[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Michael Vogt]

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package snapd - 2.16+16.10ubuntu1.2

---
snapd (2.16+16.10ubuntu1.2) yakkety; urgency=medium

  * debian/control:
 - also add a dependency to "snap-confine" to unbreak armhf
   (LP: #1634236)

 -- Michael Vogt   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:29:56
+0200

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

This bug was fixed in the package snapd - 2.16ubuntu3

---
snapd (2.16ubuntu3) xenial; urgency=medium

  * debian/control:
- also add a dependency to "snap-confine" to unbreak armhf
  (LP: #1634236)

snapd (2.16ubuntu2) xenial; urgency=medium

  * fix FTBFS on powerpc by ensuring that share/ is available
in the source tree

snapd (2.16ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * debian/control:
- fix version dependency of ubuntu-core-launcher to unbreak armhf
  (LP: #1634236)

 -- Michael Vogt   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:27:50
+0200

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[gerald.yang]

Verified pass, the new snapd (2.16ubuntu3) depends on the right version of 
snap-confine (>= 1.0.43).
Thanks

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[gerald.yang]

Hello Michael,

The new snapd in proposed updates the dependency of ubuntu-core-launcher, but 
not snap-confine,
I just upgraded snapd, but the snap-confine is still the old version 
(1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.4), 
only ubuntu-core-launcher is upgraded to the latest one 
(1.0.43-0ubuntu1~16.04.1),
could you please help to check the dependency? thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Andy Whitcroft]

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snapd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.16ubuntu1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Andy Whitcroft]

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snapd into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.16+16.10ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[John Agosta]

can you provide an ETA for when this will be pushed as a proposed SRU?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Michael Vogt]

** Description changed:

  Trivial SRU of snapd that adds a missing versioned dependency for snap-
  confine to snapd.
+ 
+ It turns out there is a regression because of this if:
+ - you use an armhf architecture
+ - snapd 2.16
+ - snap-confine < 1.0.43
+ 
+ The reason is that with snapd 2.16 we use the "snap run" to start 
applications. This is a command written in go. On armhf the auxv vector content 
is critical for successfully running go commands.
+ But apparmor cleans that by default because it might be dangerous.
+ On snap-confine 1.0.43 we added an apparmor rule to relax this.

** Description changed:

  Trivial SRU of snapd that adds a missing versioned dependency for snap-
  confine to snapd.
  
  It turns out there is a regression because of this if:
  - you use an armhf architecture
  - snapd 2.16
  - snap-confine < 1.0.43
  
  The reason is that with snapd 2.16 we use the "snap run" to start 
applications. This is a command written in go. On armhf the auxv vector content 
is critical for successfully running go commands.
  But apparmor cleans that by default because it might be dangerous.
  On snap-confine 1.0.43 we added an apparmor rule to relax this.
+ 
+ TEST CASE:
+ - install snapd 2.16 on an armhf/classic system (e.g. pi2)
+ - make sure you have snap-confine from xenial (not from xenial-updates): 
1.0.38
+ - snap install hello
+ - run "hello" and verify it does not run
+ - install snap-confine from xenial-updates (1.0.43)
+ - verify that "hello" does run now

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1634236] Re: [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

[Michael Vogt]

** Summary changed:

- [SRU] 2.16.1
+ [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236

Title:
  [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1634236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs