[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4 --- apport (2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4) eoan; urgency=medium * Create additional symlinks to the source_linux.py apport package hook for many OEM kernels. Thanks to You-Sheng Yang for the patch. (LP: #1847967) apport (2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3) eoan; urgency=medium * Use an SRU-safe substring when checking for the available version of aspell-doc in xenial, since aspell *did* have an SRU. Backported from apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu9. (LP: #1851542) -- Brian Murray Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:44:01 -0800 ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11 --- apport (2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11) bionic; urgency=medium * Create additional symlinks to the source_linux.py apport package hook for many OEM kernels. Thanks to You-Sheng Yang for the patch. (LP: #1847967) apport (2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10) bionic; urgency=medium * Use an SRU-safe substring when checking for the available version of aspell-doc in xenial, since aspell *did* have an SRU. Backported from apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu9. (LP: #1851542) -- Brian Murray Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:46:35 -0800 ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
Another way to verify the fix is just to confirm that the symlinks are now created, which they are with apport version 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4 (19.10). Setting up apport (2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4) ... apport-autoreport.service is a disabled or a static unit, not starting it. Processing triggers for systemd (242-7ubuntu3.6) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.7-3) ... Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.17-2) . bdmurray@clean-eoan-amd64:~$ ls -lh /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/*linux* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta-oem-osp1.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta-oem.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta.py -> source_linux.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 948 Nov 11 13:50 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-nexus7.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem-osp1.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem.py -> source_linux.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.2K Nov 11 13:50 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed-oem-osp1.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed-oem.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:44 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed.py -> source_linux.py -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
Another way to verify the fix is just to confirm that the symlinks are now created, which they are with apport version 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11 (18.04). Setting up apport (2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11) ... apport-autoreport.service is a disabled or a static unit, not starting it. Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.17-2) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-21) ... Processing triggers for systemd (237-3ubuntu10.38) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.3-2ubuntu0.1) ... bdmurray@clean-bionic-amd64:~$ ls -lh /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/*linux* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta-oem-osp1.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta-oem.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta.py -> source_linux.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 948 Nov 11 13:57 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-nexus7.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem-osp1.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem.py -> source_linux.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6.2K Nov 11 13:57 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed-oem-osp1.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed-oem.py -> source_linux.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Feb 10 16:46 /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed.py -> source_linux.py ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected, Accepted apport into eoan-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-eoan to verification-done-eoan. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-eoan. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-eoan ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray) ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Disco) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Yuan-Chen Cheng (ycheng-twn) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
I verified #9, it works as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
@Francis, anything I can help here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Tags added: id-5de96a57d56e071554100fdb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.20.11-0ubuntu13 --- apport (2.20.11-0ubuntu13) focal; urgency=medium [ Brian Murray ] * Create additional symlinks to the source_linux.py apport package hook for many OEM kernels. Thanks to You-Sheng Yang for the patch. (LP: #1847967) [ Michael Hudson-Doyle ] * Fix autopkgtest failures since recent security update: (LP: #1854237) - Fix regression in creating report for crashing setuid process by getting kernel to tell us the executable path rather than reading /proc/[pid]/exe. - Fix deletion of partially written core files. - Fix test_get_logind_session to use new API. - Restore add_proc_info raising ValueError for a dead process. - Delete test_lock_symlink, no longer applicable now that the lock is created in a directory only root can write to. -- Michael Hudson-Doyle Fri, 06 Dec 2019 08:57:09 +1300 ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
We have some outstanding security fixes in apport to do but we'll scheduled SRU'ing this after those are out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Description changed: + [SRU Justification] + + [Impact] + When `apport-bug linux` was executed on systems with linux-oem, linux-oem-osp1 kernels, many details are not included as generic linux kernel does. Alsa info, dmesg, lspci, lsusb, DMI, etc. are missing. + + [Fix] + Fix already merged in Focal: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/focal/apport/ubuntu/revision/2724 . + + SRU merge proposals in: + * https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/bionic/apport/bug-1847967/+merge/376380 + * https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/disco/apport/bug-1847967/+merge/376381 + * https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/eoan/apport/bug-1847967/+merge/374263 + + [Test Case] + 1. Boot with linux-oem or linux-oem-osp1 kernel and try to collect apport logs with: + + $ apport-cli --save saved.apport linux-oem-osp1 + + 2. Make sure the report contains PCI/ALSA/DMI/Sysfs info. + + [Regression Potential] + Low. + + original bug description + When `apport-bug linux` was executed on systems with linux-oem, linux- oem-osp1 kernels, many details are not included as generic linux kernel does. Alsa info, dmesg, lspci, lsusb, DMI, etc. are missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
Created: * https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/bionic/apport/bug-1847967/+merge/376380 * https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/disco/apport/bug-1847967/+merge/376381 * https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/eoan/apport/bug-1847967/+merge/374263 ** Branch linked: lp:~vicamo/ubuntu/bionic/apport/bug-1847967 ** Branch linked: lp:~vicamo/ubuntu/disco/apport/bug-1847967 ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
Yes, it was made before Focal was out, but definitely want it to be SRU- ed to all series with linux-oem/linux-oem-osp1 kernels. ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Assignee: You-Sheng Yang (vicamo) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
I've merged the the change in the linked branch to focal's branch of apport. Is this something you'd like to see SRU'ed to eoan? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/focal/apport/ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
So before the merge proposal[1] is accepted, you can take following
steps to file a bug with all the information for kernel packages:
1. find out the source package name for the binary kernel package. It
should be "linux-signed-oem[-osp1]" for signed kernel packages, and
"linux-oem[-osp1]" for unsigned ones.
$ apt show ${pkg} | grep ^Source:
2. create symlinks for apport:
$ sudo ln -s source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-
hooks/source_${srcpkg}.py
3. appport-bug ${pkg}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967
Title:
oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
Maybe the best solution is to install such links in every kernel related source packages built kernel image packages themselves. :X -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
--- debian/apport.links 2018-05-09 23:42:20 + +++ debian/apport.links 2019-10-17 06:20:03 + @@ -1,4 +1,10 @@ +/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta-oem-osp1.py +/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta-oem.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-meta.py +/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem-osp1.py +/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem.py +/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed-oem-osp1.py +/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed-oem.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-signed.py /usr/bin/apport-bug /usr/bin/ubuntu-bug /usr/share/man/man1/apport-bug.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/ubuntu-bug.1.gz ** Branch linked: lp:~vicamo/ubuntu/eoan/apport/bug-1847967 ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
sudo ln -s source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem.py sudo ln -s source_linux.py /usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_linux-oem-osp1.py Above commands would fix this issue. Judging from all other source_linux* symlinks are created by apport package itself (via %srcpkg/debian/apport.links), I suggest we add two more links for oem /oem-osp1 kernels, too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Description changed: - (To be filled with details) + When `apport-bug linux` was executed on systems with linux-oem, linux- + oem-osp1 kernels, many details are not included as generic linux kernel + does. Alsa info, dmesg, lspci, lsusb, DMI, etc. are missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847967] Re: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones
** Summary changed: - oem kernel packages treat differently from generic kernel ones + oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 Title: oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1847967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
