[Bug 275248] Re: ineffective -q option
Updated version (4.7-g) on: ftp://invisible-island.net/cproto ** Summary changed: - ineffective -q option + new upstream version [ineffective -q option] -- new upstream version [ineffective -q option] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275248] Re: ineffective -q option
** Changed in: cproto (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- ineffective -q option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275248] Re: ineffective -q option
** Changed in: cproto (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Nil (nicolas-limare) Status: New = Confirmed -- ineffective -q option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275248] Re: ineffective -q option
answer from the upstream author: thanks. That's coming from the C preprocessor (there might be a way to improve this by modifying the popen to redirect the standard error - will see). The -q option was probably documented to cover this case: cproto -q -E0 foo.c which does the expected thing. -- ineffective -q option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275248] Re: ineffective -q option
For the previous message I checked the 4.6 cproto source[1]. In fact the package is built from cproto 4.7e[2]. My remarks are still valid, the only difference is that the last code fragment refers now to lex.l:1021+ instead of lex_yy.c:3030+. [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/cproto/ [2]ftp://dickey.his.com/cproto/ -- ineffective -q option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
