[Bug 2060108] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-10 10:36 EDT--- May I ask why the distro build is forcing the use of -fno-omit-frame-pointer on ppc64le? It just leads to less efficient code on ppc64le. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108 Title: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/greenlet/+bug/2060108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060108] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-10 10:18 EDT--- The consensus in the GCC bugzilla is that the inline asm used in greenlet is itself buggy and this is not a compiler bug. A different solution to their inline asm will need to be used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108 Title: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/greenlet/+bug/2060108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060108] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 22:30 EDT--- I opened an external GCC bug to track this. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR114664 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108 Title: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/greenlet/+bug/2060108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060108] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 13:07 EDT--- (In reply to comment #5) > I've asked in the upstream issue for the preprocessed source file that I can > recreate and debug with. I was able to create a small reproducer myself. I'll have a look. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108 Title: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/greenlet/+bug/2060108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060108] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
--- Comment From berg...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-09 12:50 EDT--- (In reply to comment #4) > According to https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/issues/395 this is > the source with asm affected: > > https://github.com/python-greenlet/greenlet/blob/master/src/greenlet/ > platform/switch_ppc64_linux.h > > It is likely that r31 is reserved when the frame pointer is required. > > Adding one of the powerpc toolchain developers to confirm. I've asked in the upstream issue for the preprocessed source file that I can recreate and debug with. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108 Title: greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/greenlet/+bug/2060108/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
