[Bug 1437260]
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #49) > Thanks everyone, but the test I mostly wait for is that on intel/sna (I > assume the format was hardcoded because it worked on that driver and I don't > want to break it - it's too common) SNA compiled from 2.99.917-519-g8229390 SNA initialized with Haswell (gen7.5, gt1) backend I've just checked it on my HP chromebook running archlinux with the driver intel/sna. I didn't notice any regression. It's OK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437260 Title: Plasma5 Font Preview is not visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1437260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437260]
Created attachment 96566 FcEngine patch I have attached your patch because cut kills correct formatting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437260 Title: Plasma5 Font Preview is not visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1437260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437260]
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #42) > We need this patch tested on all possible GPUs (notably intel/sna!) Great ! You have killed this bug :) My GPU : NVIDIA Corporation G94 [GeForce 9600 GT] (rev a1) Driver : nvidia-340xx Many thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437260 Title: Plasma5 Font Preview is not visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1437260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437260]
(In reply to Thomas Lübking from comment #51) > Thanks a lot. Risking to be a complete PITA, mind testing this patch and > notably watching on whether you're on 32bit depth and whether a format is > found (and it's the correct one ;-) Testing again the new patch. It's still ok but i am in 24bits. How can i do to test 30/32bits depth ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437260 Title: Plasma5 Font Preview is not visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1437260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437260]
ditto with my old GT9600 / nvidia driver 340.93 / plasma 5.4.3 / kf 5.15.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437260 Title: Plasma5 Font Preview is not visible To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-desktop/+bug/1437260/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1329726]
Same thing here on archlinux : digikam 4.5.0 libsolid 4.14.3 camera is Canon IXUS 115HS Camera detection is ok in the kde widget device notifier and import photos works flawlessly with kio camera:/, gphoto2 and gwenview. Digikam puts this error when trying to detect camera : digikam(10794)/digikam (core) Digikam::DigikamApp::checkSolidCamera: Solid returns unsupported driver handle for gphoto2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1329726 Title: Get message: The specified camera (/org/kde/solid/udev/...) is not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/1329726/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584902] Re: iwlagn can't be forced above 54M rate and reports wrong
Ignore comment #19 My issue is not related to the bug, but to my WIFI bridge. sorry for the noise -- iwlagn can't be forced above 54M rate and reports wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584902] Re: iwlagn can't be forced above 54M rate and reports wrong
Same issue as infocreator. I have 2 systems using the same WIFI bridge Linksys WET54GS5 in adhoc mode. Here is a bench : UPLOAD speed : Netgear WPN511 (atheros) : 2.5 Mb/s INTEL 5100 AGN : 100kb/s DOWLOAD speed : Netgear WPN511 (atheros) : 1 Mb/s INTEL 5100 AGN : 64kb/s The bench is done with an ubuntu 10.04 LTS up to date. -- iwlagn can't be forced above 54M rate and reports wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
