[Bug 1671121] Re: Deleting something from the history view breaks scrolling and the ability to click on some things
I explained 2) badly :) I was about to mean that use other component for delegate and put a button on it, so when you click it that button deletes the delegate. Just to rule out the ListItem itself. But the 1) already rules it out, so it is indeed the popover which does something bad. And probably it is related to the focus handling, as I do not see anything else the popover would affect the ListView functionalities. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671121 Title: Deleting something from the history view breaks scrolling and the ability to click on some things To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1671121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1671121] Re: Deleting something from the history view breaks scrolling and the ability to click on some things
Let's try to rule out few things: 1) try to use the ListItem action to delete it 2) try to use a different delegate to delete the item. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671121 Title: Deleting something from the history view breaks scrolling and the ability to click on some things To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1671121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1642617] Re: UITK FTBFS on Qt 5.7.1
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642617 Title: UITK FTBFS on Qt 5.7.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1642617/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1618007] Re: Invalid property assignment in ActivityIndicatorStyle.qml
This should have been landed already... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618007 Title: Invalid property assignment in ActivityIndicatorStyle.qml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1618007/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624331] Re: tst_listitem_focus.13.qml unit test failure
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624331 Title: tst_listitem_focus.13.qml unit test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1628855] Re: UITK Gallery: first click on left panel list items activates the focus frame
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628855 Title: UITK Gallery: first click on left panel list items activates the focus frame To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1628855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624343] Re: Qt5.6: UbuntuListView unit test fails with TypeError
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624343 Title: Qt5.6: UbuntuListView unit test fails with TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1580172] Re: Enable UITK arm64 unit tests
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580172 Title: Enable UITK arm64 unit tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1580172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624328] Re: tst_listitem failures
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624328 Title: tst_listitem failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624328/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1580172] Re: Enable UITK arm64 unit tests
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580172 Title: Enable UITK arm64 unit tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1580172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611327] Re: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring
** Description changed: Items outside of a ListView are skipped when using keyboard navigation to change the focus. However, a ListItem inside a ListView takes the focus even when it is disabled, but it does not show the focus frame when focused. For example, execute this QML program: import QtQuick 2.4 import Ubuntu.Components 1.3 Item { width: units.gu(50) height: units.gu(50) - ListView { + UbuntuListView { anchors.fill: parent delegate: ListItem { enabled: index != 2 Label { anchors.centerIn: parent text: parent.enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled" } } model: 5 } } Press TAB to focus on the ListView. Then press the down-cursor-key twice to move the focus down inside the ListView. The focus will be on the disabled item, but not focus frame is visible This is confusing for the user since the focus seems to disappear, and the Item where the focus seems to be (although invisible) cannot be triggered because it is disabled. Note: When fixing this bug, also test the solution for Horizontal ListViews (and RightToLeft and BottomToTop directions), since I encountered this bug in the scrolling toolbar (in progress) that has a Horizontal, RightToLeft ListView. ==UX Fix=== Bypass focus for a disabled item and show focus immediately for the next available enabled item. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611327 Title: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1611327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1627078] Re: ScrollBars and ScrollView - add 'isDragged' or 'isScrolling' property
For teh sake of QQC2 compatibility, let's call the property 'pressed'. Scrollbars are exposed by ScrollView, so there's no need to expose there anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627078 Title: ScrollBars and ScrollView - add 'isDragged' or 'isScrolling' property To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1627078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1618007] Re: Invalid property assignment in ActivityIndicatorStyle.qml
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618007 Title: Invalid property assignment in ActivityIndicatorStyle.qml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1618007/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1585996] Re: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError
There are two problems: 1) the component the APL creates the default metrics is called in parallel by two changes: body.onChildrenChanged is processed in parallel with d.onDefaultColumnWidthChanged, both call the object creation. This can be filtered out, as done in the attached branch. 2) variant type properties are causing trouble when a string value is added. The property change signal is triggered twice, which - in case of the primaryPageSource - causes the primary page to be loaded twice. Changing the property type to string makes APL to work again. With the previous change applied too. ** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fixAplHickupQt56 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585996 Title: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1585996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1585996] Re: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError
If the primaryPageSource is a component, the APL works fine. This problem doesn't appear to affect adding pages to columns -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585996 Title: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1585996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1585996] Re: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585996 Title: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1585996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536669] Re: "BottomEdge" component does not support automatic mouse detection
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536669 Title: "BottomEdge" component does not support automatic mouse detection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1536669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624328] Re: tst_listitem failures
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624328 Title: tst_listitem failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624328/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586013] Re: UITK Date picker broken on xenial
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586013 Title: UITK Date picker broken on xenial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624331] Re: tst_listitem_focus.13.qml unit test failure
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624331 Title: tst_listitem_focus.13.qml unit test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1625137] Re: Layouts unit tests fail on Yakkety
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625137 Title: Layouts unit tests fail on Yakkety To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1625137/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616858] Re: ActionBar overflow issues with Qt 5.6
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616858 Title: ActionBar overflow issues with Qt 5.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1616858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1622577] Re: tst_pagestack_deprecated_toolbar unit test warnings with qt56
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622577 Title: tst_pagestack_deprecated_toolbar unit test warnings with qt56 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1622577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624340] Re: tst_textfield.11.qml unit test failures
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624340 Title: tst_textfield.11.qml unit test failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624340/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624342] Re: tst_textarea.11.qml unit test fails
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624342 Title: tst_textarea.11.qml unit test fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1624342/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1585996] Re: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1585996 Title: UITK gallery: can't open subpages on Qt 5.6 because of TypeError To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1585996/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1587580] Re: No way to escape an ampersand in UCAction
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587580 Title: No way to escape an ampersand in UCAction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1587580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1461571] Re: Text field clear button does not work with first predicted word
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1461571 Title: Text field clear button does not work with first predicted word To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1461571/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1623841] Re: ActionSelectionPopover broken in latest UITK release
** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fixActionListTrunk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623841 Title: ActionSelectionPopover broken in latest UITK release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1623841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1622742] Re: ActivityIndicator broken, likely due to Qt 5.6 update
Could you check whether staging gives you better result? The branch from Florian is under landing currently... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622742 Title: ActivityIndicator broken, likely due to Qt 5.6 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1622742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1623841] Re: ActionSelectionPopover broken in latest UITK release
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623841 Title: ActionSelectionPopover broken in latest UITK release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1623841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1590005] Re: Focus can go be moved inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView
** Branch unlinked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/dontFocusDisabledLi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590005 Title: Focus can go be moved inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1590005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1590005] Re: Focus can go be moved inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView
Yes, now I can see it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590005 Title: Focus can go be moved inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1590005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1622742] Re: ActivityIndicator broken, likely due to Qt 5.6 update
** Tags added: qt5.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622742 Title: ActivityIndicator broken, likely due to Qt 5.6 update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1622742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586013] Re: UITK Date picker broken on xenial
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586013 Title: UITK Date picker broken on xenial To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1586013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1570478] Re: Segfault in UCTheme::PaletteConfig::restorePalette with Qt 5.6
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570478 Title: Segfault in UCTheme::PaletteConfig::restorePalette with Qt 5.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1570478/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1590005] Re: activeFocusOnTab is ignored when Button is embedded inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView
Input from UX: if a ListItem is used in a horizontal oriented ListView, the horizontal navigation keys should focus the ListItems themselves, and eventual active content focusing should be omitted no matter what is the activeFocusOnTab setting is. The https://code.launchpad.net/~zsombi/ubuntu-ui- toolkit/dontFocusDisabledLi branch seem to fix this issue as well. ** Branch linked: lp:~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/dontFocusDisabledLi ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590005 Title: activeFocusOnTab is ignored when Button is embedded inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1590005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1621509] Re: ListView with extension from UbuntuToolkit updates its model after the component is completed
ListView extension is not active if someone explicitly uses ViewItems attached properties or ListItem as delegate. As your sample doesn't use either of these, it cannot be the culprit. You don't seem to use anything from UITK so the only elements are instantiated at this time are the context properties. However neither of those should have any effect on the model setup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621509 Title: ListView with extension from UbuntuToolkit updates its model after the component is completed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1621509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573616] Re: ListView keyboard navigation focus using arrow keys only works with ListItem as a delegate
A ListView can navigate with the horizontal or vertical keys (depending on the orientation) *only* if is focused. This can be achieved by setting the activeFocusOnTab: true or by setting the currentIndex through a mouse button click. The ListViewProxy mentioned above it is only active if the ListView has ViewItems attached properties defined explicitly of the ListView uses ListItem as delegate (in which case the ViewItems will automatically be attached). UbuntuListView doesn't use ViewItems attached properties at all. The bug is invalid :) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573616 Title: ListView keyboard navigation focus using arrow keys only works with ListItem as a delegate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1573616/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620991] Re: Anchoring warnings in Buttons page in UITK Gallery
The Flickable and the Scrollbar could be replaced with a ScrollView. The Flickable stays inactive if the ComboButton content is set to be an other Flickable. Having a ScrollView we could reparent it to the visual's dropdown holder. And we need to do this reparenting. The style's dropdown holder specifies the area and the place of the dropdown, and the way it expands (i.e. size expansion or overlay). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620991 Title: Anchoring warnings in Buttons page in UITK Gallery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1620991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620991] Re: Anchoring warnings in Buttons page in UITK Gallery
This worked without any warnings before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620991 Title: Anchoring warnings in Buttons page in UITK Gallery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1620991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1620991] Re: Anchoring warnings in Buttons page in UITK Gallery
I can confirm that revision 2045 brought these warnings in. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui- toolkit/staging/revision/2045 ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: Zsombor Egri (zsombi) => Andrea Bernabei (faenil) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1620991 Title: Anchoring warnings in Buttons page in UITK Gallery To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1620991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611327] Re: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring
@Tim, @Femma: I guess you meant to scroll to the next enabled/disabled item one by one, right? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611327 Title: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1611327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611327] Re: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611327 Title: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1611327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567924] Re: App crashes when using StyledItem + Ubuntu.Layouts
Does it happen with any other setup than ScrollView? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567924 Title: App crashes when using StyledItem + Ubuntu.Layouts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1567924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567924] Re: App crashes when using StyledItem + Ubuntu.Layouts
I see the crash happening when the conditional layouts are trying to set a property which for some reason bothers the theming implementation. The ascendant themed item lookup may be in trouble there, so it seems a theming FW bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567924 Title: App crashes when using StyledItem + Ubuntu.Layouts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1567924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611327] Re: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611327 Title: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1611327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1433590] Re: apparmor dbus denial for org.freedesktop.Accounts and make Other vibrations work
@zhang woh!!! It works!!! Thanks for that! We can finally proceed on UITK and System Settings app side then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1433590 Title: apparmor dbus denial for org.freedesktop.Accounts and make Other vibrations work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1433590/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611327] Re: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611327 Title: Disabled ListItem inside ListView takes focus but does not show focus ring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1611327/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1552928] Re: New bottom edge component is harder to flick up
The BottomEdge design guides state that if a gesture ends less than 1/3rd of the screen, it should collapse back. There was no mentioning on quick flicks, and we discussed this with them back then, and we agreed that we will implemented the swipe gesture for now. I think we need to revisit this with design. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552928 Title: New bottom edge component is harder to flick up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1552928/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1604780] [NEW] null initializer properties handed over to AdaptivePageLayout or PageStack page adding functions cause error
Public bug reported: If a page is added to AdaptivePageLayout or PageStack with an initializer list, where an initial value is set to null, the null value causes "Cannot convert to QVariant::<type*> from QVariant::void*" error to be shown. The error is provided by the PageWrapper 1.3 implementation. This works with 1.2 PageStack and PageWrapper (all QML). ** Affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Zsombor Egri (zsombi) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604780 Title: null initializer properties handed over to AdaptivePageLayout or PageStack page adding functions cause error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1604780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1603452] Re: [SDK] Change leading action background to red and icon to white
> What Design wants, from what I understood, is an easy way for developers to > specify that an action is destructive/neutral/positive, something like that. That way, the developer specifies the kind of action, and the SDK takes care of using the right colour, following the guidelines provided by the Design team. It could be a new property in Action, or it could be a delegate template, such as ActionDelegate { property Enum type: destructive/neutral/positive ... etc etc ... } Right... and this would bring new values in Palette each... I'd try to avoid that. Also I'd try to avoid classifying the actions into these criteria. Or any criteria. It is all about the visualization of a specific action, the Action should not have any hints for the visuals... Also, what if a developer decides to color the same way his icons as the default negative action is colored? We had yesterday a HO with Rae and Jamie, let's hope they will update the bug with the solution soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603452 Title: [SDK] Change leading action background to red and icon to white To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1603452/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1604509] Re: In the bottom edge component, using preload=true with contentUrl results in an empty page
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604509 Title: In the bottom edge component, using preload=true with contentUrl results in an empty page To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1604509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1603452] Re: [SDK] Change leading action background to red and icon to white
"Therefore if there are several actions in the leading action slot, all will be disabled. Can we change the API so that there is flexibility when choosing one action to be disabled rather than all of them?" That is not true. Beware that the disabled state is not for the background mainly, but for the text color. And the icon color is enabled sensible, meaning it uses different colors for enabled or disabled state. As we discussed once with Rae, there are some possibilities for coloring: [16:20:12] hi zsombor quick question, what colour are we currently using for the background of leading and trailing actions? [17:27:56] oh, sorry, I did not seen your ping' [17:28:48] it is normal.foreground [17:32:04] can we have different variations of it? basically what we want to do now is have a set to choose from depending on how severe the action is. e.g. red for delete, foreground for dismiss or hide [17:32:52] well, the icon color is red now for delete, the background is different [17:33:50] if you want to do that per action, the list panels will look like clothes from '60s [17:35:46] well we were wanting to change it back to red background and white icon but only for actions like delete. we have some other instances, like “dismiss” in notifications and “remove” in group chat where we want to use foreground (light and dark) and .foreground text [17:36:31] when these instances are in red, they look way too severe. like in group chat, removing someone from a chat group looks like you are removing them from your address book [17:36:36] but if you combine those with other actions, they will have different backgrounds... it may be what you want though... [17:36:56] you mean if we had two leading actions for instance? [17:37:15] yes [17:37:39] I know we advice not to, but if apps put sthing else, they'll have it in pepita [17:38:49] well our recommendation is to use leading actions for destructive and trailing for positive/neutral . if they break this, then yes, could look a but weird. but that’s why it would be great to have options to choose from. if not red, then a more neutral look like .foreground and .foregorund text [17:39:22] is there a way to have a variation like this? [17:39:28] ok... well, we can change the panel color into red, np, like I can use negative there [17:40:05] otoh, we don't have the ability to colorize the action colors individually, for that a custom delegate (painter) must be declared [17:40:23] right, we would want it back to red for things like delete. but not for every leading action….what do you mean? [17:40:44] well, that is something we cannot drive automatically [17:40:53] that's what I meant [17:41:09] we don't know whether an action is negative or not [17:42:16] so if someone wanted it changed, they’d have to do it themselves, can it be overridden in the SDK? or do they have to build the whole component from scratch? [17:42:25] yes [17:42:35] they have to color it themselves [17:42:41] that's th edelegate [17:42:55] but can still use the SDK component though [17:42:56] the delegate paints/views the action [17:42:59] yes [17:43:17] so it’s just a matter of us deciding to make the default neutral or red [17:43:23] yep [17:43:46] i’ll will talk to the others about it [17:43:52] thanks for the info [17:43:55] yw -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603452 Title: [SDK] Change leading action background to red and icon to white To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1603452/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534674] Re: [AdaptivePageLayout] Add function to return the top Page of a PageColumn
** Tags removed: adaptivepagelayout ** Tags added: apl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534674 Title: [AdaptivePageLayout] Add function to return the top Page of a PageColumn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1534674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1603353] Re: Move BottomEdge between columns in AdaptivePageLayout
** Tags added: apl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603353 Title: Move BottomEdge between columns in AdaptivePageLayout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1603353/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534674] Re: [AdaptivePageLayout] Add function to return the top Page of a PageColumn
** Tags added: convergence -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534674 Title: [AdaptivePageLayout] Add function to return the top Page of a PageColumn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1534674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551349] Re: Make ListItem automatically bind to the height of a SlotsLayout/ListItemLayout when that's the only content
No work was yet scheduled for this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551349 Title: Make ListItem automatically bind to the height of a SlotsLayout/ListItemLayout when that's the only content To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1551349/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1433590] Re: apparmor dbus denial for org.freedesktop.Accounts and make Other vibrations work
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Zhang Enweiwrote: > I am now investigating if org.freedesktop.DBus.GetConnectionUnixProcessID > is supported in go-dbus. > If it is supported, we can use pid to get the name of the process or path > of the binary. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1433590 > > Title: > apparmor dbus denial for org.freedesktop.Accounts and make Other > vibrations work > > Status in Canonical System Image: > Triaged > Status in apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in ubuntu-system-settings package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > Status in usensord package in Ubuntu: > Confirmed > > Bug description: > This affects vivid and (somewhat recently?) 14.09. > > At some point, apps started to request access to > org.freedesktop.Accounts for something, but I'm not sure what. It has > been conjectured in this bug that it is due to vibration settings. > Filing against ubuntu-system-settings for now, but please feel free to > move to the correct package. > > This happens with webapps: > Apr 7 08:42:17 ubuntu-phablet dbus[797]: apparmor="DENIED" > operation="dbus_method_call" bus="system" path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts" > interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable" member="Introspect" > mask="send" name="org.freedesktop.Accounts" pid=2632 > profile="com.ubuntu.developer.webapps.webapp-facebook_webapp-facebook_1.0.26" > peer_pid=1596 peer_profile="unconfined" > Apr 7 08:42:17 ubuntu-phablet dbus[797]: apparmor="DENIED" > operation="dbus_method_call" bus="system" path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts" > interface="org.freedesktop.Accounts" member="FindUserById" mask="send" > name="org.freedesktop.Accounts" pid=2632 > profile="com.ubuntu.developer.webapps.webapp-facebook_webapp-facebook_1.0.26" > peer_pid=1596 peer_profile="unconfined" > > and QML apps: > Apr 7 08:43:40 ubuntu-phablet dbus[797]: apparmor="DENIED" > operation="dbus_method_call" bus="system" path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts" > interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable" member="Introspect" > mask="send" name="org.freedesktop.Accounts" pid=3377 > profile="com.ubuntu.calculator_calculator_1.3.339" peer_pid=1596 > peer_profile="unconfined" > Apr 7 08:43:40 ubuntu-phablet dbus[797]: apparmor="DENIED" > operation="dbus_method_call" bus="system" path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts" > interface="org.freedesktop.Accounts" member="FindUserById" mask="send" > name="org.freedesktop.Accounts" pid=3377 > profile="com.ubuntu.calculator_calculator_1.3.339" peer_pid=1596 > peer_profile="unconfined" > > The following rules allow the requested access: > dbus (send) > bus=system > path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts" > interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.{Introspectable,Properties}" > member=Introspect > peer=(name=org.freedesktop.Accounts,label=unconfined), > dbus (send) > bus=system > path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts" > interface="org.freedesktop.Accounts" > member=FindUserById > peer=(name=org.freedesktop.Accounts,label=unconfined), > dbus (send) > bus=system > path="/org/freedesktop/Accounts/User[0-9]*" > interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" > member=Get > peer=(name=org.freedesktop.Accounts,label=unconfined), > > However, the above is too lenient and constitutes a privacy leak for > apps. FindUserById could be used by a malicious app to enumerate > usernames on multiuser systems and because we can't mediate method > data with apparmor, the Get() method can be used to obtain any > information provided by this interface. > > The following can be used to see what can be leaked to a malicious app: > gdbus introspect --system -d org.freedesktop.Accounts -o > /org/freedesktop/Accounts/User`id -u phablet` > > This can be solved in a couple of ways: > 1. add whatever information the app is trying to access to a new helper > service that only exposes things that the app needs. This could be a single > standalone service, perhaps something from ubuntu-system-settings, that > could expose any number of things-- the current locale, if the locale > changed, if the grid units changed, the vibration settings, etc. Since this > service wouldn't have any sensitive information, you could use standard > dbus properties/Get()/etc > 2. add a new dbus API to an existing service such that apparmor rules > can then be used to allow by method (eg, GetVibration() or something) > > I won't dictate the implementation except to mention that '1' seems > like something generally useful and I believe that it was something > the ubuntu-system-settings devs were already looking at for detecting > locale changes without rebooting. > > > Original description > starting an app in vivid
[Bug 1600177] Re: Keyboard Shortcut doesn't work when the action is in the overflow button
Question: does the action, which is not in the overflow, get triggered by the shortcut assigned to it? I suspect it does. The thing is, once the action goes into the overflow, it will be deactivated as long as the overflow is shown. This is due to ActionSelectionPopover being used by the overflow, which has its own ActionContext (PopupContext), which is inactive as long as it is not getting visible. ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: Zsombor Egri (zsombi) => Tim Peeters (tpeeters) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600177 Title: Keyboard Shortcut doesn't work when the action is in the overflow button To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1600177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567380] Re: Bottom edge arrow looks lo-res
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567380 Title: Bottom edge arrow looks lo-res To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1567380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1595461] [NEW] API file uses namespace inconsistently
Public bug reported: With the recent move of c++ types from Ubuntu.Components plugin into UbuntuToolkit and embedding them into a namespace caused API dump to use the namespace inconsistently. In some places has a "." in other places a "::". ** Affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Christian Dywan (kalikiana) Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595461 Title: API file uses namespace inconsistently To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1595461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594400] Re: Wrong statement about "persistentSelection" property of TextArea
This has been a copy+paste from Qt doc. So if someone disagrees, can comment to Qt :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594400 Title: Wrong statement about "persistentSelection" property of TextArea To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1594400/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591908] Re: Unit tests fail on Yakketi
Indeed, Yakkety has Qt 5.6 (so far) which brings some conceptual changes in the Qt internals which we are relying on. So far we managed to make them build, but that is not enough, as some functionality differs from how it used to be thus our tests fail. As our target is not yet Yakkety but Vivid and Xenial, the bug can be classified as high importance. Should the decision be made to switch to Yakkety, we will rise its importance. In addition, here is a list of Qt 5.6 related bugs we must target: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui- toolkit/+bugs?field.tag=qt5.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591908 Title: Unit tests fail on Yakketi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1591908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1590005] Re: activeFocusOnTab is ignored when Button is embedded inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590005 Title: activeFocusOnTab is ignored when Button is embedded inside ListItem in a horizontal ListView To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1590005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576302] Re: Cannot use keyboard to navigate the UITK gallery in single-column mode
Hold on ListView navigation is possibl eONLY if the ListView is focused. If the focused item is a Header action, the up/down keys will NOT be captured by the ListView. It is illogical that up/down keys should be grabbed by the ListView even if it has no focus. Enter/Return/Space key handling si in a separate MR. Should the Space key also act as Enter on ListItems? Or only on Buttons? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576302 Title: Cannot use keyboard to navigate the UITK gallery in single-column mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1576302/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1531814] Re: Syntax highlighting broken for ListItem
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: canonical-developer-experience Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531814 Title: Syntax highlighting broken for ListItem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-developer-experience/+bug/1531814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1531815] Re: Syntax highlighting broken for UbuntuShape
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: canonical-developer-experience Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531815 Title: Syntax highlighting broken for UbuntuShape To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-developer-experience/+bug/1531815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575060] Re: APL divider goes on top of column content
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575060 Title: APL divider goes on top of column content To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1575060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1582339] Re: Selected section has no color
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582339 Title: Selected section has no color To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1582339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1531815] Re: Syntax highlighting broken for UbuntuShape
Michael, it was never the UITK problem, but qmlplugindump one. Despite we create the types file in UITK, QtCreator will run qmlplugindump again, and that overrides the types we gave. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531815 Title: Syntax highlighting broken for UbuntuShape To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-developer-experience/+bug/1531815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1531814] Re: Syntax highlighting broken for ListItem
It was the qmlplugindump which did not resolve few types properly. Sorry for the inconvenience. Can we close the bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531814 Title: Syntax highlighting broken for ListItem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-developer-experience/+bug/1531814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1584232] Re: trailingActions overlaps APL
The clipping could be in the APL column holder. So that can be auto-set in the APL itself. ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Tags added: convergence -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1584232 Title: trailingActions overlaps APL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1584232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1531814] Re: Syntax highlighting broken for ListItem
I have a different one... Perhaps we should check it again. http://imgur.com/3snAsHX -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531814 Title: Syntax highlighting broken for ListItem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-developer-experience/+bug/1531814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1582339] Re: Selected section has no color
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582339 Title: Selected section has no color To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1582339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1582339] Re: Selected section has no color
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: Tim Peeters (tpeeters) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582339 Title: Selected section has no color To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1582339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1580627] Re: ComboButton is not propagating the click event
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Zsombor Egri (zsombi) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580627 Title: ComboButton is not propagating the click event To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1580627/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575430] Re: App very slow, great lag after update 2.2.4
** Project changed: ubuntu-ui-toolkit => ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575430 Title: App very slow, great lag after update 2.2.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/telegram-app/+bug/1575430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1545118] Re: [AdaptivePageLayout] can't easily grab scrollbar if dual column
Sorry, UX, this doesn't solve the proper aiming on the AdaptivePageLayout column divider. Implementing such a functionality is pretty complex and error prone. First, the order the overlapping components are receiving the touch events is not predefined, and not even predictable. A touch event is handled by the topmost instantiated component first, meaning if the divider is above the Scrollbar, that will get the event first, and will consume it. This means the Scrollbar below will not even see the event coming. In order to implement the event handling above, we could think of the following solutions: 1) Create a touch event handler component which would be shared between the scrollbar and the divider. The component will then need to be explicitly shared between the APL and Scrollbar -> cannot be automated by the toolkit and would require to expose some (weird) APIs for both Scrollbar/Scrollview and APL, and app developers would need to bind these two components manually. 2) make sure the Scrollview is parented so that is always going to be above the APL divider, in this way it can get the touch events prior to the APL divider. Then Scrollbar should consume vertical touch drags only, and APL divider the horizontal ones, but neither of these should consume the touch press events. This may cause problems as the touch events will be forwarded to the flickable component under the scrollbar, and no further touch events will be handled. I was thinking more on a touch grabber spot presence on the APL divider, and the touch events should be grabbed only when that spot is aimed. BUT, we still have the mouse interaction, which had not been addressed by UX at all. So I'm moving back the UX share to In Progress, until we get a proper solution for both input use cases. ** Changed in: ubuntu-ux Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545118 Title: [AdaptivePageLayout] can't easily grab scrollbar if dual column To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1545118/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576607] Re: Need public documentation for customizing Button with StyleHints
Not every component has a style API, and not every component will have style API. Ubuntu.Components.Styles contains only those APIs which are stable and are needed. Checkbox will not have style API for instance unless the component would need special property presence in the style. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576607 Title: Need public documentation for customizing Button with StyleHints To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1576607/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576515] Re: Button style API is not defined, example codes from tutorial are broken
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576515 Title: Button style API is not defined, example codes from tutorial are broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1576515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576515] Re: Button style API is not defined, example codes from tutorial are broken
** Summary changed: - Button style is not working + Button style API is not defined, example codes from tutorial are broken ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576515 Title: Button style API is not defined, example codes from tutorial are broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1576515/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1514860] Re: OptionSelector does not work with keyboard
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514860 Title: OptionSelector does not work with keyboard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1514860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1558106] Re: Invalid use of palette apparent with new SDK
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558106 Title: Invalid use of palette apparent with new SDK To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1558106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575060] Re: APL divider goes on top of column content
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575060 Title: APL divider goes on top of column content To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1575060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1563440] Re: Add ContentHub text import option to text field context menu
This needs UX input. ** Also affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit ** Also affects: ubuntu-ux Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Dywan (kalikiana) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563440 Title: Add ContentHub text import option to text field context menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1563440/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320860] Re: Section header should not go under the page header
Or simply use the PageHeader in ListView's header. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320860 Title: Section header should not go under the page header To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1320860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573027] [NEW] Palette color setup not optimal, can cause performance problems when loading the theme
Public bug reported: Separate string checking for each property that needs a different value is slow. ** Affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Pierre Bertet (bpierre) Status: Fix Committed ** Branch linked: lp:~bpierre/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/palette-colors- optimization ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573027 Title: Palette color setup not optimal, can cause performance problems when loading the theme To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1573027/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1572525] Re: [regression] Double header height is set as flickable topMargin
Alberto, may I ask what is the reason you are settjng the ListView delegate's flickable the one to control the header movement? That seems to be a bit of a bad idea tbh... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572525 Title: [regression] Double header height is set as flickable topMargin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1572525/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1553090] Re: Binding loops in implicitWidth with OTA 10 landing
@tim, does the Icon derive from AbstractButton? :D ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553090 Title: Binding loops in implicitWidth with OTA 10 landing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1553090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1558106] Re: Invalid use of palette apparent with new SDK
Could you please update the import to 1.3? The version detection may be screwed if you import 0.1 versions, and we cannot do anything about it unfortunately. There is no official way to detect from a component in what version is imported, what we do is a workaround which may break any time. Also, do not mix the import version if UITK and its submodules! Import consistently! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558106 Title: Invalid use of palette apparent with new SDK To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1558106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1563211] Re: Clicking on a listitem doen't select the item
maybe we add a property to auto-select the currentIndex... we must check whether this makes sense, we must check the performance drawbacks of having this feature there. ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563211 Title: Clicking on a listitem doen't select the item To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1563211/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1507339] Re: Small gap between listitem and first trailing action
Could you please check it again? Is it still valid? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1507339 Title: Small gap between listitem and first trailing action To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1507339/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1097728] Re: [ListItems] too many different ListItems that are not flexible enough
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097728 Title: [ListItems] too many different ListItems that are not flexible enough To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1097728/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1563262] Re: AdaptivePageLayout ignores column's minimumWidth if MainView defaults to one column layout
** Summary changed: - AdvancedPageLayout ignores column's minimumWidth if MainView defaults to one column layout + AdaptivePageLayout ignores column's minimumWidth if MainView defaults to one column layout -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563262 Title: AdaptivePageLayout ignores column's minimumWidth if MainView defaults to one column layout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1563262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1380766] Re: revert listitem dividers to previous (no margins)
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380766 Title: revert listitem dividers to previous (no margins) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1380766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567840] Re: tst_datepicker generates segfault
Actually 1.2 has a QML component, so my sensing area exclusion doesn't have any effect on 1.2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567840 Title: tst_datepicker generates segfault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1567840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567840] Re: tst_datepicker generates segfault
Oh, and Tim, there is no Ubuntu.Tests 1.2 in the system, only 1.0 or 1.3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567840 Title: tst_datepicker generates segfault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1567840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567840] Re: tst_datepicker generates segfault
I dunno how you identified the crash to happen at pickerItemChanged signal. I refactored the code to have one single pickerItem on the Picker level. So no pickerItemChange should happen. The crash happens at the test loading phase, when Loader loads the text component. I've excluded the sensing area logic from AbstractButton, which previously caused problems, but we still have crashes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567840 Title: tst_datepicker generates segfault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1567840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1567840] Re: tst_datepicker generates segfault
For me the segfault moves to a later test if I do the changes in #4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567840 Title: tst_datepicker generates segfault To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1567840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs