[Bug 1973733] Re: no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

2022-06-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
There was another security upload on 27th of may which is built on all
arches, thus this rebuild is no longer needed.

please reject cups from focal unapproved.

** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Released => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973733

Title:
  no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1973733/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1973733] Re: no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

2022-06-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy
and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? => correct.

I didn't check if we can or cannot safely copy the binary backwards, but
imho we should not.

This is not going via focal-security, because the security issue has
already been fixed on all other arches, and riscv64 currently has best
effort security support. I don't want to trigger cups security upgrade
for $everyone, just because of the fix missing on riscv64 only.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973733

Title:
  no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1973733/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1973733] Re: no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

2022-05-18 Thread Robie Basak
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy
and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? If so, then my second
question of why this isn't going in via focal-security still stands.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973733

Title:
  no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1973733/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1973733] Re: no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

2022-05-18 Thread Robie Basak
I'm not sure I follow. I see a retry button for the failed riscv64
build. Can't we just hit that?

If there's some reason that won't work, then why is this not going
through the security sponsorship queue? If we do it as an SRU, then
it'll hit focal-updates only, and focal-security will be left behind.
What's the plan for that?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973733

Title:
  no change rebuild to get security update out on riscv64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1973733/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs