[Bug 685643] Re: Vinagre can't tunnel VNC to Windows host
The problem still exists in Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) and Vinagre 2.30.2-1ubuntu1 - the same as the poster almost two years ago. The remote site is WinSSHd 5.26 on Windows Server 2008 R2. Will this be fixed in Maverick? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685643 Title: Vinagre can't tunnel VNC to Windows host To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vinagre/+bug/685643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339913] Re: jwhois does not use WHOIS servers from authoritative IANA list
This problem is Debian Bug 542148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542148 The bug has been fixed by Debian and has been available since 23 Nov 2010 and jwhois v4.0-2. When will this get fixed in Ubuntu installs? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #542148 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542148 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339913 Title: jwhois does not use WHOIS servers from authoritative IANA list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jwhois/+bug/339913/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339913] Re: jwhois does not use WHOIS servers from authoritative IANA list
I see that jwhois 4.0-2 is in Natty and Oneiric (and presumably Precise); however, it's not in Lucid or Maverick - and thus not in the LTS distribution (currently at Lucid). Isn't this going to be fixed for Lucid at least? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339913 Title: jwhois does not use WHOIS servers from authoritative IANA list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jwhois/+bug/339913/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774580] Re: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users
This is behavior present in passwd; the passwd binary is not part of the shadow package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774580 Title: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/774580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774580] Re: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users
This bug remains. Is it possible that the password aging sequence is not using PAM? # passwd -e foo passwd: user 'foo' does not exist in /etc/passwd # passwd foo Password: BAD PASSWORD: it is based on a dictionary word Retype new password: LDAP password information changed for snagoor passwd: password updated successfully # cat /etc/*ease DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS # dpkg -l | grep -E (passwd|pam|debian|libsel|libc6) ii auth-client-config 0.9 pam and NSS profile switcher ii base-passwd 3.5.22 Debian base system master password and group files ii debianutils 3.2.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific to Debian ii libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libc6-i686 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] ii libpam-cracklib 1.1.1-2ubuntu5.4 PAM module to enable cracklib support ii libpam-ldap 184-8.2ubuntu1 Pluggable Authentication Module for LDAP ii libpam-modules 1.1.1-2ubuntu5.4 Pluggable Authentication Modules for PAM ii libpam-runtime 1.1.1-2ubuntu5.4 Runtime support for the PAM library ii libpam0g1.1.1-2ubuntu5.4 Pluggable Authentication Modules library ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.1.1-2ubuntu2 parse Debian changelogs and output them in other formats ii libparted0debian1 2.2-5ubuntu5.2 The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library ii libselinux1 2.0.89-4 SELinux runtime shared libraries ii odbcinst1debian12.2.11-21 Support library for accessing odbc ini files ii passwd 1:4.1.4.2-1ubuntu2.2 change and administer password and group data -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774580 Title: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/774580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774580] Re: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users
Looking at the strace (and ltrace) output from passwd, it looks like it opens /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow directly instead of using PAM or getent or other method. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774580 Title: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/774580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 918836] [NEW] .dcrc file not recognized
Public bug reported: When using dc, the man page suggests that the ~/.dcrc file is read at startup. Using strace against dc shows that this is not the case; the ~/.dcrc file is never opened. There was a bug reported against Debian dc (Debian Bug 472250) that was reported as fixed in version 1.06.94-3.1 and the changelog reports that this change was made in Ubuntu dc. Debian bug 472250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472250 The ~/.dcrc is handy for a variety of things, but one thing is to set the precision of the calculator when starting up. ** Affects: bc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918836 Title: .dcrc file not recognized To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bc/+bug/918836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 475864] Re: Unable to kickstart with LVM partition scheme.
A year and a quarter, this bug still exists - and in Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS. This far on and the bug still isn't assigned, and its importance is Undecided? Let's move on this! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475864 Title: Unable to kickstart with LVM partition scheme. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581312] Re: Unknown key fee[x] pressed with Dell Latitude XT2
I saw this error from dell-wmi also. The system is a Lattitude e6400 and the unknown WMI event happened repeatedly (a dozen times) overnight. Doing a Fn+F8 (which changed the video from two screens to one screen to a duplicate screen back to two screens again) I got these errors: Apr 1 09:30:23 winry kernel: [260556.557580] Skipping EDID probe due to cached edid Apr 1 09:30:23 winry kernel: [260557.230789] Skipping EDID probe due to cached edid Apr 1 09:30:24 winry kernel: [260558.266557] dell-wmi: Received unknown WMI event (0x11) Sometimes the Skipping EDID error was double, mostly just singles entries before each unknown WMI event. The system is studiously kept up to date and is Ubuntu 10.10: $ uname -a Linux winry 2.6.35-28-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 1 14:40:58 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581312 Title: Unknown key fee[x] pressed with Dell Latitude XT2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581312] Re: Unknown key fee[x] pressed with Dell Latitude XT2
By the way - I just added a iSCSI volume to the aforementioned system, as well as a first attempt at installing CLVM. Perhaps this has something to do with it? The iSCSI volume was configured with LVM and XFS then mounted and unmounted. The volume was enlarged (using LVM and XFS tools) then dismounted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581312 Title: Unknown key fee[x] pressed with Dell Latitude XT2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 21214] Re: package selection section has no packages to select
Same problem exists on 10.10 (Maverick). Is a six year old bug normal??? This was reported in 2005, and here it is now 2011. Fix this already! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21214 Title: package selection section has no packages to select -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134222] Re: linux-kernel-header has files with size 0
Almost four years later, this bug is STILL unresolved. On Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-28-generic-pae# find . -type f -size 0 | wc -l 3979 /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-28-generic-pae# find include/config -type f -size 0 | wc -l 3979 Could some one resolve this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134222 Title: linux-kernel-header has files with size 0 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596780] Re: tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee)
I thought I was clear on the problem. The problem is that when the examples webapp is run, it fails because JSTL is missing - which it was never before. If that is how it upstream, then so be it. Thanks! -- tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596780] Re: tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee)
I thought I was clear on the problem. The problem is that when the examples webapp is run, it fails because JSTL is missing - which it was never before. If that is how it upstream, then so be it. Thanks! -- tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596781] Re: JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6)
I'm using 6.0.20-2ubuntu2.1 from the repositories for Lucid Lynx. -- JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596781] Re: JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6)
I'm using 6.0.20-2ubuntu2.1 from the repositories for Lucid Lynx. -- JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596780] [NEW] tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 When running Tomcat6 from repos, it becomes quickly apparent that JSTL is not present. This problem was discussed here: http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/JSTL-repositories--ftopict514769.html It was fixed by Debian with release 1:2ur2-b04-4: http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548242 Even though my system (Pentium M, 1Gb, Tomcat6, Lucid Lynx via upgrades) reports 1:2ur2-b04-6, Tomcat6 still is missing the JSTL libraries. ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596781] [NEW] JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 For example, http://127.0.0.1:8080/examples/jsp/tagplugin/notes.html reports this: Tag Plugins: Introductory Notes Tomcat 5 provides a framework for implementing tag plugins. The plugins instruct Jasper, at translation time, to replace tag handler calls with Java scriptlets. The framework allows tag library authors to implement plugins for their tags. Tomcat 5 is released with plugins for several JSTL tags. Note that these plugins work with JSTL 1.1 as well as JSTL 1.0, though the examples uses JSTL 1.1 and JSP 2.0. These plugins are not complete (for instance, some item types not handled in c:if). They do serve as examples to show plugins in action (just examine the generated Java files), and how they can be implemented. ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 596780] [NEW] tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 When running Tomcat6 from repos, it becomes quickly apparent that JSTL is not present. This problem was discussed here: http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/JSTL-repositories--ftopict514769.html It was fixed by Debian with release 1:2ur2-b04-4: http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548242 Even though my system (Pentium M, 1Gb, Tomcat6, Lucid Lynx via upgrades) reports 1:2ur2-b04-6, Tomcat6 still is missing the JSTL libraries. ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tomcat6 still missing JSTL (glassfish-javaee) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596781] [NEW] JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 For example, http://127.0.0.1:8080/examples/jsp/tagplugin/notes.html reports this: Tag Plugins: Introductory Notes Tomcat 5 provides a framework for implementing tag plugins. The plugins instruct Jasper, at translation time, to replace tag handler calls with Java scriptlets. The framework allows tag library authors to implement plugins for their tags. Tomcat 5 is released with plugins for several JSTL tags. Note that these plugins work with JSTL 1.1 as well as JSTL 1.0, though the examples uses JSTL 1.1 and JSP 2.0. These plugins are not complete (for instance, some item types not handled in c:if). They do serve as examples to show plugins in action (just examine the generated Java files), and how they can be implemented. ** Affects: tomcat6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 300935] Re: missing /etc/X11/rgb.txt file and broken link to it
I echo the sentiment previously expressed: this should be fixed in previous versions of Ubuntu like Jaunty and Intrepid. It's not hard to do; what's the hold up? -- missing /etc/X11/rgb.txt file and broken link to it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121231] Re: Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword
This bug is not present in Gnome Terminal 2.26.0 (in Jaunty) but does exist in Gnome Terminal 2.16.0. Test systems were Linux Mint 7 (Jaunty) with 2.26.0 and CentOS 5.3 (I know...) with 2.16.0 - copies were taken from Gnome Terminal and pasted into Microsoft Outlook on Windows XP using Synergy to move the clipboard around. Apparently this bug has been fixed upstream; an update to the appropriate versions should fix it. ** Also affects: gnome-terminal (CentOS) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121231] Re: Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword
Re-opening... ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121231] Re: Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword
More specifics: The problem with gnome-terminal does not show up when using xterm or rxvt. Packages are specifically these: * gnome-terminal (CentOS 5) - 2.16.0-5.3.el5 * rxvt (CentOS 5) - 18:2.7.10-2.el5.rf * xterm (CentOS 5) - 215-8.el5 * xterm (Linux Mint 7 - Jaunty) - 241-1ubuntu1 * gnome-terminal (Linux Mint 7 - Jaunty) - 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 All of these work fine except the first (gnome-terminal 2.16.0). Searching for versions of gnome-terminal turns up this: * dapper (gnome): The GNOME 2 terminal emulator application 2.14.1-0ubuntu1: amd64 i386 powerpc * dapper-updates (gnome): The GNOME 2 terminal emulator application 2.14.2-0ubuntu1: amd64 i386 powerpc * hardy (gnome): The GNOME 2 terminal emulator application 2.22.1-0ubuntu2: amd64 i386 * intrepid (gnome): GNOME 2.x terminál 2.24.1-0ubuntu1: amd64 i386 * intrepid-updates (gnome): GNOME 2.x terminál 2.24.1.1-0ubuntu1: amd64 i386 * jaunty (gnome): GNOME 2.x terminál 2.26.0-0ubuntu2: amd64 i386 * karmic (gnome): A GNOME terminálemulátor alkalmazása 2.27.91-0ubuntu1: amd64 i386 This suggests that dapper, hardy, and intrepid may be susceptible to this bug. -- Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 357865] Re: Firmware Missing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 334285 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334285 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 334285 Please include keyspan firmware -- Firmware Missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334285] Re: Please include keyspan firmware
Seven months and no fix?? There are more bug reports being added on this topic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/+bug/357865 When will Jaunty and Intrepid be fixed? -- Please include keyspan firmware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 266951] Re: Buffer I/O error on device sr0 Logical Block XXXXXX in Intrepid Ibex Alpha 5
I'm getting this error now with Xubuntu 9.04 Desktop. Kubuntu has been installed to this machine just fine, as has Linux Mint 7. Machine is a Toshiba Portege M100 with 512M RAM. The Xubuntu CDROM was burnt with DeepBurner 1.9.0.228 on Windows XP with a write speed of 16x (the burner seems to be capable of 24x or faster, but I always slow it down for read reliability). The write device is listed as a TEAC CDRWDVD DV224EV D.CF and there is no DAO option that I can find (the interface is designed to be simple). Sometimes I use InfraRecorder Portable (on same env) v0.45.0.0 to do burns: choice is a matter of wimsey (yes, it is!). I use defaults, except again I slow the burning process down (usually to 16x or 12x). Again, there's no DAO: on SAO (Session-at-Once, the default) and TAO (Track-at-Once) - I use the default. The reader in the laptop is a TEAC DW-224E-A35 (Drive rev. A01) - logos state Compact Disk ReWritable Utra Speed and DVD ROM. Will see if I can't get success on another drive - but this does seem unusual. -- Buffer I/O error on device sr0 Logical Block XX in Intrepid Ibex Alpha 5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/266951 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
