[Bug 1535006] [NEW] attempting to re-install; left blank screen (with cursor) after boot.
Public bug reported: I had previously installed Ubuntu 15 on this PC, but would not 'wake up' -- attempting to login would display black screen with active mouse cursor -- nothing else. Since not much had been done with this PC since the install, I was trying to re-install it. It complained about a need/missing boot area (~1MB). So I told it to clean the disk and re- install -- then this. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: ubiquity 2.21.25 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-15.15-generic 3.19.3 Uname: Linux 3.19.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.17.2-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.360 Date: Sat Jan 16 22:05:35 2016 InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Release amd64 (20150422) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ubiquity-2.21.25 ubuntu vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535006 Title: attempting to re-install; left blank screen (with cursor) after boot. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1535006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1042136] [NEW] update manager unresolvable problem could not initialize
Public bug reported: Could not initialize the package information An unresolvable problem occurred while initializing the package information. Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the following error message: 'E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/nz.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise- updates_restricted_binary-i386_Packages, E:The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.' ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042136 Title: update manager unresolvable problem could not initialize To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1042136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1012851] Re: Nvidia settings doesn't save monitor config
I can confirm the same behaviour on my laptop. I changed the permissions to /etc/X11/xorg.conf (sudo chmod 666 /etc/X11/xorg.conf) and tried again but still not able to save the setting changes. I WAS able to save the changes when starting nvidia settings as root (sudo nvidia-settings). This looks like a bug affecting the GUI that prompts for you to enter your user password to elevate your priveleges to root - I just don't know what that program is to report a bug for it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012851 Title: Nvidia settings doesn't save monitor config To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-settings/+bug/1012851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1012851] Re: Nvidia settings doesn't save monitor config
the latest updates today have fixed this issue (for me). Still not sure which of the 16 updated packes did it though -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012851 Title: Nvidia settings doesn't save monitor config To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-settings/+bug/1012851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597113] Re: package nvidia-current 195.36.24-0ubuntu1~10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719314/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719315/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719316/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719317/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719318/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719319/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719320/DpkgTerminalLog.gz ** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719321/GdmLog.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719322/GdmLog1.txt ** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719323/GdmLog2.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719324/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719325/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719326/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719327/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719328/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719329/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719330/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719331/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719332/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719333/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719334/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719335/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719336/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: make.log.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719337/make.log.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719338/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719339/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50719340/xkbcomp.txt -- package nvidia-current 195.36.24-0ubuntu1~10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597113] [NEW] package nvidia-current 195.36.24-0ubuntu1~10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Public bug reported: crashed during update ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: nvidia-current 195.36.24-0ubuntu1~10.04 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-lowlatency 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-lowlatency x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jun 22 01:47:21 2010 DkmsStatus: nvidia-current, 195.36.24, 2.6.32-22-lowlatency, x86_64: installed ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1) MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-790XTA-UD4 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-22-lowlatency root=UUID=c0d21c47-d32d-4b13-8084-a1c8c10a5218 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers Title: package nvidia-current 195.36.24-0ubuntu1~10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 dmi.bios.date: 11/16/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc. dmi.bios.version: F1 dmi.board.name: GA-790XTA-UD4 dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.board.version: x.x dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF1:bd11/16/2009:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-790XTA-UD4:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-790XTA-UD4:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: GA-790XTA-UD4 dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. glxinfo: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-22-lowlatency ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- package nvidia-current 195.36.24-0ubuntu1~10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525687] Re: Home directory up dated via cli files not shown in gui, even after reboots. files are definately THERE
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39523424/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39523431/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39523437/ProcStatus.txt -- Home directory up dated via cli files not shown in gui, even after reboots. files are definately THERE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525687] [NEW] Home directory up dated via cli files not shown in gui, even after reboots. files are definately THERE
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Ok guys I solved problem.. The directory permissions were read/write but no execute. strange way togo - i would have it was of paramount importance to show directory contents whatever the permissions. regards Barry Pilgrim ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus Package: nautilus 1:2.26.2-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 UnreportableReason: This is not a genuine Ubuntu package ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Home directory up dated via cli files not shown in gui, even after reboots. files are definately THERE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452208] Re: devkit-disks-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_g_method_return_error()
Error received in live desktop while installing 9.10 to 20GB ext4 primary partition of 1TB USB HD, created during manual configuration, beginning of drive, formatted during install, 0 swap space, boot loader not installed. Install is continuing (89%)... writing report from live desktop. -- devkit-disks-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_g_method_return_error() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452208 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 452208] Re: devkit-disks-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_g_method_return_error()
Repeated install just for fun... Same settings.. Error received during language pack download/install this time. Previous error popped during apt config. -- devkit-disks-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_g_method_return_error() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452208 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some components are non-free
James, you're overthinking the problem. I'm sure trademark law is very interesting, and its intersection with open source is a fascinating topic for someone's PhD thesis, but it is not the topic at hand. The difference between mysql-query-browser and firefox is very, very simple: MySQL's icons are released under the GPL, and Firefox's icons are Copyright (c) 2004-2006 The Mozilla Foundation, All Rights Reserved. -- Some components are non-free https://launchpad.net/bugs/83118 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some components are non-free
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622;msg=39 -- Some components are non-free https://launchpad.net/bugs/83118 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some components are non-free
Robert, since you're not interested in the opinions of non-lawyers, and since I am not a lawyer, it stands to reason that you would not be interested in any examples I might offer. Presumably Canonical employs lawyers who can advise them that All Rights Reserved means All Rights Reserved, and that copyrighted images do not somehow become *more* free when they are trademarked. This bug is about the Ubuntu Firefox package. If you have issues with other packages, I suggest you file a separate bug and make your case. I've made mine. -- Some components are non-free https://launchpad.net/bugs/83118 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Re: Some components are non-free
Some people may be surprised to learn that I disagree with Noah on this one. I think following Debian's lead would be too disruptive in three ways: 1. Disruptive to end users, who wouldn't understand why their browser was renamed out from under them 2. Disruptive to Canonical, who would be forced to deal with the increased support costs arising from #1 3. Disruptive to Canonical's relationship with Mozilla, the importance of which should not be underestimated Furthermore, Mark Shuttleworth has already publicly stated that Canonical will continue shipping Mozilla-approved Firefox packages ( http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/79 ), so that narrows the options considerably. Given that a Mozilla-approved package will necessarily contain non-free components, and given that Canonical plans to continue shipping and officially supporting this package, that narrows it down to precisely one solution. Canonical already has a repository for supported non-free packages; it's called restricted. -- Some components are non-free https://launchpad.net/bugs/83118 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83118] Some components are non-free
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox This is NOT a duplicate of bug 22639. It is about the recently committed fix for bug 68180. The official Firefox icons are not available under an open source license. Steps to reproduce: 1. Open Firefox 2. Type about:license and click Go 3. Read the text at the bottom of the page: Image files containing the trademarks and logos of the Mozilla Foundation, which may not be reproduced without permission. (Copyright ©2004-2006 The Mozilla Foundation. All Rights Reserved.) I am NOT claiming that the application is non-free because the name is trademarked. (There are lots of open source applications whose names are protected by trademark.) This bug is NOT claiming that the application icons are non-free because they are trademarked. The application icons are non-free because they are Copyright (c) 2004-2006 The Mozilla Foundation, All Rights Reserved. The fact that Canonical can distribute these icons at all is due to a special arrangement with Mozilla. These rights are specific to Canonical and are not automatically transferred to derivative distributions ( http://www.ubuntu.com/download/derivatives ). Therefore this package should not be in the main repository. Possible resolutions: 1. Move Firefox package to restricted repository 2. Move Firefox package to multiverse repository 3. Remove Firefox package from Ubuntu altogether I'd vote for option 1. It's the least disruptive solution, and it would allow Ubuntu to continue shipping Firefox by default without enabling additional repositories. Note that option 4 (ignore the crazy guy filing bug reports against Firefox) is really quite unfair to derivative distributions, which have an expectation that packages in the main repository are modifiable and redistributable without upstream permission. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Some components are non-free https://launchpad.net/bugs/83118 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
