[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
On Lucid 10.04 installing bacula-console-qt does not place any desktop file in /usr/share/applications $ dpkg --list|grep -i bacula ii bacula-client5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-common5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-console 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-console-qt5.0.1-1ubuntu1 Bacula Administration Tool Console ii bacula-fd5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-traymonitor 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - $ ls -la /usr/share/applications|grep -i ba -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 403 2010-03-31 21:58 baobab.desktop HTH? -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
On Lucid 10.04 installing bacula-console-qt does not place any desktop file in /usr/share/applications $ dpkg --list|grep -i bacula ii bacula-client5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-common5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-console 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-console-qt5.0.1-1ubuntu1 Bacula Administration Tool Console ii bacula-fd5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - ii bacula-traymonitor 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 network backup, recovery and verification - $ ls -la /usr/share/applications|grep -i ba -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 403 2010-03-31 21:58 baobab.desktop HTH? -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
This should be fixed now. Regards chuck ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
This should be fixed now. Regards chuck ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
** Attachment added: Patch (unified diff) to fix BAT Exec path http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27985434/bacula-console-qt.patch -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and including a patch. However, the .desktop file is generated when building the source package so your patch, while it fixes the resulting .desktop file, won't apply to the package. I'm not quite certain how to fix this myself, but I believe you can investigate the problem further by using 'apt-get source bacula' and then looking at 'scripts/bat.desktop.in' in the package. -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 20:17:49 Brian Murray wrote: Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and including a patch. However, the .desktop file is generated when building the source package so your patch, while it fixes the resulting .desktop file, won't apply to the package. I'm not quite certain how to fix this myself, but I believe you can investigate the problem further by using 'apt-get source bacula' and then looking at 'scripts/bat.desktop.in' in the package. A few responses: First some gripes about this bug tracking system: 1. Your bug emails generated by your system apparently don't take into account that there may be more one place we get bug emails. I recommend that you add something like Launchpad.bacula or something like that to the Subject line as all other bug systems do. 2. Bug reports should never be directly addressed to people receiving them in a copy form -- as is the case for me. It is very confusing. This emails was addressed to me as: From: Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com To: k...@sibbald.com Date: Today 20:17:49 which is incorrect since the bug report is copied to me. 3. I would like to unsubscribe from this list, but it seems to be next to impossible. Would you please tell me how? Thanks. = Now to answer the bug report. 4. The problem appears to be that the packaging of Bacula was incorrectly done. Bacula should be configured and built prior to packaging, and the configuration *must* correspond to the exact same places the packager is going to install files. Otherwise you introduce packing bugs as you have here. More specifically. It appears that the packager configured and built Bacula to install in /usr/sbin/bat (or at least that is where Bat was set to be installed), and then during the installation of the Bacula package, bat (the executable) was put into /usr/bin/bat. Thus the desktop files are not in synchronization with where the binary was installed. Regards, Kern Upstream Bacula Project Manager -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
2009/6/16 Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com 1. Your bug emails generated by your system apparently don't take into account that there may be more one place we get bug emails. I recommend that you add something like Launchpad.bacula or something like that to the Subject line as all other bug systems do. Sorry for the noise, as a public Ubuntu bug reporter I was not aware that Launchpad would spam people upstream before someone at Ubuntu had triaged the bug. 2. Bug reports should never be directly addressed to people receiving them in a copy form -- as is the case for me. It is very confusing. Indeed - I was just as confused when your Launchpad reply first appeared to be a private e-mail reply. 4. The problem appears to be that the packaging of Bacula was incorrectly done. Bacula should be configured and built prior to packaging, and the configuration *must* correspond to the exact same places the packager is going to install files. Otherwise you introduce packing bugs as you have here. Thanks for your clarification. Obviously the Ubuntu (or Debian) package maintainer needs to fix this. I hope you succeed in unsubscribing from the Launchpad notifications and once again my apologies for generating noise. Regards, Martin -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:46:08 Martin Kalén wrote: 2009/6/16 Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com 1. Your bug emails generated by your system apparently don't take into account that there may be more one place we get bug emails. I recommend that you add something like Launchpad.bacula or something like that to the Subject line as all other bug systems do. Sorry for the noise, as a public Ubuntu bug reporter I was not aware that Launchpad would spam people upstream before someone at Ubuntu had triaged the bug. Sorry I should have been more specific. No need for you to be sorry as a reporter of a problem (at least that is what I imagine). It has something to do with the lauchpad system that I haven't yet figured out. 2. Bug reports should never be directly addressed to people receiving them in a copy form -- as is the case for me. It is very confusing. Indeed - I was just as confused when your Launchpad reply first appeared to be a private e-mail reply. 4. The problem appears to be that the packaging of Bacula was incorrectly done. Bacula should be configured and built prior to packaging, and the configuration *must* correspond to the exact same places the packager is going to install files. Otherwise you introduce packing bugs as you have here. Thanks for your clarification. Obviously the Ubuntu (or Debian) package maintainer needs to fix this. Yes, someone should figure out some way to test these things, but with GUIs it is not so easy :-( I hope you succeed in unsubscribing from the Launchpad notifications Thanks. and once again my apologies for generating noise. For the apologies, thanks, no harm done, but as I said, it is not your fault. Regards, Kern -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
** Attachment added: Patch (unified diff) to fix BAT Exec path http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27985434/bacula-console-qt.patch -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and including a patch. However, the .desktop file is generated when building the source package so your patch, while it fixes the resulting .desktop file, won't apply to the package. I'm not quite certain how to fix this myself, but I believe you can investigate the problem further by using 'apt-get source bacula' and then looking at 'scripts/bat.desktop.in' in the package. -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 20:17:49 Brian Murray wrote: Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and including a patch. However, the .desktop file is generated when building the source package so your patch, while it fixes the resulting .desktop file, won't apply to the package. I'm not quite certain how to fix this myself, but I believe you can investigate the problem further by using 'apt-get source bacula' and then looking at 'scripts/bat.desktop.in' in the package. A few responses: First some gripes about this bug tracking system: 1. Your bug emails generated by your system apparently don't take into account that there may be more one place we get bug emails. I recommend that you add something like Launchpad.bacula or something like that to the Subject line as all other bug systems do. 2. Bug reports should never be directly addressed to people receiving them in a copy form -- as is the case for me. It is very confusing. This emails was addressed to me as: From: Brian Murray br...@ubuntu.com To: k...@sibbald.com Date: Today 20:17:49 which is incorrect since the bug report is copied to me. 3. I would like to unsubscribe from this list, but it seems to be next to impossible. Would you please tell me how? Thanks. = Now to answer the bug report. 4. The problem appears to be that the packaging of Bacula was incorrectly done. Bacula should be configured and built prior to packaging, and the configuration *must* correspond to the exact same places the packager is going to install files. Otherwise you introduce packing bugs as you have here. More specifically. It appears that the packager configured and built Bacula to install in /usr/sbin/bat (or at least that is where Bat was set to be installed), and then during the installation of the Bacula package, bat (the executable) was put into /usr/bin/bat. Thus the desktop files are not in synchronization with where the binary was installed. Regards, Kern Upstream Bacula Project Manager -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
2009/6/16 Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com 1. Your bug emails generated by your system apparently don't take into account that there may be more one place we get bug emails. I recommend that you add something like Launchpad.bacula or something like that to the Subject line as all other bug systems do. Sorry for the noise, as a public Ubuntu bug reporter I was not aware that Launchpad would spam people upstream before someone at Ubuntu had triaged the bug. 2. Bug reports should never be directly addressed to people receiving them in a copy form -- as is the case for me. It is very confusing. Indeed - I was just as confused when your Launchpad reply first appeared to be a private e-mail reply. 4. The problem appears to be that the packaging of Bacula was incorrectly done. Bacula should be configured and built prior to packaging, and the configuration *must* correspond to the exact same places the packager is going to install files. Otherwise you introduce packing bugs as you have here. Thanks for your clarification. Obviously the Ubuntu (or Debian) package maintainer needs to fix this. I hope you succeed in unsubscribing from the Launchpad notifications and once again my apologies for generating noise. Regards, Martin -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 387778] Re: Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:46:08 Martin Kalén wrote: 2009/6/16 Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com 1. Your bug emails generated by your system apparently don't take into account that there may be more one place we get bug emails. I recommend that you add something like Launchpad.bacula or something like that to the Subject line as all other bug systems do. Sorry for the noise, as a public Ubuntu bug reporter I was not aware that Launchpad would spam people upstream before someone at Ubuntu had triaged the bug. Sorry I should have been more specific. No need for you to be sorry as a reporter of a problem (at least that is what I imagine). It has something to do with the lauchpad system that I haven't yet figured out. 2. Bug reports should never be directly addressed to people receiving them in a copy form -- as is the case for me. It is very confusing. Indeed - I was just as confused when your Launchpad reply first appeared to be a private e-mail reply. 4. The problem appears to be that the packaging of Bacula was incorrectly done. Bacula should be configured and built prior to packaging, and the configuration *must* correspond to the exact same places the packager is going to install files. Otherwise you introduce packing bugs as you have here. Thanks for your clarification. Obviously the Ubuntu (or Debian) package maintainer needs to fix this. Yes, someone should figure out some way to test these things, but with GUIs it is not so easy :-( I hope you succeed in unsubscribing from the Launchpad notifications Thanks. and once again my apologies for generating noise. For the apologies, thanks, no harm done, but as I said, it is not your fault. Regards, Kern -- Incorrect application entry for bacula-console-qt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
