subject:"\[Bug 1522346\] Re\: Please merge nut 2.7.2\-4 \(main\) from debian \(unstable\)"

** Patch removed: "nut_debian_2.7.2-4_to_ubuntu.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531908/+files/nut_debian_2.7.2-4_to_ubuntu.debdiff

** Patch removed: "nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531909/+files/nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

** Patch removed: "nut_debian_2.7.2-4_to_ubuntu.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531908/+files/nut_debian_2.7.2-4_to_ubuntu.debdiff

** Patch removed: "nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531909/+files/nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

Hello Robie, Steve,

I will address both of your updates sequentially :

Le 14/01/2016 19:13, Robie Basak a écrit :
> Hi Louis,
> 
> Thank you for working on this merge. Good job identifying some changes that
> could be dropped.
> 
> However I think this work could do with some improvement before I am happy to
> upload it.
> 
> Overall it looks like it might be OK, but I'm concerned that the changelog is
> misleading. There are changes that are being carried forward that are not
> mentioned in your Remaining Changes section, and conversely there are also
> changes that are claimed to have been carried forward but are partially
> missing. Details below:
> 
> udev changes in debian/rules. Was this dropped? In your merge the delta still
> seems to be there, and it still looks relevant. So why does the changelog say
> that this is dropped?

Oh dear! I mistakenly thought that the change was coming from upstream as there
is no mention in grab-merge's REPORT file of any conflict on debian/rules. I
will revert the changelog entry accordingly.

I definitively will stop to use this tool for merges. Not only it makes my life
miserable by having to systematically revert to pristine source packages for
comparaison, but it seems to silently changes files without any indication.

So far, grab-merge has been a source of problems for me. I had to restart the
rsyslog merge twice because of mismatch and build problems.

I may need your help to get my head around it, but I will give a second look at
your git workflow that I bookmarked earlier.
> 
> Some but not all changes made in 2.7.1-1ubuntu5 seem to have disappeared. Are
> they still needed? Why is this part of the delta not mentioned in the
> changelog?
>

Indeed, the .ubuntu5 modification that you uploaded got dropped. I was mislead
to believe that it was an upstream change added and not dropped from our part. I
will reintroduce it.

I also added a mention of dropped changes in debian/tests/test-nut.py that are
now superseded upstream but had no mention in the previous changelog.

> What about these parts of the previous delta, for which I don't see any
> information in your merge changelog about whether these were carried forward 
> or
> dropped?
> 
>   * Disable systemd unit; it does not check nut.conf whether nut is
> configured, and thus fails to start (and the package install). The 
> init.d
> script works well enough for the time being. (LP: #1313231)
> 
>   * debian/tests/test-nut.py: in the CVE_2012_2944 test, give nut at most 
> 5
> seconds to shut down, instead of expecting it to be shut down 
> immediately
> after sending the killall. (LP: #1291378)
> 
>   * debian/patches/0006-ups-conf-reorder.patch: Move maxretry setting
> above Examples section, closer to the "outside of a driver definition"
> comment. (LP: #1405822)
> 

My changelog mention the following :

* Ubuntu bugs fixed upstream:

  LP: #1405822, #1291378, #1313231


Those are the three bugs that you mention above.  I do agree that I should have
carried forward the previous changelog description and state that the bug had
been fixed upstream. I'll carry that change in a new debdiff.

> Please could you address these questions above? In particular I'd like
> the changelog to be accurate in explaining what is being carried
> forward, what is being dropped and any additional changes made (I think
> there are none in this case). Otherwise it's tough both to review now
> and for a future merge.
> 
> Minor: I'd put the extra Ubuntu delta lines for debian/patches/series after 
> all
> the Debian ones, unless there's a good reason to insert them into the middle.
> 

Regarding Steve's update now :

>  - nut-{cgi,server}.postinst: the existing delta with Debian is bad form,
> adduser is designed to be called unconditionally. Not strictly speaking part
> of the merge, but something I spotted along the way that I think it's
> important to fix. Along the way, I fixed up the changelog explanation for why
> this is still needed (since we no longer do upgrades from hardy, if that were
> the only reason we could drop the delta).
>

Fixed in the new merge.

>  - debian/patches/backport-fix-lp753661.patch has been a pointless diff for
> several upstream releases. The patch still applies, but upstream fixed the
> issue differently (using rtrim() ).

Fixed in the new merge.

>  - as Robie noted, you say the udev delta is dropped, but the delta to
> debian/rules still exists. I've dropped the delta, with more explanation in
> the changelog to why it can be dropped.

Fixed in the new merge with your drop of the previous delta.

>  - the changes from 2.7.7-1ubuntu5 are restored, as still required.

Yes, already noted in Robie's comment

Regarding the apport hooks, I will treat them in a separate bug.

I hope that everything is correct this time. I will attatch a new
debdiff shortly.

Kind regards,

..Louis


-- 
Louis Bouchard
Software engineer, Cloud &

Re: [Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

Hello Robie, Steve,

I will address both of your updates sequentially :

Le 14/01/2016 19:13, Robie Basak a écrit :
> Hi Louis,
> 
> Thank you for working on this merge. Good job identifying some changes that
> could be dropped.
> 
> However I think this work could do with some improvement before I am happy to
> upload it.
> 
> Overall it looks like it might be OK, but I'm concerned that the changelog is
> misleading. There are changes that are being carried forward that are not
> mentioned in your Remaining Changes section, and conversely there are also
> changes that are claimed to have been carried forward but are partially
> missing. Details below:
> 
> udev changes in debian/rules. Was this dropped? In your merge the delta still
> seems to be there, and it still looks relevant. So why does the changelog say
> that this is dropped?

Oh dear! I mistakenly thought that the change was coming from upstream as there
is no mention in grab-merge's REPORT file of any conflict on debian/rules. I
will revert the changelog entry accordingly.

I definitively will stop to use this tool for merges. Not only it makes my life
miserable by having to systematically revert to pristine source packages for
comparaison, but it seems to silently changes files without any indication.

So far, grab-merge has been a source of problems for me. I had to restart the
rsyslog merge twice because of mismatch and build problems.

I may need your help to get my head around it, but I will give a second look at
your git workflow that I bookmarked earlier.
> 
> Some but not all changes made in 2.7.1-1ubuntu5 seem to have disappeared. Are
> they still needed? Why is this part of the delta not mentioned in the
> changelog?
>

Indeed, the .ubuntu5 modification that you uploaded got dropped. I was mislead
to believe that it was an upstream change added and not dropped from our part. I
will reintroduce it.

I also added a mention of dropped changes in debian/tests/test-nut.py that are
now superseded upstream but had no mention in the previous changelog.

> What about these parts of the previous delta, for which I don't see any
> information in your merge changelog about whether these were carried forward 
> or
> dropped?
> 
>   * Disable systemd unit; it does not check nut.conf whether nut is
> configured, and thus fails to start (and the package install). The 
> init.d
> script works well enough for the time being. (LP: #1313231)
> 
>   * debian/tests/test-nut.py: in the CVE_2012_2944 test, give nut at most 
> 5
> seconds to shut down, instead of expecting it to be shut down 
> immediately
> after sending the killall. (LP: #1291378)
> 
>   * debian/patches/0006-ups-conf-reorder.patch: Move maxretry setting
> above Examples section, closer to the "outside of a driver definition"
> comment. (LP: #1405822)
> 

My changelog mention the following :

* Ubuntu bugs fixed upstream:

  LP: #1405822, #1291378, #1313231


Those are the three bugs that you mention above.  I do agree that I should have
carried forward the previous changelog description and state that the bug had
been fixed upstream. I'll carry that change in a new debdiff.

> Please could you address these questions above? In particular I'd like
> the changelog to be accurate in explaining what is being carried
> forward, what is being dropped and any additional changes made (I think
> there are none in this case). Otherwise it's tough both to review now
> and for a future merge.
> 
> Minor: I'd put the extra Ubuntu delta lines for debian/patches/series after 
> all
> the Debian ones, unless there's a good reason to insert them into the middle.
> 

Regarding Steve's update now :

>  - nut-{cgi,server}.postinst: the existing delta with Debian is bad form,
> adduser is designed to be called unconditionally. Not strictly speaking part
> of the merge, but something I spotted along the way that I think it's
> important to fix. Along the way, I fixed up the changelog explanation for why
> this is still needed (since we no longer do upgrades from hardy, if that were
> the only reason we could drop the delta).
>

Fixed in the new merge.

>  - debian/patches/backport-fix-lp753661.patch has been a pointless diff for
> several upstream releases. The patch still applies, but upstream fixed the
> issue differently (using rtrim() ).

Fixed in the new merge.

>  - as Robie noted, you say the udev delta is dropped, but the delta to
> debian/rules still exists. I've dropped the delta, with more explanation in
> the changelog to why it can be dropped.

Fixed in the new merge with your drop of the previous delta.

>  - the changes from 2.7.7-1ubuntu5 are restored, as still required.

Yes, already noted in Robie's comment

Regarding the apport hooks, I will treat them in a separate bug.

I hope that everything is correct this time. I will attatch a new
debdiff shortly.

Kind regards,

..Louis


-- 
Louis Bouchard
Software engineer, Cloud &

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

I'll take this review (in progress).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

I'll take this review (in progress).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

Louis, I second Robie's comments. Here is an interdiff between your
merge, and what I think the merge should be. This addresses Robie's
comments about the changelog having incomplete documentation of the
remaining delta; it also includes the following changes relative to your
merge diff:

- nut-{cgi,server}.postinst: the existing delta with Debian is bad form,
adduser is designed to be called unconditionally. Not strictly speaking part
of the merge, but something I spotted along the way that I think it's important
to fix. Along the way, I fixed up the changelog explanation for why this is
still needed (since we no longer do upgrades from hardy, if that were the only
reason we could drop the delta).
- debian/patches/backport-fix-lp753661.patch has been a pointless diff for
several upstream releases. The patch still applies, but upstream fixed the
issue differently (using rtrim() ).
- as Robie noted, you say the udev delta is dropped, but the delta to
debian/rules still exists. I've dropped the delta, with more explanation in
the changelog to why it can be dropped.
- the changes from 2.7.7-1ubuntu5 are restored, as still required.

Please have a look at my delta, and let me know if you agree with these
changes. If you see anything you disagree with, let's discuss. If you
do agree with these changes, please make sure you understand the source
of these differences on your side. Then I can sponsor the upload if
we're in agreement.

BTW, one thing I notice in the Ubuntu delta that I didn't yet address in
the merge is that the apport hooks are installed in wrong paths. There
is no source package named nut-client or nut-server, installing those
files is a no-op. Also not a question of the merge, but I would gladly
take a patch fixing this as part of sponsoring the upload.

** Patch added: "nut-1522346-mergier-slangasek.diff"

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4550146/+files/nut-1522346-mergier-slangasek.diff

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

** Patch added: "nut-1522346-mergier-slangasek.diff"

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4550146/+files/nut-1522346-mergier-slangasek.diff

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

Hi Louis,

Thank you for working on this merge. Good job identifying some changes that
could be dropped.

However I think this work could do with some improvement before I am happy to
upload it.

Overall it looks like it might be OK, but I'm concerned that the changelog is
misleading. There are changes that are being carried forward that are not
mentioned in your Remaining Changes section, and conversely there are also
changes that are claimed to have been carried forward but are partially
missing. Details below:

udev changes in debian/rules. Was this dropped? In your merge the delta still
seems to be there, and it still looks relevant. So why does the changelog say
that this is dropped?

Some but not all changes made in 2.7.1-1ubuntu5 seem to have disappeared. Are
they still needed? Why is this part of the delta not mentioned in the
changelog?

What about these parts of the previous delta, for which I don't see any
information in your merge changelog about whether these were carried forward or
dropped?

  * Disable systemd unit; it does not check nut.conf whether nut is
configured, and thus fails to start (and the package install). The 
init.d
script works well enough for the time being. (LP: #1313231)

  * debian/tests/test-nut.py: in the CVE_2012_2944 test, give nut at most 5
seconds to shut down, instead of expecting it to be shut down 
immediately
after sending the killall. (LP: #1291378)

  * debian/patches/0006-ups-conf-reorder.patch: Move maxretry setting
above Examples section, closer to the "outside of a driver definition"
comment. (LP: #1405822)

Please could you address these questions above? In particular I'd like
the changelog to be accurate in explaining what is being carried
forward, what is being dropped and any additional changes made (I think
there are none in this case). Otherwise it's tough both to review now
and for a future merge.

Minor: I'd put the extra Ubuntu delta lines for debian/patches/series after all
the Debian ones, unless there's a good reason to insert them into the middle.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

Hi Louis,

Thank you for working on this merge. Good job identifying some changes that
could be dropped.

However I think this work could do with some improvement before I am happy to
upload it.

Overall it looks like it might be OK, but I'm concerned that the changelog is
misleading. There are changes that are being carried forward that are not
mentioned in your Remaining Changes section, and conversely there are also
changes that are claimed to have been carried forward but are partially
missing. Details below:

udev changes in debian/rules. Was this dropped? In your merge the delta still
seems to be there, and it still looks relevant. So why does the changelog say
that this is dropped?

Some but not all changes made in 2.7.1-1ubuntu5 seem to have disappeared. Are
they still needed? Why is this part of the delta not mentioned in the
changelog?

What about these parts of the previous delta, for which I don't see any
information in your merge changelog about whether these were carried forward or
dropped?

  * Disable systemd unit; it does not check nut.conf whether nut is
configured, and thus fails to start (and the package install). The 
init.d
script works well enough for the time being. (LP: #1313231)

  * debian/tests/test-nut.py: in the CVE_2012_2944 test, give nut at most 5
seconds to shut down, instead of expecting it to be shut down 
immediately
after sending the killall. (LP: #1291378)

  * debian/patches/0006-ups-conf-reorder.patch: Move maxretry setting
above Examples section, closer to the "outside of a driver definition"
comment. (LP: #1405822)

Please could you address these questions above? In particular I'd like
the changelog to be accurate in explaining what is being carried
forward, what is being dropped and any additional changes made (I think
there are none in this case). Otherwise it's tough both to review now
and for a future merge.

Minor: I'd put the extra Ubuntu delta lines for debian/patches/series after all
the Debian ones, unless there's a good reason to insert them into the middle.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

ubuntu wily to Xenial debdiff

** Patch added: "nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531909/+files/nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Confirmed

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

debian upstream to merged 2.7.2-4ubuntu1 debdiff

** Patch added: "nut_debian_2.7.2-4_to_ubuntu.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531908/+files/nut_debian_2.7.2-4_to_ubuntu.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

ubuntu wily to Xenial debdiff

** Patch added: "nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+attachment/4531909/+files/nut_2.7.1-1ubuntu5-2.7.2-4ubuntu1.debdiff

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Confirmed

** Changed in: nut (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1522346

Title:
  Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/1522346/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1522346] Re: Please merge nut 2.7.2-4 (main) from debian (unstable)