[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2007-09-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
No, for modern CPUs the power difference between being idle and
executing instructions is greater than the amount saved by reducing the
frequency of the processor. It generally makes sense to run as fast as
possible in order to return to idle faster.

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13610
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2007-09-10 Thread teedog
I've heard a lot of reports of horrid battery life in Ubuntu compared to
Windows XP.  Isn't defaulting to ondemand when unplugged the issue?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the default settings in Windows
XP are ondemand when on AC and powersave when unplugged.  ondemand
is extremely sensitive to CPU usage, so basically, as long as the
computer isn't completely idle, the CPU will run at max speed, even when
doing mundane stuff like browsing the web or doing word processing.
That eats up your battery life extremely quickly.

I am running an old Pentium M 1.8 GHz that throttles to 600 MHz on
powersave.  I have no issues whatsoever playing videos (even H.264
video) and music without skipping in Windows XP.  Thus, I strongly
suggest Ubuntu default to powersave mode when a laptop is unplugged.
If that is unacceptable, at least use conservative.  As it is, laptop
users who don't know how to manually change the governor setting will
likely shy away from Ubuntu due to short battery life.

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13610
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor [but not always]

2007-03-23 Thread Loom
I just got aware that powernowd isn't used anymore. I always used '-m 2'
like Kai and would prefer 'conservative' governor. But the only way to
change it, is to edit the init-script. That's not a big issue but it's
not the clean way. I would prefer to set an option in
/etc/default/powernowd to select a governor or the powernowd deamon.

For now I edit my script. But it's so simple, please package it.

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2007-03-23 Thread Paul Sladen
Loom: yup, I think there's a bug somewhere for move the initscript
currently in 'powernowd' to a new package with a proper
/etc/default/foo configuration.  Could you open a new bug for that if
you can't find it.

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-10-24 Thread Paul Sladen
powernowd (0.97-1ubuntu5) edgy; urgency=low

  * Use ondemand if possible
  * Switch back to performance if powernowd is stopped

 -- Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue,  5 Sep 2006 14:13:11
+0100


** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-power-manager = powernowd

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-09-11 Thread Richard Hughes
Support for cpufreq scaling is present in g-p-m CVS head.

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-09-11 Thread Matthew Garrett
We now use ondemand on hardware that supports it.

** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 13610] Re: Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor

2006-08-17 Thread Richard Hughes
Now this is happening in the HAL layer thanks to Holger Macht, this is
something that will be configurable in gnome-power-manager really soon.
Watch my blog for progress.

-- 
Use 'ondemand' cpufreq governor
https://launchpad.net/bugs/13610

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs