[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
I'll include this with the new amavisd-new 2.6 in Intrepid. ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
This bug was fixed in the package amavisd-new - 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu1 --- amavisd-new (1:2.6.0-1ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining Ubuntu changes: - Updated logcheck/ignore.d.server/amavisd-new (LP: #188754) - Add libmail-dkim-perl (= 0.31) to recommends for new DKIM based whitelisting - Added 81_fqdn-warning.dpatch so that correct config file path for Debian/Ubuntu is displayed if it needs to be set manually - Renumbered from 71 to put it after the new Debian patch - Added patch description - Add commented out $myhostname definition to debian/etc/conf.d05-node_id so that it will be easier for people who don't know Perl syntax to set - Updated debian/patches/40_fix_paths.dpatch to use the new path (/var/lib) for amavis-release - Remove amavisd-new-milter package for transition to Main - Remove libmilter-dev from build-dep - Comment out debian/rules related to amavisd-new-milter - Change maintainer to Ubuntu Core Developers amavisd-new (1:2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version * Updated debconf translations: - German. Closes: #448244 - Finnish. Closes: #480503 - Italian. Closes: #480508 - Russian. Closes: #480622 - Basque. Closes: #481550 Thanks to all translators and Christian Perrier for their work. -- Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:07:08 -0400 ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
I'll include this with the new amavisd-new 2.6 in Intrepid. ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
This bug was fixed in the package amavisd-new - 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu1 --- amavisd-new (1:2.6.0-1ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining Ubuntu changes: - Updated logcheck/ignore.d.server/amavisd-new (LP: #188754) - Add libmail-dkim-perl (= 0.31) to recommends for new DKIM based whitelisting - Added 81_fqdn-warning.dpatch so that correct config file path for Debian/Ubuntu is displayed if it needs to be set manually - Renumbered from 71 to put it after the new Debian patch - Added patch description - Add commented out $myhostname definition to debian/etc/conf.d05-node_id so that it will be easier for people who don't know Perl syntax to set - Updated debian/patches/40_fix_paths.dpatch to use the new path (/var/lib) for amavis-release - Remove amavisd-new-milter package for transition to Main - Remove libmilter-dev from build-dep - Comment out debian/rules related to amavisd-new-milter - Change maintainer to Ubuntu Core Developers amavisd-new (1:2.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version * Updated debconf translations: - German. Closes: #448244 - Finnish. Closes: #480503 - Italian. Closes: #480508 - Russian. Closes: #480622 - Basque. Closes: #481550 Thanks to all translators and Christian Perrier for their work. -- Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:07:08 -0400 ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
I guess a possible test procedure would be: 1. install and configure amavisd-new (I presume as maintainer you probably have servers running it). 2. sudo apt-get install logcheck logcheck-database 3. logcheck will begin hourly checks and mail output to root. If you want it to go elsewhere, configure /etc/logcheck/logcheck.conf 4. Send a few mails through so that logs appear. 5. Running: sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t You should get output including those logs for successful mail delivery (which is not desirable). 6. Apply the patches and re-run the above. You should no longer get the output from those mails. Is this sufficient or do you need something more automatic? Gavin -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
That should work. Thanks. -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: make the OK field optional in logcheck filters http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14671215/solution-1.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: make the OK field optional in logcheck filters http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14671214/solution-1.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Sorry I took my eye off the ball a little on this one.
As I'm sure you know logcheck uses a set of standard regexps to filter
out the normal log messages and send the admin the rest. amavisd-
new's filters are not quite catching all the normal mail now.
The situation seems to have changed a little since hardy (sorry I didn't
test the mail server prior to release but I guess it would be worth
fixing for the .1 release of hardy). An example mail delivery log
which escapes filtering for me is:
May 22 23:50:26 robin amavis[2067]: (02067-07) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL
[127.0.0.1] [195.113.31.123] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
mail_id: 2yKeML25dBUl, Hits: -, size: 4325, queued_as: 0B198205BA, 288
ms
The existing filter set in hardy is this:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
\([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed CLEAN,( \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]){0,2} [^]* -
[^]*(,[^]*)*, Message-ID: [^]+( \((added
by[^)]+|sfid-[_[:xdigit:]]+)\))?,( Resent-Message-ID: [^]+,)?
mail_id: [-+[:alnum:]]+, Hits: (-[.[:digit:]]*)+, size: [[:xdigit:]]+,
queued_as: [[:xdigit:]]+ OK id=[-[:alnum:]]+, [[:digit:]]+ ms$
so it would seem that the OK id=[-[:alnum:]]+ is now optional or
perhaps has even been dropped (I never see it in logs now).
If it's optional, I suggest the filter change to:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
\([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed CLEAN,( \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]){0,2} [^]* -
[^]*(,[^]*)*, Message-ID: [^]+( \((added
by[^)]+|sfid-[_[:xdigit:]]+)\))?,( Resent-Message-ID: [^]+,)?
mail_id: [-+[:alnum:]]+, Hits: (-[.[:digit:]]*)+, size: [[:xdigit:]]+,
queued_as: [[:xdigit:]]+( OK id=[-[:alnum:]]+)?, [[:digit:]]+ ms$
if it's not optional, I suggest we just remove it:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
\([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed CLEAN,( \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]){0,2} [^]* -
[^]*(,[^]*)*, Message-ID: [^]+( \((added
by[^)]+|sfid-[_[:xdigit:]]+)\))?,( Resent-Message-ID: [^]+,)?
mail_id: [-+[:alnum:]]+, Hits: (-[.[:digit:]]*)+, size: [[:xdigit:]]+,
queued_as: [[:xdigit:]]+, [[:digit:]]+ ms$
I'm attaching patches (solution-1.patch to make OK optional and
solution-2.patch to remove OK) to fix this.
I'm testing solution-2.patch now.
--
rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: solution-2 updated http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672086/solution-2.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Testing solution-2 above (ie removing the OK field from the end) has removed most of my normal mail logs. However, a few are still slipping through: May 23 10:10:30 robin amavis[17682]: (17682-03) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL [127.0.0.1] [87.42.170.254] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID: +[EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id: ci7WDJAqDHG9, Hits: -, size: 2404, queued_as: 06B6D205BC, 313 ms apparently due to the word , LOCAL near the start. I'm going to send updated patches to take account of this. ** Attachment added: solution-1 updated http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672074/solution-1.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
bah! an extra comma went in there where it shouldn't updated patches attached. ** Attachment added: updated patch solution 1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672468/solution-1-v3.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: updated patch solution 2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672473/solution-2-v3.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
OK. If you can give me a test procedure that I can use to replicate the problem and then verify that it's corrected with the new package, I should be able to get this uploaded. -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Sorry I took my eye off the ball a little on this one.
As I'm sure you know logcheck uses a set of standard regexps to filter
out the normal log messages and send the admin the rest. amavisd-
new's filters are not quite catching all the normal mail now.
The situation seems to have changed a little since hardy (sorry I didn't
test the mail server prior to release but I guess it would be worth
fixing for the .1 release of hardy). An example mail delivery log
which escapes filtering for me is:
May 22 23:50:26 robin amavis[2067]: (02067-07) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL
[127.0.0.1] [195.113.31.123] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
mail_id: 2yKeML25dBUl, Hits: -, size: 4325, queued_as: 0B198205BA, 288
ms
The existing filter set in hardy is this:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
\([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed CLEAN,( \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]){0,2} [^]* -
[^]*(,[^]*)*, Message-ID: [^]+( \((added
by[^)]+|sfid-[_[:xdigit:]]+)\))?,( Resent-Message-ID: [^]+,)?
mail_id: [-+[:alnum:]]+, Hits: (-[.[:digit:]]*)+, size: [[:xdigit:]]+,
queued_as: [[:xdigit:]]+ OK id=[-[:alnum:]]+, [[:digit:]]+ ms$
so it would seem that the OK id=[-[:alnum:]]+ is now optional or
perhaps has even been dropped (I never see it in logs now).
If it's optional, I suggest the filter change to:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
\([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed CLEAN,( \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]){0,2} [^]* -
[^]*(,[^]*)*, Message-ID: [^]+( \((added
by[^)]+|sfid-[_[:xdigit:]]+)\))?,( Resent-Message-ID: [^]+,)?
mail_id: [-+[:alnum:]]+, Hits: (-[.[:digit:]]*)+, size: [[:xdigit:]]+,
queued_as: [[:xdigit:]]+( OK id=[-[:alnum:]]+)?, [[:digit:]]+ ms$
if it's not optional, I suggest we just remove it:
^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]:
\([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed CLEAN,( \[[.:[:xdigit:]]+\]){0,2} [^]* -
[^]*(,[^]*)*, Message-ID: [^]+( \((added
by[^)]+|sfid-[_[:xdigit:]]+)\))?,( Resent-Message-ID: [^]+,)?
mail_id: [-+[:alnum:]]+, Hits: (-[.[:digit:]]*)+, size: [[:xdigit:]]+,
queued_as: [[:xdigit:]]+, [[:digit:]]+ ms$
I'm attaching patches (solution-1.patch to make OK optional and
solution-2.patch to remove OK) to fix this.
I'm testing solution-2.patch now.
--
rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: make the OK field optional in logcheck filters http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14671214/solution-1.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: make the OK field optional in logcheck filters http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14671215/solution-1.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: Remove the OK field in logcheck filters http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14671224/solution-2.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: solution-2 updated http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672086/solution-2.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Testing solution-2 above (ie removing the OK field from the end) has removed most of my normal mail logs. However, a few are still slipping through: May 23 10:10:30 robin amavis[17682]: (17682-03) Passed CLEAN, LOCAL [127.0.0.1] [87.42.170.254] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Message-ID: +[EMAIL PROTECTED], mail_id: ci7WDJAqDHG9, Hits: -, size: 2404, queued_as: 06B6D205BC, 313 ms apparently due to the word , LOCAL near the start. I'm going to send updated patches to take account of this. ** Attachment added: solution-1 updated http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672074/solution-1.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
bah! an extra comma went in there where it shouldn't updated patches attached. ** Attachment added: updated patch solution 1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672468/solution-1-v3.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Attachment added: updated patch solution 2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14672473/solution-2-v3.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
OK. If you can give me a test procedure that I can use to replicate the problem and then verify that it's corrected with the new package, I should be able to get this uploaded. -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
The patch was made against amavisd-new_2.5.3-1ubuntu3 - is this what you meant? -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Would you please show how it looks once it's fixed. For a non-logcheck user it's kind of hard to tell exactly what you're missing. -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
The patch was made against amavisd-new_2.5.3-1ubuntu3 - is this what you meant? -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Would you please show how it looks once it's fixed. For a non-logcheck user it's kind of hard to tell exactly what you're missing. -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: logcheck = amavisd-new Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Triaged -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
logcheck files are shipped with amavisd-new itself. $ apt-file list amavisd|grep logcheck amavisd-new: /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/amavisd-new amavisd-new: /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/amavisd-new What file is your patch against? The bug then should get moved over to amavisd-new probably, if you're not using obsolete rule files or something similar. -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
Sorry, I forgot diff -u :) I've re-attached the patch (to /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/amavisd- new), based on the original from amavisd-new v2.5.3. ** Attachment added: Fix logcheck rule (same as previous patch, but as a unified diff) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13830047/amavisd-new-hardy.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: logcheck = amavisd-new Importance: Undecided = Medium Status: New = Triaged -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
I have a very similar problem with hardy beta (logcheck-database v1.2.63) - it looks like the log files have changed again. The attached patch works for me (though I only had 'CLEAN' emails to test with) ** Attachment added: Fix logcheck rule for amavisd-new in hardy beta http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13708481/amavisd-new-hardy.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
There are a couple more changes that I didn't catch in the last patch - there's now an IPv6 identifier, and the 'Hits:' value may not have a '-' prefix. ** Attachment added: Fix logcheck rule #2 (supersedes previous version) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13772188/amavisd-new-hardy.patch -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188754] Re: rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ apt-cache policy amavisd-new amavisd-new: Installed: 1:2.4.2-6.2ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:2.4.2-6.2ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:2.4.2-6.2ubuntu1 0 500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com gutsy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ apt-cache policy logcheck-database logcheck-database: Installed: 1.2.61ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1.2.61ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 1.2.61ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com gutsy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.2.61 0 500 http://ie.archive.ubuntu.com gutsy/main Packages [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.10 -- rules for amavisd-new are not catching all mails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
