[Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
same here with Grive (a utility for Google Drive client) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
no, there is no guarantee about the ABI compatibility. Best thing is to avoid such a dependency, or wait until the final 14.10 release for an updated third party package. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
But this is only patch version update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
Am 07.06.2014 10:43, schrieb Nazar Mokrynskyi: But this is only patch version update. No, trusty has 2.24, utopic is built from the trunk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
Then versioning is broken, because version I've mentioned is 2.24.51, so, obviously it is backward compatible with any 2.24.*. And trusty does have 2.24 just like you've said. And all this is proved by perfectly working HHVM after symlink creation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
Am 07.06.2014 11:58, schrieb Nazar Mokrynskyi: Then versioning is broken, because version I've mentioned is 2.24.51, so, obviously it is backward compatible with any 2.24.*. And trusty does have 2.24 just like you've said. And all this is proved by perfectly working HHVM after symlink creation. No, nothing is broken. This is the versioning used by upstream. 2.24.5x and 2.24.9x lead to 2.25. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1320423] Re: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so
Usually (according to semantic versioning) patch is not used for such non-obvious things. Even in such way it would be much more logical to have versioning like GNOME, they use minor odd versions for development. I just want to explain that such magical versioning is pretty confusing. Moreover, even minor version supposed to be backward compatible, so, symlink should work great until major version is increased. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1320423 Title: Add symlink libbfd-2.24-system.so To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1320423/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
