[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2009-06-01 Thread Sean Timothy Noonan
Even the suggested workaround is broken.  There are only 2.6.30 linux-
image-debug packages available on ddebs!

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2009-06-01 Thread Max Bowsher
Sean,

It's very easy to overlook comments on a closed bug - it's not a good
way to report continuing problems.

The primary concern of this bug - the missing metapackages - is indeed
fixed.

Please follow bug 289087 concerning the missing debug packages.

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2009-03-31 Thread Yannis T
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Intrepid)
   Status: Fix Released = Confirmed

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2009-03-31 Thread Max Bowsher
@Yannis T:

It is unclear why you changed the status of this bug, so I'm changing it
back.

** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Intrepid)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2009-01-08 Thread Michael Ellerman
As of now, AFAICT the latest kernel package is linux-
image-2.6.27-9-generic, but all the ddebs are for 2.6.28?

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-11-18 Thread Matt Ginzton
So for linux-image-debug-generic, the intentional supported path is to
manually download the .ddeb from ddebs.ubuntu.com and install it with
dpkg, and do this again next time the kernel is upgraded, and it can't
be managed with apt?  Or is this an oversight or temporary situation
while other things are in flux? (In addition to me not being able to use
apt for this, I'll also note that the ddebs server seems a lot slower
than the mainline servers, btw.)

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-10-16 Thread Ben Collins
If xen or openvz reappear, the package building those binaries will also
provide the meta packages (as -rt does now).

linux-kernel-devel was a package of fabbione's creating because he
couldn't remember what all needed to be installed. IMO, it's not really
useful, and easily becomes inaccurate.

I'm adding linux-source to linux-meta, which seems to be the only meta
package really missing.

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-10-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-meta - 2.6.27.7.10

---
linux-meta (2.6.27.7.10) intrepid; urgency=low

  * Add linux-source meta package. LP: #253904

 -- Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:29:01
-0400

** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Intrepid)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-10-16 Thread Pär Andersson
I just got pointed at this bug when asking for intrepid linux-image-
debug packages on IRC.

I see how some might think it makes sense to throw kernel debug packages
with normal debug packages. However I disagree.

Debug information for kernel+modules is special because it is needed for
low level debugging tools like systemtap and oprofile, which are both
available in the normal archive. Especially oprofile is very useful to
benchmark and/or troubleshoot servers, I don't think you should have to
enable a ddebs repo just to do this. Also, how do you even figure out
that they are on ddebs? And how do you handle upgrades from hardy for
people who use this kind of tools?

A smaller problem, is that the package are not really available on ddebs
either. The packages are on http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/,
but they are not in the Packages files so you can't install them using
APT.

One bigger problem that will prevent me from installing them is that bug
185625 (sign the repository at ddebs.ubuntu.com) is not fixed. This
means that in Intrepid it is currently impossible to get trusted kernel
debug packages. :-(

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-10-13 Thread Martin Pitt
Colin Watson [2008-10-13 10:14 -]:
 linux no longer seems to build linux-image-debug-* (e.g. linux-image-
 debug-2.6.24-16-generic). Was this intentional? 

They are on ddebs.ubuntu.com now.

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-10-13 Thread Colin Watson
linux-ports-meta fixed quite a bit of this. The remaining missing
packages are:

linux-headers-cell
linux-headers-openvz
linux-headers-xen
linux-image-cell
linux-image-debug-generic
linux-image-debug-server
linux-image-openvz
linux-image-xen
linux-kernel-devel
linux-openvz
linux-source
linux-xen

*-cell were transitional packages to *-powerpc64-smp in hardy, so we can
ignore those.

The openvz and xen flavours are missing from intrepid. Is there any hope
that they will return?

linux no longer seems to build linux-image-debug-* (e.g. linux-image-
debug-2.6.24-16-generic). Was this intentional? Are crash dumps gathered
in some other way now? I haven't been keeping track. This is
particularly odd since linux-ports still builds linux-image-
debug-2.6.25-2-386.

linux used to build linux-kernel-devel, which was a metapackage with the
following dependencies. Should it be restored?

  build-essential, curl, debhelper, git-core, gitk, kernel-package,
kernel-wedge, openssh-client, rsync

It seems that linux-meta ought to build linux-source (linux-
source-2.6.27 exists, and linux-ports-meta builds linux-ports-source).

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 253904] Re: does not build a lot of metapackages any more

2008-09-30 Thread Colin Watson
There's an ubuntu-ports-meta metapackage in NEW now, but it builds (IMO)
the wrong set of binary package names - linux-ports-* rather than
linux-*. Stefan wants Ben to sign off on that being changed, so I'll
talk with him tomorrow. In the meantime, this is post-beta.

** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu Intrepid)
   Target: ubuntu-8.10-beta = ubuntu-8.10

-- 
does not build a lot of metapackages any more
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs