Upstream answer :
Why is this a functional bug? Section 4.2.7.2 says:
The value of rel describes the meaning of the link, but does not impose
any behavioral requirements on Atom Processors.
But you impose a behavioral requirement. I think This is part of the Atom
standard is not a strong argument, because the standard in this case only
describes what is to be done if the link is actually processed.
I'd say this report should be a feature request to support rel=related
links. In principle there is nothing broken with not supporting optional
metadata. Please correct me if the RFC says otherwise.
I'll think over a good way adding support for it.
** Changed in: liferea (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
liferea does not show related links
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135554
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
