Public bug reported:

[Impact]

The iptables-persistent plugins/{15-ip4tables,25-ip6tables}
use ip[6]tables-restore without --noflush unconditionally.

This doesn't play along well with ufw, which starts before
netfilter-persistent typically, and gets its rules flushed.

This makes `ufw status` return that ufw is disabled, which
is misleading, as `ufw.service` is enabled and ufw actually
loaded all its rules correctly (but they were flushed later.)

Some images ship iptables-persistent rules, thus are subject
to this issue if ufw is used.

[Workaround]

Disable the netfilter-persistent.service unit, after rules
have been migrated to ufw.

[Fix]

Proposed in Debian bug #998416 [1]

[Test Steps]

See the Debian bug.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/998416

** Affects: iptables-persistent (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Medium
     Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
         Status: Confirmed

** Affects: iptables-persistent (Debian)
     Importance: Unknown
         Status: Unknown

** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: iptables-persistent (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #998416
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998416

** Also affects: iptables-persistent (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998416
   Importance: Unknown
       Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949643

Title:
  iptables-persistent unconditionally drops existing iptables rules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables-persistent/+bug/1949643/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to