[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-09-08 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
closing the bug then, thanks.

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-08-04 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Still an issue? May someone try the same with the intrepid version of
f-spot? thanks.

** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-08-04 Thread Rob
For me itÅ› not an issue anymore.  Don know why but I can use F-spot
0.4.3.1  now without problems. Thanks for your attention.

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-06-04 Thread matteo
f-spot 0.4.3.1-0ubuntu1 aborts on AMD64:

Posted initially in the wrong thread:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/f-spot/+bug/230306/comments/13

Anyone may confirm the bug?

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-06-04 Thread Daeng Bo
Well, you have five duplicates and three people in this thread
confirming it. You also had a patch with two people claiming it fixed
the problem. I would venture to say that the original bug was confirmed
long ago and fixed.

I would't know, though, because Ubuntu shipped a default app which
didn't launch. That was the last straw for me.

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-06-04 Thread matteo
I believe I am referring to the patched version of f-spot:

f-spot 0.4.3.1-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb vs f-spot_0.4.2-1ubuntu2_amd64.deb

As far as I can see there is no further version of f-spot in the
'proposed repository' to fix this issue. It seems to me that f-spot is
broken again with an error very similar (if not equal) to the one that
was affecting version 0.4.2. What I am missing? :)

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-06-04 Thread Daeng Bo
I'm not sure. It was broken for a month. I believe it was fixed, but I
had left by that time. It may well be broken again.

As I said, though, I can't test it.

Best of luck.

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-19 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
May someone else try to test the f-spot package from the proposed
repository and see if it solve this issue? thanks.

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-19 Thread Cameron Braid
works for me ... thanks :)

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-18 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
** Changed in: f-spot (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-18 Thread Robert McKee
Hello,
the latest patch for f-spot from the proposed repository fixed my issue of 
f-spot not starting with the sigsevs on AMD 64

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-16 Thread Ge-org Brohammer
Same here

** Attachment added: output.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14559054/output.txt

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-05 Thread Daeng Bo
After additional investigation, the problem only occurs in conjunction
with some GConf settings, though I'm not sure which ones yet. Deleting
ALL GConf keys for F-Spot results in the program launching and
performing as expected, but a second attempt to launch the program
(after the keys have been reset by the program) segfaults as before.
I'll look into it more tomorrow.

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-05-04 Thread Rob
F-spot crashed also on my Hardy heron 64 LTS (fresh install)  AMD
Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+

Stacktrace:

  at FSpot.Global..cctor () 0x
  at FSpot.Global..cctor () 0xd
  at (wrapper runtime-invoke) FSpot.Defines.runtime_invoke_void 
(object,intptr,intptr,intptr) 0x
  at FSpot.Driver.Main (string[]) 0x
  at FSpot.Driver.Main (string[]) 0x00144
  at (wrapper runtime-invoke) FSpot.Driver.runtime_invoke_int_string[] 
(object,intptr,intptr,intptr) 0x

Native stacktrace:

f-spot [0x51bb67]
f-spot [0x43dacd]
/lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x7f49890db7d0]
/lib/libc.so.6(memcpy+0x60) [0x7f4988b66d50]
f-spot(mono_breakpoint_clean_code+0x1b) [0x42725b]
f-spot [0x43f78d]
f-spot [0x44005e]
[0x41eff15b]

Debug info from gdb:

(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7f4989dba7a0 (LWP 6840)]
[New Thread 0x41d21950 (LWP 6842)]
[New Thread 0x41fe1950 (LWP 6841)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
0x7f49890da5cb in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  3 Thread 0x41fe1950 (LWP 6841)  0x7f49890dae81 in nanosleep ()
   from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  2 Thread 0x41d21950 (LWP 6842)  0x7f49890d7b99 in 
pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  1 Thread 0x7f4989dba7a0 (LWP 6840)  0x7f49890da5cb in read ()
   from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 3 (Thread 0x41fe1950 (LWP 6841)):
#0  0x7f49890dae81 in nanosleep () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x004b8f4f in ?? ()
#2  0x7f49890d33f7 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#3  0x7f4988bc1b2d in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4  0x in ?? ()

Thread 2 (Thread 0x41d21950 (LWP 6842)):
#0  0x7f49890d7b99 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
   from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x004bb585 in ?? ()
#2  0x004bdb37 in ?? ()
#3  0x004cbc03 in ?? ()
#4  0x0046b3c1 in ?? ()
#5  0x004855c3 in ?? ()
#6  0x004cb287 in ?? ()
#7  0x004e07d2 in ?? ()
#8  0x7f49890d33f7 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#9  0x7f4988bc1b2d in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
#10 0x in ?? ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f4989dba7a0 (LWP 6840)):
#0  0x7f49890da5cb in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1  0x7f4989556a90 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2  0x7f4989556f7e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3  0x7f49895578df in g_spawn_sync () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4  0x7f4989557d98 in g_spawn_command_line_sync ()
   from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5  0x0051bbf9 in ?? ()
#6  0x0043dacd in ?? ()
#7  signal handler called
#8  0x7f4988b66d50 in memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
#9  0x0042725b in mono_breakpoint_clean_code ()
#10 0x0043f78d in ?? ()
#11 0x0044005e in ?? ()
#12 0x41eff15b in ?? ()
#13 0x in ?? ()
#0  0x7f49890da5cb in read () from /lib/libpthread.so.0


=
Got a SIGSEGV while executing native code. This usually indicates
a fatal error in the mono runtime or one of the native libraries 
used by your application.
=

Aborted

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-04-24 Thread Daeng Bo
I did a reinstall from the latest packages (netinst) this morning, moved
the old f-spot dir out of the way, and tested again. Still have the same
error. No one else is getting this?

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 214410] Re: f-spot sigsevs on AMD64

2008-04-15 Thread Daeng Bo
Can anyone else reproduce this? I have a pretty stock install. Purging
all mono-related packages and reinstalling doesn't help. It's sad that
we're only a few days away from an LTS release and a show-stopper bug in
Hardy's default photo manager on 64 bit platforms.

After search like hell, I found some debugging help for mono (mono
--debug /path/to/exe), but it just reported no debugging symbols found.

Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual  CPU  E2140  @ 1.60GHz, if that helps.

** Attachment added: debug.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13463125/debug.txt

-- 
f-spot sigsevs on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs