[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2011-11-11 Thread Curtis Hovey
** No longer affects: null

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943

Title:
  Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ureadahead/+bug/491943/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-09-16 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-09-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ureadahead - 0.100.0-4.1.3

---
ureadahead (0.100.0-4.1.3) lucid-proposed; urgency=low

  * Count the number of CPUs and divide buffer_size_kb by the number of CPUs.
Users should watch for instances of mmiotrace has lost events in dmesg to 
make
sure the trace buffers are not too small. The original value for
buffer_size_kb was chosen somewhat arbitrarily. Empirical testing
has shown that its large enough, so we don't actually know where the lower
boundary lies.
-LP: #491943
 -- Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com   Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:44:12 -0700

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-09-03 Thread Joseph Trent
Installed ureadahead-0.100.0-4.1.3 from lucid-proposed.
oom-killer not invoked and no mmiotrace lost errors in dmesg.

Now we can reliably boot linux-image-2.6.32-24-generic-pae-2.6.32-24.42.
We had been using 2.6.32-22.36 which had allowed us to finish booting.

So, it works for us, thanks!

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/ureadahead

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Tim,

can you please explain why the buffer should get smaller with the number
of CPUs? Why are these figures related?

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-25 Thread Tim Gardner
Martin - the value written to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
is the amount of _contiguous_ RAM allocated for each CPU. The initial
value of 128000 was somewhat arbitrary, so I decided to proceed likewise
and arbitrarily divide the value by the number of CPUs. I've tried it on
an Emerald class server (64 CPU) without any complaints in dmesg. It
appears to have solved the issue on low RAM systems as indicated above.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Ah, so buffer_size_kb is _per CPU_; that makes sense then, thanks!

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-24 Thread Chris Van Hoof
** Project changed: hwe-somerville = null

** Changed in: null
   Status: In Progress = Invalid

** Changed in: null
 Assignee: Bryan Wu (cooloney) = Chris Van Hoof (vanhoof)

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-20 Thread Tim Gardner
SRU Justification

Impact: ureadahead can cause the kernel to allocate too much RAM for tracing on 
a hyper-threaded system.
Symptoms vary, but can result in an unbootable machine.

Patch Description: Count the number of CPUs and divide the amount allocated of 
trace buffer by that number.
ureadahead allocates trace buffers using 'echo 128000  
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb. Since this is a per-CPU allocation, 
a multi-core system can end up allocating quite a lot of RAM.

Patch: see attached

** Patch added: Patch for ureadahead_0.100.0-4.1.3
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ureadahead/+bug/491943/+attachment/1505068/+files/ureadahead.diff

** Also affects: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-10.04.2

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu Lucid)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ureadahead - 0.100.0-7

---
ureadahead (0.100.0-7) maverick; urgency=low

  * Count the number of CPUs and divide buffer_size_kb by the number of CPUs.
Users should watch for instances of mmiotrace has lost events in dmesg to 
make
sure the trace buffers are not too small. The original value for
buffer_size_kb was chosen somewhat arbitrarily. Empirical testing
has shown that its large enough, so we don't actually know where the lower
boundary lies.
-LP: #491943
 -- Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com   Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:19:31 -0600

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/ureadahead

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-18 Thread Bryan Wu
Tim,

We tested on our buggy machine, this patch fixes that issue. Thanks a
lot.

Just one question, if the /proc filesystem is not ready before
ureadahead, how can we get the right CPU numbers of a system.

-Bryan

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-18 Thread Bryan Wu
Tim,

We tested on our buggy machine, this patch fixes that issue. Thanks a
lot.

Just one question, if the /proc filesystem is not ready before
ureadahead, how can we get the right CPU numbers of a system.

-Bryan

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-18 Thread Tim Gardner
Bryan - Have you checked for mmiotrace has lost events in dmesg
according to comment #23 ? As for /proc getting mounted before
ureadahead starts, I assume upstart is in charge of prioritizing those
actions.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-18 Thread Bryan Wu
Tim,

The testing machine is occupied by other team. As long as we got the
machine, I will check that mmiotrace warning.

But according to comment #23, it seems like that we cannot make sure
128M is enough for every machine, right? IMHO, kernel is supposed to
know such requirement, userspace application such as ureadahead is not
easy to set a right buffer size for every machine.

-Bryan

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-17 Thread Tim Gardner

** Patch added: Divide trace buffer size by number of CPUs
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ureadahead/+bug/491943/+attachment/1495969/+files/0001-Count-the-number-of-CPUs.patch

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-17 Thread Tim Gardner
Scott - how can I tell if the trace buffers are not big enough? Is there
some indication of overflow, or do you just get inadequate readahead?

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-17 Thread lavinog
http://alinux.tv/Kernel-2.6.34/trace/mmiotrace.txt

Check that mmiotrace did not lose events due to a buffer filling up. Either
$ grep -i lost mydump.txt
which tells you exactly how many events were lost, or use
$ dmesg
to view your kernel log and look for mmiotrace has lost events warning. If
events were lost, the trace is incomplete. You should enlarge the buffers and
try again. Buffers are enlarged by first seeing how large the current buffers
are:
$ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
gives you a number. Approximately double this number and write it back, for
instance:
$ echo 128000  /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
Then start again from the top.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-17 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags added: patch

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-16 Thread Stefano Travelli
Good news here.

I had the same issue as described by Bryan in comment #14 on my Sony
VPCF11C5E: Core i7 4 GB, the system cannot boot most of the times unless
/sbin/ureadahead is removed.

Now it works with ureadahead 0.100.0-4.1.3 from timg-tpi PPA.

Thanks,
stefano

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-16 Thread blabj
This fix works for me as well.  Thanks Tim.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-16 Thread Chris Van Hoof
** Also affects: hwe-somerville
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: hwe-somerville
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryan Wu (cooloney)

** Changed in: hwe-somerville
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: hwe-somerville
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-14 Thread Bryan Wu
Tim,

Thanks, I will try it on our testing machine.

-Bryan

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-13 Thread blabj
I have a 12 GB system with 2 quad-core Xeons running with lucid 32-bit
PAE kernel, and am getting this as well.

[   13.068253] ureadahead invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oom_adj=0
[   13.068348] ureadahead cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
[   13.068433] Pid: 434, comm: ureadahead Not tainted 2.6.32-24-generic-pae 
#39-Ubuntu
[   13.068542] Call Trace:
[   13.068626]  [c01d5714] oom_kill_process+0xa4/0x2b0
[   13.068712]  [c01d5d89] ? select_bad_process+0xa9/0xe0
[   13.068800]  [c01d5e11] __out_of_memory+0x51/0xa0
[   13.068883]  [c01d5eb8] out_of_memory+0x58/0xb0
[   13.068969]  [c01d86f7] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x407/0x4a0
[   13.069057]  [c01d88ca] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x13a/0x170
[   13.069143]  [c01d891c] __get_free_pages+0x1c/0x30
[   13.069227]  [c01b643a] ring_buffer_resize+0x18a/0x2a0
[   13.069313]  [c01b7a15] tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x25/0x80
[   13.069402]  [c01bb772] tracing_entries_write+0xe2/0x160
[   13.069485]  [c01baf87] ? trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit+0x37/0x50
[   13.069573]  [c02ff724] ? security_file_permission+0x14/0x20
[   13.069659]  [c02123b4] ? rw_verify_area+0x64/0xe0
[   13.069743]  [c05b3347] ? unlock_kernel+0x27/0x30
[   13.069828]  [c02124d2] vfs_write+0xa2/0x1a0
[   13.069911]  [c035e7c9] ? copy_to_user+0x39/0x130
[   13.069994]  [c01bb690] ? tracing_entries_write+0x0/0x160
[   13.070078]  [c0212df2] sys_write+0x42/0x70
[   13.070161]  [c0109763] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
[   13.070243] Mem-Info:
[   13.070322] DMA per-cpu:
[   13.070459] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.070542] CPU1: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.070623] CPU2: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.070705] CPU3: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.070786] CPU4: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.070870] CPU5: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.070951] CPU6: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.071032] CPU7: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[   13.071114] Normal per-cpu:
[   13.071192] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 176
[   13.071274] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 178
[   13.071359] CPU2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  76
[   13.071442] CPU3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 118
[   13.071524] CPU4: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 135
[   13.071609] CPU5: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 184
[   13.071692] CPU6: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 172
[   13.071773] CPU7: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  90
[   13.071854] HighMem per-cpu:
[   13.071932] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 172
[   13.072014] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 159
[   13.072096] CPU2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 166
[   13.072177] CPU3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 166
[   13.072259] CPU4: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  40
[   13.072343] CPU5: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 107
[   13.072426] CPU6: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 185
[   13.072510] CPU7: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  42
[   13.072593] active_anon:204 inactive_anon:96 isolated_anon:0
[   13.072593]  active_file:122 inactive_file:618 isolated_file:0
[   13.072594]  unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
[   13.072595]  free:2914842 slab_reclaimable:404 slab_unreclaimable:5300
[   13.072596]  mapped:335 shmem:52 pagetables:73 bounce:0
[   13.073010] DMA free:3524kB min:64kB low:80kB high:96kB active_anon:0kB 
inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB 
isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15840kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB 
writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:0kB slab_unreclaimable:68kB 
kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB 
pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
[   13.073220] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 867 12149 12149
[   13.073595] Normal free:3564kB min:3732kB low:4664kB high:5596kB 
active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:176kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:887976kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB 
slab_reclaimable:1616kB slab_unreclaimable:21132kB kernel_stack:1312kB 
pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:55 
all_unreclaimable? no
[   13.073810] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 90262 90262
[   13.074184] HighMem free:11652280kB min:512kB low:12652kB high:24796kB 
active_anon:816kB inactive_anon:384kB active_file:492kB inactive_file:2296kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:11553620kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:1340kB shmem:208kB 
slab_reclaimable:0kB slab_unreclaimable:0kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:292kB 
unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[   13.074446] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
[   13.074815] DMA: 3*4kB 1*8kB 5*16kB 5*32kB 3*64kB 2*128kB 3*256kB 2*512kB 
1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3524kB
[   13.075623] Normal: 24*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 
1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3680kB
[   13.076425] HighMem: 146*4kB 129*8kB 50*16kB 30*32kB 14*64kB 10*128kB 
4*256kB 2*512kB 4*1024kB 6*2048kB 2839*4096kB = 11652528kB
[   

[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-13 Thread blabj
An easy way to disable ureadahead without uninstalling is to just move
/etc/init/ureadahead* someplace else.  eg. mv /etc/init/ureadahead*
/root

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-13 Thread Tim Gardner
** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = In Progress

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-13 Thread Tim Gardner
Bryan - please try  ureadahead 0.100.0-4.1.3 in my PPA at 'deb
http://ppa.launchpad.net/timg-tpi/ppa/ubuntu lucid main'. This version
divides buffer_size_kb by the number of CPUs so that the total
allocation does not exceed 128000.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-08-12 Thread Bryan Wu
We got a very critical issue on an Intel machine with 4 cores and 8
threads CPUs. Since we got 4G RAM, we are using 32bits -pae kernel.
ureadahead will try to get 128M trace buffer percpu, so it will allocate
128M * 8 = 1G RAM. Normally it will be killed by OOM, but system cann't
boot at all mostly.

After it killed ureadahead, it hangs there. Kernel is still alive, since
I can use SysRq magic key to get some information. It seems like it is
waiting for something but never continue.

After totally disabling the ureadahead, we got system booting and
working properly.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-07-06 Thread Paul Gortmaker
Also seen on a 2GB machine with the server kernel.

Note that you can do an:

apt-get --purge remove ureadahead

as a workaround, with largely no ill effects, if you aren't relying on
any of its functionality directly.

This will remove the meta-package ubuntu-minimal, so once this bug is
fixed, you can do

apt-get install ubuntu-minimal

to get back ureadahead and the meta package at the same time

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-07-06 Thread k3lt01
If you take a look at the forums you will notice that there are alot of
threads where I have recommended this for low RAM systems. The last time
ureadahead was on my laptop it took over 2 hours to get anywhere after a
reprofile. I just automatically remove it on low RAM systems now because
of this.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-06-14 Thread psychaos
uname -r
2.6.35-2-generic-pae

[7.973371] Out of memory: kill process 375 (ureadahead) score 37 or a child
[7.973373] Killed process 375 (ureadahead) vsz:2372kB, anon-rss:132kB, 
file-rss:560kB
[7.975277] ureadahead: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0xd0
[7.975278] Pid: 375, comm: ureadahead Not tainted 2.6.35-2-generic-pae 
#3-Ubuntu
[7.975280] Call Trace:
[7.975287]  [c05f2121] ? printk+0x2d/0x34
[7.975292]  [c01e904a] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x47a/0x4b0
[7.975295]  [c01e91ef] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x16f/0x1c0
[7.975299]  [c01e925c] __get_free_pages+0x1c/0x30
[7.975302]  [c01c0947] ring_buffer_resize+0x1b7/0x390
[7.975306]  [c01c2107] tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x37/0x80
[7.975309]  [c01c5f82] tracing_entries_write+0xe2/0x160
[7.975312]  [c01c56f7] ? trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit+0x37/0x50
[7.975316]  [c030e3b4] ? security_file_permission+0x14/0x20
[7.975320]  [c02235b4] ? rw_verify_area+0x64/0xe0
[7.975323]  [c02236d2] vfs_write+0xa2/0x1a0
[7.975326]  [c01c5ea0] ? tracing_entries_write+0x0/0x160
[7.975329]  [c0223fb2] sys_write+0x42/0x70
[7.975332]  [c0109463] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28


Any news?

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-06-06 Thread dino99
same errors with 35-1-generic-pae on maverick a1 with 4 go ram


** Attachment added: syslog
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49759331/syslog

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-06-06 Thread Joshua R. Poulson
Another system with 4GB of memory (Lenovo Thinkpad W510):

Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392338] ureadahead invoked oom-killer: 
gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oom_adj=0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392342] ureadahead cpuset=/ 
mems_allowed=0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392345] Pid: 474, comm: ureadahead 
Tainted: GW  2.6.32-22-generic-pae #36-Ubuntu
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392346] Call Trace:
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392352]  [c01d4d34] 
oom_kill_process+0xa4/0x2b0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392355]  [c01d53a9] ? 
select_bad_process+0xa9/0xe0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392357]  [c01d5431] 
__out_of_memory+0x51/0xa0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392359]  [c01d54d8] 
out_of_memory+0x58/0xb0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392361]  [c01d7d17] 
__alloc_pages_slowpath+0x407/0x4a0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392364]  [c01d7eea] 
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x13a/0x170
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392366]  [c01d7f3c] 
__get_free_pages+0x1c/0x30
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392369]  [c01b5a5a] 
ring_buffer_resize+0x18a/0x2a0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392371]  [c01b7035] 
tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x25/0x80
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392374]  [c01bad92] 
tracing_entries_write+0xe2/0x160
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392376]  [c01ba5a7] ? 
trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit+0x37/0x50
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392379]  [c02fe3b4] ? 
security_file_permission+0x14/0x20
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392383]  [c0211984] ? 
rw_verify_area+0x64/0xe0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392385]  [c0211aa2] 
vfs_write+0xa2/0x1a0
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392387]  [c01bacb0] ? 
tracing_entries_write+0x0/0x160
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392390]  [c02123c2] 
sys_write+0x42/0x70
Jun  6 20:57:26 bigthink kernel: [4.392392]  [c0109763] 
sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-05-31 Thread dino99
kernel 34-5 generic-pae on maverick:

ureadahead invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oom_adj=0
 kernel: [8.729062] ureadahead cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0
 kernel: [8.741183] Pid: 343, comm: ureadahead Not tainted 
2.6.34-5-generic-pae #12-Ubuntu
 kernel: [8.753804] Call Trace:
 kernel: [8.766178]  [c01dc2da] dump_header+0x7a/0xb0
 kernel: [8.778538]  [c01dc36c] oom_kill_process+0x5c/0x160
 kernel: [8.790755]  [c01dc8d9] ? select_bad_process+0xa9/0xe0
 kernel: [8.802973]  [c01dc961] __out_of_memory+0x51/0xb0
 kernel: [8.815039]  [c01dca18] out_of_memory+0x58/0xd0
 kernel: [8.827234]  [c01df446] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x416/0x4b0
 kernel: [8.839506]  [c01df61a] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x13a/0x170
 kernel: [8.851563]  [c01df66c] __get_free_pages+0x1c/0x30
 kernel: [8.863486]  [c01b8d77] ring_buffer_resize+0x1b7/0x390
 kernel: [8.875423]  [c01b9f07] tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x37/0x80
 kernel: [8.887397]  [c01bddc2] tracing_entries_write+0xe2/0x160
 kernel: [8.899340]  [c03047d4] ? security_file_permission+0x14/0x20
 kernel: [8.911211]  [c021a2b4] ? rw_verify_area+0x64/0xe0
 kernel: [8.911214]  [c021a3d2] vfs_write+0xa2/0x1a0
 kernel: [8.911225]  [c01bdce0] ? tracing_entries_write+0x0/0x160
kernel: [8.911228]  [c021acb2] sys_write+0x42/0x70
 kernel: [8.911234]  [c0109463] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28
 kernel: [8.911236] Mem-Info:
 kernel: [8.911238] DMA per-cpu:
 kernel: [8.911240] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
kernel: [8.911241] CPU1: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
 kernel: [8.911243] CPU2: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
 kernel: [8.911244] CPU3: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
 kernel: [8.911245] Normal per-cpu:
 kernel: [8.911247] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 161
 kernel: [8.911249] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 176
 kernel: [8.911250] CPU2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 184
 kernel: [8.911252] CPU3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  66
 kernel: [8.911253] HighMem per-cpu:
 kernel: [8.911254] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 154
 kernel: [8.911256] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  35
 kernel: [8.911257] CPU2: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 167
 kernel: [8.911259] CPU3: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  77
 kernel: [8.911263] active_anon:121 inactive_anon:64 isolated_anon:0
 kernel: [8.911264]  active_file:205 inactive_file:659 isolated_file:0
kernel: [8.911264]  unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
kernel: [8.911265]  free:820438 slab_reclaimable:686 slab_unreclaimable:4224
 kernel: [8.911266]  mapped:289 shmem:48 pagetables:3 bounce:0
 kernel: [8.911271] DMA free:3516kB min:64kB low:80kB high:96kB 
active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15804kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:0kB 
slab_unreclaimable:64kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB 
writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes
kernel: [8.911274] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 869 4039 4039
kernel: [8.911281] Normal free:3920kB min:3736kB low:4668kB high:5604kB 
active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:132kB inactive_file:0kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:890008kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:4kB shmem:0kB 
slab_reclaimable:2744kB slab_unreclaimable:16832kB kernel_stack:720kB 
pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 
all_unreclaimable? no
 kernel: [8.911284] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 25363 25363
 kernel: [8.911291] HighMem free:3274316kB min:512kB low:3920kB high:7328kB 
active_anon:484kB inactive_anon:256kB active_file:688kB inactive_file:2692kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:3246564kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:1152kB shmem:192kB 
slab_reclaimable:0kB slab_unreclaimable:0kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:12kB 
unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:64 all_unreclaimable? no
kernel: [8.911294] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
 kernel: [8.911297] DMA: 3*4kB 6*8kB 2*16kB 5*32kB 3*64kB 4*128kB 4*256kB 
1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3516kB
kernel: [8.911303] Normal: 128*4kB 38*8kB 2*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 
0*256kB 0*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3920kB
 kernel: [8.911309] HighMem: 28*4kB 28*8kB 28*16kB 44*32kB 27*64kB 13*128kB 
2*256kB 3*512kB 4*1024kB 3*2048kB 795*4096kB = 3274192kB
kernel: [8.911316] 924 total pagecache pages
 kernel: [8.911317] 0 pages in swap cache
 kernel: [8.911319] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
 kernel: [8.911320] Free swap  = 0kB
 kernel: [8.911321] Total swap = 0kB
 kernel: [8.924396] 1310704 pages RAM
kernel: [8.924398] 1082370 pages HighMem
 kernel: [8.924399] 281342 pages reserved
 kernel: [8.924400] 620 pages shared
 kernel: [8.924401] 

[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-05-13 Thread Frits Jalvingh
Same here: on every machine I have, all having 4GB or more memory
available. It always kills plymouthd process when called.

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-04-12 Thread TimArbuckle
I get this in dmesg every boot (multiple times) and I have 2 GB:

[   12.742072] ureadahead invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0, order=0, oom_adj=0
[   12.742076] ureadahead cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0-1
[   12.742080] Pid: 578, comm: ureadahead Not tainted 2.6.32-18-server 
#27-Ubuntu
[   12.742082] Call Trace:
[   12.742090]  [810b319d] ? cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed+0x9d/0xb0
[   12.742095]  [810f5d74] oom_kill_process+0xd4/0x2f0
[   12.742099]  [810f6330] ? select_bad_process+0xd0/0x110
[   12.742102]  [810f63c8] __out_of_memory+0x58/0xc0
[   12.742104]  [810f655e] out_of_memory+0x12e/0x1a0
[   12.742110]  [81556f5e] ? _spin_lock+0xe/0x20
[   12.742114]  [810f95a1] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x511/0x580
[   12.742117]  [810f9781] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x171/0x180
[   12.742122]  [8112c6c7] alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xd0
[   12.742124]  [810f868e] __get_free_pages+0xe/0x50
[   12.742129]  [810d4284] ring_buffer_resize+0x204/0x340
[   12.742133]  [810d5c9d] tracing_resize_ring_buffer+0x2d/0xa0
[   12.742135]  [810da277] tracing_entries_write+0x137/0x1d0
[   12.742139]  [810d9b53] ? 
trace_nowake_buffer_unlock_commit+0x43/0x60
[   12.742144]  [812504b6] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x20
[   12.742148]  [81143238] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1a0
[   12.742151]  [81143aa1] sys_write+0x51/0x80
[   12.742157]  [810131b2] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b


$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch)
Release:10.04
Codename:   lucid

$ uname -a
Linux hostname 2.6.32-18-server #27-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 26 22:21:21 UTC 2010 
x86_64 GNU/Linux


$ cat /proc/meminfo 
MemTotal:2044892 kB
MemFree: 1766344 kB
Buffers:   12744 kB
Cached:94456 kB
SwapCached:0 kB
Active:67472 kB
Inactive:  80856 kB
Active(anon):  44016 kB
Inactive(anon):  376 kB
Active(file):  23456 kB
Inactive(file):80480 kB
Unevictable:   0 kB
Mlocked:   0 kB
SwapTotal:   5988344 kB
SwapFree:5988344 kB
Dirty:16 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 41404 kB
Mapped:24144 kB
Shmem:  3264 kB
Slab:  34712 kB
SReclaimable:  13444 kB
SUnreclaim:21268 kB
KernelStack:3032 kB
PageTables: 5884 kB
NFS_Unstable:  0 kB
Bounce:0 kB
WritebackTmp:  0 kB
CommitLimit: 7010788 kB
Committed_AS: 415540 kB
VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed:  279140 kB
VmallocChunk:   34358413300 kB
HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB
HugePages_Total:   0
HugePages_Free:0
HugePages_Rsvd:0
HugePages_Surp:0
Hugepagesize:   2048 kB
DirectMap4k:8192 kB
DirectMap2M: 2080768 kB

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-04-08 Thread Scott James Remnant
This is set to 128MB or something at the moment; that's ridiculously
high

** Summary changed:

- When trying to profile on a system with 512MB -- get a kernel OOM
+ Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-04-08 Thread Scott James Remnant
This is set to 128MB or something at the moment; that's ridiculously
high

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-04-08 Thread Scott James Remnant
Will use bug #501715 for that

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 491943] Re: Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value

2010-04-08 Thread Scott James Remnant
Another point is that the trace buffer is not shrunk after profiling;
this was for my own debugging, but I think by default we should reclaim
this kernel memory

-- 
Kernel trace buffer should be set to less unrealistic value
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs