[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-26 Thread Alex Tu
marked this verification as failed, because we get better solution to
reach the target by https://github.com/dell/dkms/pull/98

I'll change this bug title and content to match the new patch.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-disco
** Tags added: verification-failed-bionic verification-failed-disco

** Summary changed:

- priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"
+ ability to install dkms without version checking and retire it when kernel 
fixed issue

** Description changed:

+ refer to https://github.com/dell/dkms/pull/98
+ 
  [Impact]
- the priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force". #89 
https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/89
+ to have a way for this case
+ "user need to force install the dkms, but also would like to retire that dkms 
once kernel fixes the issue."
+  - upstream patch : https://github.com/dell/dkms/pull/98
  
  [Test case]
- 1. install the dkms package which already patched (also can be found from my 
test ppa[1])
- 2. install a DKMS which has OBSOLETE_BY and FORCE
- e.g.ath10k of my testing ppa : [2]
-  - the target dkms defined OBSOLETE_BY and FORCE
-  - user install dkms on a system which installed kernel version less than 
OBSOLETE_BY and another kernel higher than OBSOLETE_BY
-  - the dkms can be installed well.
+ 1. install the dkms package which already patched
+ 2. install a DKMS which has file content "{dkms name}_version-override" under 
/usr/share/dkms/modules_to_force_install/
+- the installation should ignore module version checking.
+ 
+ 3. update that installed DKMS to a new one which added OBSOLETE_BY in 
dkms.conf
+- on the kernel which version lower than OBSOLETE_BY, the dkms should be 
installed.
+- on the kernel which version higher than OBSOLETE_BY, the dkms should NOT 
be installed.
  
  [Regression potential]
- medium as it touched the version sanity. This change land a change from 
upstream.
- 
- [1]:https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+recipe/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89
- [2]:https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+recipe/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89-dkms
+ medium as it touched the version sanity. This change already there in 
upstream.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  ability to install dkms without version checking and retire it when
  kernel fixed issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-20 Thread Alex Tu
Not really understand that why the regression happen in #12 but not in #10.
And I also check installing nvidia-dkms-430 with proposed dkms and it looks 
works well.

installation:
- https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4wtRyswGvK/

dpkg -l | grep "nvidia\|dkms":
- http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NMHNr9cWx8/

So, I believe both #10 and #12 is miss alarm.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-13 Thread Alex Tu
Hi Łukasz,

from the regression of autopkgtests in #10, it seems the connection of
test environment is not stable so it got "connection timed out".

Could you please re-trigger the autopkgtest again?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-12 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,

Accepted dkms into disco-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/2.6.1-4ubuntu2.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from
verification-needed-disco to verification-done-disco. If it does not fix
the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag
to verification-failed-disco. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Disco)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-disco

** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-10 Thread Alex Tu
the package is waiting on the queue:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=1_text=dkms
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=1_text=dkms

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dkms - 2.7.1-2ubuntu2

---
dkms (2.7.1-2ubuntu2) eoan; urgency=medium

  * dkms: cherry-pick from upstream a35d981 for issue #89
0019-fix-OBSOLETE_BY-be-blocked-by-force-Closes-89.patch (LP: #1838921)

 -- Timo Aaltonen   Mon, 02 Sep 2019 17:28:28 +0300

** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-02 Thread Alex Tu
per talked on IRC, to avoid confusing I renamed the branch for DKMS
package, and bump the package version as well. And also confirmed with
the sponsor that git repository is enough, so I list them below. Please
ping me if any other need for SRU, I'll response ASAP.

# based on bionic:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/bionic-dkms-2.3-closes89

# based on disco:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/disco-dkms-2.6.1-closes89

# based on eoan:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/eoan-dkms-2.7.1-closes89

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-09-02 Thread Timo Aaltonen
can you just attach debdiffs for dkms?

for instance the git repo for eoan is for oem-backlight-dell-dell-uart-
backlight-lp1811346-4.15-dkms...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-08-29 Thread Alex Tu
btw, the patch in #1 is there, and all be verified by multipass VMs.

# based on bionic:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89
patch : 2774f8c
testing ppa: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+archive/ubuntu/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89/+packages
kernel dkms for test: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/bionic-force-test-dkms
test result: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/R4TTQWbvDk/


# based on disco:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/2.6.1-4ubuntu2.2-closes89
patch: 7cc6815
testing ppa: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+archive/ubuntu/2.6.1-4ubuntu2.2-closes89/+packages
kernel dkms for test: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/disco-force-test-dkms
test result: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/sV4shyGS8m/

# based on eoan:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/2.7.1-1ubuntu2-closes89
patch: 041a918
testing ppa: 
https://launchpad.net/~alextu/+archive/ubuntu/2.7.1-1ubuntu2-closes89/+packages
kernel dkms for test: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/eoan-force-test-dkms
test result: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Zn8BNKzCWn/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-08-29 Thread Alex Tu
btw, the patch in #1 is there:

# based on bionic:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89
patch : 2774f8c
testing ppa: :https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+recipe/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89

# based on disco:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+git/dkms-2.3-lp1838245/+ref/2.6.1-4ubuntu2.2-closes89
patch: 7cc6815
testing ppa: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+recipe/2.6.1-4ubuntu2.2-closes89

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-08-05 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Also affects: dkms (Ubuntu Disco)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: dkms (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1838921] Re: priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

2019-08-05 Thread Alex Tu
a test result here for reference:
in my system there're 2 kernels 4.15.0-1030 and 4.15.0-1045

1. installed dkms from [1], which included the proposed patch.
2. install dkms from [2], which set OBSOLETE_BY="4.15.0-1033" , and set 'FORCE' 
already.

from the attached message during installation,
 - for kernel 4.15.0-1030: line 4604 checked srcversion, but still install dkms 
because of 'FORCE' be set 
 - for kernel 4.15.0-1045: line 9419 checked obsolete value, then stop install 
dkms.

[1]:https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+recipe/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89
[2]:https://code.launchpad.net/~alextu/+recipe/2.3-3ubuntu9.5-closes89-dkms

** Attachment added: "install-ath10k-closes89.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+attachment/5280862/+files/install-ath10k-closes89.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838921

Title:
  priority of OBSOLETE_BY should higher than "force"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1838921/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs