[Bug 1782362] Re: dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

2022-02-07 Thread Bryce Harrington
Xenial and trusty have reached end of standard support

** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782362

Title:
  dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1782362/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782362] Re: dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

2018-07-19 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
FYI the code does not apply as-is to the older versions.
The changelog/header entries can easily be matched, but the options.c code 
essentially needs a rewrite to match the older versions - the ttl handling was 
different and also the code was in other places.

At least it would be one backport as 2.68 and 2.75 seem to have more or
less the same code for this section. But I wonder how much risk we
should go potentially making a bad backport or if we should consider
this being a bad configuration.

At those more experienced, while a crash is always bad - is this "just" a case 
happing in a bad config?
It seems to violate this from the man page 
"--cname=,[,][,] [...] The  cname must be unique," 
but isn't all to clear there and obviously a fault isn't the best response even 
to a misconfig.
Or can there be external influences that make it affect you - like people 
redefining their DNS to cause you to have a loop - not sure how real that would 
be?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782362

Title:
  dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1782362/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782362] Re: dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

2018-07-19 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
Steps to reproduce are as easy as:
  $ dnsmasq --cname localhost,localhost

bad = segfault
good = exit with "dnsmasq: CNAME loop involving localhost"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782362

Title:
  dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1782362/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782362] Re: dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

2018-07-19 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
With 2.77 and later being good marking bug tasks for affected releases
accordingly.

@Simon - that should be
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=903df07bcb53f175851a7c2891d60fcf64a1f6bc
right?

@Frank - for the SRU processing [1] later on if th patches are somewhat
applicable to 2.75 / 2.68 in the affected releases it might be helpful
having a set of minimal steps to set up the CNAME-loop.

[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782362

Title:
  dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1782362/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1782362] Re: dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

2018-07-18 Thread  Christian Ehrhardt 
** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Trusty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1782362

Title:
  dnsmasq segfaults on cnames referring to themselves

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1782362/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs