[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-08-22 Thread Canonical Juju QA Bot
** Project changed: juju-core => juju

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-07-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package juju-core -
2.0~beta12-0ubuntu1.16.04.1

---
juju-core (2.0~beta12-0ubuntu1.16.04.1) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium

  [ Nicholas Skaggs ]
  * New upstream release 2.0-beta12 (LP: #1604137).
  * Update debian/copyright.
  * Add skip to current-manual-provider for bug 1605313 and bug 1605050
  * Fix adt test for manual-provider

  [ Martin Packman ]
  * Allow stripping of go binaries (LP: #1564662).
  * Mark juju-2.0 as conflicting and replacing old ppas (LP: #1600257).
  * Adjust where bash completion script is installed (LP: #1588403).

 -- Nicholas Skaggs   Mon, 18 Jul 2016
14:00:19 -0400

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-07-28 Thread Chris J Arges
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,

Accepted juju-core into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-
core/2.0~beta12-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-07-22 Thread Curtis Hovey
** Changed in: juju-core
Milestone: 2.0.0 => 2.0-beta14

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-07-22 Thread Martin Packman
** Changed in: juju-core
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: juju-core
Milestone: 2.1.0 => 2.0.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-07-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package juju-core -
2.0~beta12-0ubuntu3.16.10.1

---
juju-core (2.0~beta12-0ubuntu3.16.10.1) yakkety; urgency=medium

  * Add skip to current-manual-provider for bug 1605313 and bug 1605050

 -- Nicholas Skaggs   Thu, 21 Jul 2016
15:12:52 -0400

** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-04-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
building cmd/juju with go 1.7 tip and then stripping results in a
binary that is "only" 33 MB, so there is some progress being made
there too :-)

On 6 April 2016 at 17:30, John A Meinel  wrote:
> I tried stripping my 1.6 based build, and it seems to be working. (Juju
> does reflection at init() time as part of some of the registries), so it
> seems safe to do. On the flip side it isn't amazingly better. It seems
> to be a bit less than 2:1. (73MB down to 40MB.) Almost certainly still
> worth it, just doesn't compensate for the 1:10 growth of the Juju binary
> itself over time.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662
>
> Title:
>   Juju binaries should be stripped
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-04-05 Thread John A Meinel
I tried stripping my 1.6 based build, and it seems to be working. (Juju
does reflection at init() time as part of some of the registries), so it
seems safe to do. On the flip side it isn't amazingly better. It seems
to be a bit less than 2:1. (73MB down to 40MB.) Almost certainly still
worth it, just doesn't compensate for the 1:10 growth of the Juju binary
itself over time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-04-04 Thread Curtis Hovey
** Tags added: packaging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1564662] Re: Juju binaries should be stripped

2016-03-31 Thread Richard Harding
This will be a target for the Juju team to update and verify that the
stripping of the binary is safe and passes all testing. This requires
building in some gating based on if the binary is golang vs gccgo.


** Also affects: juju-core
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: juju-core
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: juju-core
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: juju-core
Milestone: None => 2.1.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662

Title:
  Juju binaries should be stripped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs