[Bug 935484] Re: wayland-demos version 0.1.0~0-0ubuntu2 FTBFS on i386 in precise
libwayland0 (= 0.1.0~0.2-0ubuntu3) is the oneric version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935484 Title: wayland-demos version 0.1.0~0-0ubuntu2 FTBFS on i386 in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland-demos/+bug/935484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935484] Re: wayland-demos version 0.1.0~0-0ubuntu2 FTBFS on i386 in precise
wayland-demos is uninstallable in precise ATM # apt-get install wayland-demos Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wayland-demos : Depends: libwayland0 (= 0.1.0~0.2-0ubuntu3) but 0.85.0-1ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libxkbcommon0 (= 0.1.0~0-1ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935484 Title: wayland-demos version 0.1.0~0-0ubuntu2 FTBFS on i386 in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland-demos/+bug/935484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 727535] Re: grub on btrfs with compress=lzo fails to boot
please either update grub package, or change the installer set the Not_Compressed xattr to /boot as mentioned by @kylegates the later is more likely to happen to precise at this late date -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727535 Title: grub on btrfs with compress=lzo fails to boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/727535/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 809758] Re: ovito version 0.9.2-1build2 failed to build on armel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 841503 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841503 smistad, you mean that the armel build needed libGL.so in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu, instead of looking in /usr/lib/arm-linux- gnueabi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809758 Title: ovito version 0.9.2-1build2 failed to build on armel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovito/+bug/809758/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 498439] Re: uprecords reports 100% uptime
whats going on here is a difference between the monotonic time reported by /proc/uptime and the hwclock which does a few of the other numbers (not sure specifics) . I think this all just means your monotonic (cpu- based) clock is running alittle fast compared to the RTC (battery- powered clock). What you are experiencing is minor compared to debbug: ? which is that if ntpdate sets the clock back, you end up with duplicated entries in uprecords and uptime can go WAY up due to these double records. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498439 Title: uprecords reports 100% uptime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uptimed/+bug/498439/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917049] [NEW] 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device
Public bug reported: not really sure whats going on, but I found 30GB of logs in kern.log messages and syslog, computer was reset before this from sluggish performance, and problem has no reoccured. I've truncated the files, but compressed parts of the start of the thrashing is still on my disk, i will include the very tail of the files here. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-38-generic 2.6.32-38.83 Regression: No Reproducible: No ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-38.83-generic 2.6.32.52+drm33.21 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-38-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jan 15 23:15:30 2012 Frequency: This has only happened once. InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20110720.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917049 Title: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/917049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917049] Re: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device
** Attachment added: version.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917049/+attachment/267/+files/version.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917049 Title: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/917049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917049] Re: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device
** Attachment added: lspci-vnvn.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/917049/+attachment/2676668/+files/lspci-vnvn.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917049 Title: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/917049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917049] Re: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device
** Attachment added: kern.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/917049/+attachment/2676669/+files/kern.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917049 Title: 30GBs of logs having to do with swap-device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/917049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343677] Re: [Jaunty] Sound in GTK apps can't be disabled under KDE
also effects LXDE (and probably XFCE and all non-gnome DEs) -- [Jaunty] Sound in GTK apps can't be disabled under KDE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343677] Re: [Jaunty] Sound in GTK apps can't be disabled under KDE
alternate workaround to #14: apt-get remove libcanberra-gtk-module -- [Jaunty] Sound in GTK apps can't be disabled under KDE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299553] Re: SATA (root) hard drive gone on resume from suspend
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- SATA (root) hard drive gone on resume from suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462461] [NEW] add License: field to mirror package lists
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt software-store currently doesn't display informations about licences . While there is an effort to make license information machine parsable: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ it is not in the downloaded package list so it can be displayed by the software center. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- add License: field to mirror package lists https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435183] Re: software-store doesn't display informations about licences
blocks on bug 462461 -- software-store doesn't display informations about licences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435183] Re: software-store doesn't display informations about licences
Re: submitter, the text should never say something like the proposed free for non-commercial use, it should say License: proprietary for anything that is not DFSG free. There are two fields, price and license. -- software-store doesn't display informations about licences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 376024] Re: alsa-utils missing asoundconf
WOW, each time I upgrade Ubuntu the sound system gets worse. Pulseaudio cant handle all the hardware ALSA can, such as 24-bit emu10k1 cards, which are quite common. In Fedora it works out of the box... ** Changed in: alsa-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix = New -- alsa-utils missing asoundconf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376024 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 435183] Re: software-store doesn't display informations about licences
What is currently in Karmic Beta is not very good nor useful. it just says License: Open Source For everything in main and universe and unknown for things in multiverse proprietary for things in restricted instead of Open Source software-center needs to use the copyright information from the packages see http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ -- software-store doesn't display informations about licences https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313642] Re: [needs packaging] miniupnpd
@komputes Yes minupnp is both a server daemon (minupnpd). and a client library/program. You could use the program directly, or patch the program to use the minupnp NAT-PMP library. You can get the source here: http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/files/ what program are you thinking of? If it is free and open source software you should submit a bug, perhaps with your own patch. ** Summary changed: - [needs packaging] miniupnpd + [needs packaging] miniupnpd, miniupnpc ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #444392 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444392 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444392 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [needs packaging] miniupnpd, miniupnpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313642] Re: [needs packaging] miniupnpd
** Summary changed: - [needs packaging] miniupnpd, miniupnpc + [needs packaging] miniupnpd -- [needs packaging] miniupnpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399676] Re: D-Bus should support safe restarts after upgrade of daemon
how do i delete this ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #495257 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495257 ** Also affects: dbus via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495257 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: dbus (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495257 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: dbus Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: dbus Status: Unknown = New ** Changed in: dbus Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #495257 = None -- D-Bus should support safe restarts after upgrade of daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 288290] Re: gedit bracket completion plugin incorrectly does not disable
as said above, also just don't turn it on. -- gedit bracket completion plugin incorrectly does not disable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
