[Bug 423648] Re: Requestsync for ClustalX package

2010-03-24 Thread Fabrice Coutadeur
package builds and installs, sync request ACK'd

** Changed in: clustalx (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

** Summary changed:

- Requestsync for ClustalX package
+ Sync clustalx 2.0.12-2 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-free)

-- 
Sync clustalx 2.0.12-2 (multiverse) from Debian unstable (non-free)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 423648] Re: Requestsync for ClustalX package

2010-03-24 Thread Stunts
** Summary changed:

- Package heavily out of date
+ Requestsync for ClustalX package

-- 
Requestsync for ClustalX package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 423648] Re: Requestsync for ClustalX package

2010-03-24 Thread Stunts
I have done what you recommended.
I hope I followed all the necessary guidelines.

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: clustalx
  
  This package version is heavily outdated. You should consider updating
  it.
  
  The newer version have better stability, (highly) improved speed and a
  much cleaner GUI.
  
- Thank you for your attention.
+ The new version builds on Ubuntu 10.04, and is available here, together with 
the build logs:
+ https://launchpad.net/~plessy/+archive/plessy/+build/1472225
+ 
+ We are past feature Freeze, but, according to the guidelines:
+ The benefits of the latest version far out weight the dangers of a 
regression. This new version has been very tested and is much much improved 
relatively to the one available in the repositories;
+ The package builds, installs and upgrades, and no other packages depend on 
it, so it won't break anything downstream.
+ Nobody uses such an old version, since it is too slow for larger datasets, it 
only outputs data in a single format (as opposed to the new one that outputs to 
several format for different programs), and is generally ugly and unappealing 
to use.
+ 
+ Thanks you.

-- 
Requestsync for ClustalX package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 423648] Re: Requestsync for ClustalX package

2010-03-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi all,

For the record, the reason why Debian's clustalx has not migrated in
testing is only the lack of autobuilders for non-free packages. There is
no release-critical problem in clustalx 2.0.12-2.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

-- 
Requestsync for ClustalX package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 423648] Re: Requestsync for ClustalX package

2010-03-24 Thread StefanPotyra
Ack, FFe granted, please go ahead.

** Changed in: clustalx (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
Requestsync for ClustalX package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423648
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs