[Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts
We bring in Java 8 from openjdk-r. Not having supported Java 8 in Trusty is one of our other huge gripes, and arguably the fact that it's not integrated and tested but you have to use a PPA instead is part of why these problems don't get found until users try to use the software :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396760 Title: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/1396760/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
Independent of the "Java is completely broken" issue, I do think the originally stated case of "ca-certificate-java should support openjdk-8" is still totally valid. Installing this package seems to bring in java 7 even when you already have 8 installed. The current situation is pretty ridiculous. Java 7 is EOL and not useful to the majority of users of the most popular languages on the planet. Java 8 is only available via an unsupported PPA, and any attempt to get support (either here, or on the PPA, or via the request process to get Java 8 added to Trusty) has simply failed. I hate being that guy whining on the bug tracker, but Ubuntu is really dropping the ball on this one. Just look at the request for an official Java 8 packaging: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty- backports/+bug/1368094 with 750 "+1"s. The community is trying to work with Ubuntu to highlight this and get it fixed, but every attempt either gets ignored or closed as invalid... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706442 Title: please add support for openjdk-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/1706442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
We're also finding that we cannot install Java 8 on Trusty anymore. One other thing I noted is that the openjdk-8 package seems to have a 'Breaks: ' directive for older versions of ca-certificates-java, including this version. This is a really serious issue for us, and this is not the first time Java support on Ubuntu LTS has broken in really bad ways that makes me wonder what sort of testing and validation these packages go through :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706442 Title: please add support for openjdk-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/1706442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts
We just ran into this bug on 14.04 How come it never got backported? This is a super serious issue, and just led to a outage on our site :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396760 Title: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/1396760/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1306991] Re: pip stops with ImportError for request-Modul
We rolled out a new pip package to all our systems this morning. Since it happened to pull in a new requests library, we now are the proud owners of approximately 50 hosts with completely broken pip installs. Exact same problem described here. How does a bug this serious persist in a LTS release for two years, without even being triaged or assigned a priority?!?! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306991 Title: pip stops with ImportError for request-Modul To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1306991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1342938] Re: dpkg-sig --verify fails on packages compressed with xz
Debian Stable fixed this bug almost two years ago. I just ran into it on Ubuntu again. Does anyone actually care that this OS works? :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1342938 Title: dpkg-sig --verify fails on packages compressed with xz To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg-sig/+bug/1342938/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1328975] Re: libc6: getaddrinfo() sends DNS queries to random file descriptors
Additionally, attempting to bring in utopic libc to fix the bug causes dependency resolution problems down the road. Both the trusty python3 and Xamarin Mono repositories then start to fail with messages like: The following packages have unmet dependencies: nuget : Depends: libnuget-core-cil (= 2.8.7+md510+dhx1-0xamarin1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libmono-corlib4.5-cil (>= 4.0.0~alpha1) but 3.2.8+dfsg-4ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libmono-microsoft-build-framework4.0-cil (>= 3.6.0) but 3.2.8+dfsg-4ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libmono-microsoft-build4.0-cil (>= 3.6.0) but 3.2.8+dfsg-4ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libmono-system-core4.0-cil (>= 4.0.0~alpha1) but 3.2.8+dfsg-4ubuntu1 is to be installed Depends: libmono-system4.0-cil (>= 4.0.0~alpha1) but 3.2.8+dfsg-4ubuntu1 is to be installed [91mE: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. [0m [91m This is an extremely frustrating situation to be in, our application is crashing almost daily due to this issue, and we seem to have no supported path forward. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328975 Title: libc6: getaddrinfo() sends DNS queries to random file descriptors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1328975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1328975] Re: libc6: getaddrinfo() sends DNS queries to random file descriptors
It looks like the bug may actually be fixed in trusty-security eglibc 2.19-0ubuntu6.6 eglibc (2.19-0ubuntu6.6) trusty-security; urgency=medium * SECURITY UPDATE: getaddrinfo writes to random file descriptors under high load - debian/patches/any/cvs-resolv-reuse-fd.diff: reload file descriptor after calling reopen in resolv/res_send.c. - CVE-2013-7423 So this bug status is misleading; the issue should be fixed against Trusty I believe. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-7423 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328975 Title: libc6: getaddrinfo() sends DNS queries to random file descriptors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1328975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1328975] Re: libc6: getaddrinfo() sends DNS queries to random file descriptors
I too cannot understand why this fix was refused to backport to trusty. We just spent two man-weeks tracking down this issue in one of our applications, and to find that a severe race condition in libc was fixed in Debian over a year ago but still not fixed in a *long term supported* version of Ubuntu is ... frustrating, to put it lightly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328975 Title: libc6: getaddrinfo() sends DNS queries to random file descriptors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1328975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1310292] Re: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version
BTW, this is actually maybe a security problem too -- people who think they are installing a supported version are actually silently getting an unsupported version that no longer receives upstream security fixes: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/01/10/ruby-1-9-3-will-end- on-2015/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292 Title: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.0/+bug/1310292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1310292] Re: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version
Here is our workaround which should be better than the ones proposed above (doesn't get wiped out by package upgrade / reinstall) # Rename original out of the way, so updates / reinstalls don't squash our hack fix dpkg-divert --add --rename --divert /usr/bin/ruby.divert /usr/bin/ruby dpkg-divert --add --rename --divert /usr/bin/gem.divert /usr/bin/gem # Create an alternatives entry pointing ruby - ruby2.0 update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/ruby ruby /usr/bin/ruby2.0 1 update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gem gem /usr/bin/gem2.0 1 Can we get this issue re-evaluated / re-opened? IMO the Won't Fix assessment was premature, especially in the context of Ruby 1.9 being unsupported. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292 Title: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.0/+bug/1310292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1310292] Re: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version
I just stumbled on this, and if the Ubuntu team will close such obvious problems with Won't fix for a LTS release, they should IMO just be up front that it is not supported and remove Ruby packaging entirely. Leaving totally broken packages in doesn't help anyone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292 Title: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.0/+bug/1310292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1341628] Re: [needs-packaging]openjdk-8 in 14.04
The lack of a openjdk8 package makes it very difficult to install any Java packages via apt, as they all end up depending on something like 'java7-runtime-headless | java6-runtime-headless'. So you end up having two different JDK installations just because of the lack of e.g. 'java8 -runtime-headless' pointing at an openjdk8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341628 Title: [needs-packaging]openjdk-8 in 14.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/1341628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] Re: Bad page map in openjdk-7
Seems to fix it for me too, at least from a first check. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309288] Re: docker.io requires apparmor but package does not depend on it
As the bug report says, this exists in the 14.04 release and still affects 0.9.1~dfsg1-2. 0.10.0 from upstream is also affected. ** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309288 Title: docker.io requires apparmor but package does not depend on it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1309288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309288] [NEW] docker.io requires apparmor but package does not depend on it
Public bug reported: If you install ubuntu-minimal, apparmor is not installed. If you then try to use docker, any attempt to launch one fails with: root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# docker run busybox /bin/echo hi 2014/04/18 01:10:15 no such file or directory once you: root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# apt-get install apparmor apparmor-profiles it then works: root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# docker run busybox /bin/echo hi 2014/04/18 01:10:15 no such file or directory This is tracked upstream as: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/4734 but seems to be un-resolved. Tested on 14.04 LTS ** Affects: docker.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to docker.io in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309288 Title: docker.io requires apparmor but package does not depend on it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1309288/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1308796] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086539/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086540/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086542/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086541/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796/+attachment/4086538/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] Re: Bad page map in openjdk-7
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: [ 2808.161850] BUG: Bad page map in process java pte:0320 pmd:e8048067 [ 2808.161860] addr:7f968a63a000 vm_flags:0870 anon_vma: (null) mapping: (null) index:7f968a63a [ 2808.161866] CPU: 0 PID: 18543 Comm: java Tainted: GB 3.13.0-24-generic #46-Ubuntu [ 2808.161868] 8800e7f623c0 8800e8277a98 81715a64 7f968a63a000 [ 2808.161871] 8800e8277ae0 81174183 0320 0007f968a63a [ 2808.161872] 8800e80481d0 0320 7f968a63a000 7f968a63b000 [ 2808.161874] Call Trace: [ 2808.161881] [81715a64] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 2808.161884] [81174183] print_bad_pte+0x1a3/0x250 [ 2808.161886] [81175439] vm_normal_page+0x69/0x80 [ 2808.161888] [8117580b] unmap_page_range+0x3bb/0x7f0 [ 2808.161890] [81175cc1] unmap_single_vma+0x81/0xf0 [ 2808.161892] [81176d39] unmap_vmas+0x49/0x90 [ 2808.161894] [8117feec] exit_mmap+0x9c/0x170 [ 2808.161898] [8110fcf3] ? __delayacct_add_tsk+0x153/0x170 [ 2808.161901] [8106482c] mmput+0x5c/0x120 [ 2808.161903] [81069bbc] do_exit+0x26c/0xa50 [ 2808.161906] [810d7591] ? __unqueue_futex+0x31/0x60 [ 2808.161907] [810d83b6] ? futex_wait+0x126/0x290 [ 2808.161909] [8106a41f] do_group_exit+0x3f/0xa0 [ 2808.161912] [8107a050] get_signal_to_deliver+0x1d0/0x6f0 [ 2808.161916] [81013448] do_signal+0x48/0x960 [ 2808.161919] [8101b7d9] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 [ 2808.161921] [8109d13d] ? sched_clock_local+0x1d/0x80 [ 2808.161924] [82fc] ? acct_account_cputime+0x1c/0x20 [ 2808.161925] [8109d76b] ? account_user_time+0x8b/0xa0 [ 2808.161927] [8109dd84] ? vtime_account_user+0x54/0x60 [ 2808.161929] [81013dc9] do_notify_resume+0x69/0xb0 [ 2808.161932] [817266ea] int_signal+0x12/0x17 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.46 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Apr 16 22:18 seq crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Apr 16 22:18 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iw' Date: Thu Apr 17 00:06:35 2014 Ec2AMI: ami-2ef19b1e Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown) Ec2AvailabilityZone: us-west-2a Ec2InstanceType: m3.medium Ec2Kernel: aki-fc8f11cc Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig' Lspci: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lspci' Lsusb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lsusb' PciMultimedia: ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=ecdfe459-e35e-4416-a9c1-9ee71f9f93e7 ro RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-24-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-24-generic N/A linux-firmware N/A RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill' SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + --- + AlsaDevices: + total 0 + crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Apr 17 17:56 seq + crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Apr 17 17:56 timer + AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 + Architecture: amd64 + ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: + CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + CurrentDmesg: Error: command ['sh', '-c', 'dmesg | comm -13 --nocheck-order /var/log/dmesg -'] failed with exit code 1: comm: /var/log/dmesg: Permission denied + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 + Ec2AMI: ami-2ef19b1e + Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown) + Ec2AvailabilityZone: us-west-2a + Ec2InstanceType: m3.medium + Ec2Kernel: aki-fc8f11cc + Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable + IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Lspci: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Lsusb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Package: linux (not installed) + PciMultimedia: + + ProcEnviron: + TERM=xterm-256color + PATH=(custom, no user) + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/zsh + ProcFB: + + ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=ecdfe459-e35e-4416-a9c1-9ee71f9f93e7 ro + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 +
[Bug 1308796] Re: Bad page map in openjdk-7
Apport does not seem to want to collect another report -- I chose to send report but nothing is appearing in this bug :( If you would like additional files let me know and I can collect them by hand. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] Re: Bad page map in openjdk-7
Sorry, the above were accidentally collected as duplicates. I am now running Linux ip-10-70-6-145 3.15.0-031500rc1-generic #201404131835 SMP Sun Apr 13 22:36:23 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux as requested. I can still trigger this, easiest way to reproduce is just running 'jps': [ 503.124559] BUG: Bad page map in process jps pte:0320 pmd:e77af067 [ 503.124571] addr:7fa42ebc1000 vm_flags:0870 anon_vma: (null) mapping: (null) index:7fa42ebc1 [ 503.124577] CPU: 0 PID: 4240 Comm: jps Not tainted 3.15.0-031500rc1-generic #201404131835 [ 503.124579] 7fa42ebc1000 8800e77fd9c8 8175ba7d 0007 [ 503.124581] 880004cfa8a0 8800e77fda18 8118311f 810056e1 [ 503.124583] dead00100100 ea00039dfc80 7fa42ebc1000 [ 503.124584] Call Trace: [ 503.124592] [8175ba7d] dump_stack+0x46/0x58 [ 503.124596] [8118311f] print_bad_pte+0x1bf/0x290 [ 503.124600] [810056e1] ? __raw_callee_save_xen_pte_val+0x11/0x1e [ 503.124602] [8118451e] vm_normal_page+0x6e/0x80 [ 503.124604] [8118558f] zap_pte_range+0x13f/0x450 [ 503.124606] [81185a74] unmap_page_range+0x1d4/0x310 [ 503.124608] [81006a47] ? xen_unpin_page+0x27/0x30 [ 503.124610] [81185c37] unmap_single_vma+0x87/0x100 [ 503.124612] [81186514] unmap_vmas+0x54/0xa0 [ 503.124614] [8118f64c] exit_mmap+0x9c/0x170 [ 503.124617] [810667fa] mmput.part.25+0x4a/0x120 [ 503.124619] [81066900] mmput+0x30/0x40 [ 503.124621] [8106b49a] exit_mm+0x13a/0x190 [ 503.124623] [81118e3b] ? taskstats_exit+0x1cb/0x270 [ 503.124625] [8106b63b] do_exit+0x14b/0x470 [ 503.124627] [8107871b] ? __dequeue_signal+0x6b/0xb0 [ 503.124629] [8106b9f4] do_group_exit+0x44/0xa0 [ 503.124631] [8107ba30] get_signal_to_deliver+0x230/0x580 [ 503.124634] [81013ca7] do_signal+0x47/0x140 [ 503.124637] [810a1259] ? account_user_time+0x99/0xb0 [ 503.124639] [810a188d] ? vtime_account_user+0x5d/0x70 [ 503.124642] [81159a8f] ? context_tracking_user_exit+0x6f/0xf0 [ 503.124644] [81013e42] do_notify_resume+0xa2/0xd0 [ 503.124647] [8177212a] int_signal+0x12/0x17 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Description changed: [ 2808.161850] BUG: Bad page map in process java pte:0320 pmd:e8048067 [ 2808.161860] addr:7f968a63a000 vm_flags:0870 anon_vma: (null) mapping: (null) index:7f968a63a [ 2808.161866] CPU: 0 PID: 18543 Comm: java Tainted: GB 3.13.0-24-generic #46-Ubuntu [ 2808.161868] 8800e7f623c0 8800e8277a98 81715a64 7f968a63a000 [ 2808.161871] 8800e8277ae0 81174183 0320 0007f968a63a [ 2808.161872] 8800e80481d0 0320 7f968a63a000 7f968a63b000 [ 2808.161874] Call Trace: [ 2808.161881] [81715a64] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 2808.161884] [81174183] print_bad_pte+0x1a3/0x250 [ 2808.161886] [81175439] vm_normal_page+0x69/0x80 [ 2808.161888] [8117580b] unmap_page_range+0x3bb/0x7f0 [ 2808.161890] [81175cc1] unmap_single_vma+0x81/0xf0 [ 2808.161892] [81176d39] unmap_vmas+0x49/0x90 [ 2808.161894] [8117feec] exit_mmap+0x9c/0x170 [ 2808.161898] [8110fcf3] ? __delayacct_add_tsk+0x153/0x170 [ 2808.161901] [8106482c] mmput+0x5c/0x120 [ 2808.161903] [81069bbc] do_exit+0x26c/0xa50 [ 2808.161906] [810d7591] ? __unqueue_futex+0x31/0x60 [ 2808.161907] [810d83b6] ? futex_wait+0x126/0x290 [ 2808.161909] [8106a41f] do_group_exit+0x3f/0xa0 [ 2808.161912] [8107a050] get_signal_to_deliver+0x1d0/0x6f0 [ 2808.161916] [81013448] do_signal+0x48/0x960 [ 2808.161919] [8101b7d9] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 [ 2808.161921] [8109d13d] ? sched_clock_local+0x1d/0x80 [ 2808.161924] [82fc] ? acct_account_cputime+0x1c/0x20 [ 2808.161925] [8109d76b] ? account_user_time+0x8b/0xa0 [ 2808.161927] [8109dd84] ? vtime_account_user+0x54/0x60 [ 2808.161929] [81013dc9] do_notify_resume+0x69/0xb0 [ 2808.161932] [817266ea] int_signal+0x12/0x17 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.46 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Apr 16 22:18 seq crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Apr 16 22:18 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord'
[Bug 1309288] [NEW] docker.io requires apparmor but package does not depend on it
Public bug reported: If you install ubuntu-minimal, apparmor is not installed. If you then try to use docker, any attempt to launch one fails with: root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# docker run busybox /bin/echo hi 2014/04/18 01:10:15 no such file or directory once you: root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# apt-get install apparmor apparmor-profiles it then works: root@ip-10-70-7-210:~# docker run busybox /bin/echo hi 2014/04/18 01:10:15 no such file or directory This is tracked upstream as: https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/4734 but seems to be un-resolved. Tested on 14.04 LTS ** Affects: docker.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309288 Title: docker.io requires apparmor but package does not depend on it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1309288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1308796] [NEW] Bad page map in openjdk-7
Public bug reported: [ 2808.161850] BUG: Bad page map in process java pte:0320 pmd:e8048067 [ 2808.161860] addr:7f968a63a000 vm_flags:0870 anon_vma: (null) mapping: (null) index:7f968a63a [ 2808.161866] CPU: 0 PID: 18543 Comm: java Tainted: GB 3.13.0-24-generic #46-Ubuntu [ 2808.161868] 8800e7f623c0 8800e8277a98 81715a64 7f968a63a000 [ 2808.161871] 8800e8277ae0 81174183 0320 0007f968a63a [ 2808.161872] 8800e80481d0 0320 7f968a63a000 7f968a63b000 [ 2808.161874] Call Trace: [ 2808.161881] [81715a64] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 2808.161884] [81174183] print_bad_pte+0x1a3/0x250 [ 2808.161886] [81175439] vm_normal_page+0x69/0x80 [ 2808.161888] [8117580b] unmap_page_range+0x3bb/0x7f0 [ 2808.161890] [81175cc1] unmap_single_vma+0x81/0xf0 [ 2808.161892] [81176d39] unmap_vmas+0x49/0x90 [ 2808.161894] [8117feec] exit_mmap+0x9c/0x170 [ 2808.161898] [8110fcf3] ? __delayacct_add_tsk+0x153/0x170 [ 2808.161901] [8106482c] mmput+0x5c/0x120 [ 2808.161903] [81069bbc] do_exit+0x26c/0xa50 [ 2808.161906] [810d7591] ? __unqueue_futex+0x31/0x60 [ 2808.161907] [810d83b6] ? futex_wait+0x126/0x290 [ 2808.161909] [8106a41f] do_group_exit+0x3f/0xa0 [ 2808.161912] [8107a050] get_signal_to_deliver+0x1d0/0x6f0 [ 2808.161916] [81013448] do_signal+0x48/0x960 [ 2808.161919] [8101b7d9] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 [ 2808.161921] [8109d13d] ? sched_clock_local+0x1d/0x80 [ 2808.161924] [82fc] ? acct_account_cputime+0x1c/0x20 [ 2808.161925] [8109d76b] ? account_user_time+0x8b/0xa0 [ 2808.161927] [8109dd84] ? vtime_account_user+0x54/0x60 [ 2808.161929] [81013dc9] do_notify_resume+0x69/0xb0 [ 2808.161932] [817266ea] int_signal+0x12/0x17 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.46 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Apr 16 22:18 seq crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Apr 16 22:18 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iw' Date: Thu Apr 17 00:06:35 2014 Ec2AMI: ami-2ef19b1e Ec2AMIManifest: (unknown) Ec2AvailabilityZone: us-west-2a Ec2InstanceType: m3.medium Ec2Kernel: aki-fc8f11cc Ec2Ramdisk: unavailable IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig' Lspci: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lspci' Lsusb: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'lsusb' PciMultimedia: ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=ecdfe459-e35e-4416-a9c1-9ee71f9f93e7 ro RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-24-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-24-generic N/A linux-firmware N/A RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill' SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ec2-images trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1308796 Title: Bad page map in openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1308796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73457] Re: MASTER Firefox is already running, but is not responding when /home is an NFS directory
However, mounting everything nolock is definitely not a long term solution... is anyone taking a look at this issue? Is this bug something that should be filed at Mozilla instead? -- MASTER Firefox is already running, but is not responding when /home is an NFS directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73457] Re: MASTER Firefox is already running, but is not responding when /home is an NFS directory
This bug seems to have resurfaced in Intrepid, I hope reopening it is the right thing to do. If not, tell me and I'll file a new one or something. ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- MASTER Firefox is already running, but is not responding when /home is an NFS directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73457] Re: MASTER Firefox is already running, but is not responding when /home is an NFS directory
I apologize for resurrecting this bug report from the dead, but I anticipate that if I file a new report it will just be marked as a duplicate of this one :) I recently upgraded a few machines to Intrepid and am now experiencing this problem. Same symptoms - 90% of the time firefox says it's already running or refuses to start at all (no windows or anything). Firefox is already not running. There's no stale lockfiles. Remounting the NFS file system with nolock mitigates the problem, but that's obviously not an acceptable long-term solution Setup: Client: Intrepid Ibex up-to-date amd64 with /home mounted NFS Server: FreeBSD 7 with a UFS2 volume exported Could someone confirm and/or reopen the bug? I am very willing to help troubleshoot, but I'll need some guidance - I don't know too much about NFS locking. Thanks, Steven Schlansker -- MASTER Firefox is already running, but is not responding when /home is an NFS directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272991] Re: intrepid alpha 6: no video during install
It might be useful to indicate what hardware (esp. motherboard and video card and monitor) you are using, as well as things like the monitor refresh rate and how you are plugged in (DVI/VGA) -- intrepid alpha 6: no video during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kubuntu-meta in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187538] Re: Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
doesn't seem to happen anymore. -- Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34556] Re: Transparent windows have opaque corners
Nah, it's long gone. This bug is ancient :) -- Transparent windows have opaque corners https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34556] Re: Transparent windows have opaque corners
Fixed somewhere along the line quite some time ago. ** Changed in: xcompmgr (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Transparent windows have opaque corners https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194029] Re: 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
Is it possible that this bug is affecting other applications too? I occasionally (but not nearly as often) see similar behavior in Firefox - it hangs for a few seconds and then eventually 'catches up' and goes through all the keyboard/mouse movements in high speed (this is without synergy installed, but the behavior seems similar) I just introduced a friend of mine to Ubuntu and he's having the problem too with other random applications. -- 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194029] Re: 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue
This looks very similar to bug #91540, in case that helps anyone. I had that problem back in the day, and now it's happening again... :( -- 2.6.24-8 Introduces Network Issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187538] Re: Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
** Attachment added: partman http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12683660/partman -- Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187538] Re: Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
Oops! Sorry, forgot to mention :) amd64 desktop -- Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187265] [NEW] fsck: root primary superblock differs from backup immediately after install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: e2fsprogs I did a fresh install into a 20G partition, checked the format box in the manual partition editor on the Hardy Alpha 3 CD, and everything installed fine. Rebooted, and it booted fine... until I hit fsck. It then said that the root primary superblock features different from backup, check forced It then proceeded to fsck. At the end, it said fsck died with exit status 1 The system then proceeded to boot normally. Seems to be harmless so far, but sure doesn't foster peace of mind :) ** Affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fsck: root primary superblock differs from backup immediately after install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187538] [NEW] Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux)
Public bug reported: I installed from Hardy Alpha 3 CD in a tri-boot configuration - /dev/sda1 Windows XP /dev/sda2 Hardy /dev/sda3 Gutsy After installation completed, I could no longer boot Windows. It gave a message that autochk.exe could not be found. After tracking down the problem via Googling, I found that /dev/sda1's partition type had changed from 7 (HPFS/NTFS) to 83 (Linux) I assume this is because of the installer, but I can not be absolutely sure as I booted Hardy a few times before trying Windows again. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Hardy installer changes all partition types to 83 (Linux) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91540] Re: Timeout issue with edgy as server and feisty as client
This also happens if you compile synergy from source. -- Timeout issue with edgy as server and feisty as client https://launchpad.net/bugs/91540 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 91540] Re: Timeout issue with edgy as server and feisty as client
I have the same problem with a Mac OS X synergy server and feisty as the client. -- Timeout issue with edgy as server and feisty as client https://launchpad.net/bugs/91540 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89772] floating point exception on startup
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I dist-upgraded to feisty the other day, and openoffice no longer works. Attempting to run oowriter, oomath, etc exits immediately (no startup screen or graphics at all) with Floating Point exception strace is attached. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- floating point exception on startup https://launchpad.net/bugs/89772 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 89772] Re: floating point exception on startup
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
I dist-upgraded to feisty the other day, and openoffice no longer works.
Attempting to run oowriter, oomath, etc exits immediately (no startup
screen or graphics at all) with Floating Point exception
- strace is here:
- execve(/usr/bin/oowriter, [oowriter], [/* 19 vars */]) = 0
- brk(0) = 0x805e000
- access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- mmap2(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7f8
- access(/etc/ld.so.preload, R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/i686/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/i686/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/i686/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/tls/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/i686/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/i686/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/i686/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/local/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/i686/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such
file or directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/i686/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/i686/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/tls/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/i686/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/usr/lib/i686/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/i686/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/usr/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/lib/tls/i686/sse2/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
- open(/lib/tls/i686/sse2/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
- open(/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY) = 3
- read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\20Z\1\000..., 512)
= 512
- fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1248904, ...}) = 0
- mmap2(NULL, 1258876, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0xb7e4c000
- mmap2(0xb7f79000, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x12c) = 0xb7f79000
- mmap2(0xb7f7d000, 9596, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7f7d000
- close(3)= 0
- mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7e4b000
- set_thread_area({entry_number:-1 - 6, base_addr:0xb7e4b8c0, limit:1048575,
seg_32bit:1, contents:0, read_exec_only:0, limit_in_pages:1, seg_not_present:0,
useable:1}) = 0
- mprotect(0xb7f79000, 8192, PROT_READ) = 0
- getpid()= 4548
- rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
- geteuid32() = 1000
- brk(0) = 0x805e000
- brk(0x807f000) = 0x807f000
- getppid() = 4547
- stat64(/home/steven, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0750, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
- stat64(.,
[Bug 80389] Re: gnunet needs to depend on gmp, but doesn't
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66467 *** Ah, my apologies. I searched but somehow managed to avoid finding the duplicated bug :) -- gnunet needs to depend on gmp, but doesn't https://launchpad.net/bugs/80389 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80389] gnunet needs to depend on gmp, but doesn't
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnunet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install gnunet-gtk Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: gnunet libextractor1c2a libltdl3 Suggested packages: libextractor-python libextractor-java Recommended packages: libextractor-plugins The following NEW packages will be installed: gnunet gnunet-gtk libextractor1c2a libltdl3 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. ... Unpacking gnunet-gtk (from .../gnunet-gtk_0.7.0e-2_i386.deb) ... Setting up gnunet (0.7.0e-2ubuntu1) ... Migrating previous GNUnet data (gnunet-update) gnunet-update: error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing gnunet (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Setting up libltdl3 (1.5.22-4) ... Setting up libextractor1c2a (0.5.14-3) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gnunet-gtk: gnunet-gtk depends on gnunet (= 0.7.0e); however: Package gnunet is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gnunet-gtk (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: gnunet gnunet-gtk E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get install libgmp3c2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libgmp3c2 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 432kB of archives. After unpacking 705kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com edgy/main libgmp3c2 2:4.2.1+dfsg-3 [432kB] Fetched 432kB in 2s (208kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package libgmp3c2. (Reading database ... 156305 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgmp3c2 (from .../libgmp3c2_2%3a4.2.1+dfsg-3_i386.deb) ... Setting up gnunet (0.7.0e-2ubuntu1) ... Migrating previous GNUnet data (gnunet-update) Creating new GNUnet group gnunet [done] Creating new GNUnet user gnunet [done] Updating files and directories permissions [done] Writing new configuration file [done] All done. Stopping GNUnet: No /usr/bin/gnunetd found running; none killed. gnunetd. Setting up gnunet-gtk (0.7.0e-2) ... Setting up libgmp3c2 (4.2.1+dfsg-3) ... ** Affects: gnunet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gnunet needs to depend on gmp, but doesn't https://launchpad.net/bugs/80389 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60625] Re: Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
My system soon after that decided to give up entirely, to the point where there were more broken things than working. I decided to reinstall from the latest edgy beta... sorry I can't do as you asked. Maybe I just caught an unlucky combination of package versions that conspired to wreck my system... the new install does not have this problem. Thanks for your unfortunately unsuccessful help. Steven -- Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60625] Re: Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
I have these: / /usr /var /home /boot on separate partitions. /boot is ext3 and the rest are jfs. All are, of course, marked to mount at boot. -- Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60625] Re: Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
Interesting. Looking at /etc/init.d/networking, it logs a message saying Configuring network interfaces... and then runs ifup... But maybe I'm just confused. Anyway, here's ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8D:7E:90:D7 BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:217 Base address:0x4000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:40 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:40 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:3552 (3.4 KiB) TX bytes:3552 (3.4 KiB) And this is very strange - /etc/iftab seems to have disappeared. I know it used to exist on the system; I remember editing it a few weeks ago. This problem started happening when I dist-upgraded to edgy. If having that file missing would cause this, maybe one of the packages accidentally deleted the iftab file? -- Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60625] Re: Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
85-ifupdown.rules does exist. /var/log/udev does not exist. -- Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60625] Re: Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy
And to my knowledge I have not messed with the logging facilities much... -- Automatic interfaces not brought up on boot on edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/60625 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60623] Upgrading mdadm package is impossible - can't upgrade while raid arrays active
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mdadm I've upgraded to edgy and just today-ish a new mdadm package came out. I can't upgrade it, because /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid fails while trying to stop /dev/md0 and /dev/md1. Trying to do a mdadm -S /dev/md0 fails as well, even though it is not mounted and no processes (apparently) hold it open - it fails with Device or resource busy. I tried to boot into singleuser, and the same thing happens. Booting with init=/bin/bash left me at the initramfs, where it was indeed possible to mdadm -S the arrays but it was not possible to upgrade mdadm (as I did not have the root fs mounted) For some reason booting with the emergency kernel option doesn't seem to work anymore, it does a normal boot instead. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: mdadm 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 29 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/152kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 162878 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace mdadm 2.4.1-6ubuntu1 (using .../mdadm_2.4.1-6ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ... * Stopping RAID array md1... ...fail! * Stopping RAID array md0... ...fail! invoke-rc.d: initscript mdadm-raid, action stop failed. dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... * Stopping RAID array md1... ...fail! * Stopping RAID array md0... ...fail! invoke-rc.d: initscript mdadm-raid, action stop failed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/mdadm_2.4.1-6ubuntu2_amd64.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 * Assembling RAID arrays... ...done. * Starting RAID monitoring service mdadm --monitor /sbin/mdadm already running. ...fail! Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/mdadm_2.4.1-6ubuntu2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Affects: mdadm (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Upgrading mdadm package is impossible - can't upgrade while raid arrays active https://launchpad.net/bugs/60623 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60626] init: rc6 process (4517) killed by signal 15 when rebooting from singleuser
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: upstart
In single user ('single' appended to kernel command line) trying to
reboot causes rc6 to segfault (signal 15)
No other error comes up, and the system does not reboot.
A reboot -f does manage to reboot, although I imagine that this isn't
the preferred workaround.
Trying to halt does the same thing (rc0 killed by signal 15). halt -f works
fine.
** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
init: rc6 process (4517) killed by signal 15 when rebooting from singleuser
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60626
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60626] Re: init: rc6 process (4517) killed by signal 15 when rebooting from singleuser
Whoops, sorry, brain fart there :p
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /etc/event.d/
control-alt-delete rc0 rc0-poweroff rc2 rc4 rc6 rcS-sulogin tty1
tty3 tty5
rc-default rc0-halt rc1 rc3 rc5 rcS sulogin tty2
tty4 tty6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/event.d/rc0
# rc0 - runlevel 0 compatibility
#
# This task runs the old sysv-rc runlevel 0 (halt/poweroff) scripts with
# the decision as to whether to halt or power off the system left up to the
# script (and thus /etc/default/poweroff).
start on halt
start on runlevel-0
stop on shutdown
stop on runlevel-2
stop on runlevel-3
stop on runlevel-4
stop on runlevel-5
script
set $(runlevel --set 0 || true)
if [ $1 != unknown ]; then
PREVLEVEL=$1
RUNLEVEL=$2
export PREVLEVEL RUNLEVEL
fi
exec /etc/init.d/rc 0
end script
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: upstart
In single user ('single' appended to kernel command line) trying to
- reboot causes rc6 to segfault (signal 15)
+ reboot causes rc6 to terminate (signal 15)
No other error comes up, and the system does not reboot.
A reboot -f does manage to reboot, although I imagine that this isn't
the preferred workaround.
Trying to halt does the same thing (rc0 killed by signal 15). halt -f works
fine.
--
init: rc6 process (4517) killed by signal 15 when rebooting from singleuser
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60626
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60502] Udev doesn't update /dev/disk/by-label to reflect LVM LVs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udev I have several LVM VGs, each with multiple LVs. They are all assigned disk labels such as /backup to reflect their purpose. I mount them with LABEL=/backup type entries in /etc/fstab. This same fstab worked on Dapper just fine, but now Edgy complains that /dev/disk/by- label//backup does not exist. Indeed, by listing the directory, all my drives except for the LVs show up just fine. I've searched google, and the only reference to having udev update its directories said that rebooting would fix it. Obviously this doesn't fix it in this situation. Seems to affect Edgy only. ** Affects: udev (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: udev I have several LVM VGs, each with multiple LVs. They are all assigned disk labels such as /backup to reflect their purpose. I mount them with LABEL=/backup type entries in /etc/fstab. This same fstab worked on Dapper just fine, but now Edgy complains that /dev/disk/by- label//backup does not exist. Indeed, by listing the directory, all my drives except for the LVs show up just fine. I've searched google, and the only reference to having udev update its directories said that rebooting would fix it. Obviously this doesn't fix it in this situation. + + Seems to affect Edgy only. -- Udev doesn't update /dev/disk/by-label to reflect LVM LVs https://launchpad.net/bugs/60502 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
