[Bug 1566778] Re: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566778 Title: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1566778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1566778] Re: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566778 Title: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1566778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1566778] Re: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing
** Description changed:
It is not very clear how one is best to have, for example, a Page with a
PageHeader and a ListView, and have the ListView take up the whole page.
Page {
- PageHeader {}
+ header:PageHeader {}
ListView {}
}
This has changed quite a lot in different versions of the UITK -- should
the ListView be set to anchors.fill: parent? Or anchors.top: page.top?
Or anchors.top: pageheader.bottom? Should Page.flickable be set to the
ListView, or will that be set automatically, or is it deprecated in
favour of PageHeader.flickable, and does that have to be set explicitly
or will it be set automatically? Should one set the ListView to
anchors.fill:parent with a topMargin of pageheader.height as the UITK
gallery does?
It would be very useful to have a series of examples with diagrams
showing how to achieve various standard effects, for example:
1. a page with a header and a listview, where the listview takes up the whole
page and the header scrolls away as the listview is scrolled
2. a page with a header and a listview, where the listview takes up the whole
page and the header does not scroll away but stays fixed
3. a page with a header and a button which stays fixed under the header, and
a listview which takes up the rest of the page and scrolls
etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566778
Title:
Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1566778/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1566778] Re: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Peeters (tpeeters) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566778 Title: Documentation on anchoring and PageHeader is confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1566778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
