[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
** Changed in: hal Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 Title: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power- manager not detect the battery properly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
** Changed in: hal Importance: Medium => Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 Title: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power- manager not detect the battery properly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
I am having exactly this issue: gnome-power-manager does not update power-consumption (shows approx. 6W constantly, was 18W on Feisty), remaining battery time constantly 3h (should be 1:30h - old battery). Plugging / unplugging power is detected. $ dpkg -s hal|grep Version Version: 0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu8.1 Was the bug reintroduced in subsequent updates? I am not aware of having noticed this issue some weeks ago. I'm also checking https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/194960. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Disregard my previous comment. It was meant for bug 220324. Rick -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Here is the output of "hal-device `hal-find-by-capability --capability
battery`" after restarting hal "sudo /etc/init.d/hal restart".
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/init.d$ hal-device `hal-find-by-capability --capability
battery`
udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/acpi_C171'
battery.serial = '16425' (string)
info.capabilities = { 'battery' } (string list)
battery.charge_level.warning = 2721 (0xaa1) (int)
info.category = 'battery' (string)
info.product = 'Battery Bay' (string)
battery.technology = 'lithium-ion' (string)
battery.reporting.warning = 189 (0xbd) (int)
battery.rechargeable.is_discharging = false (bool)
battery.model = 'Primary' (string)
battery.charge_level.granularity_1 = 1440 (0x5a0) (int)
battery.charge_level.granularity_2 = 1440 (0x5a0) (int)
linux.acpi_path = '/proc/acpi/battery/C171' (string)
battery.charge_level.design = 54201 (0xd3b9) (int)
battery.charge_level.low = 547 (0x223) (int)
battery.reporting.last_full = 3764 (0xeb4) (int)
battery.reporting.technology = 'LIon' (string)
battery.charge_level.current = 54201 (0xd3b9) (int)
battery.reporting.granularity_1 = 100 (0x64) (int)
battery.is_rechargeable = true (bool)
battery.reporting.current = 3764 (0xeb4) (int)
battery.reporting.granularity_2 = 100 (0x64) (int)
battery.voltage.unit = 'mV' (string)
battery.charge_level.capacity_state = 'ok' (string)
info.parent = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/computer' (string)
battery.rechargeable.is_charging = false (bool)
battery.reporting.rate = 0 (0x0) (int)
battery.charge_level.rate = 0 (0x0) (int)
battery.reporting.design = 3764 (0xeb4) (int)
battery.present = true (bool)
info.udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/acpi_C171' (string)
linux.acpi_type = 0 (0x0) (int)
battery.voltage.design = 14400 (0x3840) (int)
battery.reporting.low = 38 (0x26) (int)
battery.type = 'primary' (string)
battery.reporting.unit = 'mAh' (string)
battery.voltage.current = 16713 (0x4149) (int)
battery.charge_level.last_full = 54201 (0xd3b9) (int)
battery.charge_level.percentage = 100 (0x64) (int)
battery.vendor = 'Hewlett-Packard' (string)
linux.hotplug_type = 4 (0x4) (int)
battery.charge_level.unit = 'mWh' (string)
--
01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not
detect the battery properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
osteenbergen: ah, so the "acpi -v" output is indeed wrong? Can you please report a new bug about this (against 'linux'), since this bug has a lot of subscribers, and the precise issue here is fixed already? Thank you! -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Same on my laptop : $ dpkg -s hal|grep Version Version: 0.5.11~rc2-1ubuntu6 Charging but no AC attached is reported -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
That also doesn't work. It reports the same information 100% and charging without ac attached. Tried reinstalling but no luck. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
osteenbergen, oh, you are saying that the output of "acpi -V" is wrong? How about gnome-power-manager (the battery icon in the desktop panel tray), does that work correctly? If so, can you please file a new bug against 'acpi'? Thank you! -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
~$ dpkg -s hal|grep Version Version: 0.5.10+git20080301-1ubuntu1 -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Clean install of Hardy and it is not working! $ acpi -v acpi 0.09 Copyright (C) 2001 Grahame Bowland. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ acpi -V Battery 1: charging, 100%, until charged Thermal 1: ok, 40.0 degrees C AC Adapter 1: off-line No power, but charging... -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Hi, osteenbergen [2008-03-11 19:45 -]: > Clean install of Hardy and it is not working! Can you please check "dpkg -s hal|grep Version" and confirm that you actually use 0.5.10+git20080301-1ubuntu1? -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
The HAL updates seem to have fixed it for me. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
** Changed in: hal Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Yep it works! I had to wait for the new packages to propagate through the French servers. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Hi, Jim Braux-Zin [2008-03-04 17:36 -]: > Bad news : with the new hal my external USB drive fails to be mounted > automatically. The error message is in French but it means "bad mounting > options". I can see no error in either 'dmesg' or /var/log/daemon.log . I think it stumbles over the 'usefree' mount option. Please upgrade to gnome-mount 0.7-2ubuntu2 (in Hardy since yesterday) and check whether it works again? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) My 5 today: #193521 (jockey), #151025 (gnome-mount), #195548 (jockey), #194963 (jockey), #194052 (gnome-power-manager, hal) Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Bad news : with the new hal my external USB drive fails to be mounted automatically. The error message is in French but it means "bad mounting options". I can see no error in either 'dmesg' or /var/log/daemon.log . Maybe there is another reason but I'm sure it worked before hal upgrade and it don't work know. Is anybody experiencing the same issue? PS The battery status is still fine though :-) -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Same here, 0.5.10+git20080301-1ubuntu1~ppa3 fix my battery problem. :D Misterious, screen brightness is lower now, but i'm not sure if it is releated. Thanks! :) -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
A comment: bug #135548 and bug #154003 look very similar. Do you think they've got the same cause? -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Don't say thanks to me, Mark Pitt has done the hard work. ;) Great it works now. There is a possibility that some small changes are going to be made to the package, so if the version appears in the official repositories, could you also tell if that one works? Thanks. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
It seems fixed for me with your packages : I tried plugging and unplugging, putting and removing the battery, the state reported is correct and the remaining capacity percentage seems correctly updated. I'm going to do more extensive testing but thank you anyway! -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
A new version is going to be uploaded soon. Until then it's placed here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~pitti/+archive Please test it to see if it solves the problem for you. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Add one more problem to battery detection issue: Last night the plug got pulled on the laptop and it drained the battery, however, it did not even attempt a shutdown as it was supposed to do when battery levels went to critical. Ubuntu Hardy - fully up-to-date Dell XPS M1530 -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
With the installation of hal 0.5.10-5ubuntu8 tonight, this problem seems to be solved for me. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
This bug was fixed in the package hal - 0.5.10-5ubuntu8 --- hal (0.5.10-5ubuntu8) hardy; urgency=low [ Scott James Remnant ] * Add debian/patches/96_uinput_device_support.patch: This creates a HAL device for the uinput device, allowing us to set ACLs for it using PolicyKit/ConsoleKit. [ Daniel T Chen ] * Add debian/patches/97_fix_power_info_via_sysfs.patch: Fix battery status reading from /sys. Patches taken from upstream GIT head. (LP: #194052, #194719) [ Martin Pitt ] * Add debian/patches/02_sysfs_battery_serial.patch: Get battery serial number from sysfs. Patch taken fro upstream GIT head. -- Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:02:40 +0100 ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Merged Daniel's branch, will upload today. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Bug in hal, not in gnome-power-manager ** Changed in: power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
I'm using the ~3 debs and they seem to work just fine for me so far. @Bart: That's because gnome-power-manager has not finished profiling your batteries yet, after a few charges/discharges it will report that more accurately than acpi -b. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Your debs fix at least part of the problem. It now correctly shows the status of the battery ( plugged in or discharging ), and updates the %, but also still says "Battery discharge time is unknown", while acpi -b says "Battery 1: discharging, 65%, 02:37:38 remaining" -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Please try the updated ~2 debs (posted at the same URL). -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
** Changed in: hal Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
yoops, I just realized those packages are i386, and I'm running 64-bit here. How would I go about re-creating them on my side? I'm fairly familiar with compiling software, but patching and packaging is a little shaky. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
I'm wondering if HAL is completely to blame for this behavior. Take this with a grain of salt because I don''t know exactly where HAL sits in the stack of things, but I've noticed today that the output of 'cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/*' shows that the 'remaining capacity' line is no longer reporting correctly as I thought it had been previously. Is this a HAL deficiency? I thought the /proc tree didn't have much, if anything to do with HAL. I've been noticing some inconsistency in behavior on this bug, including an apparent memory leak I mentioned in #196688. It seems the sequence of events is: 1- Boot up laptop. 2- GPM does not report drain correctly, including displaying on the battery icon even when on AC. At this point "/proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/*" "remaining capacity" is also stuck at the level the machine was presumably at when it booted. 3- Changing power state (plugging in and removing AC) a few times seems to kick it into a more correct state, with the GPM icon correctly toggling between AC and BAT, though still not showing changes in charge level. "Remaining Capacity" in /proc/... is now updating. 4- Usually at this point GPM runs away and consumes all available RAM and swap until it is killed, as I describe in #196688. This seems to be getting to be a fairly complex problem. Any thoughts? I'll be trying Daniel's packages and see what they do. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
I've posted test packages at http://www.trilug.org/~crimsun/hal/. Please leave feedback here. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Sense Hofstede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In bug #197090 someone reported a similar issue but solved it by > restarting hal. Does that work for you? > No, restarting hal does not work in my case. -- -Regards- -Quentin Hartman- -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
In bug #197090 someone reported a similar issue but solved it by restarting hal. Does that work for you? ** Tags added: metabug -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Daniel T Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thoughts? > Well, from my relatively ignorant point of view, it seems that it would be worthwhile to attempt to get this actually fixed in time Hardy. We really don't want people living with this sort of oddness for 3 years. That being it said, it would also be wise to have an acceptable fallback (reverting the patch?) should that prove impossible. I'll commit to devoting what resources I have to getting this done right in time for Hardy. That will primarily amount to being a guinea pig though, since I have zero experience hacking on things this low-level. At this point it seems speed is important, and I think that would be the best way I could help. -- -Regards- -Quentin Hartman- -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
I'd say that someone should write a temporally patch for hardy, and that we're going to use sysfs in 8.10. When it's October I hope the errors with sysfs will be fixed and I think that's enough time for that to happen. If it doesn't happen fast enough we could always put a few Ubuntu developers on the issue and send the patch upstream. But I'm not very experienced with programming and Ubuntu, so there is a large change I just said some non-sense. ;) -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
In HAL. HAL fails to reread battery status from sysfs. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Is this bug caused by the battery detection in the kernel or in hal? -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
For me, at least, the old behavior (i.e. gpm reporting twice the amount of actual batteries), also caused other issues, such as absurd notes on remaining power, suspend and other things being triggered when they shouldn't (and not triggered when they should), and so on. I think we should try to fix this with patches from git, didn't someone mention here or on another related bug report that hal-git actually worked fine? I have been using the following two patches http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=commitdiff;h=7430beeb6c6fd6c8e51c24df20fd53c526aed6e8 http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=hal.git;a=commitdiff;h=f018f6480384e2607aa3cac6aad5f114b832ebc0 against the latest hardy hal package and most of my problems seem to be gone. Right now, I only seem to have problems that I've always had (gpm saying I'm on battery power, when battery becomes fully charged, gpm saying suspend failed, when in fact it didn't, and so on). I say, try with at least these patches before reverting 01_proc_sys_batteries. Regards, K. -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Hi, It sounds like the simplest course in terms of maintenance is option 1. The original battery duplication will get fixed upstream. Chris On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:58 +, Daniel T Chen wrote: > After briefly discussing this bug with Seb and Brian yesterday, it is > worth noting that we should consider one of these options, too: > > 1) Drop this patch (01_proc_sys_batteries); > 2) Invert the logic in this patch so that Gutsy's behaviour (reading > /proc/acpi) is restored. This means ignoring sysfs for power in instances > where both /proc/acpi and sysfs exist. > > >From what I gather, the sysfs interface is preferable to /proc/acpi, but > Seb mentioned there also being backlight issues even with the slew of > patches backported from fd.o hal.git. > > Choosing option (1) above is fairly straightforward: it eliminates this > and several other bugs at the expense of possibly duplicated power > source entries in g-p-m (this latter bit possibly being as major as > "omgconfusedbbq" - a minor annoyance but bearable IMO). Gutsy's > behaviour will be restored mostly (save the duplication). > > Choosing option (2) above is less straightforward: it also eliminates > this and several other bugs; Gutsy's behaviour will be restored. > However, Ubuntu will need to maintain this "inverted patch" for several > years, since upstream has already deprecated reading /proc/acpi for > power in favour of sysfs. Ultimately the questions involved must > include, "Will the power estimation and backlight regressions be fixed > in time for Hardy?" > > In light of 8.04 being LTS, we should entertain keeping the path that > seems to cause fewer regressions. > > Thoughts? > -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
After briefly discussing this bug with Seb and Brian yesterday, it is worth noting that we should consider one of these options, too: 1) Drop this patch (01_proc_sys_batteries); 2) Invert the logic in this patch so that Gutsy's behaviour (reading /proc/acpi) is restored. This means ignoring sysfs for power in instances where both /proc/acpi and sysfs exist. >From what I gather, the sysfs interface is preferable to /proc/acpi, but Seb mentioned there also being backlight issues even with the slew of patches backported from fd.o hal.git. Choosing option (1) above is fairly straightforward: it eliminates this and several other bugs at the expense of possibly duplicated power source entries in g-p-m (this latter bit possibly being as major as "omgconfusedbbq" - a minor annoyance but bearable IMO). Gutsy's behaviour will be restored mostly (save the duplication). Choosing option (2) above is less straightforward: it also eliminates this and several other bugs; Gutsy's behaviour will be restored. However, Ubuntu will need to maintain this "inverted patch" for several years, since upstream has already deprecated reading /proc/acpi for power in favour of sysfs. Ultimately the questions involved must include, "Will the power estimation and backlight regressions be fixed in time for Hardy?" In light of 8.04 being LTS, we should entertain keeping the path that seems to cause fewer regressions. Thoughts? -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
** Changed in: hal Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
Here, it only shows "Ladezeit unbekannt" (Charging time is inknown). -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194719] Re: 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly
** Summary changed: - 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detecting the battery properly + 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly -- 01_proc_sys_batteries.patch causes a regression making gnome-power-manager not detect the battery properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
