[Bug 1876282] Re: libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal

2021-03-17 Thread terry b
This issue also exists in 21.04 beta. Same solution works. It didn't
show up until today.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876282

Title:
  libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1876282/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1062735] Re: ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date

2020-11-29 Thread terry b
I ended up just adding this to my crontab to pull an updated copy once a
month.

# Update the pci id file
20 120  *   *   /usr/sbin/update-pciids

The easy solution might be to add a cron file to do something similar. A
cleaner solution would be to include it into it a dedicated package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062735

Title:
  ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/arpwatch/+bug/1062735/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1764896] Re: System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU

2020-11-29 Thread terry b
This is resolved now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764896

Title:
  System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1764896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1876282] Re: libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal

2020-10-23 Thread terry b
This issue also exists in 20.10. The fix works as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876282

Title:
  libc++1 is kept back after upgrade to focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1876282/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899272] Re: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration

2020-10-23 Thread terry b
HI Asavah,

I took your suggestion and modified it slightly.

sudo -s
do-release-upgrade -d (expected to fail)

cd /var/cache/apt/archives
dpkg --force-depends --force-breaks -i libnss-nis_3.1-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb

do-release-upgrade -d

It did allow the libnss-nis package to install. Afterwards, running do-
release-upgrade -d worked nicely.

Thanks for you help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899272

Title:
  upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899272/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899272] Re: upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration

2020-10-22 Thread terry b
Tested after 20.10 release. No improvement.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899272

Title:
  upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899272/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899272] [NEW] upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration

2020-10-10 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

This problem shows up when using any update method (update-manager -d,
do-release-upgrade -d). The captured data shows an immediate-configure
error.

--

Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s)   
  
Error in function: install

apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not configure 'libc6:amd64'. , E:Could not perform 
immediate configuration on 'libnss-nis:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under 
APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)
Error in sys.excepthook:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 477, in 
add_to_existing
self.write(f)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 430, in write
block = f.read(1048576)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/codecs.py", line 322, in decode
(result, consumed) = self._buffer_decode(data, self.errors, final)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x8b in position 1: invalid 
start byte

Original exception was:
apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not configure 'libc6:amd64'. , E:Could not perform 
immediate configuration on 'libnss-nis:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under 
APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)
Error in function: install

apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 
'libffi8ubuntu1:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under 
APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)
Error in sys.excepthook:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 477, in 
add_to_existing
self.write(f)
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 430, in write
block = f.read(1048576)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/codecs.py", line 322, in decode
(result, consumed) = self._buffer_decode(data, self.errors, final)
UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x8b in position 1: invalid 
start byte

Original exception was:
apt_pkg.Error: E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 
'libffi8ubuntu1:amd64'. Please see man 5 apt.conf under 
APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)

Could not install the upgrades

The upgrade has aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A 
recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). 


Upgrade infeasible 

The upgrade could not be completed, there were errors during the 
upgrade process. 


Restoring original system state

Aborting
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree  
Reading state information... Done

--
I've deleted the cache of new packages and rerun the download to confirm that I 
didn't have a bad package download.

ubuntu-release-upgrader-core/focal-updates,focal-updates,now 1:20.04.25 all 
[installed]
  manage release upgrades

ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk/focal-updates,focal-updates,now 1:20.04.25 all 
[installed,automatic]
  manage release upgrades

ubuntu-release-upgrader-qt/focal-updates,focal-updates,now 1:20.04.25 all 
[installed]
  manage release upgrades


root@wizard:/var/lib# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Release:20.04

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.25
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair nvidia_modeset 
nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Sat Oct 10 10:17:59 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-11 (1308 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20170222)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-10-10 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:
 
mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.release-upgrades: 2020-04-02T08:44:51.029022

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899272

Title:
  upgrade to 20.10 beta from 20.04 fails immediate configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899272/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1870562] Re: Open of CDR file fails

2020-04-06 Thread terry b
** Also affects: libcdr (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562

Title:
  Open of CDR file fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1870562] Re: Open of CDR file fails

2020-04-04 Thread terry b
I reinstalled v1.5 of lib cdr and inkscape works now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562

Title:
  Open of CDR file fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1870562] Re: Open of CDR file fails

2020-04-04 Thread terry b
On further research... This appears to be a bug in libcdr... v1.6

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130914

** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #130914
   https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130914

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562

Title:
  Open of CDR file fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1870562] [NEW] Open of CDR file fails

2020-04-03 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

Opening of a .cdr file is supported in Inkscape and worked on my test
files before the upgrade. Now it errors out with Failed to load the
requested file 

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: inkscape 0.92.4-5ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu22
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Apr  3 09:03:29 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-11 (1118 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20170222)
SourcePackage: inkscape
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-04-02 (1 days ago)

** Affects: inkscape (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870562

Title:
  Open of CDR file fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1870562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858015] [NEW] Option missing from color calibration instructions

2019-12-31 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/color-calibrate-
printer.html.en

Lists 2 options for calibrating a printer. It should list a third. If
the user has a scanner,the scanner can be used to calibrate the printer.

Using an IT8 target provided at http://www.targets.coloraid.de/ or
similar, the scanner can be calibrated. Then using the calibrated
scanner and a target that is printed out by the printer, a calibration
profile can be generated.

I'm happy to help write this up if needed.

** Affects: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858015

Title:
  Option missing from color calibration instructions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1858015/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1764896] [NEW] System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU

2018-04-17 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

There are 2 monitors connected to 1 GPU. The monitor connected via a
digital connection always comes up correctly. The monitor connected via
DISPLAYPORT does not come up, even though the machine is booting
correctly.

It's almost like the DP path isn't recognized by xorg.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-generic 4.15.15
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
Date: Tue Apr 17 18:02:09 2018
DistUpgraded: 2018-03-30 21:12:37,078 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: 
'./xorg_fix_proprietary.py'
DistroCodename: bionic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 nvidia, 390.48, 4.15.0-13-generic, x86_64: installed
 nvidia, 390.48, 4.15.0-15-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/580] 
[1002:67df] (rev e7) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] Ellesmere [Radeon RX 
470/480/570/580] [1462:3417]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-11 (402 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20170222)
MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M.
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.15.0-15-generic 
root=UUID=68755ecb-0ee0-46a1-8a3e-c027d0cbac65 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-03-31 (17 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 12/13/2016
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: P7.20
dmi.board.name: Z170M Pro4S
dmi.board.vendor: ASRock
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP7.20:bd12/13/2016:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnZ170MPro4S:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.family: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.91-2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.0.0~rc5-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 18.0.0~rc5-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.19.6-1ubuntu3
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:18.0.1-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20171229-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.15-2

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic third-party-packages ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764896

Title:
  System will not display using displayport from AMD GPU

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1764896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1690953] [NEW] gdm package tries to restart service and fails

2017-05-15 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

on 5/15 I updated my system. During the update gdm 3.24.1.0ubuntu0.1 was
updated via apt.

The following packages will be upgraded:

  gdm3 gir1.2-gdm-1.0 git git-man libgdm1 libxen-4.8 libxenstore3.0 

7 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 41 not upgraded. 

Need to get 684 kB/4,842 kB of archives.

After this operation, 14.3 kB of additional disk space will be used.

Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y

Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty-updates/universe amd64 gdm3 
amd64 3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 [629 kB]

Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty-updates/universe amd64 libgdm1 
amd64 3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 [45.7 kB]   
 
Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty-updates/universe amd64 
gir1.2-gdm-1.0 amd64 3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 [8,670 B]
Fetched 684 kB in 0s (1,247 kB/s) 
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 528045 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../0-git-man_1%3a2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1_all.deb ...
Unpacking git-man (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) over (1:2.11.0-2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../1-git_1%3a2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking git (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) over (1:2.11.0-2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../2-gdm3_3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking gdm3 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) over (3.24.0-0ubuntu2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../3-libgdm1_3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libgdm1 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) over (3.24.0-0ubuntu2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../4-gir1.2-gdm-1.0_3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking gir1.2-gdm-1.0 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) over (3.24.0-0ubuntu2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../5-libxenstore3.0_4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libxenstore3.0:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) over (4.8.0-1ubuntu2) ...
Preparing to unpack .../6-libxen-4.8_4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libxen-4.8:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) over (4.8.0-1ubuntu2) ...
Setting up git-man (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) ...
Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ...
ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot
Processing triggers for libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.52.0-1) ...
Setting up libxenstore3.0:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) ...
Setting up libgdm1 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) ...
Setting up libxen-4.8:amd64 (4.8.0-1ubuntu2.1) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.24-9ubuntu2) ...
Processing triggers for systemd (232-21ubuntu3) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.6.1-2) ...
Processing triggers for dbus (1.10.10-1ubuntu2) ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.15-1) ...
Setting up git (1:2.11.0-2ubuntu0.1) ...
Setting up gir1.2-gdm-1.0 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) ...
Setting up gdm3 (3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1) ...
gdm.service is not active, cannot reload.
invoke-rc.d: initscript gdm3, action "reload" failed.

The Reload failed because I use Kwin. The failure should have been more
graceful.

** Affects: network-manager-pptp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690953

Title:
  gdm package tries to restart service and fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-pptp/+bug/1690953/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1313376] [NEW] Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes

2014-04-27 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

The RICOH_SG3110DN.ppd is missing a number of paper sizes including 4x6.
I can't see where to file this.

I have an adjusted PPD that contains the 4x6. How can I go about getting
this in the fixed PPD.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: printer-driver-sag-gdi 0.1-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Sun Apr 27 09:21:36 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-25 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 
(20140416.2)
Lpstat:
 device for C543dn: dnssd://Lexmark%20C543._ipp._tcp.local/
 device for CardPrinter: 
dnssd://RICOH%20AficioSG3110DN%20%5B7F8186%5D._pdl-datastream._tcp.local/
 device for PDF: cups-pdf:/
 device for SG3110DN: 
dnssd://RICOH%20AficioSG3110DN%20%5B7F8186%5D._pdl-datastream._tcp.local/
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
PackageArchitecture: all
Papersize: letter
PpdFiles:
 C543dn: Lexmark C543 Foomatic/Postscript
 PDF: Generic CUPS-PDF Printer
 CardPrinter: RICOH AficioSG3110DN PXL
 SG3110DN: RICOH AficioSG3110DN PXL
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic 
root=UUID=7ace8435-91c4-4b61-a6b3-e0c17d287caa ro nomdmonddf nomdmonisw
SourcePackage: rastertosag-gdi
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/16/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2004
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P7P55D EVO
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2004:bd12/16/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP7P55DEVO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: rastertosag-gdi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

** Attachment added: RICOH_SG3110DN.ppd.working
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313376/+attachment/4098450/+files/RICOH_SG3110DN.ppd.working

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313376

Title:
  Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rastertosag-gdi/+bug/1313376/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1313376] Re: Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes

2014-04-27 Thread terry b
Hi Till,

The printer supports all of the following, plus some that would be real unusual 
like 
Marching Band, Compact, etc. It might just be simpler to find a way to support 
custom sizes.

* denotes existing

Std Paper Tray and Bypass
*Letter 
8.5 x 11.0
*Legal  
8.5 x 14.0
*Half Letter5.5 x 8.5
Executive   
7.25 x 10.5
F   
8.0 x 13.0
Folio   
8.5 x 13.0
*A4
*A5
*A6

Envelopes
Com10
Monarch 
7.25 x 10.5
C6
C5
DL

Custom Size - Std Tray
2.1 x 5.0 - 8.5 x 14

Custom Size Multi bypass tray
2.1 x 5.0 - 8.5 x *51*
*   Note that most of the cards below are index or Photo sizes, but can 
be*
*   printed on the card stock the printer supports.*
US Business Card2.0 x 3.5
3x5 
3.0 x 5.0
4x6 
4.0 x 6.0
5x8 
5.0 x 8.0
2R  
2.5 x 3.5
3R  
3.5 x 5.0
4R  
4.0 x 6.0
5R  
5.0 x 7.0
6R  
6.0 x 8.0
8R  
8.0 x 10.0

*B5JIS

Acceptable Paper Types
*Plain Paper
*Inkjet Plain Paper
*Glossy Paper
*Postcard
*Inkjet Postcards
*Envelopes*
*Thick Paper

Terry


 Did you add all missing paper sizes in the attached PPD? If not, please
 give us a complete list of missing paper sizes. Thanks.
 
 ** Package changed: rastertosag-gdi (Ubuntu) = foomatic-db (Ubuntu)
 
 ** Changed in: foomatic-db (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313376

Title:
  Ricoh SG3110dn PPD missing paper sizes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foomatic-db/+bug/1313376/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1293704] Re: Kleopatra don't support s/mime

2014-04-04 Thread terry b
Hi Felix,

It does allow the tests to pass at the Kleopatria startup.

The cursory look that I took the the app, show that everything appears to be 
working.

Thanks for jumping on the Felix!

Regards,

Terry


 This is a regression introduced in gpgme1.0 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu2 which
 completely disables the gpgsm (S/MIME) and gpgconf backends.
 
 Could you please test this package:
 https://launchpad.net/~debfx/+archive/experimental/+packages?field.name_filt
 er=gpgme1.0
 
 It basically reverts the changes from 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu2 and fixes a build
 failure,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293704

Title:
  Kleopatra don't support s/mime

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1293704/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1293032] [NEW] gpgme not complied with correct switches

2014-03-16 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

In trying to start up Kleopatra I discovered that the self test failed.
It found 2 errors.

First, the GpgSM test failed as the library was complied without support
for gpgsm.

Second, the GpgConf test failed as the library was complied without
support for gpgconf.

Description:Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch)
Release:14.04

libgpgme11:
  Installed: 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu3
  Candidate: 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 1.4.3-0.1ubuntu3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: gpgme (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Package changed: ubuntustudio-default-settings (Ubuntu) = gpgme
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293032

Title:
  gpgme not complied with correct switches

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme/+bug/1293032/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290717]

2014-03-16 Thread terry b
Daniel - As you requested

ATR:AddressAttribute
ATR:DispatchModeAttribute
ATR:MDNStateAttribute
ATR:ScamAttribute
ATR:SentActionAttribute
ATR:SentBehaviourAttribute
ATR:TransportAttribute
ATR:contactmetadata
ATR:pop3resourceattribute
GID
PLD:ENVELOPE
PLD:HEAD
PLD:RFC822

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290717

Title:
  akonadi 1.11.80  fails to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/akonadi/+bug/1290717/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290717]

2014-03-16 Thread terry b
That took care of the akonadi issue. Thanks Daniel !!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290717

Title:
  akonadi 1.11.80  fails to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/akonadi/+bug/1290717/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290717]

2014-03-13 Thread terry b
The updated packages on 3/10 allowed Akonadi to start doing a data scan that 
never finished. 
The packages released on 3.11 are back to the original issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290717

Title:
  akonadi 1.11.80  fails to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/akonadi/+bug/1290717/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1168775] [NEW] lynis does not process security/limits.conf correctly

2013-04-13 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

In script tests_kernel there is a test for core file status  5820. The
problem is that in lines 267 and 268 the output is an A else B type of
statement. The problem code and a proposed fixed are attached below:

267,268c267,268
   FIND1=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1==*  
$2==soft  $3==core  $4==0) { print soft core disabled } else { 
print soft core enabled } }'`
   FIND2=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1==*  
$2==hard  $3==core  $4==0) { print hard core disabled } else { 
print hard core enabled } }'`
---
   FIND1=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1==*  
 $2==soft  $3==core  $4==0) { print soft core disabled } }'`
   FIND2=`cat /etc/security/limits.conf | awk '{ if ($1==*  
 $2==hard  $3==core  $4==0) { print hard core disabled } }'`

Basically.. With the else {...} portion of the statement that causes
something to print out each time instead of just for the one line that
matches. The causes the output of the script to be incorrect and the
result printed in the analysis to be wrong.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: lynis 1.3.0-1 [modified: usr/share/lynis/include/tests_authentication 
usr/share/lynis/include/tests_banners usr/share/lynis/include/tests_kernel 
usr/share/lynis/include/tests_storage]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-17.27-generic 3.8.6
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Apr 13 17:04:13 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-09-04 (587 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64+mac (20110901)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lynis
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-03-23 (21 days ago)

** Affects: lynis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168775

Title:
  lynis does not process security/limits.conf correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynis/+bug/1168775/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1168777] [NEW] Words Lynix expects to find in banners is too limited

2013-04-13 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

In the file tests_banners on line 27 is the following:

LEGAL_BANNER_STRINGS= access authorized Legal legal monitor owner
policy policies private prohibited this unauthorized

There are a lot of ways to begin the wording of a sentence in a banner,
but at a minimum having the option to have Access capitalized and also
to have the word restricted available would make this package easier
to use.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: lynis 1.3.0-1 [modified: usr/share/lynis/include/tests_authentication 
usr/share/lynis/include/tests_banners usr/share/lynis/include/tests_kernel 
usr/share/lynis/include/tests_storage]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-17.27-generic 3.8.6
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Apr 13 17:16:54 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-09-04 (587 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64+mac (20110901)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lynis
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-03-23 (21 days ago)

** Affects: lynis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168777

Title:
  Words Lynix expects to find in banners is too limited

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lynis/+bug/1168777/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1062735] [NEW] ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date

2012-10-06 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

The file /usr/share/arpwatch/ethercodes.dat is out of date.

Description:Ubuntu quantal (development branch)
Release:12.10

arpwatch:
  Installed: 2.1a15-1.2
  Candidate: 2.1a15-1.2
  Version table:
 *** 2.1a15-1.2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

The software does not correctly report the manufacturer of the detected
MAC. Updating the

** Affects: arpwatch (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062735

Title:
  ethercodes.dat in arpwatch is out of date

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/arpwatch/+bug/1062735/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 858370] [NEW] Packaging error -greens.png

2011-09-24 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

When trying to update digikam in the 11.10 beta I get the following error -- 
Package: /var/cache/apt/archives/digikam-data_2%3a2.1.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb
Error: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/digikam/2Greens.png', 
which is also in package digikam-doc 1.2~svn1134171-1

** Affects: digikam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858370

Title:
  Packaging error -greens.png

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/+bug/858370/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 846451] [NEW] Packaging problem in Beta 1

2011-09-10 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

I did a fresh install of Kubuntu 11.10 Beta 1 from the Alternate
installer CD using the AMD64 architecture..

When I tried to install flash it failed. Installing flashplugin-nonfree
or flashplugin-installer gave the following errors:

** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846451

Title:
  Packaging problem in Beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/846451/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 846451] Re: Packaging problem in Beta 1

2011-09-10 Thread terry b
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree


Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 flashplugin-nonfree : Depends: flashplugin-installer but it is not going to be 
installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree flashplugin-installer


Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 flashplugin-installer : Depends: flashplugin-downloader but it is not 
installable
 Depends: nspluginwrapper but it is not going to be 
installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
# apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree flashplugin-installer 

Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 flashplugin-installer : Depends: flashplugin-downloader but it is not 
installable
 Depends: nspluginwrapper but it is not going to be 
installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

The more that I look at this is appears that the flashplugin-downloader
is missing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846451

Title:
  Packaging problem in Beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/846451/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 846451] Re: Packaging problem in Beta 1

2011-09-10 Thread terry b
Just as a test I pulled down the flash 11 RC1 (version  11.0.r1.129)
from
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplatformruntimes/flashplayer11/

It also has a dependency on libkutils4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846451

Title:
  Packaging problem in Beta 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/846451/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700409] Re: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron

2011-02-18 Thread terry b
Steve,

You're right. When I initially went thru the examples I didn't see
anything except the exec command line. I've since found the script
function and how to resolve the problem.

I've modified the script as follows:

# cron - regular background program processing daemon
#
# cron is a standard UNIX program that runs user-specified programs at
# periodic scheduled times

description regular background program processing daemon

start on runlevel [2345]
stop on runlevel [!2345]

expect fork
respawn

script
. /etc/default/cron
exec cron $LSBNAMES $EXTRA_OPTS 
end script

This seems to address the problem.

** Attachment added: cron.conf
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/700409/+attachment/1858310/+files/cron.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700409

Title:
  Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 716311] Re: flash not installed

2011-02-10 Thread terry b
I see this as well. It appears that the tar.gz file gets downloaded, but
the libflashplayer.so flie is never installed correctly.

I'm running 64 bit as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716311

Title:
  flash not installed

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 707770] [NEW] libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps

2011-01-25 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

I was installing an application that required the 32 bit compatibility
libs on a 64 bit system. The library that was needed was
/usr/lib32/libpng.so.3

It turns out that this should be a link to /usr/lib32/libpng12.so.0.
Installing this link fixed the issue, but I would suggest that when the
package libpng3 is installed then the link should be installed at the
same time.

lsb_release -rd = Description:Ubuntu 10.10   Release:
10.10

Package Version - 1.2.44-1 of libpng3

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: libpng3 1.2.44-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jan 25 19:43:41 2011
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: libpng

** Affects: libpng (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707770

Title:
  libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 707770] Re: libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps

2011-01-25 Thread terry b


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707770

Title:
  libpng.so.3 missing for 32 bit apps

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700409] [NEW] Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron

2011-01-08 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: upstart

The defaults for cron are listed in /etc/default/cron. If I uncomment
EXTRA_OPTS= -L 2 in order to add additional logging to cron nothing
happens when the process is restarted using service cron restart or
service cron stop/start.

This occurs because the upstart command for cron exec's cron with no
input from the default file.

Other services controlled by upstart may have the same issue.

If the defaults need to occur elsewhere then could the documentation be
updated or a README in /etc/default be created with the correct process?


Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10

Patched current as of 1/8/2010

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: upstart 0.6.6-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jan  8 11:22:28 2011
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: upstart

** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700409

Title:
  Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 700409] Re: Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron

2011-01-08 Thread terry b


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700409

Title:
  Upstart does not pass cmd line args to cron

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591980] Re: system-config-printer-kde missing error

2010-09-03 Thread terry b
fixed for me as well. Lucid w/ 4.5.1.

The last update that I had indicated the 4.5.1 has not been released for
Maverick yet.

-- 
system-config-printer-kde missing error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591980
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdeadmin in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 535538] [NEW] no feed back in jockey

2010-03-09 Thread terry b
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: jockey-kde

After initialing starting up jockey-kde the I was presented with only
one option - to install the Nvidia drivers. With only one presented
choice the obvious thing to do was to press activate. This caused the
selection window to gray out, but nothing else happened.

There appears to be no default selection where there is only one choice.
This is could be an issue.

The bigger issue is that pressing activate with no selection provides no
feed back that the application still needs information.

Once I clicked on the needed driver and then pressed activate,
everything worked as expected.

Description:Ubuntu 9.10
Release:9.10

t...@gremlin:~$ apt-cache policy jockey-kde
jockey-kde:
  Installed: 0.5.5-0ubuntu3
  Candidate: 0.5.5-0ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 0.5.5-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 0.5.5-0ubuntu2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Mar  9 23:22:37 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 004: ID 046d:c517 Logitech, Inc. LX710 Cordless Desktop Laser
 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0020  
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0020  
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: jockey-kde 0.5.5-0ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.31-20-generic 
root=UUID=46e01e3e-ae29-44ae-9f32-50941493dd9c ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.57-generic
SourcePackage: jockey
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic x86_64
XsessionErrors:
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1895): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (npviewer.bin:2384): Gtk-WARNING **: 
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libqtcurve.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
dmi.bios.date: 07/28/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0209
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P7P55D EVO
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0209:bd07/28/2009:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP7P55DEVO:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: jockey (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug

-- 
no feed back in jockey
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 535538] Re: no feed back in jockey

2010-03-09 Thread terry b

** Attachment added: .var.log.jockey.log.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670838/.var.log.jockey.log.txt

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670839/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670840/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670841/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Devices.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670842/Devices.txt

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670843/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670844/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670845/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670846/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670847/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670848/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40670849/XorgConf.txt

-- 
no feed back in jockey
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs