[Bug 230745] Re: no graceful handling of empty fork command
** Changed in: terminator (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- no graceful handling of empty fork command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230745] Re: no graceful handling of empty fork command
** Changed in: terminator Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- no graceful handling of empty fork command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230745] Re: no graceful handling of empty fork command
** Changed in: terminator (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- no graceful handling of empty fork command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230745] Re: no graceful handling of empty fork command
commit 255 solves the failing situation properly - instead of exiting the entire application, just the terminal that failed to spawn a shell will close. -- no graceful handling of empty fork command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230745] Re: no graceful handling of empty fork command
This is fixed by commit 253, with a bonus commit (254) to bail out when a shell fails to spawn.. Bailing out the whole program is probably a bad idea though, so this might want to be reverted/changed in future. ** Changed in: terminator Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Jones (cmsj) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- no graceful handling of empty fork command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 230745] Re: no graceful handling of empty fork command
per passwd(5), the command interpreter field of gecos is optional, so we absolutely must handle this, although they recommend immediately falling back to sh. ** Changed in: terminator Importance: Undecided => Critical Status: New => Confirmed Target: None => 1.0-beta ** Also affects: terminator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: terminator (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- no graceful handling of empty fork command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
