18.0-10-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu13
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Oct 19 14:24:05 2018
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-20 (333 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
SourcePackage: network-manager-openvpn
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-10-19 (0 days ago)

** Affects: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug cosmic

** Description changed:

  The exact same VPN configuration (both server-client) was working perfectly 
with Ubuntu 18.04. After upgrading, the DNS server is not updated with the one 
pushed by the VPN server. It's not updated even if I set it to MANUAL and 
specify the IP address in the VPN configuration dialog.
  This can be checked with `systemd-resolve --status` which returns the 
original LAN provided DNS server.
  
- This brokes completely an OpenVPN connection under Ubuntu 18.10.
+ This breaks completely an OpenVPN connection under Ubuntu 18.10.
  
  The workaround I did was to manually add a script in
  `/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d` which forces systemd-resolve to use a
  specific IP address as the main DNS server. But it's an ugly hack.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: network-manager-openvpn 1.8.6-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-10.11-generic 4.18.12
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-10-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu13
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Oct 19 14:24:05 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-20 (333 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
  SourcePackage: network-manager-openvpn
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-10-19 (0 days ago)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798818

Title:
  DNS server is not updated after VPN is established

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-openvpn/+bug/1798818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1798049] Re: ssh ConnectTimeout is obeyed only on 1st ConnectionAttempt

2018-10-16 Thread Vide
I've opened a bug report upstream
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2918 because friends not
using Ubuntu confirmed the same erratic behavior even with newer OpenSSH
versions (7.8)

** Bug watch added: OpenSSH Portable Bugzilla #2918
   https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2918

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798049

Title:
  ssh ConnectTimeout is obeyed only on 1st ConnectionAttempt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1798049/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1798049] [NEW] ssh ConnectTimeout is obeyed only on 1st ConnectionAttempt

2018-10-16 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

This seems a regression from Ubuntu 17.10 OpenSSH 7.5.

Setting the SSH option ConnectTimeout=N only works on the first
ConnectionAttempts. So, if you set ConnectionAttempts=2 for example, it
will time out after N second on the first attempt and wait the full,
default TCP timeout on the second attempt.

Example of the error:

$ time ssh - -o ConnectTimeout=2 -o ConnectionAttempts=2  -o 
StrictHostKeyChecking=false -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null  1.2.3.4
OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4, OpenSSL 1.0.2n  7 Dec 2017
debug1: Reading configuration data /home/vide/.ssh/config
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for *
debug2: resolving "1.2.3.4" port 22
debug2: ssh_connect_direct: needpriv 0
debug1: Connecting to 1.2.3.4 [1.2.3.4] port 22.
debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
debug1: connect to address 1.2.3.4 port 22: Connection timed out
debug1: Trying again...
debug1: Connecting to 1.2.3.4 [1.2.3.4] port 22.
debug1: connect to address 1.2.3.4 port 22: Connection timed out
ssh: connect to host 1.2.3.4 port 22: Connection timed out

real2m13,670s
user0m0,012s
sys 0m0,018s

The first timeout happens after 2 seconds, the second after ~2 minutes

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: openssh-client 1:7.6p1-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-34.37-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-34-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Oct 16 10:48:41 2018
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-11-20 (329 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 ssh-askpass   N/A
 libpam-sshN/A
 keychain  N/A
 ssh-askpass-gnome N/A
SSHClientVersion: OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4, OpenSSL 1.0.2n  7 Dec 2017
SourcePackage: openssh
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798049

Title:
  ssh ConnectTimeout is obeyed only on 1st ConnectionAttempt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1798049/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1709699] Re: gpk-update-viewer fails with "Spawn of helper 'usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/aptcc/get-distro-upgrade.py' failed ... (No such file or directory)"

2018-04-28 Thread Vide
same here. Ubuntu 17.10. Intel i5 2500k. gnome-shell version 3.26.2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709699

Title:
  gpk-update-viewer fails with "Spawn of helper
  'usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/aptcc/get-distro-upgrade.py' failed ...
  (No such file or directory)"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-packagekit/+bug/1709699/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1574041] Re: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

2016-05-10 Thread Vide
Going back to 4.4.0-21 fixes the problem for me, so I don't know if I'm
hitting the same bug as the bug reporter

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574041

Title:
  xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of
  current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1574041/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1574041] Re: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

2016-05-10 Thread Vide
In my case, with the current USB hub I have, it started with the latest
16.04 kernel upgrade. I am running this version:

Linux shadow 4.4.0-22-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 5 16:53:32 UTC 2016
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574041

Title:
  xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of
  current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1574041/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1574041] Re: xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

2016-05-10 Thread Vide
What happen inb my case is that I have a Logitech mouse and a Cherry
keyboard connected to the external USB, it works perfectly if I boot up
the kernel with the hub already plugged in but if I unplug the hub and
then plug it again, after a few seconds, the mouse stops working (the
keyboard still works, though)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574041

Title:
  xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr not part of
  current TD ep_index 3 comp_code 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1574041/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1521862] Re: Clementine crashes with "assert failure ***stack smashing detected***"

2016-01-04 Thread Vide
As of today i have the same problem.
I am running Ubuntu 15.10

clementine.desktop[26653]: *** stack smashing detected ***: clementine
terminated

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521862

Title:
  Clementine crashes with "assert failure ***stack smashing detected***"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clementine/+bug/1521862/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 974060] Re: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

2013-04-15 Thread Vide
Updated to Ubuntu 13.04, the bug is still there :(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974060

Title:
  next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminator/+bug/974060/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 974060] Re: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

2013-01-30 Thread Vide
Just tested that branch, and now it works again! Thank you very much!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974060

Title:
  next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminator/+bug/974060/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1066998] Re: empathy-chat crashed with SIGSEGV in _dbus_list_unlink()

2012-11-07 Thread Vide
It has just happened to me as well, I had just tried to open a new chat
with a jabber account, already had 3 chat tabs opened. Not very useful I
know but that's what I was doing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066998

Title:
  empathy-chat crashed with SIGSEGV in _dbus_list_unlink()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1066998/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 974060] Re: next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

2012-08-03 Thread Vide
It happens to other keybindings as well, like split_horiz and
split_vert, even if the modified keybinding is stored in Terminator's
config file.

~/.config/terminator$ cat config 
[global_config]
  enabled_plugins = InactivityWatch, ActivityWatch, TerminalShot, 
LaunchpadCodeURLHandler, APTURLHandler, LaunchpadBugURLHandler
  sticky = True
[keybindings]
  split_horiz = PrimaryShifth
  split_vert = PrimaryShiftj

I still get disabled for these keybindings (and ctrl+shift+h doesn't
split my terminal horizontally)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974060

Title:
  next_tab and prev_tab keybindings stop working if changed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminator/+bug/974060/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730993] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

2012-07-28 Thread Vide
Right now I don't have that Macbook  anymore so I cannot tell you if
it's still existing with the current kernel (upstream or Ubuntu
flavored).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730993

Title:
  WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
  suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/730993/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 887983] Re: Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message

2011-11-09 Thread Vide
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887983

Title:
  Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/887983/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 887983] [NEW] Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message

2011-11-09 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

Step to reproduce: 
1) receive a very large ( 210k) plain text message (no attachements, just text 
in the body)
2) click on it and get it shown in the preview pane
3) select another message (same folder, another folder, doesn't matter) and see 
that the preview pane always shows the very large message previewed in 2)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: evolution 3.2.0-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Nov  9 11:46:16 2011
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: evolution
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-10 (29 days ago)

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887983

Title:
  Preview pane does not refresh after previewing a very large message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/887983/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 787551] Re: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization found - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o

2011-06-16 Thread Vide
Hi

will this be fixed to Natty as well?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787551

Title:
  ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization
  found - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 787551] Re: ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization found - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o

2011-06-16 Thread Vide
Hi

will this be fixed to Natty as well?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787551

Title:
  ntpdate 4.2.6p2@1.2194-o: no server suitable for synchronization
  found - works with 4.2.4p8@1.1612-o

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ntp/+bug/787551/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 688816] Re: Don't create windows over the launcher

2011-03-28 Thread Vide
I'd like to ask that even when the user maximezes the window, it should
not overlap the launcher area (thus making it hide) just as it doesn't
overlap the menu bar. Should I open a new bug or this is the right place
to ask such a thing?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688816

Title:
  Don't create windows over the launcher

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730993] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

2011-03-07 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

The laptop doesn't resume from suspend when opening the lid.
Steps to reproduce:
1) connect the power chord
2) close the lid and let it get suspended to ram
3) disconnect the power chord
4) open the lid

ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: linux-image-2.6.38-5-generic 2.6.38-5.32
Regression: No
Reproducible: Yes
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-5.32-generic 2.6.38-rc6
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-5-generic i686
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be 
restarted.
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  vide   1356 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0x5044 irq 43'
   Mixer name   : 'SigmaTel STAC9221 A1'
   Components   : 'HDA:83847680,106b2200,00103401'
   Controls  : 21
   Simple ctrls  : 13
Date: Mon Mar  7 21:51:43 2011
Failure: oops
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=b3686267-1674-43f3-99c0-e2ac73418513
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
MachineType: Apple Inc. MacBook2,1
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-5-generic 
root=UUID=d6ecd158-e2de-4654-9aea-bd786da27a03 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-5-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-5-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware1.48
SourcePackage: linux
Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 
suspend_test_finish+0x89/0x90()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-02-20 (15 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 06/27/07
dmi.bios.vendor: Apple Inc.
dmi.bios.version: MB21.88Z.00A5.B07.0706270922
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: Mac-F4208CA9
dmi.board.vendor: Apple Inc.
dmi.board.version: PVT
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Apple Inc.
dmi.chassis.version: Mac-F4208CA9
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAppleInc.:bvrMB21.88Z.00A5.B07.0706270922:bd06/27/07:svnAppleInc.:pnMacBook2,1:pvr1.0:rvnAppleInc.:rnMac-F4208CA9:rvrPVT:cvnAppleInc.:ct10:cvrMac-F4208CA9:
dmi.product.name: MacBook2,1
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: Apple Inc.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 kernel-oops kernel-power natty 
needs-upstream-testing resume suspend

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730993

Title:
  WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
  suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730993] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53 suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

2011-03-07 Thread Vide
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730993

Title:
  WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:53
  suspend_test_finish 0x89/0x90()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669940] [NEW] Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10

2010-11-02 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: keyutils

I'm mounting a remote cifs share using sec=krb5 to mount it passwordless
(auth token provided by kerberos) and it worked well in Ubuntu 10.04.
After upgradi ng to 10.10, it's broken with a

mount error(2): No such file or directory
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

error message.
if you install the keyutils package the problem is fixed, so keyutils should 
be brought in by some other package in the upgrade process 8as said, it worked 
before)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: keyutils 1.4-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Nov  2 15:39:15 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: keyutils

** Affects: keyutils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04  10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669940] Re: Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10

2010-11-02 Thread Vide


-- 
Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04  10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 669940] Re: Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04 10.10

2010-11-02 Thread Vide
in 10.04 it is smbfs which pulls keyring in. something changed
apparently cause I do had smbfs installed in 10.04 prior to upgrade

-- 
Keyutils is not installed automatically when upgrading 10.04  10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2010-10-05 Thread Vide
I'm using Ubunto 10.10 and the bug, with gedit and a fstab mounted CIFS share, 
is still there.
Steps to reproduce (the usuals):
- create a new file with gedit in the remote share
- type something
- Ctrl+S to save
- type something
- Ctrl+S to save: bug happens!

And to all the people/developers saying we should use gvfs+cifs... well,
I'll do it  when I'll get the same performances as with kernel mode CIFS
(50MB/s (fifty) against 6MB/s (six))

-- 
gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 653623] [NEW] gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations

2010-10-02 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gvfs

When I connect to Ubuntu 10.10 my Canon Powershot SX20 IS it's detected and I 
can browse with Nautilus the pictures, but when I try any expensive I/O 
operation (say, copy a picture or a movie), gvfs-gphoto2 process eats almost 
100% CPU and no data is transferred. Nautilus always says 0 of NNN bytes 
transferred and the it times out with a -1 unknown error.
No problem copying files using for example Digikam (so no Gnome libraries 
involved) on the same exact Ubuntu installation

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gvfs-backends 1.6.4-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Oct  2 16:46:39 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gvfs

** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick

-- 
gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 653623] Re: gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations

2010-10-02 Thread Vide

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653623/+attachment/163/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
gvfs-gphoto2 eating 100% CPU and no I/O operations
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 99437] Re: umount: mount disagrees with the fstab

2010-09-28 Thread Vide
I'm experiencing the same as hcmeyr, Ubuntu 10.10 latest packages installed.
mounting a cifs share present in fstab works with mount mountpoint but 
umount mountpoint fails with a mount disagrees with the fstab. sudo umount 
mountpoint works as expected

-- 
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-20 Thread Vide
It seems that it works OK on amd64 but it doesn't work on i386. I've
added the same repo on both machines and the version is the same a part
from the architecture

Marcos, Alexander, Ninjix, are you using i386 or amd64?

-- 
AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582153] [NEW] Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars

2010-05-18 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: screen

GNU screen only accept login names with less than 21 characters. This is
a problem with Ubuntu 10.04 cause if you're using likewise-open as
authenticating method it defaults (and it cannot be changed, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/likewise-open/+bug/534629 ) to
DOMAIN\loginname as login name. So it's quite likely that your login
name exceeds the 20 chars limit

There is already a bug upstream

http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?21653

but no answer til now (it's from 2007). There is already a very simple
patch which solves the problem

http://www.mail-archive.com/screen-de...@gnu.org/msg00186.html

which got unresponded as well. Please, can you apply this patch in
Ubuntu's build of screen? Thanks in advance

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: screen 4.0.3-14ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue May 18 10:25:28 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: screen

** Affects: screen (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid screen

-- 
Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 582153] Re: Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars

2010-05-18 Thread Vide

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48645205/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Screen doesn't accept login names longer than 20 chars
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-18 Thread Vide
Now that is strange.. I've got a machine where the fix works (mine) and
another on a colleague's PC with the same exact configuration (copied
from my machine), the same exact likewise-open build (from your PPA) and
there it still doesn't work. It accepts logins only with
DOMAIN\username, not username.

How can I debug it?

-- 
AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Vide
It works for me too but there is still a problem/different behaviour
respect to 9.10. Now when I login I've always get DOMAIN\username as
my unix username while before it was simply username. This poses
problems with, for example, screen which complain about LoginName too
long. Is this a bug or a config option?

-- 
AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Vide
Gerald: I simply try to execute screen with screen :)
My unix name is now 8 (domain name) + 1 (slash) + 14 (username) so it sums 23. 
And I can't change anything in my scenario.

Any suggestion?

-- 
AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 534629] Re: AssumeDefaultDomain does not work

2010-05-14 Thread Vide
Yeah, I saw this too. There's a patch for that but it seems that was
ignored.

http://www.mail-archive.com/screen-de...@gnu.org/msg00186.html

I'll open a wish in Ubuntu Launchpad so Ubuntu could apply this patch.
If this is the new and definitive likewise behavior, more people are
going to see this happening in the future.

-- 
AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395040] Re: Send message to group disabled

2010-05-07 Thread Vide
this was already fixed by upstream

** Changed in: kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Send message to group disabled 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 567327] Re: Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM

2010-05-07 Thread Vide
Ok, this seems fixed with the final release

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568422] Re: Upgrading from likewise-open5 changes home directory locations

2010-04-27 Thread Vide
This happens here as well. Updated from 9.10 to 10.04 beta2 (now on rc, 
tomorrow on final :) via update-manager, I had to create a symlink for 
/home/likewise-open pointing to /home.
This is a showstopper for me upgrading all the workstation I manage from 9.10 
to 10.04

-- 
Upgrading from likewise-open5 changes home directory locations
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 567327] [NEW] Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM

2010-04-20 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

$ uname -a
Linux pc-0707-007 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:09:38 UTC 2010 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

$ cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 
0

Ihave 4GB of RAM and with program using 1.5GB of RAM, the kernel decides that 
even with swappines set to 0 it should swap to disk and not free some MBs from 
the 2.5GB of RAM allocated to buffers.
This makes impossible to work with a desktop cause the disk is thrashing all 
the time, mouse and GUI is unresponsive and I have to hard-reset. There is NO 
program eating memory, the most RAM-hungry program in my installation is 
evolution wich is using, according to ps, about 150MB of RSS.

Disabling/enabling swap as per

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SwapFaq#head-
b179a5c0d7df0ab7d0ea1d58caaa47c7a5f8ab0e

is not a viable workaround

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: kernel ram swap

-- 
Machine swaps too much, leaving too much buffers in RAM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567327
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2010-03-13 Thread Vide
why did you mark this as invalid?

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387900] Re: Could not create a python ScriptEngine for the Python Widget

2009-10-14 Thread Vide
I can confirm lovinglinux comment. Just dist-upgraded Karmic today, KDE
restart and all my python based plasmoid are gone. Please fix it before
release, thanks!

-- 
Could not create a python ScriptEngine for the Python Widget
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387900
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2009-08-04 Thread Vide
Andrew: I'm no Ubuntu dev but I've been suffering this bug when first appeared 
and the bug is clearly and without any doubt on the Samba server side. With 
Samba server I don't mean upstream Samba code but the Samba server present for 
example in Debian Etch (and other OS/devices too, like your NAS). 
The bug is not in the client side, so no Ubuntu fault here. Why Hardy was 
working and Intrepid/Jaunty aren't without the nodfs option? Simply because THE 
KERNEL HAS BEEN UPDATED. Ubuntu even backported new changes (the nodfs option) 
which could be used as workaround for people experiencing the bug in older 
versions

So, before ranting, go read all the previous comments.
Long story short: in your smbmount command pass the nodfs option by mean of the 
-o switch

smbmount '\\192.168.1.2\public' /home/andrew/naspublic -o guest,nodfs

should work with Ubuntu = Intrepid

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2009-08-04 Thread Vide
Andrew: I'm no Ubuntu dev but I've been suffering this bug when first appeared 
and the bug is clearly and without any doubt on the Samba server side. With 
Samba server I don't mean upstream Samba code but the Samba server present for 
example in Debian Etch (and other OS/devices too, like your NAS). 
The bug is not in the client side, so no Ubuntu fault here. Why Hardy was 
working and Intrepid/Jaunty aren't without the nodfs option? Simply because THE 
KERNEL HAS BEEN UPDATED. Ubuntu even backported new changes (the nodfs option) 
which could be used as workaround for people experiencing the bug in older 
versions

So, before ranting, go read all the previous comments.
Long story short: in your smbmount command pass the nodfs option by mean of the 
-o switch

smbmount '\\192.168.1.2\public' /home/andrew/naspublic -o guest,nodfs

should work with Ubuntu = Intrepid

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 395040] [NEW] Send message to group disabled

2009-07-03 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

Using KDE 4.3RC1 (and formerly Beta2) from 
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/backports/ubuntu jaunty main

the Send message to group option in the context menu when clicking on
a group name is grayed out, making impossible to send messages to group.
This is a very useful feature that was always present in past Kubuntu
KDE releases. I wonder if this is upstream or just Ubuntu related. I'm
using Jabber as transport protocol

** Affects: kopete (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Send message to group disabled 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kopete in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2009-01-19 Thread Vide
Thierry, I've just tried what simonm said and no errors here, it all
seems fine (mounting a Debian 3.0.24-6etch10 samba server from Ubuntu
8.10 with 2.6.27-11 kernel and the nodfs option)

% echo 1 2 3  test_file
% cat test_file
1 2 3
% echo 4 5 6  test_file
% cat test_file
1 2 3
4 5 6

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 213754] Re: dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
Yes, this is still an issue with Optiplex 330  and Ubuntu Intrepid, even
if running the very latest 2.6.27-11-generic kernel

-- 
dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213754
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 231667] Re: Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
Hi, I'm running Ubuntu Intrepid with kernel 2.6.27-11 and a Broadcom tg3
ethernet controller

02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5787
Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02)

and I have a similiar problem, but only with DHCP. I have to issue 2 
consecutives DHCP requests before I get the IP, then all work correctly. 
The problem happens both with networkmanager or classic /etc/network/interfaces 
configuration

-- 
Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231667
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 231667] Re: Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
For the record, it's a Dell Optiplex 330 (a workstation)

-- 
Broadcom BCM5722 (tg3) acts weird on reboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231667
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 213754] Re: dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression

2008-12-24 Thread Vide
Yeah, I forgot to mention that. reboot=bios (reboot=b is just the same) still 
works around the problem.
I attach the dmidecode output as requested

** Attachment added: dmidecode output
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20708091/dmidecode-optiplex330.txt

-- 
dell xps 410n won't reboot - regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213754
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
I was affected by this problem as well and I can confirm that using
2.6.27-11 and the nodfs mount option the problem is solved. I tested
this on x86 and x86_64.

I can add that with the -9 kernel the
/proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled workarond wasn't working anymore
(with previous revisions it worked smoothly, but it was a workaround)

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
I was affected by this problem as well and I can confirm that using
2.6.27-11 and the nodfs mount option the problem is solved. I tested
this on x86 and x86_64.

I can add that with the -9 kernel the
/proc/fs/cifs/LinuxExtensionsEnabled workarond wasn't working anymore
(with previous revisions it worked smoothly, but it was a workaround)

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
Tom: as Thierry clearly stated  you have to use a recent kernel from the
intrepid-proposed repository. The 2.6.27-9 you're using is still broken

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 286828] Re: Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
Tom, but your mount at bootime issue it's a completely different topic
(do you put the _netdev label in the fstab options? it's mandatory for
network shares).

-- 
Access to samba 3.0.24-3.0.25 shares using CIFS is broken on 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 298208] Re: keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)

2008-12-23 Thread Vide
Hi

it seems that with latest 2.6.27-11 (from intrepid-proposed) cifs and
kerberos work again! I can mount my remote share with the sec=krb5i
option and I don't need to type a password to get it mounted (although a
Password: prompt is shown anyway, just hitting enter or putting
password= in the mount options do the trick)

-- 
keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298208
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 298208] Re: keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)

2008-11-27 Thread Vide
Argh, I've hit the smae bug :( While reading 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/236830 I thought we were 
already there with SSO auth against CIFS exports but with Intrepid I'm 
experiencing the same dmesg output (created I suspect with my first mount.cifs 
sec=krb5i which egfaulted). Then if I try with sec=krb5 or sec=krb5i it doesn't 
matter, it asks for a password and then it stucks there forever.
I'm using likewise-open from Intrepid to get the kerberos ticket.

-- 
keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298208
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 298208] Re: keyutils is broken (keyctl segfaults trivially)

2008-11-27 Thread Vide
My dmesg output, if it helps

[701194.599816] Oops:  [#1] SMP 
 
[701194.599820] Modules linked in: udf crc_itu_t isofs loop nls_iso8859_1 vfat 
fat usb_storage libusual vmnet vmblock vmci vmmon nls_cp437 nls_utf8 cifs i915 
drm binfmt_misc rfcomm bridge stp bnep sco l2cap bluetooth ppdev 
cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_stats cpufreq_userspace 
cpufreq_ondemand freq_table video output pci_slot sbs sbshc container wmi 
battery ipv6 af_packet iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables dm_crypt 
crypto_blkcipher dm_mod ac lp dcdbas serio_raw psmouse pcspkr snd_usb_audio 
snd_usb_lib evdev snd_hwdep iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support parport_pc parport 
snd_hda_intel snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss 
snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi button snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer 
snd_seq_device snd intel_agp agpgart soundcore snd_page_alloc shpchp 
pci_hotplug ext3 jbd mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif sg ata_generic 
usbhid hid ata_piix pata_acpi libata scsi_mod dock tg3 libphy ehci_hcd uhci_hcd 
usbcore thermal processor fan fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor fuse [last 
unloaded: vmci]   
[701194.599924] 
 
[701194.599927] Pid: 760, comm: mount.cifs Tainted: P  (2.6.27-7-server 
#1)  
[701194.599930] EIP: 0060:[c0219a6f] EFLAGS: 00210246 CPU: 0  
 
[701194.599934] EIP is at call_sbin_request_key+0x29f/0x2b0 
 
[701194.599936] EAX:  EBX:  ECX:  EDX: c3f025b0 
 
[701194.599939] ESI: d40b7b80 EDI: d092cf00 EBP: d40b7c0c ESP: d40b7b58 
 
[701194.599942]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068   
 
[701194.599945] Process mount.cifs (pid: 760, ti=d40b6000 task=c3f025b0 
task.ti=d40b6000)   
 
[701194.599947] Stack: d40b7b80 c04401e9  c0445ae4 f7c73818 c3f025b0 
d092c600 d0920030   
[701194.599956]c048b780 c05d6a88 d0920030 c038b198 d40b7ba4 c0215ec8 
d06cd420    
[701194.599964]d092cc80   d40b7bc8 c0215f59  
 d06cd420   
[701194.599972] Call Trace: 
 
[701194.599975]  [c038b198] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0x20   
 
[701194.599981]  [c0215ec8] ? __key_instantiate_and_link+0xa8/0xc0
 
[701194.599986]  [c0215f59] ? key_instantiate_and_link+0x79/0x80  
 
[701194.51]  [c0219f91] ? request_key_auth_new+0x1e1/0x220
 
[701194.56]  [c02197d0] ? call_sbin_request_key+0x0/0x2b0
[701194.61]  [c02195b1] ? construct_key+0x81/0xe0
[701194.67]  [c02196cc] ? request_key_and_link+0xbc/0xf0
[701194.600014]  [c0219bbd] ? request_key+0x4d/0x80
[701194.600019]  [f9253ea4] ? cifs_get_spnego_key+0x174/0x270 [cifs]
[701194.600033]  [c038c36d] ? _spin_lock+0xd/0x10
[701194.600038]  [f924a56c] ? GetNextMid+0xac/0xc0 [cifs]
[701194.600050]  [f9252b38] ? CIFS_SessSetup+0x378/0x720 [cifs]
[701194.600061]  [c018e9b3] ? mempool_free_slab+0x13/0x20
[701194.600067]  [c018ebef] ? mempool_free+0x7f/0x90
[701194.600072]  [f924a8b7] ? cifs_buf_release+0x17/0x20 [cifs]
[701194.600083]  [f9239315] ? CIFSSMBNegotiate+0x165/0x800 [cifs]
[701194.600093]  [f923c363] ? cifs_setup_session+0x1a3/0x350 [cifs]
[701194.600105]  [c014ee18] ? kthread_create+0xa8/0xb0
[701194.600112]  [f92403ed] ? cifs_mount+0x97d/0xed0 [cifs]
[701194.600124]  [c01b5f99] ? get_slab+0x9/0x70
[701194.600130]  [c025cd59] ? strlen+0x9/0x20
[701194.600135]  [f9231df3] ? cifs_read_super+0x93/0x1e0 [cifs]
[701194.600145]  [c01bc200] ? set_anon_super+0x0/0xd0
[701194.600150]  [f9231fa9] ? cifs_get_sb+0x69/0xc0 

[Bug 126330] Re: KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work

2008-11-22 Thread Vide
I can confirm that it works with Kubuntu 8.10 Intrepid  (KDE 4.1)

-- 
KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126330
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 126330] Re: KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work

2008-03-10 Thread Vide
I can confirm this bug, I'm using KMail 1.9.9 Enterprise branch in
Kubuntu Gutsy and the bug is present at least from Feisty... previously
it worked rather well, so it seems a regression.

This
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/126330/comments/3
workaround didn't fix the problem

-- 
KMail: e-mail autocompletion from LDAP source doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126330
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to kdepim in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-11-27 Thread Vide
Ok, I was missing linux-backports-modules-server, once installed, the
system booted up, and now is up  running with all the disks correctly
detected. Thanks for the fix! :)

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-11-27 Thread Vide
Ok, this seemed strange to me in fact... well, I'll wait for a linux-
modules-server update in the proposed updates repo, let me know when
there are news, it's a non-production machine so I can reboot it quite
easily if you need more testing

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-11-21 Thread Vide
Just upgrade from dapper-proposed to 2.6.15-51.63and now I've got a
kernel panic. I attach the screenshot of the panic

** Attachment added: Kernel panic output
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10497363/dsc00167.jpg

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57233
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2007-07-04 Thread Vide
:00:00.0 0600: 1166:0017 (rev 32)
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort- SERR- PERR-

:00:00.1 0600: 1166:0017
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- 
MAbort- SERR- PERR-

:00:02.0 0200: 8086:100e (rev 02)
Subsystem: 1028:0135
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 32 (63750ns min), Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 193
Region 0: Memory at fe10 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Region 2: I/O ports at ecc0 [size=64]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=1 PME-
Capabilities: [e4] PCI-X non-bridge device.
Command: DPERE- ERO+ RBC=0 OST=0
Status: Bus=0 Dev=0 Func=0 64bit- 133MHz- SCD- USC-, DC=simple, 
DMMRBC=2, DMOST=0, DMCRS=1, RSCEM-
Capabilities: [f0] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 
Enable-
Address:   Data: 

:00:0e.0 0300: 1002:4752 (rev 27)
Subsystem: 1028:0135
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop+ ParErr- 
Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 32 (2000ns min), Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
Region 0: Memory at fd00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
Region 1: I/O ports at e800 [size=256]
Region 2: Memory at fe121000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Expansion ROM at 6000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [5c] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-

:00:0f.0 0600: 1166:0201 (rev 93)
Subsystem: 1166:0201
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
Latency: 32

:00:0f.1 0101: 1166:0212 (rev 93) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
Subsystem: 1028:4135
Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 64, Cache Line Size: 0x08 (32 bytes)
Region 0: I/O ports at ignored
Region 1: I/O ports at ignored
Region 2: I/O ports at ignored
Region 3: I/O ports at ignored
Region 4: I/O ports at 08b0 [size=16]

:00:0f.2 0c03: 1166:0220 (rev 05) (prog-if 10)
Subsystem: 1166:0220
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr+ 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 32 (2ns max)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 10
Region 0: Memory at fe12 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]

:00:0f.3 0601: 1166:0225
Subsystem: 1166:0230
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0

:00:10.0 0600: 1166:0101 (rev 05)
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
Capabilities: [60] 
:00:10.2 0600: 1166:0101 (rev 05)
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
Capabilities: [60] 
:01:02.0 0104: 101e:1960 (rev 02)
Subsystem: 1028:0511
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- 
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 32, Cache Line Size: 0x10 (64 bytes)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 177
Region 0: Memory at fcd0 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64K]
Expansion ROM at fce0 [disabled] [size=32K]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2

[Bug 25380] Re: k3b has problems using a USB writer

2006-11-04 Thread Vide
I'm sorry that I can't help you anymore tracking this problem but I do
not have anymore access to the hardware on which I was experiencing
problems. I hope other people that could reproduce this bug can help :)

-- 
k3b has problems using a USB writer
https://launchpad.net/bugs/25380

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide


-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6-386

I own a Dell PowerEdge 1600SC with a LSI 1030ST controller and I can't
see the attached disk with the latest Dapper kernel image revision,
while wi th standard 6.06 version (2.6.15-23) I can mount the disk
smoothly.

** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
I can say that even with more recent kernels (2.6.17 on latest knoppix,
for example) I cannot see the disk, while with Ubuntu 2.6.15-23 (server
or desktop flavour) as said, it works.

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide


-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57233] Re: Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST

2006-08-22 Thread Vide
Here it is lspci output

:00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom GCNB-LE Host Bridge (rev 32)
:00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom GCNB-LE Host Bridge
:00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet 
Controller (rev 02)
:00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
:00:0f.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
:00:0f.1 IDE interface: Broadcom CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
:00:0f.2 USB Controller: Broadcom OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
:00:0f.3 ISA bridge: Broadcom CSB5 LPC bridge
:00:10.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
:00:10.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
:01:02.0 RAID bus controller: American Megatrends Inc. MegaRAID (rev 02)
:01:04.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X 
Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)

-- 
Minor revision 2.6.15-26 doesn't detect attached SCSI disks to LSI 1030ST
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57233

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs