[Bug 99276] Re: User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups.
Sure, no problem. Problem still exists on 8.04 (64bit edition) with latest updates Feb 28 2008. Thanks -- User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 183428] Re: Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on 6.06, 7.04.7.10
I had similiar issue with 7.10 on Apple PPC G3 platform. The source of the problem was that initramfs was missing IDE driver for my hardware. The problem only occured after install. The LiveCD had the driver. I basically followed the procedure listed at bottom of this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=588153 from Efrain Valleshttp://ubuntuforums.org/member.php?u=51963 to fix the problem. It basically rebuilts the initramfs with the missing driver. I don't know the driver you need so you will probably have to perform lsmod | grep ide or lsmod | grep ata from liveCD to find listed drivers. -- Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183428] Re: Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on hardy
Problem fixed with latest -4.5 update. Call closed. -- Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183430] Re: firefox freezing after latest hardy updates
Problem has been fixed in latest updates. I believe problem was caused by non-free flash plugin based on other bug reports of similar problems. Call closed. -- firefox freezing after latest hardy updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183428] Re: Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on hardy
** Attachment added: lspci -v -v output from 8.04 with -2 kernel http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11370717/lspci-v-v.txt -- Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183428] Boot fails with 2.6.24-4 with initramfs error on hardy
Public bug reported: Upgraded 7.10 64bit to 8.04 64bit and it works fine with 2.6.24-2 kernel. Can not boot with 2.6.24-3 or -4 since it can't find hard disk. Disabled splash and quiet from grub and last message before failure on boot-up is: floppy0: no floppy controllers found Then get message that it can't find hard disk and initramfs error. Don't know how to capture better error message. Output for lspci -v below (taken from second install of 32bit 7.10 on same hardware). 00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Host Bridge (rev a4) Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 Memory at e800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] Capabilities: access denied 00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 LPC Bridge (rev a6) Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device 0c80 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce3 SMBus (rev a4) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 006d Flags: 66MHz, fast devsel, IRQ 10 I/O ports at 2040 [size=64] I/O ports at 2000 [size=64] Capabilities: access denied 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (rev a5) (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device 0c80 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 Memory at e000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: access denied 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (rev a5) (prog-if 10 [OHCI]) Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device 0c80 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 20 Memory at e0001000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: access denied 00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 2.0 (rev a2) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device 0c80 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 Memory at e0004000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256] Capabilities: access denied 00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Audio (rev a2) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 006d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 19 I/O ports at 1400 [size=256] I/O ports at 1c00 [size=128] Memory at e0002000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: access denied 00:06.1 Modem: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Audio (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [Generic]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 006d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 I/O ports at 1800 [size=256] I/O ports at 1c80 [size=128] Memory at e0003000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: access denied 00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce3 IDE (rev a5) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP]) Subsystem: nVidia Corporation Unknown device 0c80 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 [virtual] Memory at 01f0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8] [virtual] Memory at 03f0 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=1] [virtual] Memory at 0170 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8] [virtual] Memory at 0370 (type 3, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=1] I/O ports at 2080 [size=16] Capabilities: access denied 00:0a.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 PCI Bridge (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=0a, sec-latency=128 I/O behind bridge: 3000-7fff Memory behind bridge: e010-e17f Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 6000-67ff 00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 AGP Bridge (rev a4) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 16 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=10 Memory behind bridge: e200-e2ff Prefetchable memory behind bridge: f000-f80f 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration Flags: fast devsel Capabilities: access denied 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map Flags: fast devsel 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller Flags: fast devsel 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control Flags: fast devsel 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 440 Go 64M] (rev a3) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device 006d Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 248, IRQ 22 Memory
[Bug 183430] firefox freezing after latest hardy updates
Public bug reported: Firefox 2.0.11 under 64bit Hardy alpha 1 was working fine. After updates of something in the past 3-4 days, it now freezes for a few seconds for all sites (or just about every site). Firefox is basically unusable in current form. It was fine at initial alpha 2 updates. Now every time a second tab is opened, the whole browser freezes. The freezing is not permanent. I just need to wait 3-5 seconds for response. CPU activity is low during the freeze state. I Installed epiphany for test and it seems fine. No add-ons installed on Firefox. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox freezing after latest hardy updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 130436] Re: gutsy new kernal .9 broke zd1211rw
Here's the results from iwconfig (showing neighbour network)while it had errors in dmesg, I just discovered it connected to my hidden ssid wep network finesorry about that, I would say this is non-bugI orginally tested it by connecting to neighbour wireless (bad test).this wireless device works out of the box on latest .9 kernel. lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. irda0 no wireless extensions. eth1 IEEE 802.11b/g ESSID:linksys Nickname:zd1211 Mode:Managed Frequency:2.437 GHz Access Point: 00:18:F8:5E:2A:D4 Bit Rate=1 Mb/s Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0 Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 On 8/11/07, Paul Dufresne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks sparc128. To any of you two: what does iwconfig returns? -- gutsy new kernal .9 broke zd1211rw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130436 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- gutsy new kernal .9 broke zd1211rw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130436] Re: gutsy new kernal .9 broke zd1211rw
First time trying gutsy with this wireless device but I have the same problem...tried it on two laptops... Attached is requested information. ** Attachment added: Requested logs for zd1211rw kernel .9 problem (gutsy) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8777427/logs.tar -- gutsy new kernal .9 broke zd1211rw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108784] totem could not read from resource on Real Audio stream
Public bug reported: Feisty 7.04 with 2.6.20-15. x86 32bit Attempting to play this audio stream. http://cbc.ca/asithappens/media/dailyshow/2007-04-19-aih1.ram Firefox help application shows Totem as default application for this download. Totem launches and produces error An error occurred. Could not read from resource After googling, I find out that this is RealAudio stream. I should of received codec warning that totem does not support realAudio and to install Realplayer 10. Looks like Gnome/Gstreamer bug reported here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319449 Newbie, would not be able to find solution for this...need more user friendly warning until Totem/Gstreamer bug is resolved. Or Ubuntu should prompt to install RealPlayer10 and setup the plugin within Firefox. BTW, Great job on the codec automatic handling on 7.04.. ** Affects: totem (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- totem could not read from resource on Real Audio stream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108784 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108791] realplayer10 install does not automatically setup Firefox .ram handling
Public bug reported: Feisty 7.04 x86 32bit Trying to listen to this RealAudio stream http://cbc.ca/asithappens/media/dailyshow/2007-04-19-aih1.ram Helixplayer totally useless since it does not support this format. Had no choice but to install RealPlayer 10.0.8.805 from commercial applications. While it installs, it does not configure itself to automatically handle this stream. I had to manually select realplayer from /usr/bin and make it default application. Solution is not acceptable to newbie since he/she would have no idea what real player binary is called or where it is located.Totem codec handling improvements work great for Microsoft and Apple formats but does not support platform neutral vendor Real? Ubuntu needs to better support vendors who are Linux friendly. Real is sole or secondary format for many National public broadcast news sites like CBC Canada, BBC UK, ABC Australia's (http://www.cbc.ca/radioshows/, http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/ http://www.abc.net.au/rn/encounter/default.htm). If WMA and MOV formats are relatively painless on 7.04, the Real formats should be also. I realize that Real is special case since WMA and MOV support are handled within Totem. BTW, installing Realplayer under WinXP for this same file was painless since it automatically updated Firefox to support it within the external Realplayer application. This bug should be forwarded to Real since they are responsible for application installation issues? If yes, inform them they are pushing Ubuntu users to select Windows Media player over Real Player since Ubuntu automatically makes Windows Media Format the better supported format I did notice that Real .rpm streams seem to work fine with Firefox. ** Affects: realplayer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- realplayer10 install does not automatically setup Firefox .ram handling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99498] Re: Nautilus and hal can't umount usb hd disk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63090 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63090 I am having the same problem with 80Gb HD with FAT32 and EXT3 partitions under Feisty 2.6.20-15. Same operation on same computer works fine under Edgy with 2.6.17-11. This is serious regression which will dumb found new users. sudo umount works fine but not user friendly. -- Nautilus and hal can't umount usb hd disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99498] Re: Nautilus and hal can't umount usb hd disk
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63090 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63090 I can confirm that this can be fixed by applying workaround suggested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/99538... which is : Can you guys please temporarily move away /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/10-storage-policy.fdi, then reboot and check if it works then? If so, then bug 63090 would be the root cause. -- Nautilus and hal can't umount usb hd disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97682] Re: bcm43xx firmware not available - bcm 4318 wireless card not working
I take it back. Not sure how or why but under 7.04 with 2.6.20-14, I was able to get it working with BCM4306. As I always try the newbie method (pure GUI), I was only able to get it working by using the Gnome Network Applet Control (left click on applet in Gnome panel). I then selected connect to other wireless network. I then type essid and specified no wireless security. It then connected and worked fine. Going back to Gnome Network Setttings (system - administation), I could then select roaming mode and that worked now too. It seems the trick was adjusting some setting in the Applet first. I tried duplicating this problem and can not. If I knew what settings files were updated, I would reset them and try this again. Dumb question : Why does Network Settings - wireless device - properties not have Security None like edgy. It only has WEP ASCII and WEP HEX. Shouldn't None be there? -- bcm43xx firmware not available - bcm 4318 wireless card not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97682] Re: bcm43xx firmware not available - bcm 4318 wireless card not working
Correction : Edgy say Plain ASCII and Hexdecimal for password type. Feisty now says WEP ASCII and WEP Hexdecimal. I assumed this was the same thing but I'm confused why WEP name convention is used when WEP is not turned on -- bcm43xx firmware not available - bcm 4318 wireless card not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97682] Re: bcm43xx firmware not available - bcm 4318 wireless card not working
This should not be rejected since this is real problem. I am using BCM4306 under 6.10 with firmware method and it works. I download the firmware package from http://ubuntu.cafuego.net/pool/edgy- cafuego/bcm43xx/bcm43xx-firmware_1.3-1ubuntu2_all.deb. This method is not the most stable but I am trying to avoid ndiswrapper solution. This firmware package does not work under feisty. Under 7.04 2.6.20-13, I tried the Ubuntu repos and got nowhere. I first install bcm43xx-fwcutter (from feisty repo) and then it prompted for firmware (which I installed). I got nothing from network-manager with this solution and it does not even show anything from dmesg. The firmware is under /lib/firmware just like 6.10 lshw -class network shows this for wireless device. description: Wireless interface product: BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller vendor: Broadcom Corporation physical id: 2 bus info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:02.0 logical name: eth2 version: 03 serial: 00:90:4b:99:e7:23 width: 32 bits clock: 33MHz capabilities: bus_master ethernet physical wireless configuration: broadcast=yes driver=bcm43xx driverversion=2.6.20-13-generic latency=64 link=no multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11b/g resources: iomemory:e0104000-e0105fff irq:21 What other information is required to find the source of this problem? -- bcm43xx firmware not available - bcm 4318 wireless card not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99276] Re: User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups.
Problem exists under 6.10 and 7.04. Did not verify under 6.0.6. Only tested under x86. 6.10 and 7.04 have all fixes as of March 30th. Thanks, -- User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups. https://launchpad.net/bugs/99276 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99265] Re: Creating users with UID under 1000 creates account but it is hidden in GUI
Problem exists under 6.10 and 7.04. Did not verify with 6.0.6. -- Creating users with UID under 1000 creates account but it is hidden in GUI https://launchpad.net/bugs/99265 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99276] User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools Scenario : System has 100+ accounts. Admin adds user from User and Groups Novice Admin decides for whatever reason they will specify the UID manually for the next account in the Advanced tab. They assume system will not allow duplicate UID so he does not verify UID in /etc/passwd. If the admin enters UID already assigned, GUI does not notify him that account was not created. Users and Groups completes the Add User function with no warnings or error message. To make things worse, the following happens: 1) Personal user group is created in /etc/group. 2) GUI shows the new User Account in User Settings. User thinks everything is good. However, when user opens and closes the Users and Groups GUI, the new account disappears from the User Setting GUI. The GUI should not be showing the new account in the first place since nothing was placed in /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow. Performing same operation for command line tool adduser informs admin that account already exists. ** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups. https://launchpad.net/bugs/99276 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99277] Re: User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups.
Duplicate of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system- tools/+bug/99276 Delete this. -- User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups. https://launchpad.net/bugs/99277 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 99277] User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools Scenario : System has 100+ accounts. Admin adds user from User and Groups Novice Admin decides for whatever reason they will specify the UID manually for the next account in the Advanced tab. They assume system will not allow duplicate UID so he does not verify UID in /etc/passwd. If the admin enters UID already assigned, GUI does not notify him that account was not created. Users and Groups completes the Add User function with no warnings or error message. To make things worse, the following happens: 1) Personal user group is created in /etc/group. 2) GUI shows the new User Account in User Settings. User thinks everything is good. However, when user opens and closes the Users and Groups GUI, the new account disappears from the User Setting GUI. The GUI should not be showing the new account in the first place since nothing was placed in /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow. Performing same operation for command line tool adduser informs admin that account already exists. ** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- User and Groups does not inform user that manual UID already exists and create user groups. https://launchpad.net/bugs/99277 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
