[Bug 1413279] Re: upstart event static-network-up emited to early

2015-01-21 Thread Clint Byrum 
Thanks for the bug report john!

This makes perfect sense to me. The original was written assuming eth0
would only have one /e/n/i section, but in the file above, it has two.

I think the answer is to include the address family, so eth0.inet and
eth0.inet6 should be two different interfaces so the script will
continue to wait until both are up.

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Tags added: ipv6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413279

Title:
  upstart event static-network-up emited to early

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1413279/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1413279] Re: upstart event static-network-up emited to early

2015-01-21 Thread Scott Moser 
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1379427 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1379427

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1379427
   /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart emits static-network-up to early

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413279

Title:
  upstart event static-network-up emited to early

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1413279/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs