[Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules
237-3ubuntu10.29 - works for me (Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS, 4.15.0-51-generic) Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842651 Title: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70 -persistent-network.rules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1842651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules
A lot of dependencies and the new naming scheme is too unreliable because multiple servers are being served. with 70-persistent-net.rules we can trust the interfaces get the correct device name we need (until now). If something like that is broken during a release change (18.04 to 19.04) it's ok (but not good) but during a simple package update basic functions should never get removed or broken! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842651 Title: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70 -persistent-network.rules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1842651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1842651] Re: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules
Same Problem with version .28! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842651 Title: Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70 -persistent-network.rules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1842651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1842651] [NEW] Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70-persistent-network.rules
Public bug reported:
Since the latest update from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 and
systemd_237-3ubuntu10.25 to udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 and
systemd_237-3ubuntu10.26 the renaming of network interfaces by
/etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-network.rules does not work.
/etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-network.rules:
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="00:30:18:cb:5b:55", NAME="eth0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", ATTR{address}=="00:30:18:cb:5b:56", NAME="eth1"
/var/log/syslog:
systemd-udevd[423]: Error changing net interface name 'eth1' to 'eth0': File
exists
When I downgrade the packages to the version with 237-3ubuntu10.25 the
following messages are in /var/log/syslog:
Sep 4 13:10:09 brutus kernel: [4.518507] igb :04:00.0 rename2: renamed
from eth0
Sep 4 13:10:09 brutus kernel: [4.565081] igb :07:00.0 eth0: renamed
from eth1
The latest version does not rename the interfaces temporary if there is
a conflict!
Manually installing the old packages with
dpkg -i libacl1_2.2.52-3_amd64.deb libsystemd0_237-3ubuntu10.25_amd64.deb
libudev1_237-3ubuntu10.25_amd64.deb systemd_237-3ubuntu10.25_amd64.deb
systemd-sysv_237-3ubuntu10.25_amd64.deb udev_237-3ubuntu10.25_amd64.deb
did fix the problem temporary.
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: regression-update systemd udev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842651
Title:
Regression: after Uprade from udev_237-3ubuntu10.25 to
udev_237-3ubuntu10.26 network interfaces don't get renamed by 70
-persistent-network.rules
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1842651/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 282186] Re: HP Photosmart 2610 top first cm not printed
You can download the driver for the HP Deskjet 2630 in : https://file- hpdrivers.com/hp-photosmart/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282186 Title: HP Photosmart 2610 top first cm not printed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/282186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1367286] Re: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102
D20: deferred_configure '/etc/init/irqbalance.conf' (= '/etc/init/irqbalance.conf') useredited=-1 distedited=-1 what=2 start: Job is already running: irqbalance invoke-rc.d: initscript irqbalance, action "start" failed. dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Paketes irqbalance (--install): Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück D02: post_script_tasks - ensure_diversions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367286 Title: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1367286/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1367286] Re: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102
manual stopping of irqbalance before starting the update did it for me! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367286 Title: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1367286/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1367286] Re: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102
manual stopping of irqbalance before starting the update did it for me! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367286 Title: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1367286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1367286] Re: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102
D20: deferred_configure '/etc/init/irqbalance.conf' (= '/etc/init/irqbalance.conf') useredited=-1 distedited=-1 what=2 start: Job is already running: irqbalance invoke-rc.d: initscript irqbalance, action "start" failed. dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Paketes irqbalance (--install): Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück D02: post_script_tasks - ensure_diversions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1367286 Title: package irqbalance 1.0.6-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 102 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1367286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1477395] Re: bindgraph str2time error - can't parse logfile date format
Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS bind9 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.3 bindgraph 0.2a-5.1 libparse-syslog-perl1.10-2ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477395 Title: bindgraph str2time error - can't parse logfile date format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bindgraph/+bug/1477395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1477395] [NEW] bindgraph str2time error - can't parse logfile date format
Public bug reported: bindgraph does not start - I am getting the following error message: * Starting DNS Statistics /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl Prototype mismatch: sub Parse::Syslog::str2time ($$$) vs () at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 121. Subroutine str2time redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 66. Subroutine new redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 138. Subroutine _next_line redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 206. Subroutine next redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 388. Not enough arguments for Parse::Syslog::str2time at /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl line 264, near }) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl line 282. [fail] seems to be a problem with the str2time which is embedded in bindgraph and a second problem with the format of the bind logfiles date field 23-Jul-2015 07:06:56.242 client 192.168.10.102#58986 (g.bing.com): query: g.bing.com IN A + (192.168.10.1) problem still exists if I change the LOG_FORMAT in /etc/default/bindgraph from bind93 to bind92 ** Affects: bindgraph (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: bindgraph does not start - I am getting the following error message: - * Starting DNS Statistics /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl Prototype mismatch: sub Parse::Syslog::str2time ($$$) vs () at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 121. + * Starting DNS Statistics /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl Prototype mismatch: sub Parse::Syslog::str2time ($$$) vs () at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 121. Subroutine str2time redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 66. Subroutine new redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 138. Subroutine _next_line redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 206. Subroutine next redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Parse/Syslog.pm line 388. Not enough arguments for Parse::Syslog::str2time at /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl line 264, near }) BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/bindgraph.pl line 282. - [fail] + [fail] seems to be a problem with the str2time which is embedded in bindgraph and a second problem with the format of the bind logfiles date field 23-Jul-2015 07:06:56.242 client 192.168.10.102#58986 (g.bing.com): query: g.bing.com IN A + (192.168.10.1) problem still exists if I change the LOG_FORMAT in /etc/default/bindgraph from bind93 to bind92 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477395 Title: bindgraph str2time error - can't parse logfile date format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bindgraph/+bug/1477395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981789] Re: Postgrey does not stop
same problem here on multiple 12.04 systems: root@server:~# cat /var/run/postgrey.pid 1302 root@server:~# service postgrey restart * Stopping postfix greylisting daemon postgrey [ OK ] * Starting postfix greylisting daemon postgrey [ OK ] root@server:~# cat /var/run/postgrey.pid 19917 root@server:~# ps -ef|grep postgrey postgrey 1302 1 0 Jun01 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/postgrey --pidfile=/var/run/postgrey.pid --daemonize --inet=10023 root 19995 19772 0 12:45 pts/000:00:00 grep --color=auto postgrey root@server:~# service postgrey status * postgrey is not running root@server:~# kill 1302 root@server:~# service postgrey start * Starting postfix greylisting daemon postgrey Pid_file /var/run/postgrey.pid already exists. Overwriting! [ OK ] root@server:~# service postgrey status * postgrey is running root@server:~# cat /var/run/postgrey.pid 21897 root@server:~# start-stop-daemon --stop --oknodo --pidfile /var/run/postgrey.pid --name postgrey No postgrey found running; none killed. start-stop-daemon does not find the postgrey process - even if I use --exec /usr/sbin/postgrey it won't work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981789 Title: Postgrey does not stop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgrey/+bug/981789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 981789] Re: Postgrey does not stop
the problem seem to be that start-stop-daemon uses /proc/pid/stat to identifiy the process - since ubuntu 12.04 stat changed a little bit! this ist from ubuntu 11.10: root@server:~# cat /proc/1816/stat 1816 (postgrey) S 1 1816 1816 0 -1 4202816 1088 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 20 0 1 0 78655 12664832 2025 4294967295 134512640 135724624 3215822704 3215822032 3078628388 0 0 128 86023 3239325390 0 0 17 1 0 0 106 0 0 and this one form 12.04: root@server:~# cat /proc/21897/stat 21897 (/usr/sbin/postg) S 1 21897 21897 0 -1 4202816 1258 0 5 0 2 8 0 0 20 0 1 0 25279596 16523264 2416 4294967295 134512640 135963288 3220517632 3220517008 3077846052 0 0 128 86023 3239400398 0 0 17 3 0 0 150 0 0 if I use /usr/sbin/postg to start-stop the daemon it works: root@server:~# start-stop-daemon --stop --oknodo --pidfile /var/run/postgrey.pid --name /usr/sbin/postg after that no postgrey process is left -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981789 Title: Postgrey does not stop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgrey/+bug/981789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1001078] [NEW] package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
Public bug reported: got an error on upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: netbase 4.47ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-19.33-generic-pae 3.0.27 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-19-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri May 18 06:08:02 2012 DpkgHistoryLog: Start-Date: 2012-05-18 06:08:02 DpkgTerminalLog: netbase (4.47ubuntu1) wird eingerichtet ... update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/networking: file does not exist dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von netbase (--configure): Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111011) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: netbase Title: package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-18 (0 days ago) modified.conffile..etc.init.d.networking: [deleted] ** Affects: netbase (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001078 Title: package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netbase/+bug/1001078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1001078] Re: package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001078 Title: package netbase 4.47ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netbase/+bug/1001078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
Same problem here with Ubuntu Lucid 10.04.3 and samba 3.4.7 - 32 bit driver works like charm, 64 bit driver gives the message with 0x00d8. one year is a very very long time for a bug! if you have hunderts of computers you don't really want to user lpt oder ipp printing with local drivers will this bug ever be fixed? ist it fixed in 10.10 or 11.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482836 Title: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/482836/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
btw tried to install printer with konica minolta bizhub 283 driver from this website: http://download6.konicaminolta.eu/konmin/public/BEUDEsw (Druckertreiber PCL6PCL6 driver (WHQL) for KONICA MINOLTA bizhub 423/363/283/2231.1.2.0 2010-06-01) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482836 Title: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/482836/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
Same problem here with Ubuntu Lucid 10.04.3 and samba 3.4.7 - 32 bit driver works like charm, 64 bit driver gives the message with 0x00d8. one year is a very very long time for a bug! if you have hunderts of computers you don't really want to user lpt oder ipp printing with local drivers will this bug ever be fixed? ist it fixed in 10.10 or 11.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482836 Title: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/482836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
btw tried to install printer with konica minolta bizhub 283 driver from this website: http://download6.konicaminolta.eu/konmin/public/BEUDEsw (Druckertreiber PCL6PCL6 driver (WHQL) for KONICA MINOLTA bizhub 423/363/283/2231.1.2.0 2010-06-01) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482836 Title: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/482836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
