Re: [Bug 848622] Re: X.Org ABI Bump will break virtualbox-guest-X11
I agree you are entirely right on principle; I thought the appearance of xserver 1.11 in PPAs presaged its appearance in Oneiric, but you set me straight on that. There would be no sense having packages in the same repository break one another. Anyone's Oneiric which failed to boot after an apt-get dist-upgrade (which is probably everybody's Oneiric, at least the Alphas) would attest to the wisdom of that. What I did instead is to install two packages from Debian Sid, _*virtualbox-guest-x11_4.1.2-dfsg-1+b1*/**/_, which survives the ABI bump quite nicely (and, only because they are twins) *_/virtualbox-guest-utils_4.1.2-dfsg-1+b1/_.* Although I hate to install Debian packages on Ubuntu, or vise versa, I sometimes feel I have no choice. I don't think xorg-edgers particularly wants to become a VirtualBox PPA. My HID mouse still works; that's all I can say. I'm sorry if you're more accustomed to conversing with people who actually know what they're talking about, but I'm a relative newcomer, and I only get to play around in virtual sandboxes for the hour or so a day I have to myself. On 9/13/2011 9:50 AM, Felix Geyer wrote: Looks like the mouse driver is indeed broken with xserver 1.11 (you could have at least included a link to the upstream bug report). Still, I fail to see the point of this bug report since Ubuntu doesn't use that version for the next release and we are not doing upstream development. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848622 Title: X.Org ABI Bump will break virtualbox-guest-X11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/848622/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 848622] [NEW] X.Org ABI Bump will break virtualbox-guest-X11
Public bug reported: I'm sure this comes as no news, but the dependency on xorg-video-abi-10 and xorg-input-abi-12 will be bad news if and when xserver 1.11 oozes out of its present cage in X.Org Edgers and into Oneiric repositories. Forgive me if this is entirely misdirected. Maybe Robert or Cyril should, or will, provide a version of virtualbox-guest-x11 based on Debian Experimental, which does survive the ABI bump, and will thus not croak the VM. But they do not seem so inclined if they tossed out xserver-xorg-video-vmware from video-all because it fails to build against xserver 1.11 on amd64. root@ubuntu:~# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu oneiric (development branch) Release:11.10 root@ubuntu:~# apt-cache policy virtualbox-guest-x11 virtualbox-guest-x11: Installed: 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 4.1.2-dfsg-1ubuntu1 0 800 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848622 Title: X.Org ABI Bump will break virtualbox-guest-X11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/848622/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 839166] Re: mountall hangs while trying to send dbus? messages for /proc
Anecdotally, updating mountall from 2.25ubuntu1 (natty) to 2.31 (oneiric) is what appears to croak my system (which is virtualized). The system hangs at mountall on the next cold boot. I thought it was either base-files or initscripts, but since upgrading either one of these takes mountall with it, my uninformed opinion is that something is fishy with mountall. My issue is perhaps a little different. I do not have this issue with the version you are reporting (2.25). It does exist with 2.31. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839166 Title: mountall hangs while trying to send dbus? messages for /proc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/839166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807974] Re: debootstrap fails to install libc6 installing oneiric from natty
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011, Steve Langasek wrote: Oneiric is a development release which is currently in the alpha stage of its development cycle. Total unusability is a very real and ordinary risk of running the software at this stage. I'm not complaining, since I'm not one of your developers, and therefore do not have to eat your dog food unless I choose to. Sorry, that's unrelated to any of the above changes and no one else is reporting such a problem. The more likely culprit here would be some kind of disk corruption or hardware failure. How odd, when the hardware in question is completely virtualized, and, whenever it did occur, it would occur simultaneously in two parallel, but physically distinct and independent virtualization environments, both of which emulate completely different hardware, and use distinct virtual-disk formats. In fairness, though, this has not happened in quite a while now. I'm only reminded because it surface for me again today, although the system was nice enough to recover itself gracefully (on previous occasions, dpkg --configure -a sufficed): E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg received a segmentation fault. A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.0.0-8-generic Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Setting up libstdc++6-4.5-dev (4.5.3-6ubuntu1) ... Setting up g++-4.5 (4.5.3-6ubuntu1) ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807974 Title: debootstrap fails to install libc6 installing oneiric from natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/807974/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795815] Re: No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails
While I might still have a valid bug (inability to build kernel modules from source is a real problem, especially for things like VMware Tools, in all post-BKL kernels), I've given up completely on Ubuntu virtual kernels for precisely the application for which they were expressly designed. For VMware Ubuntu guests, the sound drivers are missing. For VirtualBox linux guests, the generic drm modules are missing. Moving to generic kernels moot both issues. I now have sound and direct-rendering in their respective environments. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795815 Title: No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/795815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
I'm sure you've already seen today's drop in SF [2011.07.19-450511] which supposedly fixes the gcc compilation issues, so I won't torture you gentlemen further. I see new code related to FUSE blocking filesystems which they don't talk about, probably because it's coming from upstream, and VMware corporate has tied their hands. I don't know who I feel sorrier for, you or them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-vm-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
I'm sure you've already seen today's drop in SF [2011.07.19-450511] which supposedly fixes the gcc compilation issues, so I won't torture you gentlemen further. I see new code related to FUSE blocking filesystems which they don't talk about, probably because it's coming from upstream, and VMware corporate has tied their hands. I don't know who I feel sorrier for, you or them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811385] Re: reboot hangs at Plymouth logo after upgrading base-files and initscripts
My report appears to be invalid. My Plymouth hadn't been updated to take the /run transition into account, even if initramfs had been. At least that's the conclusion I draw. After reverting to a stable baseline, updating Plymouth, then updating base-files and initscripts, everything worked, even after a cold boot. My apologies. Even if the updates really did make their appearance at the same time, it became increasingly difficult to keep track of which package triggered any given consequence. ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+question/165176 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811385 Title: reboot hangs at Plymouth logo after upgrading base-files and initscripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/811385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807845] Re: dpkg crashed with SIGSEGV in debsums
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807845 Title: dpkg crashed with SIGSEGV in debsums To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/807845/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 812022] Re: plymouth regression: text missing in initramfs (again)
Thank you gentlemen for looking into this. I do not have your skills, so while I suspect something is still wrong somewhere, it's difficult to isolate in a way that would be useful to you. On one virtualized system, Plymouth boots to a black screen, which I'm willing to overlook since the login screen eventually appears. On another virtualization platform, otherwise the same, Plymouth splash works, but hangs if I put the last nail in its coffin (by updating initscripts and base-files). As soon as I'm convinced I'm good again, the logo stops spinning and croaks. Obviously this would be useless as a bug report so I don't file one. But I'm very glad individuals of your talent are looking into this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812022 Title: plymouth regression: text missing in initramfs (again) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/812022/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807974] Re: debootstrap fails to install libc6 installing oneiric from natty
Excuse me if it is inappropriate to say this here, but a seemingly related series of breaking changes still persists. First, X lost all input devices. Then, there was a hang on boot. The Plymouth logo stopped spinning and the system just croaked; the login screen never appeared. The latest breaking change occurred while upgrading *one* package only (base-files) to 6.4ubuntu2. Supposedly that was expressly intended to fix other devastating bugs. After that, I gave up and reverted to a stable snapshot. I'm all for stealing from Debian Unstable, but when this is done in a piecemeal and uncoordinated manner, and Oneiric is orders of magnitude more unstable than Sid, something is wrong. Really, this is getting to be too much. I'm not talking about an ugly screen or a few missing icons. We are approaching total unusability. More often than not, dpkg receives a segfault during routine upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807974 Title: debootstrap fails to install libc6 installing oneiric from natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/807974/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 811385] [NEW] reboot hangs at Plymouth logo after upgrading base-files and initscripts
Public bug reported: Please excuse me if I am reporting against the wrong package, or even if this report is invalid altogether, but I was told in no uncertain terms that today's update of initramfs-tools resolved this issue. It does not. I survived the botched, uncoordinated migration to /run, and tried to avoid upgrading all packages at once. I had the current versions of udev and initramfs under my belt before attempting the following: initscripts: 2.88dsf-13.10ubuntu4 base-files: 6.4ubuntu2 A warm reboot of the (virtual) machine seems OK, but a cold restart hangs at the Plymouth logo. Eventually, Plymouth stops spinning and the login screen never appears. Recovery mode of the same kernel version (3.0.0-5-virtual) still works. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: base-files 6.4ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-5.6-virtual 3.0.0-rc7 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-5-virtual x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jul 15 20:57:58 2011 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: base-files UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-04-30 (76 days ago) ** Affects: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811385 Title: reboot hangs at Plymouth logo after upgrading base-files and initscripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/811385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Thanks in advance for putting up with the observations of a clueless outsider ;-) * The transitional-package approach, which I think is what you used for open-vm-toolbox in ppa15, worked nicely. * The conflicting-package approach, which I think is what you are using for open-vm-toolbox in ppa19, achieves the same result, although with benign errors that can be ignored. This is probably just due to the way I had to install (using dpkg rather than apt or Synaptic). * The most important thing, that DKMS actually works, has been true since the earliest ppa's and continues. GOD BLESS YOU!! * Anything I said about initialization scripts or mounting is completely inappropriate and beyond the scope of this bug report and its resolution. I just didn't know who else would be listening to me ;-) * I couldn't agree more that it is confusing to read documentation about vmmemctl and vmware-user that even *I* suspect are just no longer true. But I think the point about DnD is still valid because I've played with it. In other words, the observations are uninformed by knowledge, but empirical. I still suspect something is rotten in Denmark because a force-reload of my modified open-vm-tools script frequently fails (mount: mount point /proc/fs/vmblock/mountPoint does not exist). Loading vmblock is *supposed* to create /proc/fs/vmblock (it does) and two nodes therein (dev and mountPoint). The former it always does; the latter, not always. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-vm-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Thanks in advance for putting up with the observations of a clueless outsider ;-) * The transitional-package approach, which I think is what you used for open-vm-toolbox in ppa15, worked nicely. * The conflicting-package approach, which I think is what you are using for open-vm-toolbox in ppa19, achieves the same result, although with benign errors that can be ignored. This is probably just due to the way I had to install (using dpkg rather than apt or Synaptic). * The most important thing, that DKMS actually works, has been true since the earliest ppa's and continues. GOD BLESS YOU!! * Anything I said about initialization scripts or mounting is completely inappropriate and beyond the scope of this bug report and its resolution. I just didn't know who else would be listening to me ;-) * I couldn't agree more that it is confusing to read documentation about vmmemctl and vmware-user that even *I* suspect are just no longer true. But I think the point about DnD is still valid because I've played with it. In other words, the observations are uninformed by knowledge, but empirical. I still suspect something is rotten in Denmark because a force-reload of my modified open-vm-tools script frequently fails (mount: mount point /proc/fs/vmblock/mountPoint does not exist). Loading vmblock is *supposed* to create /proc/fs/vmblock (it does) and two nodes therein (dev and mountPoint). The former it always does; the latter, not always. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Nate, I wish I was more than a newcomer; I'd gladly help you, since I am getting obsessed to an unhealthy and unnatural degree with making VMware work from am end-user perspective. I realize this is sick ;-) If I weren't so frustrated that the Debian package maintainers seem to be indifferent, absent, clueless, or just paralyzed, I wouldn't have reached out to my Ubuntu brothers. Debian has had grave bug reports for at least four months on their totally obsolete, supposedly latest version of Tools and hasn't even classified any of them. Much less uploaded a new package to unstable or experimental. So I was reaching out to you in desperation; I had you pegged as someone actively working to get a solution I could steal. So while I'm sorry for treading on your ppa, I *have* successfully installed ppa9 in a semi-Oneiric Natty (basically a 3.0.1 kernel with as much of the internals and build infrasturucture upgraded as I can without breaking my desktop, which is fragile because, of course, VMware doesn't support direct-rendering in linux guests). DMKS built all modules without any problems whatsoever. I would like only to observe that distro package maintainers have to look thought the eyes of the recipient to ensure that end-users will have a good experience. This is what I mean: * Even if shared folders are always enabled in the host, the guest will not auto-mount them. Timing issues in loading the necessary modules makes using fstab problematic. * Drag and Drop operations from the *host* to *guest* will fail because the open-vm-tools initialization does not seem to provide the necessary environment, and once created, that environment is volatile, since VMwareDnD has to be created in \tmp. After doing some reading, I've modified the startup section of my /etc/init.d/open-vm-tools as follows (I make no claim about knowing what I'm doing, or that it is sufficiently general): log_daemon_msg mounting hgfs shares mount -t vmhgfs .host:/ /mnt/hgfs log_end_msg 0 if [ ! -d /tmp/VMwareDnD ] then log_daemon_msg making a directory on the guest to store files for DnD mkdir /tmp/VMwareDnD chmod 1777 /tmp/VMwareDnD log_end_msg 0 fi log_daemon_msg mounting vmblock for DnD mount -t vmblock none /proc/fs/vmblock/mountPoint log_end_msg 0 Source: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/open-vm- tools/index.php?title=Packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-vm-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Nate, I wish I was more than a newcomer; I'd gladly help you, since I am getting obsessed to an unhealthy and unnatural degree with making VMware work from am end-user perspective. I realize this is sick ;-) If I weren't so frustrated that the Debian package maintainers seem to be indifferent, absent, clueless, or just paralyzed, I wouldn't have reached out to my Ubuntu brothers. Debian has had grave bug reports for at least four months on their totally obsolete, supposedly latest version of Tools and hasn't even classified any of them. Much less uploaded a new package to unstable or experimental. So I was reaching out to you in desperation; I had you pegged as someone actively working to get a solution I could steal. So while I'm sorry for treading on your ppa, I *have* successfully installed ppa9 in a semi-Oneiric Natty (basically a 3.0.1 kernel with as much of the internals and build infrasturucture upgraded as I can without breaking my desktop, which is fragile because, of course, VMware doesn't support direct-rendering in linux guests). DMKS built all modules without any problems whatsoever. I would like only to observe that distro package maintainers have to look thought the eyes of the recipient to ensure that end-users will have a good experience. This is what I mean: * Even if shared folders are always enabled in the host, the guest will not auto-mount them. Timing issues in loading the necessary modules makes using fstab problematic. * Drag and Drop operations from the *host* to *guest* will fail because the open-vm-tools initialization does not seem to provide the necessary environment, and once created, that environment is volatile, since VMwareDnD has to be created in \tmp. After doing some reading, I've modified the startup section of my /etc/init.d/open-vm-tools as follows (I make no claim about knowing what I'm doing, or that it is sufficiently general): log_daemon_msg mounting hgfs shares mount -t vmhgfs .host:/ /mnt/hgfs log_end_msg 0 if [ ! -d /tmp/VMwareDnD ] then log_daemon_msg making a directory on the guest to store files for DnD mkdir /tmp/VMwareDnD chmod 1777 /tmp/VMwareDnD log_end_msg 0 fi log_daemon_msg mounting vmblock for DnD mount -t vmblock none /proc/fs/vmblock/mountPoint log_end_msg 0 Source: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/open-vm- tools/index.php?title=Packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
I think that response was beneath you. PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS TO SHOUT AT ME. Don't worry, I won't bother you again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-vm-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
I think that response was beneath you. PLEASE DO NOT USE ALL CAPS TO SHOUT AT ME. Don't worry, I won't bother you again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Nate, I believe you are on the right track. I know this is not the type of feedback you need (or want) in this venue. After all, my virtual platform is Debian Sid, not Oneiric; and my kernel is 2.6.39-2, not 3.0-rcx. But the underlying problems seem to be from the same causes. And I know all the dire warnings about installing Ubuntu binaries on Debian, or the reverse. But one of the reasons I virtualize non- production environments is so that I *can* screw them up ;-) But the great news is that DKMS *finally* doesn't croak: # dpkg -i *.deb Selecting previously deselected package open-vm-dkms. (Reading database ... 332857 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking open-vm-dkms (from open-vm-dkms_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_all.deb) ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-source from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-source 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-source_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement open-vm-source ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-toolbox from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-toolbox 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-toolbox_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement open-vm-toolbox ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-tools from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-tools 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-tools_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_amd64.deb) ... Stopping open-vm guest daemon: vmtoolsd. Removing open-vm-tools modules: vmhgfs WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/options, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-extra, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-amd76-edac, it will be ignored in a future release. vmmemctl WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/options, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-extra, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-amd76-edac, it will be ignored in a future release. FATAL: Module vmmemctl not found. vmsync WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/options, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-extra, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-amd76-edac, it will be ignored in a future release. . Unpacking replacement open-vm-tools ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-tools-dbg from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-tools-dbg 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-tools-dbg_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement open-vm-tools-dbg ... Setting up open-vm-dkms (2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9) ... Loading new open-vm-tools-2011.05.27 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... Building only for 2.6.39-2-amd64 Building for architecture amd64 Building initial module for 2.6.39-2-amd64 Done. vmblock.ko: Running module version sanity check. Error! Module version 1.1.2.0 for vmblock.ko is not newer than what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 (1.1.2.0). You may override by specifying --force. vmci.ko: Running module version sanity check. Good news! Module version 9.2.0.0 for vmci.ko exactly matches what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64. DKMS will not replace this module. You may override by specifying --force. vmhgfs.ko: Running module version sanity check. Error! Module version 1.4.1.1 for vmhgfs.ko is not newer than what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 (1.4.1.1). You may override by specifying --force. vmsync.ko: Running module version sanity check. Error! Module version 1.1.0.1 for vmsync.ko is not newer than what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 (1.1.0.1). You may override by specifying --force. vmxnet.ko: Running module version sanity check. Good news! Module version 2.0.9.0 for vmxnet.ko exactly matches what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64. DKMS will not replace this module. You may override by specifying --force. vsock.ko: Running module version sanity check. Good
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Nate, I believe you are on the right track. I know this is not the type of feedback you need (or want) in this venue. After all, my virtual platform is Debian Sid, not Oneiric; and my kernel is 2.6.39-2, not 3.0-rcx. But the underlying problems seem to be from the same causes. And I know all the dire warnings about installing Ubuntu binaries on Debian, or the reverse. But one of the reasons I virtualize non- production environments is so that I *can* screw them up ;-) But the great news is that DKMS *finally* doesn't croak: # dpkg -i *.deb Selecting previously deselected package open-vm-dkms. (Reading database ... 332857 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking open-vm-dkms (from open-vm-dkms_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_all.deb) ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-source from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-source 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-source_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement open-vm-source ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-toolbox from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-toolbox 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-toolbox_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement open-vm-toolbox ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-tools from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-tools 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-tools_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_amd64.deb) ... Stopping open-vm guest daemon: vmtoolsd. Removing open-vm-tools modules: vmhgfs WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/options, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-extra, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-amd76-edac, it will be ignored in a future release. vmmemctl WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/options, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-extra, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-amd76-edac, it will be ignored in a future release. FATAL: Module vmmemctl not found. vmsync WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/options, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/ndiswrapper, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-firewire, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-extra, it will be ignored in a future release. WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-amd76-edac, it will be ignored in a future release. . Unpacking replacement open-vm-tools ... dpkg: warning: downgrading open-vm-tools-dbg from 1:8.4.2-261024-1 to 2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9. Preparing to replace open-vm-tools-dbg 1:8.4.2-261024-1 (using open-vm-tools-dbg_2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement open-vm-tools-dbg ... Setting up open-vm-dkms (2011.05.27-420096-0~ppa9) ... Loading new open-vm-tools-2011.05.27 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... Building only for 2.6.39-2-amd64 Building for architecture amd64 Building initial module for 2.6.39-2-amd64 Done. vmblock.ko: Running module version sanity check. Error! Module version 1.1.2.0 for vmblock.ko is not newer than what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 (1.1.2.0). You may override by specifying --force. vmci.ko: Running module version sanity check. Good news! Module version 9.2.0.0 for vmci.ko exactly matches what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64. DKMS will not replace this module. You may override by specifying --force. vmhgfs.ko: Running module version sanity check. Error! Module version 1.4.1.1 for vmhgfs.ko is not newer than what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 (1.4.1.1). You may override by specifying --force. vmsync.ko: Running module version sanity check. Error! Module version 1.1.0.1 for vmsync.ko is not newer than what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64 (1.1.0.1). You may override by specifying --force. vmxnet.ko: Running module version sanity check. Good news! Module version 2.0.9.0 for vmxnet.ko exactly matches what is already found in kernel 2.6.39-2-amd64. DKMS will not replace this module. You may override by specifying --force. vsock.ko: Running module version sanity check. Good
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Nate, your efforts are much appreciated and I'll be following them with great interest. While I still use the proprietary VMWare Tools [8.4.6 Build 385536] on my Ubuntu 11.04 guest [kernel 2.6.39-3], they seem to be quite broken on Debian Sid [kernel 2.6.39-1]. I was quite sure they would still build on the rc7 kernel for which Debian Unstable obliged me to create my own kbuild infrastructure (quite educational for a novice). Since the Debian version, even in Unstable, is quite ancient [8.4.2-261024-1], I am becoming quite desperate. Desperate enough to perhaps install an Ubuntu package on Debian ;-) Cheers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to open-vm-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 776103] Re: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h
Nate, your efforts are much appreciated and I'll be following them with great interest. While I still use the proprietary VMWare Tools [8.4.6 Build 385536] on my Ubuntu 11.04 guest [kernel 2.6.39-3], they seem to be quite broken on Debian Sid [kernel 2.6.39-1]. I was quite sure they would still build on the rc7 kernel for which Debian Unstable obliged me to create my own kbuild infrastructure (quite educational for a novice). Since the Debian version, even in Unstable, is quite ancient [8.4.2-261024-1], I am becoming quite desperate. Desperate enough to perhaps install an Ubuntu package on Debian ;-) Cheers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/776103 Title: package open-vm-dkms 2011.03.28-387002-0ubuntu2 fails to build against 2.6.39 kernels, due to missing linux/smp_lock.h To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/776103/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 795815] [NEW] No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails
Thanks for the suggestion, Daniel. On those few occasions when I am really desperate to hear sound, I fall back to the 2.6.38-10-generic kernel (2.6.38-10-virtual has no sound either). In fact, there has really been no sound since Maverick. I believe that's because I've installed the 'linux-alsa-driver-modules-2.6.38-10-generic' package from 'http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-audio-dev/ppa/ubuntu'. The PPA has server and generic branches for 2.6.38-10, as well as 2.6.38-9, but not for virtual, and nothing for 2.6.39. # uname -r 2.6.38-10-generic # modprobe snd_ens1371 # hwinfo --sound 52: PCI 201.0: 0401 Multimedia audio controller [Created at pci.318] UDI: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_1274_1371 Unique ID: GA8e.FGsk7T8RAT9 Parent ID: 7EWs.3XzZP_1GzlF SysFS ID: /devices/pci:00/:00:11.0/:02:01.0 SysFS BusID: :02:01.0 Hardware Class: sound Model: Ensoniq Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI64V, AudioPCI128 Vendor: pci 0x1274 Ensoniq Device: pci 0x1371 ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] SubVendor: pci 0x1274 Ensoniq SubDevice: pci 0x1371 Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI64V, AudioPCI128 Revision: 0x02 Driver: ENS1371 Driver Modules: snd_ens1371 I/O Ports: 0x2000-0x3fff (rw) IRQ: 19 (no events) Module Alias: pci:v1274d1371sv1274sd1371bc04sc01i00 Driver Info #0: Driver Status: snd_ens1371 is active Driver Activation Cmd: modprobe snd_ens1371 Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #18 (PCI bridge) # aplay -l List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: AudioPCI [Ensoniq AudioPCI], device 0: ES1371/1 [ES1371 DAC2/ADC] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 card 0: AudioPCI [Ensoniq AudioPCI], device 1: ES1371/2 [ES1371 DAC1] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 I do believe I've seen enough to conclude the problem is not with hardware virtualization per se, and since I'm unable to build from source, I'm prepared to wait. On 6/10/2011 8:24 PM, Daniel T Chen wrote: If you're using 11.04, why not use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/InstallingLinuxAlsaDriverModules? Be sure to use 2.6.38-9-generic until the -10 builds are available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795815 Title: No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/795815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795815] [NEW] No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: alsa-source root@ubuntu:~# hwinfo --sound 52: PCI 201.0: 0401 Multimedia audio controller [Created at pci.318] UDI: /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_1274_1371 Unique ID: GA8e.FGsk7T8RAT9 Parent ID: 7EWs.3XzZP_1GzlF SysFS ID: /devices/pci:00/:00:11.0/:02:01.0 SysFS BusID: :02:01.0 Hardware Class: sound Model: Ensoniq Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI64V, AudioPCI128 Vendor: pci 0x1274 Ensoniq Device: pci 0x1371 ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] SubVendor: pci 0x1274 Ensoniq SubDevice: pci 0x1371 Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI64V, AudioPCI128 Revision: 0x02 I/O Ports: 0x2000-0x3fff (rw) IRQ: 5 (no events) Module Alias: pci:v1274d1371sv1274sd1371bc04sc01i00 Config Status: cfg=new, avail=yes, need=no, active=unknown Attached to: #18 (PCI bridge) root@ubuntu:~# module-assistant auto-install alsa-source -i . Updated infos about 1 packages Getting source for kernel version: 2.6.39-3-virtual Kernel headers available in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.39-3-virtual Creating symlink... apt-get -y install build-essential Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done build-essential is already the newest version. [...] make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver' /usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver CPP=gcc -E CC=gcc modules make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.39-3-virtual' CC [M] /usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/hrtimer.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/hwdep.o /usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/hwdep.c:25:28: fatal error: linux/smp_lock.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[5]: *** [/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore/hwdep.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/acore] Error 2 make[3]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.39-3-virtual' make[2]: *** [compile] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver' make[1]: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver' make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2 BUILD FAILED! See /var/cache/modass/alsa-source.buildlog.2.6.39-3-virtual.1307758419 for details. root@ubuntu:~# ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: alsa-source 1.0.24+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.39-3.10-virtual 2.6.39 Uname: Linux 2.6.39-3-virtual x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw--- 1 root root 116, 1 2011-06-10 18:59 seq crw--- 1 root root 116, 33 2011-06-10 18:59 timer AplayDevices: aplay: device_list:240: no soundcards found... Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: arecord: device_list:240: no soundcards found... AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: Date: Fri Jun 10 19:48:35 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: alsa-driver UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-30 (41 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/31/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: 6.00 dmi.board.name: 440BX Desktop Reference Platform dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.board.version: None dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr6.00:bd12/31/2009:svnVMware,Inc.:pnVMwareVirtualPlatform:pvrNone:rvnIntelCorporation:rn440BXDesktopReferencePlatform:rvrNone:cvnNoEnclosure:ct1:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: VMware Virtual Platform dmi.product.version: None dmi.sys.vendor: VMware, Inc. ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795815 Title: No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/795815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 795815] Re: No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails
** Attachment added: module-assistant buildlog attached https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795815/+attachment/2164715/+files/alsa-source.buildlog.2.6.39-3-virtual.1307758419 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795815 Title: No sound in 11.04 with 2.6.39-3 kernel; alsa-source build fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/795815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
