[Bug 2064776] Re: Ubuntu 23.10 fails to transition thunderbird to snap package
Software updater crashes on first start -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064776 Title: Ubuntu 23.10 fails to transition thunderbird to snap package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2064776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073581] [NEW] Failed to upgrade 22.04 to 24.04
Public bug reported: do-release upgrade failed with such output: yakov@Astra:~ >.do do-release-upgrade Checking for a new Ubuntu release = Welcome to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 'Noble Numbat' = The Ubuntu team is proud to announce Ubuntu 24.04 LTS 'Noble Numbat'. To see what's new in this release, visit: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NobleNumbat/ReleaseNotes Ubuntu is a Linux distribution for your desktop or server, with a fast and easy install, regular releases, a tight selection of excellent applications installed by default, and almost any other software you can imagine available through the network. We hope you enjoy Ubuntu. == Feedback and Helping == If you would like to help shape Ubuntu, take a look at the list of ways you can participate at http://www.ubuntu.com/community/participate/ Your comments, bug reports, patches and suggestions will help ensure that our next release is the best release of Ubuntu ever. If you feel that you have found a bug please read: http://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs Then report bugs using apport in Ubuntu. For example: ubuntu-bug linux will open a bug report in Launchpad regarding the linux package. If you have a question, or if you think you may have found a bug but aren't sure, first try asking on the #ubuntu or #ubuntu-bugs IRC channels on Libera.Chat, on the Ubuntu Users mailing list, or on the Ubuntu forums: http://help.ubuntu.com/community/InternetRelayChat http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users http://www.ubuntuforums.org/ == More Information == You can find out more about Ubuntu on our website, IRC channel and wiki. If you're new to Ubuntu, please visit: http://www.ubuntu.com/ To sign up for future Ubuntu announcements, please subscribe to Ubuntu's very low volume announcement list at: http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce Continue [yN] y Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [833 B] Get:2 Upgrade tool [1,282 kB] Fetched 1,283 kB in 0s (0 B/s) authenticate 'noble.tar.gz' against 'noble.tar.gz.gpg' extracting 'noble.tar.gz' Reading cache Checking package manager Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Hit http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu jammy InRelease Hit http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu jammy-updates InRelease Hit http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu jammy-backports InRelease Hit http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu jammy-security InRelease Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Checking for installed snaps Calculating snap size requirements Updating repository information Get:1 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble InRelease [256 kB] Get:2 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble-updates InRelease [126 kB] Get:3 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble-backports InRelease [126 kB] Get:4 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble-security InRelease [126 kB] Get:5 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main i386 Packages [1,041 kB] Get:6 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 Packages [1,401 kB] Get:7 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main Translation-en [513 kB] Get:8 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [464 kB] Get:9 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main DEP-11 48x48 Icons [106 kB] Get:10 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main DEP-11 64x64 Icons [156 kB] Get:11 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main DEP-11 64x64@2 Icons [21.8 kB] Get:12 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main DEP-11 128x128 Icons [328 kB] Get:13 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 c-n-f Metadata [30.5 kB] Get:14 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 Packages [93.9 kB] Get:15 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 Packages [14.7 kB] Get:16 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/restricted Translation-en [18.7 kB] Get:17 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 c-n-f Metadata [416 B] Get:18 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/universe amd64 Packages [15.0 MB] Get:19 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/universe i386 Packages [8,514 kB] Get:20 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/universe Translation-en [5,982 kB] Get:21 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/universe amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [3,871 kB] Get:22 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/universe DEP-11 48x48 Icons [3,717 kB] Get:23 http://mirror.il.kamatera.com/ubuntu noble/universe DEP-11 64x64 Icons [7,747 kB] Get:24 http://mirror.
[Bug 1929101] [NEW] systemd-networkd can't set ip6tnl interface mode as any
Public bug reported: systemd-networkd provides "Mode=" configuration for a virtual device of "Kind=ip6tnl". But setting mode to "any" doesn't work, tunnel mode stay as ipv6/ipv6: 20/05/21 18:08:33 darkyman@mnt-myt-focal ~ > ip -6 tun show ip6tnl0: ipv6/ipv6 remote :: local :: encaplimit 0 hoplimit inherit tclass 0x00 flowlabel 0x0 (flowinfo 0x) I'm expecting it to be in any/ipv6 mode like: ip6tnl0: any/ipv6 remote :: local :: encaplimit 0 hoplimit inherit tclass 0x00 flowlabel 0x0 (flowinfo 0x) Config file attached (00-ip6tnl0.netdev), I'm using systemd `systemd 245 (245.4-4ubuntu3.6)` on a `Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS`. Currently I'm using systemd service as a workaround this issue, which sets mode to "any" by calling /usr/sbin/ip -6 tunnel change ip6tnl0 mode any And that's what networkctl thinks about this tunnel interface ● 7: ip6tnl0 Link File: /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link Network File: /etc/systemd/network/01-ip6tnl0.network Type: tunnel6 State: degraded (configured) MTU: 9000 (min: 68, max: 65407) Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 1/1 Address: fe80::3063:1eff:febf:8aaa May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-udevd[1062]: ip6tnl0: Could not generate persistent MAC: No data available May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: netdev ready May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: netdev could not be created: Invalid argument May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: IPv6 successfully enabled May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: Link UP May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: Gained carrier May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: Gained IPv6LL ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "systemd-networkd ip6tnl configuration" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929101/+attachment/5499022/+files/00-ip6tunl0.netdev ** Description changed: systemd-networkd provides "Mode=" configuration for a virtual device of "Kind=ip6tnl". But setting mode to "any" doesn't work, tunnel mode stay as ipv6/ipv6: 20/05/21 18:08:33 darkyman@mnt-myt-focal ~ > ip -6 tun show ip6tnl0: ipv6/ipv6 remote :: local :: encaplimit 0 hoplimit inherit tclass 0x00 flowlabel 0x0 (flowinfo 0x) I'm expecting it to be in any/ipv6 mode like: ip6tnl0: any/ipv6 remote :: local :: encaplimit 0 hoplimit inherit tclass 0x00 flowlabel 0x0 (flowinfo 0x) Config file attached (00-ip6tnl0.netdev), I'm using systemd `systemd 245 (245.4-4ubuntu3.6)` on a `Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS`. Currently I'm using systemd service as a workaround this issue, which sets mode to "any" by calling /usr/sbin/ip -6 tunnel change ip6tnl0 mode any + + And that's what networkctl thinks about this tunnel interface + + ● 7: ip6tnl0 + Link File: /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link + Network File: /etc/systemd/network/01-ip6tnl0.network + Type: tunnel6 + State: degraded (configured) +MTU: 9000 (min: 68, max: 65407) + Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 1/1 +Address: fe80::3063:1eff:febf:8aaa + + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-udevd[1062]: ip6tnl0: Could not generate persistent MAC: No data available + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: netdev ready + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: netdev could not be created: Invalid argument + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: IPv6 successfully enabled + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: Link UP + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: Gained carrier + May 20 17:55:36 mnt-myt-focal.example.com systemd-networkd[1008]: ip6tnl0: Gained IPv6LL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929101 Title: systemd-networkd can't set ip6tnl interface mode as any To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1929101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[Bug 1807132] Re: package gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed gdm3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
duplicates https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1774039 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1807132 Title: package gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed gdm3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1807132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1807132] [NEW] package gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed gdm3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: First install Ubuntu 18.04LTS, OS X 10.11.6, Parallels 11.1.2 (32408)) Macbook Pro 15-inch mid 2015 failed on apt-get upgrade ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-29.31-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-29-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Dec 6 02:42:20 2018 ErrorMessage: installed gdm3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-06 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, 3.6.7-1~18.04 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1 apt 1.6.6 SourcePackage: gdm3 Title: package gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed gdm3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1807132 Title: package gdm3 3.28.3-0ubuntu18.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed gdm3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1807132/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 815996] Re: Desktop occasionally freezes/locks up when switching workspaces
Still persists in ubuntu-16.04-beta2-desktop-i386.iso which runs in VMware Fusion 8.1.0 (3272237) with open-vm-tools* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815996 Title: Desktop occasionally freezes/locks up when switching workspaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/815996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509596] Re: Second monitor blanks at login prompt
The following worked for me: 1. Install xserver-xorg-video-intel package and rebooting. This showed output on the second monitor in lower resolution. 2. Adding higher resolution via xrandr: sudo xrandr --addmode DP1 1920x1080 3. Using the Ubuntu settings, display module to switch to higher resolution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509596 Title: Second monitor blanks at login prompt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1509596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1509596] Re: Second monitor blanks at login prompt
I am seeing a similar problem with NUC5I7RYH. Both monitors look find at boot-up but one goes blank one you get to the login prompt for X Windows. No flickering. Also on 15.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509596 Title: Second monitor blanks at login prompt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1509596/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816732] Re: [Aspire 5830T, Conexant ID 506c, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
Spoke too soon; the fix disappeared on the next reboot. However, if after using the fix you use >> sudo alsactl store The fix appears to persist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816732 Title: [Aspire 5830T, Conexant ID 506c, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/816732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 816732] Re: [Aspire 5830T, Conexant ID 506c, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all
Used same fix, worked here as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816732 Title: [Aspire 5830T, Conexant ID 506c, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/816732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594570] Re: Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic and Lucid (ZeroCD feature)
Okay, Didier, I'll keep it in mind. Thanks! -- Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic and Lucid (ZeroCD feature) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594570] Re: Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic and Lucid (ZeroCD feature)
Hey, I understand that usb_modeswitch was nominated to 10.10, yep? If so, that's very good news for me. Atm my connection limited to email only (my monthly traffic is limited to 2GB), and I write this message with my HTC, so I think I'll be able to do this only after September 1st - but I'll definately try. -- Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic and Lucid (ZeroCD feature) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594570] Re: Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic (ZeroCD feature)
Yeah, just booted up Lucid from LiveCD - same result, dongle detects only as removable data storage. Though, Airplus MCD-650 CDMA dongle finally was detected by NetworkManager as 3G-device, but that's not applicable to the topic. ** Summary changed: - Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic (ZeroCD feature) + Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic and Lucid (ZeroCD feature) -- Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic and Lucid (ZeroCD feature) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594570] Re: Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device from data storage device in Karmic (ZeroCD feature)
** Attachment added: "lspci -vvnn output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50372531/lspci%20-vvnn.txt -- Alcatel OT-X020 hdspa dongle doesn't switches to modem device mode from data storage device mode in Karmic (ZeroCD feature) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589572] Re: Not a bug
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49651184/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49651185/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49651186/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49651187/profiles.ini.txt -- Not a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589572] [NEW] Not a bug
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox The fonts in Firefox under Lucid Lynx have become not-so-attractive ... less than they were under Karmic Koala. Why so ? What happened I want the same old nice FF fonts - they were so tidy and neat ... work it up to the standards of Internet Explorer 8, or Google Chrome ! Many thanks and greetings, -- Yakov ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.35-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jun 4 13:16:18 2010 FirefoxPackages: firefox 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-gnome-support 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 firefox-branding 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 abroswer N/A abrowser-branding N/A InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_IN SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Not a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396214] Re: two KDE4 panel - configuration problem
as an additional info: after removing ~/.kde folder for some time everything was ok, but suddenly, without any clear reason, panel and desktop configuration becomes totally messed. So, it is clear error in reading some configuration files. -- two KDE4 panel - configuration problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396214] Re: two KDE4 panel - configuration problem
after upgrade to KDE4.3.0RC2 this problem appears almost every reboot and its really bad, because configuration with two panles becomes unusable. What additional info a can provide to fix this problem? -- two KDE4 panel - configuration problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79380] Re: krdc top fullscreen toolbar doesn't unhide
and this bug doesnt appears in Debian/KDE4.2.4... -- krdc top fullscreen toolbar doesn't unhide https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 396214] [NEW] two KDE4 panel - configuration problem
Public bug reported: j...@jack-laptop:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 KDE4.3.0RC1 Add two KDE panel with different setting - one of them placed top/center with autohide, another - full-size right screen edge sometimes after re-login autohide option is swapped between panel, sometime top panel becomes left-aligned instead of center. Cant find any particular scenario to reproduce it. As an addintional info - this never happens in Debian/Unstable with KDE4.2.4 ** Affects: meta-kde (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- two KDE4 panel - configuration problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79380] Re: krdc top fullscreen toolbar doesn't unhide
nope... face fix bug in Jaunty/KDE4.3RC1... -- krdc top fullscreen toolbar doesn't unhide https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdenetwork in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382851] Re: Network stops working after upgrading to Jaunty from Intrepid
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419759/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419760/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419761/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419762/HalComputerInfo.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419763/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419764/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419765/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27419766/ProcModules.txt -- Network stops working after upgrading to Jaunty from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382851] [NEW] Network stops working after upgrading to Jaunty from Intrepid
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Jaunty from Intrepid, network problems started. The network slows down and then stops completely. If I disable and re-enable the network from NetworkManager, everything goes back to normal. The problem happens with both my wired Ethernet card using forcedeth and my wireless one. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=99c04663-4bc1-4112-a852-c2b113fc7b56 Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 002: ID 046d:c517 Logitech, Inc. LX710 Cordless Desktop Laser Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Unknow Unknow NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.42 ProcCmdLine: root=/dev/md1 ro quiet splash crashkernel=384M-2G:6...@16m,2G-:1...@16m irqpoll ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.42-generic SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Network stops working after upgrading to Jaunty from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382851 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363763] Re: Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions
> on the encrypted partition : Time: 134 seconds , cpu iowait about 40-50 % > on the unencrypted partition : Time: 72 seconds , cpu iowait about 10 % You see the huge difference with my results of testing 8.04 -generic kernel (whose results are not good too). It seems things become worse. Just for fun I tested old host still running 2.4.25 uniprocessor kernel on Seagete Barracuda SATA drive (no RAID cards): not encrypted device: 15 seconds encrypted (cryptoloop) device: 18 seconds iostat shows about 750 reads/sec! Its definitely something wrong with modern 2.6 kernels. The kind of IO load that I try to reproduce with testing script is typical database reading workload (random access, small blocks). Modern kernels perfoms bad with this kind of IO (at least Ubuntu kernels). I hope kernel maintainers/developers will find time to discover and resolve the issue. -- Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363763] Re: Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions
> my kernel ( standard from 9.04 ): > Linux 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:58:03 UTC 2009 x86_64 > GNU/Linux I did not test 2.6.28-11-generic kernel. Could you run the script attached to this ticked on your system and report back the results? -- Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363763] Re: Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions
I've done more tests and updated the description. New testing script (rand_access_raw.sh) is attached. ** Summary changed: - Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions + Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions ** Description changed: Binary package hint: linux-image-server - I have noticed that random-access reads from file located on encrypted filesystem performs very slow -- 2 times slower compared with CentOS 5.3 distribution. There are very high IO wait values during the test. + Ubuntu-server kernel performs very slow doing random-access reads from encrypted filesystem -- 3-8 times slower compared with CentOS 5.3 distribution and with ubuntu -generic and -rt kernels. There are very high IO wait values during the test. I have reproduced this issue on different hardware with several ubuntu server kernels: - several 8.04 kernels (last one tested is 2.6.24-23-server) - 9.04 RC kernel - I wrote a simple script that creates a 100M file and performs "random-access" reads from it. - The script is attached. + I wrote a simple script that performs "random-access" reads from device and measures the time spent reading 100M of data. + The script is attached (rand_access_raw.sh). How to reproduce the issue: 1. Create a mapping for encrypted device -cryptsetup --cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 --key-size=256 --hash=ripemd160 create cfs1 /dev/sdb - 2. Create filesystem -mkfs.ext3 /dev/mapper/cfs1 - 3. mkdir /mnt/test; mount /dev/mapper/cfs1 /mnt/test - 4. copy attached script to /mnt/test; +cryptsetup --cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 --key-size=256 --hash=ripemd160 create cfs1 /dev/sdb2 5. Run the script: -cd /mnt/test; ./random_access.sh - 6. compare results with other distributions. +./random_access_raw.sh /dev/mapper/cfs1 + 6. compare results with other distributions and kernels. - My results are: - 1. ubuntu 2.6.24-23-server: - not encrypted fs: 20 seconds - encrypted fs: 80 seconds - 2. centos 2.6.18-128.el5PAE (similar results on several fedora kernels) - not encrypted fs: 20 seconds - encrypted fs: 40 seconds - As you see, ubuntu is two times slower :-( + My results for not encrypted (/dev/sdb1) and encrypted (/dev/mapper/cfs1) devices are: + 1. ubuntu 2.6.28-11-server: + not encrypted device: 40 seconds + encrypted device: 220 seconds + 2. ubuntu 2.6.24-23-server: + not encrypted device: 32 seconds + encrypted device: 133 seconds + 3. centos 2.6.18-128.el5PAE (similar results on several fedora kernels) + not encrypted device: 23 seconds + encrypted device: 40 seconds + 4. ubuntu 2.6.24-23-generic: + not encrypted device: 20 seconds + encrypted device: 71 seconds + 5. ubuntu 2.6.24-23-rt: + not encrypted device: 21 seconds + encrypted device: 25 seconds + + Compare results of ubuntu-server kernels (especialy 2.6.28!) with + ubuntu-rt or centos kernels. I'm ready to provide any additional info that can help to solve an issue. ** Tags added: dm-crypt ** Tags removed: dmcrypt ** Attachment added: "rand_access_raw.sh" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26035684/rand_access_raw.sh ** Attachment removed: "rand_access.sh" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25755426/rand_access.sh -- Random access read speed from encrypted device is very slow compared with other linux distributions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 361689] Re: hald segfault when using a raid volume
Hi, I upgraded today from Intrepid to Jaunty, and had the same problem with no mouse/keyboard in X, and a message in system log about a segfault with HAL. I am using software raid. I downloaded and installed the package supplied by Chris and it works. I hope this patch will be applied to the official package as well. Thanks for the help! -- hald segfault when using a raid volume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361689 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363763] Re: Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions
Can I somehow assist in discovering the problem? For example is there any reason to test if this issue present in Debian kernel? If yes, which debian version I should test? -- Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363763] Re: Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions
** Attachment added: "rand_access.sh" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25755426/rand_access.sh -- Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363763] [NEW] Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-server I have noticed that random-access reads from file located on encrypted filesystem performs very slow -- 2 times slower compared with CentOS 5.3 distribution. There are very high IO wait values during the test. I have reproduced this issue on different hardware with several ubuntu server kernels: - several 8.04 kernels (last one tested is 2.6.24-23-server) - 9.04 RC kernel I wrote a simple script that creates a 100M file and performs "random-access" reads from it. The script is attached. How to reproduce the issue: 1. Create a mapping for encrypted device cryptsetup --cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 --key-size=256 --hash=ripemd160 create cfs1 /dev/sdb 2. Create filesystem mkfs.ext3 /dev/mapper/cfs1 3. mkdir /mnt/test; mount /dev/mapper/cfs1 /mnt/test 4. copy attached script to /mnt/test; 5. Run the script: cd /mnt/test; ./random_access.sh 6. compare results with other distributions. My results are: 1. ubuntu 2.6.24-23-server: not encrypted fs: 20 seconds encrypted fs: 80 seconds 2. centos 2.6.18-128.el5PAE (similar results on several fedora kernels) not encrypted fs: 20 seconds encrypted fs: 40 seconds As you see, ubuntu is two times slower :-( I'm ready to provide any additional info that can help to solve an issue. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: dmcrypt iowait kernel -- Random access read speed from encrypted filesystem is very slow compared to other linux distributions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363763 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85822] Re: /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty
I can confirm that this does not happen in Hardy. I guess this can be closed. -- /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 124159] Re: Broadcom bcm43xx Wireless driver regression in gutsy
Hi To restrict inrterface rate, you can add to configuration of the corresponding interface in /etc/networks/interfaces wireless-rate 5.5M And yes, I confirm the problem (HP Pavilion zv3240 w/Broadcom adapter). -- Broadcom bcm43xx Wireless driver regression in gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72609] Re: K3b temporarily ejects disk before verification
Not only verification does not continue after the tray is closed by hand, but in that case k3b completely hangs and should be killed (HP Pavilion zv5340us, AMD64). AFAIK, a sequence of unmount-mount should be enough to ensure all caches are reset, shouldn't it? Unmounting doesn't suppose ejecting. Besides, all decent Windows burners manage to do this w/o ejecting, so I think the problem is not unsurmountable. This bug is extremely annoying for every laptop owner. -- K3b temporarily ejects disk before verification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72609 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85822] Re: /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty - Beta
Update from beta installation attempt - failure. The raid, which is configured as /dev/md0 is ignored, and the installer is consistently looking for /dev/md/* which it cannot find. "ln /dev/md0 /dev/md/0 -s" did the trick. BUT lvm is now broken. My lvm sits on top of the raid. I can define a new logical volume, but it can not be selected from the list of partitions. ALL logical volumes are listing correctly, but selecting any one of them (including, of course the newly created one) returns to the same screen. There is NO message in the log screen when this happens (alt-f4). Yakov. -- /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/85822 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 85822] Re: /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty
Hi, Yes, Herd5 is also broken, and even the workaround I had for Herd4 does not work this time, because the mere existence of a raid partition on the disks causes Herd5 installer to say "boot partition not found" (and I have more than a dozen partitions on my two drives, only two of them are raid). Thanks for the update. arcterex wrote: > As a note this may still is happening in herd5 - alternate. An install > on root raid after initial reboot drops down to initramfs with the 'no > job control' error message. I fixed this by following the instructions > at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2272436 > > Not sure if this is the exact same issue. However, it appears from > other bugs here that feisty and root raid aren't mixing well :( > -- /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/85822 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 85822] Re: /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty
Brian Murray wrote: > Thanks for your bug report. Did this occur with the Herd 4 release of > Feisty? Thanks in advance. > > ** Changed in: Ubuntu > Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > That is correct. Herd 4 - alternate. Regards, Yakov. -- /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/85822 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85822] Re: /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty
** Description changed: During install, a raid was not recognized. Apparently the installer searches for /dev/m/0 where the existing raid is defined to reside on /dev/md0. "ln /dev/md0 /dev/md/0 -s" enabled me to continue with the install successfully. - Further on, the system wont boot. after applying the above line to the - target volume, I was able to boot. + Further on, the system wont boot. At thie stage I generated an + mdadm.conf which seemed to force generating the raid. + + In Dapper and Edgy these operations and especially the creation of + mdadm.conf where not necessary. From looking at the log it seems that + /dev/md0 WAS created during the kernel boot but was closed in favor of a + "/dev/md/n" construct (which might be good for newly generated raids but + not for existing ones). ProblemType: Bug Date: Sat Feb 17 18:52:37 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux study-linux 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux -- /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/85822 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 85822] /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty
Public bug reported: During install, a raid was not recognized. Apparently the installer searches for /dev/m/0 where the existing raid is defined to reside on /dev/md0. "ln /dev/md0 /dev/md/0 -s" enabled me to continue with the install successfully. Further on, the system wont boot. after applying the above line to the target volume, I was able to boot. ProblemType: Bug Date: Sat Feb 17 18:52:37 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux study-linux 2.6.20-8-generic #2 SMP Tue Feb 13 05:18:42 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- /dev/md0 construct not supported in Feisty https://launchpad.net/bugs/85822 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
